Shall We Not Revenge?

Category: Life & Society Topics: Movies Views: 4115

If one wants to understand what the Palestinians did on election day, one has to see the film "Paradise Now", which has been nominated for an Oscar for the best foreign film, after collecting several prestigious international prizes. It explains better than a million words. 

Its makers - the screenwriter-cum-director, Hani Abu-As'ad from Nazareth , and the actors, are Palestinians. (Amir Harel, one of the producers, is a Jewish Israeli.) 

The two main characters, Sa'id and Khaled, are suicide bombers. The film addresses a question that is troubling everyone in Israel , and perhaps throughout the world: Why do they do it? What makes a person get up in the morning and decide to blow himself up in the middle of a crowd of people in Jerusalem or Tel-Aviv? And some of the people also ask: Who are they? What is their background? How did they come to be like that? 

The film also answers another question: Why did the great majority of the Palestinians elect the very group that sent these people to blow themselves up? 

The film answers these questions. Not with slogans, not with propaganda speeches, nor with an academic report. It does not preach, praise or get mad. It tells a story. The story says everything. And since not many Israelis are going to see it, I permit myself to do what is generally not being done: to tell the story of the film until almost the end.

The Movie "Paradise Now"

THE OPENING scene creates the atmosphere: Suha, a beautiful young Palestinian woman of good family, brought up in France , approaches a checkpoint, one of the innumerable roadblocks that dot the West Bank landscape. She faces an intimidating soldier, a mustached face under a steel helmet, in a bullet-proof vest. Their eyes meet. He does not talk. He measures her up and down, down and up. He checks her bag, slowly, slowly. His eyes do not leave her eyes. 

When he finishes, he returns her documents to her--almost. When she tries to take them, he raises his hand. Let her make an effort. In the end, without a word, he orders her with a movement of his head to move on. 

Just a few minutes--minutes in which total humiliation, mutual fear and hatred flow together. The viewer feels that the woman is on the point of blowing herself up. But nothing happens. She moves on. 

. . . Two young men, in their early 20s, in Nablus , the central town of the northern West Bank . Practically unemployed, like almost all the young men in Nablus . They have no future. No hopes. Not even dreams. They can do nothing to help their destitute families. They live at the bottom, in a mixture of boredom, frustration, despair. Even the cup of tea that a servile but stubborn boy sells them for 20 cents is cold. 

They are bearded, but not fanatical. Religious like everyone else, no more. They were born under occupation and are living under occupation. Nablus is surrounded on all sides by roadblocks. There is no work. No nothing. Only neglect and depressing poverty. The occupation is the central fact in their lives. Everything begins with the occupation, everything ends with it. 

. . . One of them, Sa'id, meets Suha. Something clicks between them. Just then the two youngsters receive the message: you have been chosen. Tomorrow you will carry out a suicide attack in Tel-Aviv. 

. . . An abandoned building serves as the headquarters of the underground. Final preparations: The beards are shaved off. Their hair is cut. They put on good suits. They get their pictures taken. A short pep talk, without pathos, from the chief, a "wanted person" who is a living legend (still living). The attack is in retaliation for the "targeted killing" of a comrade. 

The two look silently on while they are fitted with explosive belts. They are warned that these cannot be removed without exploding. A spine-chilling moment: the two see their pictures on the posters that will go up after the deed. 

. . . On the way. The fence is cut. On the other side, a military jeep suddenly approaches. Khaled slides back through the breach, Sa'id continues on his way into Israel . He reaches a bus stop, waits, sees a woman playing with her little child. The bus arrives. The woman and the child get in. At the last minute Sa'id hesitates, gestures the driver to move on--without him. 

. . . Among the comrades, panic ensues. Where is Sa'id? Has he deserted? Betrayed them? Run away? They search for him everywhere. Sa'id, still wearing the explosive belt, secretly returns to Nablus , looks for Khaled. He comes upon Suha. While they embrace, Suha says that it's the wrong way, civilians should not be harmed, it won't achieve liberation from the occupation. But Sa'id begs the chief to try him again, to give him a second chance. An important detail comes out: Sa'id's father had been a collaborator and was executed. Sa'id wants to eradicate the terrible stain, the shame that has pursued him from childhood. "He was a good man, but weak," he says. "The Israelis exploited his weakness. It's they who are to blame." 

. . . Finally, the two comrades reach Tel-Aviv. For the youngsters from poor, run-down Nablus , Tel-Aviv looks like something from another world--shining, rich, unattainable. Skyscrapers. Girls in bikinis. People frolicking on the seashore. 

At the last moment, Khalid falters and tries to convince Sa'id to give up the mission. But Khalid returns to Nablus alone. Sa'id goes on to avenge his father's death. 

. . . Last scene: Sa'id sits in the bus, surrounded by soldiers and civilians. The camera focuses on his eyes. The eyes fill the screen. We are petrified by what is going to happen in a moment . . . . 

All this recounted in a restrained cinematic language. There are almost no verbal statements. On the face of it, a banal story, even with light moments: Khaled is reciting his farewell message before the video camera, the camera does not work properly, he has to repeat the moving message again and again. Comrades stand around, eating. He looks at them, stops and has to start again. And again. A comic interlude.

After the Movie

I STUDIED the faces of the people leaving the Tel-Aviv cinema after the performance. They were silent and thoughtful. For the first time in their life they have seen the terrorists who are killing us, who blow themselves up among children, men and women. They see ordinary youngsters, who behave and react as ordinary people. They see the occupation from the other side, the underside. 

I sat in the dark cinema, and found myself in a situation of total dissonance: we, the intended victims, who could easily have been sitting on that bus, see everything through the eyes of our murderer. A thought strikes us: that force will not help here. If we kill those two, two others will take their place. The fence will hold up some of them, but not all of them. The Security Service, with the help of collaborators, will prevent some of the attacks, but cannot prevent all of them--and the children of the collaborators will come to avenge. When there are people like that, who grow up in these conditions, some of them will always reach their targets. 

The film does not provide solutions. It does not even pretend to be balanced. It exposes us to the face of a reality that we do not know, from an angle that we are not used to--and tortures us with the tension of conflicting emotion. 

And perhaps also prompts us to think about a solution that will cause Sa'id and Khaled to turn in a different direction. A solution that will put an end to the humiliation, to the crushing of personal and national dignity, to the destitution and hopelessness.

"Munich" - Another Movie

A FEW days later, I saw another film that was nominated for Oscars, the much-praised film of Steven Spielberg, " Munich ." As it so happens, I saw it in Germany , not so far from Munich itself. 

On leaving the cinema, my German host wanted to know what I thought of it. Spontaneously, without thinking, I said what I had felt throughout: "Disgusting!" 

Only later did I have time to sort out the impressions that I had accumulated during this very long film. What had disgusted me so much? 

First of all, the Spielberg style, a combination of the highest cinematic technique and the lowest cultural content. It has pretensions to profundity, with new and revealing insights, but basically it is nothing but another American Western, where the good guys slaughter the bad guys and the blood flows like water. 

Some Jewish politicians protested against the film for equating the "terrorists" with the "avengers." And indeed, in several places in the film the "terrorists" were allowed to declaim some sentences in their defense, about the injustice done to them by the Jews and their right to a homeland. But that is only lip-service, a pretense, in order to give an impression of balance. But in the portrayal of the Munich attack--fragments of which are dispersed throughout the film--the Arabs appear as miserable, ugly, unkempt, cowardly creatures, the very opposite of Avner, the Israeli avenger, who is handsome and decent, brave and well turned-out--in short, the younger brother of Ari Ben Canaan, the superman of "Exodus." 

The Arabs have no qualms of conscience, but the Israelis have scruples in every interval between murders. They hesitate every time when they blow up / shoot / cut down one of their "targets"--which they do, of course, only after ensuring the safety of the wife and children of the victim. They are not just killers, they are Jewish killers. As an Israeli satirical slogan goes: "Shoot and weep." 

The presentation of the affair itself is highly manipulative. It withholds from the viewer some very relevant facts. For example: 

- That the post-mortems showed that nine of the 11 Israeli athletes were killed by the bullets of the pathetically untrained German policemen. (The post-mortem reports are kept secret until this very day, both in Israel and Germany . But a powerful person like Spielberg should know about them.) 

- That it was Golda Meir and her German colleagues--great heroes, every one of them--who sealed the fate of the hostages, when they rejected the kidnappers' demand to take them to an Arab country, where they would have surely been traded for Palestinian prisoners held in Israel. 

- That the Palestinians, who were killed in revenge for Munich , had nothing to do with the affair. The Mossad was looking for easy targets and chose PLO diplomats posted to European capitals, who were quite unprotected. 

But most of all I was repulsed by the Spielbergian vulgarity that runs through the whole film, including explicit sex scenes that are both gratuitous and particularly unaesthetic. 

The film contributes nothing to an understanding of the conflict. It is basically a routine gangster film, which Spielberg centered on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in order to garner the longed-for Oscars that have eluded him until now.

Uri Avnery is an Israeli journalist, peace activist and a former member of the Israeli Knesset. He is also is a founding member of Gush Shalom, an Israeli peace group founded in 1993.

  Category: Life & Society
  Topics: Movies
Views: 4115

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:

don't believe I'm for this hollywood description of hollywood movie? :). I just know the brainwashed mentality of those who locked themselves in myth called "land of meeting" and named themselves Isrealis. I know for sure, you will read just the quotes from the people who agree with you... :)

as far as I studied about this people who locked themselves in the myth of "chosen people", you have no free will at all when it comes to discuss the reality of the myths you were feed up. I watched good movies about the Israeli Army giving special training to kids between 5 and 12 years old. the difference between my movies and your movie is mine real movies not made up by hollywood.

you have to grow a free will to critisize your facts before you point the fingers to others. you live in society made by a myth of a movement originated from Poland and from people, the history witness they were converted to jewdaism in 15 century.

this group of Zion, as they name themselves, used 2 myths to create the worst religious problem known in the history of mankind: the land of the meeting and the chosen people.

let's think with the logic about this myths? the first one speaks about meeting of the sons of Israel in the land that God the Almighty promised them. I wonder how come you never asked yourself: how God can promise sons of Israel tribes 3000 years ago something that He will deliver to those converted eastern european in 20 century??? that's if we consider that the British and God are one for you, since the British who gave the land to the wrong people :).

the second myth of "chosen people". this second myth is hilarious! if the chosen people refer to sons of Israel tribes awhile back, still can make sense because no one genocided them. but if anyone who call himself jew is involved, why the history of Europe was full of genocides of this chosen people!!!?. were they chosen for masacres!!!!?
The Truth Hurt and The game goes on


I agree that Paradise Now gave us an insight into bombers background, its difficult to believe that a person can just be a bomber without something to trigger their inner self. Though it is not allowed in Islam to maimed or killed innocents, I guess with the agression that the Palestinian faced, there is little choice. However, I am against suicide bomber because Prophet Muhammad pbuh, is against it as has been written in hadith and Al-Quran.


Assalaam o Alikum,

I*'ve just seen the movie and Iam really moved. Here in the west we have no faint idea what is going on in palestine or israel. Media surely propagates that palestinians are the culprits, blowing themselves up in public, nobody asks for the motives, a shame to my mind. The situation down there makes clear, that the world is not working the way it is now, democracy or the "law of money" brings mere destruction, grief, jealousy and hatred. From an islamic perspective though, the movie contained a lot of things that are forbidden in Islam (like free mixing of men and women, smoking ect.). Beside it is totally forbidden to commit suicide and I don't know of any other scholarly opinion on that matter. I think the people who organize these attacks use the believes and the desire of the muslims to become martyres, since martyres are promised a high rank in paradise. But blowing oneself up got nothing to do with martyrum so to stop this spiral of violence we should adhere to the teachings of Islam, the Religion of our one God, if we would follow it, Life on earth would be peaceful without any oppression or persecution.

Allaah knows best,
Allaah Hafiz,

Pls how can we get the CD or DVD of the film Paradise Now?
Thank you

Shall We Not Revenge? What Is Revenge?

Revenge can be peaceful or Non-Peaceful(violence, destruction), but the result is victory thru either way.What is the Choice?

Muhammad-pbuh is a perfect ROLE MODEL-Hero who acieved his goals thru different treatis, truce, Delegations and even wars sometimes(with perfect rules). Please read his Biography(Biography of the Noble PROPHET- AR-RAHEEQ AL MAKHTUM -Darussalam).

India(Mahatma Gandhi) and Japan achieved their goals & look at those countries and their status & standing in the world now.

One cannot achieve the victory or its goals with violence or destruction. Maybe it is not time to sacrifice the innocent & prestigious lives & focus on the other peaceful ways to come up.

I am totally against the occupation and the abuses by the foreigners and please do not take me wrong.

May Allah guide us and give VICTORY to Islam and true believers...AAMEEN.