What is behind the French Burqa?

Category: Europe, World Affairs Topics: France Views: 5740

Why the French obsession with the burqa? After all, as the French government itself has conceded, only about 1,900 women wear the full-body covering. So why are over half of the respondents in recent public opinion polls in favor of a ban on it? 

The answer is simple. This is not about a fashion faux pas or women's rights, but about sending a message to Muslims. Concerned with increasingly visible numbers of Muslims openly practicing their way of life while enjoying the privileges of life in the West, French citizens and politicians alike feel that they need to restore "Frenchness" to their streets. 

What exactly they mean by this is unclear, but there is apparently agreement that it means a largely homogenous society or, at the least, a multicultural one with well-integrated foreigners. Whether such a society is desirable or not, the burqa ban is not the way to get there. 

This confusion is at the root of the French parliamentary commission's decision to recommend a partial ban on burqas. It would ban burqas in hospitals, schools, government offices and on public transport. Women defying the ban would be denied public services.

The commission's report said "the wearing of the full veil is a challenge to our republic. This is unacceptable. We must condemn this excess." If fewer than 2,000 Muslim women are capable of mounting a challenge to the republic, France must be built on weak foundations. 

The ban's proponents claim to be acting in the cause of equality, that the burqa is a symbol of the repression of women. President Sarkozy, who has publicly declared that the attire is not "welcome in France," said in 2007 that "France will not abandon the women who are condemned to the burqa."

The irony of fighting repression with a ban seems to have escaped notice. 

What is proposed is a serious invasion of personal liberty without reasonable justification. To be sure, individual freedoms can be legally curtailed when circumstances such as security, crime prevention or violence justify it. But the justifications given for the restriction of the religious freedoms by the burqa ban - equality, repression of women, protection of French cultural values - do not seem to be on the same footing. 

To begin with, judgments about cultural values are very subjective. Who decides if particular items of clothing fit with French values? Can we trust politicians and bureaucrats to make these decisions for us? 

Secondly, where do you draw the line? Are turbans, yarmulkes, saris, salwars and long skirts next? Many groups, including some feminists, assert that crucifixes and crosses are examples of patriarchal oppression. Would a government ban on jewelry containing crucifixes be justified? This is a slippery slope.

If we support a burqa ban on the basis that we dislike the clothing, or that it offends our notion of freedom, or that it makes us uncomfortable, we would then be opening ourselves to all manner of compromises on the many unpopular personal choices that we make in daily life. 

The freedom to do that which is unpopular or ugly, but is harmless or legal, is precisely what a civilized society is about. We should not toss this aside lightly.

Burqa bans have been considered by other jurisdictions. In Egypt, the High Administrative Court recently overturned a ban on female students wearing the niqab - a full face veil - at university examinations. The court held that the "a girl's right to dress the way she sees fit in accordance with her beliefs and her social environment is a firm right that cannot be violated." 

The court did carve out a security exception, saying that a student wearing the niqab must show her face when asked for security reasons. Similarly, many Islamic states require women to unveil for photo identity cards, professional exams and certain medical procedures. 

Religious preferences must yield when there is a compelling government interest and where accommodation is not reasonably possible. 

The proposed French restrictions on the burqa do not satisfy either of these requirements. What compelling interest does the government have in banning burqas in hospitals or government offices? Or on buses and trains? 

To the extent that there are any reasonable security concerns, it should be permissible to require burqa-clad women to be screened by police officers. Similarly, banning burqas from some government jobs would also be acceptable.

In any case, how would the partial ban be enforced? Enforcement would be costly and would only drive burqa-clad women out of the public space and into more darkness. If the purpose of the ban is women's empowerment, this would be counterproductive. 

In the end, the law would only serve to expose the Muslim community to scorn and ridicule and to further heighten the serious ethnic and religious differences in French society. 

Instead, France should invest in persuading the Muslim community to discard the veil voluntarily. A combination of compulsory education, incentives and access to equal opportunities is a better way forward. Bans only breed resentment and discord.

Sandeep Gopalan is head of the law department at the National University of Ireland, Maynooth.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 28, 2010, in The International Herald Tribune.

  Category: Europe, World Affairs
  Topics: France
Views: 5740

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
I agree that France should not ban the burqa on the basis of it being "anti-French", but I think they should ban it on the basis of security and law enforcement reasons. If people can go around incognito, then it is impossible to identify them when it comes to the commission of crimes. So I believe that everyone's face should be visible when in public. But let Catholic nuns and Muslim women be fully robed and scarved -- yet keep their face visible for identification purposes. We can't exist as a society if everyone goes around with their face covered!

A muslim will not enter paradise if his neigbours are not at peace due to his behaviours. Islam asked us to do good. All these years we are accusing others for our misfortunes or suffering. Why not while compalining, we also ask ourselves what we have done that they hate us so much. We have to contribute or provide solutions so that peaceful co-existance is possible and within reach.

im for this article but what would you do if u saw this:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100201/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iraq . copy and paste on your address bar. 80% probability tht, tht was a sunni woman. I hate this more than anything but if u were reading this as a western government official what would u do? specially if ur thinking one muslim killing their own(non muslims dont know better)& specially after all the tragedies that have happened in the past few months including the undergarments bomber. I mean I hate to see this screening machine tht looks thru your clothes but what would you do if you were in their place. tht one foolish guy could have taken down a whole plane full of ppl and not to mention ppl on the ground after the plane crash. imgine if non muslims were doing these kinds of thing to us and we were in their place what would we do. Our scholars would immedeatly do a positive fatwa abt this screening and restricting abaya thing giving reasons like its a need and there is no other way and we would be using these technologies and restrictions too. I mean lets be honest not all non muslims are looking at muslims out of hate some are truly fear full i mean the ppl on the planes are normal ppl some of them have muslim friends but as soon as someone with a beard comes on a plane WOW fear runs like crazy thru them. I dont agree with their tactics but if we were in their place what would we have done.

I think President Sarkozy is creating a new battlefield! burka is not welcome in France and later all Europe. Muslim countries will retaliate? skirt, bikinis, shorts are not welcome in Muslim countries. Later, carlsberg, beer, martinis and all alcohol drinks are not welcome in Muslim countries.
Still President Sakorzy needs to read the whole Koran to understand the real problem !

President Sarkozy obviously, blindly against islam without any just cause. to be great president he must exercise wisdom with great knowledge. read the koran to know is islam friend or foe. Daniel Streich has more gut than Presidenr Sarkozy, or the heart is permenently locked!

In regards to the French Ban of the veil: ignorance, lack of knowledge. Unfortunatley people make a superficial assesment based upon personal perference. the French government should study the religion of Islam before the draw personal conclusions. However, their are many within the muslim religion that are unclear or are limited in knowledge that follow culture mores: just as thier are many that call themselves Jews, Christians that are limited in kowledge in regards to their religion: Everything goes only except when someone is sick, death, famine, loss of job, and ofcourse lack of money and entertainment, only than do we acknowledge mortality. The French government has colonized their culture in many countries, you mean to tell me that this alright; as long as it isn't on french soil: lets' reasses "Napolean Complex."

I think the author himself is on slippery slope....Through the
entire article the author takes a positive line of personal freedom
unless there are valid concerns (security,....). However, his last
paragraph is as bad as french ban where he suggests efforts to
discard the veil altogether. I cannot find a logical reason why
bikini does not have any objections against it but burqa does
have....I thought French pride themselves (as all western
countries) on personal freedoms but it seems they are mere
words only....

I just didn't like Sandeep Gopalan's last paragraph, where he mentioned that France should invest in having the muslims voluntarily discarding the veil. If women want to wear it, then nobody should have a problem with it. Nobody is putting a gun towards their head and forcing them to wear it!

A very stimulating and refreshing argument in a different perspective! A very convincing and pursuasive one Sandeep! This should be published in Le Monde, Le Figaro, La Libert etc. And maybe in Germany as well as they are going to be the next to copy the Franais in banning the burqa and who knows, later maybe the whole of Europe!?

I have of the openion that if the french govt. want same citizen than they must encourage everyone to practice islam the religion of equality. And also they must make it compulsory to all french women citizen to strictly wear a burqa so as to end vulgarity in franch.
May allah bless all those who are practicing islam in such environment