The Origins of a Holy Book

Category: Faith & Spirituality, Life & Society Topics: Quran Views: 16491

Later this spring, a team of scholars at Germany's Berlin-Brandenberg Academy of Sciences will complete the first phase of what will ultimately be an unprecedented, two-decade effort to throw light on the origins of the Koran.

The project, called the Corpus Coranicum, will be something that scholars of the Koran have long yearned for: a central repository of imagery, information, and analysis about the Muslim holy book. Modern research into Islam's origin and early years has been hampered by the paucity and inaccessibility of ancient texts, and the reluctance of Muslim governments in places like Yemen to allow wide access to them.

But, drawing on some of the earliest Korans in existence - codices found in Istanbul, Cairo, Paris, and Morocco - the Corpus Coranicum will allow users to study for themselves images of thousands of pages of early Korans, texts that differ in small but potentially telling ways from the modern standard version. The project will also link passages in the text to analogous ones in the New Testament and Hebrew Bible, and offer an exhaustive critical

commentary on the Koran's language, structure, themes, and roots. The project's creators are calling it the world's first "critical edition" of the Koran, a resource that gathers historical evidence and scholarly literature into one searchable, cross-referenced whole.

Critical editions - usually books rather than websites - are a commonplace in academia. University bookstores do a brisk business in critical editions of the world's best-known literary works, from "The Iliad" to "Hamlet" to "Das Kapital."" As labor-saving devices for scholars and teaching aids for students, they can be invaluable. Presenting a novel or manifesto or play in its historical context helps readers to see the ways it was shaped by contemporaneous events and local attitudes, how it was built from the distinctive cultural building blocks at hand. Embedding a work in critical commentary - and critical editions often include essays that are sharply at odds with each other - gives readers a sense of the richness of possible readings of the text.

But the form takes on a special significance with holy books, where millions of people order their lives in accordance to what they see as divine language. Standard versions like the King James Bible or the regularized Cairo Koran (the version, first printed in 1924, that most Muslims have today) help to unite the faithful in one common reading of their holy book. A critical edition, on the other hand, by its nature, highlights the contingency of a text's creation and gives readers the tools to interpret it for themselves.

Among Koranic scholars, there's a great deal of excitement about the Corpus Coranicum, which will help them make better sense of a text that - despite the fact that millions regularly recite from it and live their lives according to its precepts - remains something of a historical and theological puzzle

"I think it is a big deal," says Jane McAuliffe, the editor of the Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an and the president of Bryn Mawr College, "it's a wonderful opportunity to do something that the field of Koranic studies has wanted to do for a long time."

At the same time, the impending publication of the Corpus has set off a small stir outside the scholarly world. Islam has a long and lively tradition of theological debate, but in recent years revisionist scholars in the Muslim world have been threatened, branded heretics, and even attacked for their work. Already, the creators of the Corpus Coranicum, in response to press coverage in Germany, have felt the need to publicly insist on al-Jazeera and in visits to Muslim countries that they have no intention of undermining the faith. In part what's to blame is the strict, austere form of Islam that is dominant in some parts of the world, but the friction also stems from the relationship all Muslims have to the Koran. To a mainstream Muslim, the Koran is not merely a divinely inspired text put together by disciples, as most modern Christians believe the Bible to be. It is the literal word of God, dictated directly to Mohammed. To question that is to insult the faith.

The fact that it will be born on the Web makes the Corpus Coranicum seem a quintessentially 21st-century project, but its roots actually extend back to the 1930s. Then, as now, Germany produced some of the world's leading Koranic scholars - proteges of the great 19th-century linguist, historian, and "Semiticist" Theodor Noldeke.

The archive that was to become the Corpus Coranicum was started by the German Arabist Gotthelf Bergstrasser, who traveled through Europe and the former Ottoman Empire photographing the old Korans he turned up. After Bergstrasser's death in a mountain climbing accident in the Alps, a colleague named Otto Pretzl took over, before he died in a plane crash while serving in World War II. That left the photo archive in the hands of a young scholar named Anton Spitaler.

Then, in a mystifying twist detailed in a 2008 Wall Street Journal article, Spitaler began to claim, falsely, that the photo archive had been destroyed in 1944 by an Allied bombing raid. Spitaler kept up this deception until the early 1990s, when he revealed to a former student of his named Angelika Neuwirth that he still had all 450 rolls of film. He offered to give them to her - she is today the head of the Corpus Coranicum project - and he died a decade later without explaining himself.

According to Islam, the Koran is a series of revelations Mohammed was given through the Angel Gabriel, starting in 610 AD and ending with Mohammed's death two decades later. Those revelations were recorded and compiled by Mohammed's followers. In the religion's early years, little need was seen for a standardized text - Mohammed and most of his followers were illiterate and as a result the Koran was meant to be recited rather than read (a tradition that remains central to Islam). Transmission was mainly oral, with written texts simply an aid. But within decades of Mohammed's death, conquests had ballooned the size of the Muslim empire and many of the original disciples were themselves aging and dying, and one of Mohammed's successors decreed a standard written version to unify the growing faith. In a pre-printing-press world, however, the process took time, and alternate versions continued to be written and read for decades, and perhaps centuries.


SKU: 15940-6124


SKU: 15940-6235

The value of the earliest surviving Korans, then, is that they show both the roots of the text and the ways it evolved during the window between its birth and its standardization - a time when what to include was still in dispute.

Though the publication of the first section of the Corpus is only the beginning, it's possible to see in it the outlines of its larger ambitions. The goal, essentially, is to place the text in a historical context. "We want to frame the Koran as a text of late antiquity," says Michael Marx, the project's research director. "We put stress on the links that the Koran has to other Near Eastern religions: Christian sources, rabbinic sources."

For instance, in one of the parallels that the researchers will post, they compare one of the most important passages in the entire Koran - "He is God, one, God the absolute, He did not beget nor is He begotten, And there is none like Him" - to nearly identical passages in the Hebrew Bible and the Nicene Creed (the profession of faith in many Christian liturgical services). Both the Bible and the Creed long predate the birth of the Koran. To Marx, this demonstrates the extent to which the Koran, a text that proclaims itself immutable and eternal, is in fact a recognizable product of the particular historical moment in which it was created.

"Once you have all the texts on the table," he says, "it's possible to make quite clear that the Koran has a history, that it is interacting with human history."

Marx doesn't argue that the Koran's history necessarily undercuts its claim to divinity, nor that it is a derivative text. Instead, he sees the parallels between it and other scriptures as evidence that it was seeking to insert itself into the religious debates of its day. If anything, he argues, the links should highlight how intertwined the West's own religious traditions are with those of Islam.

"It shows how closely the text is related to our own identity. One could, bluntly speaking, talk about a European approach to the Koran," he says.

Other contemporary scholars take things further. Gerd-R. Puin, a retired professor of Arabic studies at Germany's Saarland University, has been working for decades on a trove of Korans from a mosque in Yemen - possibly the oldest ones in existence. Because they were primarily memory aids, early Korans were written in a vowel-less "skeleton" language. Deciphering those clusters of consonants requires a sense of what languages and what cultural and religious traditions Mohammed and his earliest followers were borrowing from and reacting against. Much of the wording and imagery of the Koran are borrowed from Christian and Jewish texts, Puin argues. In fact, he says, much of the Koran is incomprehensible unless read alongside those earlier texts. As an example, he points to the term "sakina," which Muslim scholars have translated as a spirit of calm - Puin argues that it only makes sense as a descendant of the Hebrew term "shekhinah," which means the presence of God. The more one studies its historical context, Puin argues, the harder it is to resist the sense that the Koran itself was, at least in part, pieced together from parts of other religions.

"For Muslims, the word of the Koran is eternal, it predates the Old Testament, it predates history itself," Puin says. "But from a Western point of view, you could say, OK, this is a clear reliance of the Koran on the Old Testament because the Old Testament was there earlier."

It's up for debate when the first true critical edition of the Bible was created, but one candidate is the Dutch theologian Erasmus's 1516 Novum Instrumentum omne. That text, by challenging aspects of the existing Latin translation and providing Christians with the tools to interpret the text for themselves, helped pave the way for the violent convulsion of the Reformation.

No mainstream Koranic scholars see the Corpus Coranicum, or work like it, triggering a Muslim Reformation. So far, the debates over the roots of the Koran have remained within academia, and most scholars don't see that changing.

"Most Muslims simply don't care about this sort of work, any more than most Christians care about the Dead Sea Scrolls," says Walid Saleh, an Islamic scholar at the University of Toronto specializing in the history of Koranic interpretation. "This is a Western academic enterprise, this critical historical study."

Nonetheless, scholars offering revisionist readings of the Koran have run into trouble in the Muslim world in recent years. The Egyptian theologian Nasr Abu Zayd was branded an apostate by a court in his homeland and ordered to divorce his Muslim wife. The liberal Islamic scholar Suliman Bashear was attacked and thrown out a second-story window by his students in the West Bank. One of the most controversial revisionist Koranic scholars is a German man who writes under a pseudonym, "Christoph Luxenberg," out of fear for his safety - his best-known claim is that the heavenly virgins who await Islamic martyrs are the result of a mistranslation and are actually "white grapes."

Some Koranic scholars, both in and out of the Muslim world, emphasize that it's important not to make too much of these incidents. In fact, they argue, there is a proud tradition of dissident Muslim theology.

"There are some spectacular exceptions, but in general it's very hard to find [Muslim] heretics who didn't die in their beds," says Caner Dagli, an Islamic scholar at the College of the Holy Cross and co-editor of a forthcoming annotated translation of the Koran.

Still, questioning the origins of the Koran itself, he adds, is a special case. Most Christians believe that, while the Bible is holy scripture, it was written by various prophets and disciples. To Muslims, the Koran is different.

"For Muslims, the Koran is the literal word of god," says Dagli. "They don't consider Muhammad to be the author of the Koran. It came straight down from heaven, and you won't find a Muslim who would say otherwise. That's non-negotiable."

Drake Bennett is the staff writer for Ideas.


SKU: 15940-6234


SKU: 15940-6233

  Category: Faith & Spirituality, Life & Society
  Topics: Quran
Views: 16491

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
I agree with Muhammad Ali that it is amazing that most of the comments posted here
resist solid scholarly work on the Qur'an. That the Muslim world has not yet produced a
critical edition of the Qur'an, with all reported textual variants and permitted readings,
should be a matter of concern to educated Muslims. Instead a report on a scholarly project
by non-Muslims produces anger (Kaamla) and stereotyping (Muslim). Where is the desire to
get to the truth about the origins of the Qur'an?

Muslims have & will continue to research all aspects of Islam including the Quran & its translations/dialects. However, there is a danger to the credulous & the ignorant amongst our brethren, to their very iman. Only the historically naive & gullible would fall prey to the unscientific methodology, ESPECIALLY the non sequitur concocted conclusions arrived at by the "historians". If skilled academics do not employ the usual scientific & logical methods, & instead fabricate misleading agenda-driven half-truths, then we have every right to hold them to account for their misdeeds. Many of these highly qualified academics also happen to be JESUITS as in the Turkish Hadith "re-evaluation" project.In the UK, a friend of mine at SOAS university was told by his prof. that he indeed was a Jesuit. Westoxified self-hating Muslims, who only believe the "White man",(even if there are Muslims) do not advance the cause of balanced research, shame.

This is what muslim scholars should have done several decades ago. But reading comments written by others here except Hilal, I can see why this has never occured. If Quran is the truth, then no body should get worried about this. I guess the only people scared would be those who have no faith or those who really think they know the truth.

I am surprised that Islamicity, a supposedly Islamic site is parroting the usual Orientalist line without much furqan. Such one-sided rubbish is not only insulting to our intelligence, but dangerous for naive Muslims unaware of the nature of the historical discourse. The only true Quran is in classical Arabic with the dialect of Makkah. Any others are just rough translations into languages such as modern Englishes or vernacular Arabic dialects - they are not accurate.

While I was reading this my heart began to burn with anger. If you are a Muslim, believe in the Quran that Allaah (SWT) sent to Mohammed (SAW) through Gabriel, and you live by the sunnah, because you want to not because you have to, then you will recognize that this article is nothing but Shaytan trying to confuse you. You also know, and can rest on the fact that Allaah (SWT) guides those that he wants and misguides those that he wants and nothing and no one can change that.

I think, if I am not mistaken, one of the small signs of the Last Hour is that the unbelivers will try prove The Holy Qur'an wrong.

Can you imagine the claim that there are people who are non-muslims but still are regarded as 'Scholars of Islam'!!**?? How can non-muslim remain a non-muslim if he/she claims to be a (genuine) scholar of Islam?? Imagine the claim that Germany has produced leading 'Koranis Scholar' ****!!!!!!!????????? I mean what a farse!!!!!

Corpus Coranicum is just one of many projects who are trying to prove Allah (SWT) is wrong!!!! I mean what qualifications do they have to claim themselves as scholars of Islam.

But interestingly the more the non-muslims are are bashing Islam & trying to prove us wrong the faster Islam is growing, SubhanAllah, Alhamdulillah

With superior killing machines the Christians, Jews and the Hindus having been waging war on Muslims since the end of the Khelafat, but unfortunatly till date they have been unable to wipe the light and the truth --- which is Islam.

Some of the author's statements could be potentially misleading in particular the issue of the Quran being compiled into one version "decades after" the passing of the Prophet saaws. I'm not impressed or even intertested in this project. Over several centuries, hundreds of scholars dedicated their lives studying and transmitting the glorious book to the next generation. What benefit now that some western scholars (with the usual agenda) have engaged on a project like this? The glorious Qur'an is a multi-dimensional book which only the good of heart will understand and appreciate. This project is no more than an attempt by non-believers to flatten those dimensios into one linear dimension i.e. historicity. It will fail in this respect but may have the benefit of unearthing ancient copies to the modern muslim.

I think it's a great task to be undertaken. Qura'n revealed by the Creator for the humanity not for Muslim. Islam is not a new way of life but the continuation of previously revealed way of life which started when Allah (sw) created the frist creation. All the mesenger were chosen by the Creator and brought the same message. Profhet Moussa (Moses) did not bring Judaism, nor Prophet Eissa (Jesus) brought Christianity.
Europeans have to understand Qura'n more so than any one else since there exist a great deal of misinformation amongst them about Islam.

I do not understand where some of the people quoted get their
information from and why this author chooses to put them in his
article. The lack of depth of understanding is obvious. As far as
the original bible (injeel in the quran) was also God's word and
was sent chronologically before the quran and every Muslim
child knows this. The problem is that adding of man's word into
God's word corrupted the bible. The quran has been left
uncorrupted despite many who tried and will always try to
corrupt it. Those who do not believe in God should stay away
from religion because religion means a way of life sent by God.
If one tries to change religion to suit his life (e.g. in the modern
world adultery, indecency, abortion, etc. are all acceptable even
among devoutly religious people) and still dares to profess he is
following God's religion is fooling himself/ herself. Moreover, if
God's commands bother somebody, he/ she is better off staying
away from religion than to tell truly, practicing, religious people
what to do. Let me remind everyone 'Religion means something
God-sent and not man-made.' God alone knows the intentions
of such hollow-opined people and He is enough to protect the
last of a series of laws sent down by Him. The religion sent by
God has always been the same; true monotheism that considers
God as a super being without any form/ son/ father- this was
the religion of Nuh, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad
(peace be on all of them).

Quran has proven to be the only authentic book survived for more than 1,400 years with no mistakes, no alteration, and no contradictions. This, in itself is a miracle and the prove that Quran is not a historical account.

But Quran is only for those with clean and honest heart. And it is the only book that is protected by Allah (Al Hijr 15:9)

I suggest you guys don't waste your time to prove otherwise.

Approach this beautiful and brilliant Quran with humility and try to learn and understand from it. We are lucky that we have this preserved words from the Almighty, otherwise will will end-up using all those altered and fictionalized books.

May Allah gives us hidayah (right path).