Print Page | Close Window

British Woman Marries Dolphin

Printed From: IslamiCity.org
Category: Politics
Forum Name: Current Events
Forum Description: Current Events
URL: https://www.islamicity.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3377
Printed Date: 28 April 2024 at 8:16am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: British Woman Marries Dolphin
Posted By: wasi siddiqui
Subject: British Woman Marries Dolphin
Date Posted: 03 January 2006 at 4:34pm
JERUSALEM, Israel �  javascript siteSearch'Sharon Tendler'; - Sharon Tendler met Cindy 15 years ago. She said it was love at first sight. Last week she finally took the plunge and proposed. The lucky "guy" plunged right back.

In a modest ceremony at javascript siteSearch'Dolphin Reef'; - Dolphin Reef in the southern Israeli port of Eilat, Tendler, a 41-year-old British citizen, apparently became the world's first person to "marry" a javascript siteSearch'dolphin'; - dolphin .

Dressed in a white dress, a veil and pink flowers in her hair, Tendler got down on one knee on the dock and gave Cindy a kiss. And a piece of herring.

"It's not a perverted thing. I do love this dolphin. He's the love of my life," she said yesterday, upon her return to London.Tendler, who said she imports clothes and promotes rock bands in England, has visited Israel several times a year since first meeting the dolphin.

When asked in the past if she had a boyfriend, she would always reply, "No. I'm going to end up with Cindy." On Wednesday, she made it official, sort of. While she acknowledged the "wedding" had no legal bearing she did say it reflected her deep feelings toward the bottlenosed, 35-year-old object of her affection.




Replies:
Posted By: kenski70
Date Posted: 05 January 2006 at 2:14pm
This woman needs a hobby.

-------------
Sorry about that turn signal,I must have fallen asleep.


Posted By: Servetus
Date Posted: 05 January 2006 at 5:09pm

[tongue-in-cheek mode on]

This story is disconcerting.  I cannot believe that Sharon Tendler would actually name her dolphin husband Cindy!

[tongue-in-cheek mode off]

 


Posted By: Angel
Date Posted: 05 January 2006 at 6:44pm
Originally posted by Servetus Servetus wrote:

[tongue-in-cheek mode on]

This story is disconcerting.  I cannot believe that Sharon Tendler would actually name her dolphin husband Cindy!

[tongue-in-cheek mode off]

 

 

You know, this is the most stupidist and idoitic thing I have ever ever read!!

I understand that she loves the dolphin but...................



-------------
~ Our feet are earthbound, but our hearts and our minds have wings ~


Posted By: Colin
Date Posted: 05 January 2006 at 10:07pm
Sounds like the woman has totally flipp(er)ed....


Posted By: Abeer23
Date Posted: 05 January 2006 at 10:36pm

She doesn't need a hobby she needs help  Or maybe a husband would do the trick.

Salaam



Posted By: Angel
Date Posted: 06 January 2006 at 5:08am
Colin, Abeer....

-------------
~ Our feet are earthbound, but our hearts and our minds have wings ~


Posted By: DavidC
Date Posted: 21 January 2006 at 2:10pm
But everybody must seek out the true porpoise of their life....

-------------
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.


Posted By: Mishmish
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 4:55pm
I don't know, this story seems sorta fishy to me...

-------------
It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)


Posted By: Colin
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 5:34pm

Maybe she was the princess of whales?



Posted By: ak_m_f
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 6:26pm
Originally posted by Colin Colin wrote:

Maybe she was the princess of whales?



Posted By: Mishmish
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 8:22pm
Well, maybe she'll be able to turn the tide of public opinion. Guess she'll just have to wait and sea...

-------------
It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)


Posted By: Tim Evans
Date Posted: 04 February 2006 at 12:00pm
 Is the dolphin an Iswaeli?

-------------
Tim in Britain


Posted By: Ketchup
Date Posted: 11 February 2006 at 2:08pm

This is a disgusting story.  When they say dolphins make loving partners and enjoy it some peoples motives aren't as innocent as it first appears.

The dolphin wont complain but it doesnt make it right.

 

I would post links but they would probably get deleted.



Posted By: Servetus
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 10:15am

(Ketchup:) "This is a disgusting story."

How so?  What is the problem?  If I might venture, are you feeling a bit 'zoophobic' (not defined as fear of visiting the Zoo)?  [Serv inserts smiley face.]  If so, zoophobia is nothing that a little social engineering, plenty of mass media and some finishing individual therapy won't cure.

"The dolphin wont complain but it doesnt make it right."

In the relativist, post-modern era, I would think, there is no right and wrong -there is only legal and illegal and those are subject to change.  Prepare, then, "oh brave, new world," for interspecies marriage!

Serv



Posted By: christian
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 10:48am
freaky


Posted By: Ketchup
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 11:01am
Originally posted by Servetus Servetus wrote:

(Ketchup:) "This is a disgusting story."

How so?  What is the problem?  If I might venture, are you feeling a bit 'zoophobic' (not defined as fear of visiting the Zoo)?  [Serv inserts smiley face.]  If so, zoophobia is nothing that a little social engineering, plenty of mass media and some finishing individual therapy won't cure.

"The dolphin wont complain but it doesnt make it right."

In the relativist, post-modern era, I would think, there is no right and wrong -there is only legal and illegal and those are subject to change.  Prepare, then, "oh brave, new world," for interspecies marriage!

Serv

That isn't what i meant.. are her motives as inocent as they sound?

Studies have shown that male dolphins get sexually aroused around women.  It is no coincidence that male dolphins will flock around female swimmers and can be aggressive towards men..

 

This is from a diary of a dolphin trainer..

http://www.tomigaya.shibuya.tokyo.jp/lilly/womandolph10x.html - http://www.tomigaya.shibuya.tokyo.jp/lilly/womandolph10x.htm l

This is her observations... I wont post any text as it may look vulgar and crass... please also note she is having none of it.

 



Posted By: Colin
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 11:31am

Quote Studies have shown that male dolphins get sexually aroused around women. 

 

Oh dear! I think I might be a dolphin......



Posted By: Ketchup
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 11:51am


Posted By: Servetus
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 12:47pm

(Colin:) �Maybe {Sharon Tendler} was the princess of whales?�

Who recently married the long-lost Dauphin?

(Ketchup:) "That isn't what i meant.. are her motives as inocent as they sound?"

Even if they aren�t, my above post regarding 'zoophobia' stands (but for what I am not sure). 



Posted By: Ketchup
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 12:57pm
I'm scared of spiders, does that count?  How ever irrational it may seem.


Posted By: Servetus
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 1:42pm

(Ketchup:) �I�m scared of spiders, does that count?  How ever irrational it may seem.�

No, not exactly (but good thinking and I am sorry to hear of your phobia).  In this case, the term 'zoophobia' sounds general enough to permit fear of spiders but it is at times rather more specific than that.  Please, if you will, think of it this way.  For purposes of this discussion, and to narrow it down a bit, a �zoophobe� is opposite to what Wikipedia calls a �zoophile.�  I quote Wikipedia below, but bracket my comments:

Quote Zoophilia is usually [especially by what remains of the atavistic religionists and renegade Traditionalists] considered to be unnatural, and sexual acts with animals are often condemned as animal abuse and/or outlawed as [oh no, not these again] �crimes against nature� ... However, some [especially relativistic moderns, or post-moderns] � argue that this is not inherently the case. Although research has [fortunately for the 'zero-population' gang] broadly been supportive of at least some of zoophiles' central claims, common [read: in the main ignorant] culture is generally hostile to the concept of animal-human sexuality � The activity [with animals] or desire [sexual attraction to animals] itself is [like many a so-called pathology before it] no longer classified as a pathology under DSMIV (TR) (the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of [that august body of analyzers of what any modern worth his salt will tell us does not exist, the psyche, or soul] the American Psychiatric Association unless accompanied by distress or interference with normal functioning on the part of the person �

�Oh brave, new world, that has such people in it!"  Anyone for a swim?

Serv

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beastiality



Posted By: Mishmish
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 1:47pm

Originally posted by Ketchup Ketchup wrote:

The dolphin wont complain but it doesnt make it right.

 I think this is being taken seriously...



-------------
It is only with the heart that one can see clearly, what is essential is invisible to the eye. (The Little Prince)


Posted By: Ketchup
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 2:07pm
Originally posted by Servetus Servetus wrote:

(Ketchup:) �I�m scared of spiders, does that count?  How ever irrational it may seem.�

No, not exactly (but good thinking and I am sorry to hear of your phobia).  In this case, the term 'zoophobia' sounds general enough to permit fear of spiders but it is at times rather more specific than that.  Please, if you will, think of it this way.  For purposes of this discussion, and to narrow it down a bit, a �zoophobe� is opposite to what Wikipedia calls a �zoophile.�  I quote Wikipedia below, but bracket my comments:

Quote Zoophilia is usually [especially by what remains of the atavistic religionists and renegade Traditionalists] considered to be unnatural, and sexual acts with animals are often condemned as animal abuse and/or outlawed as [oh no, not these again] �crimes against nature� ... However, some [especially relativistic moderns, or post-moderns] � argue that this is not inherently the case. Although research has [fortunately for the 'zero-population' gang] broadly been supportive of at least some of zoophiles' central claims, common [read: in the main ignorant] culture is generally hostile to the concept of animal-human sexuality � The activity [with animals] or desire [sexual attraction to animals] itself is [like many a so-called pathology before it] no longer classified as a pathology under DSMIV (TR) (the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of [that august body of analyzers of what any modern worth his salt will tell us does not exist, the psyche, or soul] the American Psychiatric Association unless accompanied by distress or interference with normal functioning on the part of the person �

�Oh brave, new world, that has such people in it!"  Anyone for a swim?

Serv

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beastiality

I misunderstood what you meant... if the thought of  sexual acts with animals disgusts and revolts me then I guess that makes me zoophobic... my upbringing teaches me to respect all animals, my upbringing also teaches me that beastiality is wrong on every level.

Horses for courses I guess.



Posted By: Servetus
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 2:32pm

(Ketchup:)  " ... my upbringing also teaches me that beastiality is wrong on every level."

I do not mean to turn this thread into one of my book reports, but Robert Bork, in his either alarmist or alarming Slouching Towards Gomorrah argues that (I paraphrase) such absolutist and morally loaded concepts as right and wrong are increasingly giving way, in an at best amoral (when not immoral), legally relativistic society (USA), to legal and illegal.  Those latter two, as we all know, are prone to change and are not determined by religion but by the courts .

I appreciate your response and enjoy talking to you.

Best regards,

Serv 



Posted By: Ketchup
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 2:59pm
Originally posted by Servetus Servetus wrote:

(Ketchup:)  " ... my upbringing also teaches me that beastiality is wrong on every level."

I do not mean to turn this thread into one of my book reports, but Robert Bork, in his either alarmist or alarming, Slouching Towards Gomorrah, argues that (I paraphrase) such absolutist and morally loaded concepts as right and wrong are increasingly giving way, in an at best amoral (when not immoral), legally relativistic society (USA), to legal and illegal.  Those latter two, as we all know, are prone to change and are not determined by religion but by the courts .

I appreciate your response and enjoy talking to you.

Best regards,

Serv 

 

That doesn't sound like the sort of book I would read but any way.. you are correct as morals are good but ultimately every thing is governed by law.

 

Assuming this is factually correct.. though it doesn't cover every country,  it is interesting to see that from this list the UK has the toughest laws..

Quote http://www.totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - http://www.totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html

STATE/COUNTRY  VAR  LAW  SN         &nbs p;         &nbs p;         &nbs p;  PEN

USA LAWS

       Alabama: C  YES   Code of Ala. @13A-6-63   "sodomy in the 1st degree"
                           (1994)                     criminal offense http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - .
        Alaska: C  NONE
       Arizona: C  NONE
      Arkansas: C  YES   Ark. Stat. Ann.          Criminal Offense:
                           @13A-6-63 (1994)         "sodomy in 1st degree"
    California: C  YES   Penal Code Section 286.5 Misdemeanor
      Colorado: C  NONE
   Connecticut: C  YES   General Statutes of CT   Class A misdemeanor
                           Sec. 53a-73a          ;    Sexual assault in the 
                                                       fourth degree http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - .
      Delaware: C  YES   11 Del. C. @777 (1993)   Class D Criminal felony.
       Florida: C  NONE
       Georgia: C  YES   O.C.G.A. @16-6-6 (1994)  1-5 yr. jail sentence http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - .
        Hawaii: C  NONE
         Idaho: C  YES   Idaho Code @18-6605      "length of imprisonment in
                           (1994)                     excess of 5 years is left
                                                        to discretion of court."
      Illinois: C  YES   720 ILCS 5/12-12 (1994)  Crime http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - .
       Indiana: C  YES   Burn Ind. Code http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - . Ann.
                           @35-42-4-2 (1994)
          Iowa: C  NONE
        Kansas: C  YES   K.S.A. @2103506 (1993)   Aggravated criminal sodomy
                                                       security level 2, felony
      Kentucky: C  NONE
     Louisiana: C  YES   Revised Statutes 14:89   $2,000 fine and/or 5 years
                                                       with or without hard labor.
         Maine: C  YES   17-A M.R.S. @ 251 (1994) Class C Crime; 3-5 years
      Maryland: C  YES   Unnatural/Perverted      up to $1,000 fine,
                           Sexual Acts Article 27,  Max of 10 years PT
                           Section 553
Massachusetts: C  YES   Mass. Ann. Laws.         Jail sentence of not
                           ch. 272 @34 (1994)       more than 20 years
      Michigan: C  YES   MCL @750.185 (1992)      Jail sentence of not more
                                                       than 15 years
    Minnessota: C  YES   Minn. Stat. @609.294,    Either fine of not more
                           (1993)                    than $3,000 or sentence of
                                                       not more than 1 year.
   Mississippi: C  YES   Miss. Code http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - . Ann.,        Sentence of not more than
                           @97-29-59        &nb sp;       10 years.
      Missouri: C  NONE
       Montana: C  YES   Mont. Code http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - . Ann.,        10 year sentence and/or
                           @45-5-505 (1994)         $50,000 fine http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - .
      Nebraska: C  NONE
        Nevada: C  NONE
New Hampshire: C  NONE
    New Jersey: C  NONE
    New Mexico: C  NONE
      New York: C  YES   NY CLS Penal @130.20     Class A misdemeanor.
                           (1994)
North Carolina: C  YES   N.C. Gen. Stat. @14-177  Class I felony.  3-10 years
                           (1994)
  North Dakota: C  YES   N.D. Cent. Code          Various penalties, and can
                           @12.1-20-03, 12.1-20-07, be considered either
                           12.1-20-12(1993)       &n bsp; "gross sexual imposition,"
                                                       "sexual assault" or
                                                       "deviate sexual act"
          Ohio: C  NONE
      Oklahoma: C  YES   21 Okl. St. @886 (1994)  "imprisonment not to
                                                        exceed 10 years"
        Oregon: C  NONE
  Pennsylvania: C  YES   18 Pa. C. S. @3101,
                           3123 and 3124 (1994)
  Rhode Island: C  YES   R.I. Gen. Laws @11-10-1  7-20 years.
                           (1993)
South Carolina: C  YES   S.C. Code Ann.         &n bsp; 5 yrs jail and/or fine of
                           @16-15-120 (1993)        at least $500
  South Dakota: C  NONE
     Tennessee: C  YES   Tenn. Code http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - . Ann.
                           @39-13-501 (1994)
         Texas: C  NONE
          Utah: C  YES   Bestiality 76-9-301.8    Class B Misdemeanor
       Vermont: C  NONE
      Virginia: C  YES   Va. Code http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - . Ann.         &n bsp; Class 6 Felony
                           @18.2-361 (1994)
    Washington: C  NONE
Washington DC: C  YES   DC Code @22-3502 (1994)  Fine not more than $1,000
                           ("Sexual Psychopath"     and/or sentence of not
                            chapter)        &nbs p;       more than 10 yrs
West Virginia: C  NONE
     Wisconsin: C  YES   Wis. State http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - . @944.17      None listed
                           (1993)
       Wyoming: C  NONE

========================[C - LAWS IN OTHER COUNTRIES]

        Canada: C  YES   Criminal Code of Canada  Approx 10 years
                           Part V, Section 160.
                           <URL:http://canada.justice http://totse.com/en/law/justice_for_all/beastlaw.html - . gc.ca/>
       Denmark: W  NONE
       Finland: W  NONE  -           ;           ;    -
        Mexico: C  NONE  according to Franz, Carl:
                           "The People's Guide to Mexico", 1988. pg. 398.
   New Zealand: C  YES   Crimes Act of 1964       Maximum 7 years PT
                           Section 143 & 144
   Switzerland: W  NONE
United Kingdom: C  YES   Sexual Offences Act of   Life imprisonment
                           1956, Section 12(1)      (typically 30 years)
                           Sexual Offences Act of
                           1967, Section 3(1)

To me it is wrong to others it isn't.  To me having sex with an animal is just as bad as having sex with a small child.

 

Its good talking to you too Serv, it is refreshining.

Kind regards.



Posted By: Tim Evans
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 3:45pm

I only regret that I was so flipp-ant when first addressing this.

What are the chances of anyone developing a relationship with a dolphin? Get a grip!



-------------
Tim in Britain


Posted By: Ketchup
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 4:49pm
About the same chances as some one marrying one I'd say.


Posted By: Servetus
Date Posted: 14 February 2006 at 5:02pm

"I only regret that I was so flipp-ant when first addressing this.  What are the chances of anyone developing a relationship with a dolphin? Get a grip!

Well, Tim, you were excusably flipp-ant and I will be happy to get a grip when I am finally fin-ished with this discussion.  At this rate, as I see it, the impulse toward the final legal recognition of interspecies marriage, at least within secular societies, will not, I predict, be slowed by the fact that one�s chances with a dolphin are next to null.  I grant that there might be flaws in my logic here, but, for that matter, my chances (for marriage) with Greta Sacchi are none too favorable either!

 

I depart this conversation for now. 

 

"So long and thanks for all the fish!"

 

Serv  




Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net