Struggle for civilization

Category: Americas, World Affairs Topics: Crime And Justice, George W. Bush, Human Rights Views: 2543

"This struggle has been called a clash of civilizations. In truth, it is a struggle for civilization." - George W. Bush, Sept. 11, 2006

Oh Lord, if only he meant it. 

So many of us saw it five years ago - in that fleeting eternity, as the towers slid to earth, taking with them unknown thousands of innocent souls. The merciless suddenness, the sheer irrationality, of their deaths released not just the hope but the conviction that this should never happen again. This was the spirit of 9/11, and it could have given birth to a struggle for civilization . . . for something different, a reorganization of national priorities, around compassion for every human on the planet.

Instead it gave us the precise opposite: two devastating wars, a strutting president in a flight suit - and Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, torture memos, secret prisons in Eastern Europe, a fledgling national gulag. 

Read the stories of our Gitmo detainees, the men that Bush administration officials call "the worst of the worst." Most of them, according to various independent investigations, aren't even enemy combatants. They're unlucky guys who were in the wrong place at the wrong time, arrested in random sweeps; turned in by countrymen for personal revenge or simply to collect bounty money; or, like 80-year-old Haji Nusra, punished for the crime of mouthing off:

Nusra, who lived in a small mountain village in Afghanistan, was partially paralyzed from a stroke and bedridden at the time of his arrest, according to one of the capsule bios in a report by the Center for Constitutional Rights called "Faces of Guantanamo: Guantanamo's Many Wrongly Imprisoned." "He is . . . unable to stand or walk unassisted. Despite his age and frailty, Mr. Nusrat was arrested after protesting the arrest of his son. . . . (He said he) believed he would die in Guantanamo, and he did not know whether or not his wife remained alive during the long years of his detention."

Or consider the case of Murat Kurnaz, a German resident of Turkish descent, who "was traveling through Pakistan with Islamic missionaries in November 2001 when he was pulled off a bus at a routine stop by local police and turned over to U.S. officials."

Kurnaz, who was released last month after almost five years of imprisonment, had been held on the false allegation that a friend of his was a suicide bomber. (The friend is still alive and living in Germany and was never under suspicion by the German government.) During Kurnaz's stay as a guest of the Bush administration, he told Amnesty International, he suffered waterboarding, electric shock and a mock execution; he was left shackled and handcuffed with his arms above his head for days at a time; he was sexually humiliated by a female guard as he lay shackled to the floor.

But that was then. Bush's struggle for civilization is now in cruise mode. For instance, the Pentagon's new Army Field Manual, which was under debate for more than a year, has just been released. It "specifically bans," according to the New York Times, "forcing a detainee to be naked or perform sexual acts; using beatings and other forms of causing pain, including electric shocks; . . . staging mock executions; withholding food, water or medical care; or using dogs against detainees."

Surely this is the vision we all had as the Towers collapsed - a world where U.S. prisoners are not sexually humiliated, mauled by dogs or beaten to death. Sorta warms the heart.

Or maybe not. 

"The worst abuse is being told they're there indefinitely - there's no hope. That's what they're constantly told," said Chicago lawyer Pat Bronte, who is part of a team representing several Guantanamo detainees. "Most of the guys are young, in their 20s and early 30s," she said. "Some have wives and children. They all have families they haven't see in four and a half or five years."

Well, too bad. "As has been the case in previous wars, the country that takes prisoners generally decides that they would prefer them not to go back to the battlefield," Donald Rumsfeld said in 2002. "They detain those enemy combatants for the duration of the conflict." And this is a war without end.

"I also think about the young men and women who are guarding them," Bronte went on. "They're being trained to treat these guys like they're all responsible for 9/11. This is very corrupting and unfair to our young people, (telling them) it's OK to humiliate and degrade, ignore the Geneva Conventions. The effects of that will be with us for years to come."

Could things be more badly botched? Could the true spirit of 9/11 be more debased? For now, civilization itself is under lock and key at Guantanamo, and last week the president told members of Congress he hopes they can figure out a way to keep it there.

Robert Koehler, an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist, is an editor at Tribune Media Services and nationally syndicated writer. You can reach him at [email protected] or visit his Web site at

  Category: Americas, World Affairs
  Topics: Crime And Justice, George W. Bush, Human Rights
Views: 2543

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
AC FROM UK said:
Charles Jacks: Comment ref. 40252.
What a brilliant analysis of Western Civilisation in it's entirety Bro! What you say is true today as it was 500, or 1000 or 2000 or 5000 years ago about the basis of Western Civilisation. Good one mate!

By the way here's another one from Mahatma Gandhi.
When India got it's independence from Britain (actually freed it's self from the murderous and thieving occupation by the Brits-i.e. Western Civilisation) a BBC reporter asked Mahatma Gandhi now that India had got independence from Britain, if he would like India to be like Britain? Gandhi's reply was, God for bid that India should become like Britain. It took Britain (Western Civilisation) half the World (my emphasis: of murdering, stealing, thieving, destroying, raping etc...) to get where it is. I would not want that on the conscious of India. Well Britain is still destroying, murdering, killing, thieving, raping etc..., in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon half a century later.
And it is a great pity and shame that the Indian nation did not heed Gandhi's warning and accept his wisdom in not being like Britain in that they have killed and murdered over 80,000 Kashmiris in Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir. And the Indian armed forces have committed mass rape of Kashmiri women and children. So much for Gandhi's vision of an India guided by it's conscious!

When Mahatma Gandhi was asked what he thought of western civilization he replied: "I think it would be a good idea." Given others view of it, it should not be much of a loss to humanity to pull the plug on it. However, the disadvantages of doing so will have to be prepared for.
One measure of the height, and width and depth of western civilization may be to count the unexploded bomblets manufactured in the US, transported through England and distributed by Israel littering the landscape of Lebanon. The westerners that like to say that "democracies do not attack one another" must be pointing out that the countries that attacked Lebanon's democracy are no longer democracies but tyrannies pretending otherwise. The lipstick on their demons is cracking.
If you want to scrape the pancake makeup off the face of the demon, a butter knife should do. Note that they have given significant aid and comfort to their adversaries in calling this a fight for civilization. First they have qualified their adversary as capable of threatening their "civilization". Second, in picking such words for a public relations push they demonstrate just how deep their despair over their condition is. Indeed this would seem to be the cry of the desperate.
Instead of a decade of sanctions softening Iraq into something they can make bleed oil by bombing the infrastructure, the sanctions hardened Iraq into a tar baby from which they are unable to extract themselves. Their struggles have weakened them to the point they need other countries to take over their fights for them.
Consider that the western countries willingness to attack is directly correlated to that countries inability to supply their demand for oil. The US oil supply peaked about the time of the 70's oil embargo. England's supply is on the downward side of the Hilbert curve as well. So from their point of view this could well be a fight for their civilization, a civilization that could collapse without it.

jehad mean struggle for islamism or islamic civilization.

Bush and Ben Ladin are working toghether to make a clash of cilvilizations happen. Now Radzinger the Nazi has found an acceptable way to be anti-semitic. "civilized" westerners are scaling the height of civilization!!! Hooray

Judging by the Pope's comment quoting another Pope nearly seven hundred years ago insulting the Prophet shows the type of hatred they harbour for Islam and Muslims.So as clearly stated by the Author although a Non-Muslim but quite objective is a struggle that will last for ever until Jesus Peace be Upon Him comes back as beleived by both Christians and Muslims.The Article written by this journalist clearly states the fact as opined by all other objective human beings.

Yes, it is struggle between Islam and West.
Jihad means "struggle of life"