Israel needs to return land then expect peace

Category: Middle East, World Affairs Topics: Foreign Policy, Occupation, Saudi Arabia Views: 3824

The United States and other Western powers have for some time been pushing Saudi Arabia to make more gestures toward Israel. More recently, the crown prince of Bahrain urged greater communication with Israel and joint steps from Arab states to revive the peace process. 

Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of Islam, the custodian of its two holy mosques, the world's energy superpower and the de facto leader of the Arab and Muslim worlds - that is why our recognition is greatly prized by Israel. However, for all those same reasons, the kingdom holds itself to higher standards of justice and law. It must therefore refuse to engage Israel until it ends its illegal occupation of the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights as well as Shabaa Farms in Lebanon. For Saudis to take steps toward diplomatic normalization before this land is returned to its rightful owners would undermine international law and turn a blind eye to immorality.

Shortly after the Six-Day War in 1967, during which Israel occupied those territories as well as East Jerusalem and the Sinai Peninsula, the United Nations Security Council passed a resolution stating that, in order to form "a just and lasting peace in the Middle East," Israel must withdraw from these newly occupied lands. The Fourth Geneva Convention similarly notes "the occupying power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies." 

Now, Israeli leaders hint that they are willing to return portions of these occupied territories to Arab control, but only if they are granted military and economic concessions first. For the Arabs to accept such a proposal would only encourage similar outrages in the future by rewarding military conquest. 

After the Oslo accords of 1993, Arab states took steps to improve their relationships with Israel, allowing for recognition in the form of trade and consular agreements. Israel, however, continued to construct settlements, making its neighbors understandably unwilling to give up more without a demonstration that they would be granted something in return. 

Today, supporters of Israel cite the outdated 1988 Hamas charter, which called for the destruction of Israel, as evidence of Palestine's attitude toward a two-state solution, without considering the illegalities of Israel's own occupation. Israel has never presented any comprehensive formulation of a peace plan. Saudi Arabia, to the contrary, has done so twice: the Fahd peace plan of 1982 and the Abdullah peace initiative of 2002. Both were endorsed by the Arab world, and both were ignored by Israel.

In order to achieve peace and a lasting two-state solution, Israel must be willing to give as well as take. A first step should be the immediate removal of all Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Only this would show the world that Israel is serious about peace and not just stalling as it adds more illegal settlers to those already occupying Palestinian land. 

At the same time, the international community must pressure Israel to relinquish its grip on all Arab territory, not as a means to gain undeserved concessions but instead as an act of good faith and a demonstration that it is willing to play by the Security Council's rules and to abide by global standards of military occupation. The Arab world, in the form of the Arab peace initiative that was endorsed by 22 countries in 2002, has offered Israel peace and normalization in return for Israeli withdrawal from all Arab territories including East Jerusalem - with the refugee issue to be solved later through mutual consent.

There have been increasing well-intentioned calls for Saudi Arabia to "do a Sadat": King Abdullah travels to Israel and the Israelis reciprocate by making peace with Saudi Arabia. However, those urging such a move must remember that President Anwar el-Sadat of Egypt went to Israel in 1977 to meet with Prime Minister Menachem Begin only after Sadat's envoy, Hassan el-Tohamy, was assured by the Israeli foreign minister, Moshe Dayan, that Israel would withdraw from every last inch of Egyptian territory in return for peace. Absent a similar offer today from Israel to the leaders of Palestine, Lebanon and Syria, there is no reason to look at 1977 as a model. 

President Obama's speech in Cairo this summer gave the Arab and Muslim worlds heightened expectations. His insistence on a freeze on settlement activity was a welcome development. However, all Israeli governments have expanded settlements, even those that committed not to do so. 

No country in the region wants more bloodshed. But while Israel's neighbors want peace, they cannot be expected to tolerate what amounts to theft, and certainly should not be pressured into rewarding Israel for the return of land that does not belong to it. Until Israel heeds President Obama's call for the removal of all settlements, the world must be under no illusion that Saudi Arabia will offer what the Israelis most desire - regional recognition. We are willing to embrace the hands of any partner in peace, but only after they have released their grip on Arab lands.

Prince Turki al-Faisal, the chairman of the King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies, is a former director of Saudi Arabia's intelligence services and ambassador to the United States.

Source: New York Times

  Category: Middle East, World Affairs
  Topics: Foreign Policy, Occupation, Saudi Arabia
Views: 3824

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
Your stating in your head line Israel needs to return land then expect peace.
I would also like muslims to hand over all the land they stole when they invaded and occupy other peoples land .EG mecca was pagan land hand it over for peace then talk about Israel. Don't be a hypocrite ,

It's true - Israel needs to give back Palestinian land. Otherwise it's as if someone is telling you to be friends with a person that just robbed you of your home, beat you up, killed your loved ones, blocked you off from assistance, and then expects you to become friends with them and show no grudge against their existence.

I second what Shami just said. Personally, I don't think Mecca and Medina should even be part of Saudi Arabia, but a separate estate or protectorate controlled by all the Muslim nations. In that way, no country can wield too much influence over the most holiest of shrines of the Muslim world, let alone something as corrupt and morally bankrupt as the Al Saud family.

It is unfortunate that Israelies think they have the right to go and steal the land, property, happiness and life from the Palestinians. They also cry because they are being bombarded, but if they could only see they are doing this to them selfs. They need to stop the settlements and their hatred, maybe then they could live in peace!

I think the good prince arrogates too much importance to himself and his kingdom (Makkah and Madina Harams being the property of ALL Muslims, NOT just Saudis). The 1.4 billion Muslims that inhabit Allah's earth are not beholden to the Saudi family nor do the Saudis represent the views of Muslims in general. In particular no one, Saudi or otherwise, has the right to deny or undermine or negotiate away the sacred right of return of the Palestinians to their original homeland (now called Israel). This part of the Saudi-offered deal (deferral of the right or return) should be opposed at all costs.

It may sound very simplistic but the essence of peace in the ME lies in the Israels's willingness to honor UN resolutions that demand Israel to vacate all occupied Palestinian land.

ONLY then will be a realistic and lasting hope of peace can emerge in the region. No parties gain from the staus quo - a real willingness for peace must be exhibited by all parties. I hope and pray that Israel and Palestine reach a lasting and viable peace deal soon without shedding any bloods.