An open letter to �the world"

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

 Israeli_Avatar wrote:

Stop making excuses for your laziness and lack of depth; and instead of saying that my comments are too numerous and fallacious, maybe you should be a little more specific and address something with logic and clarity, instead of all of these contradictions.

given that my reply was directly to what you have attempted to assert, any complaints about "depth" should be addressed to yourself. This rant does not even make sense. You are obviously trying to increase your vocabulary but you still need to learn what the words mean and how to use them. They simply do not suit you. 

"Yes, that is what I said, but I apologize for giving you waay too much credit for being astute, since you were unable to recognize a glaring example of "sarcasm" I will now "dumb" down my replies be very careful and thoughtful. I am sorry."
Sarcasm, are inteligent people supposed to know this because of the "LOL" and the quotation marks around truths? And after calling me a fool and speaking of the moon, a symbol of sacriligious Arabia, why would you even think of being sacrcastic?

The moon is not on any flag from the peninsula. Your ignorance betrays you yet again.
By the way, this is now  your second official warning. I already warned you about your nasty habit of throwing in red herrings (you use them as a way to lash out in a tantrum).
One more warning left.

"the "mark" defined by the basic rules of logic that govern rhetoric. I am sorry if you wish to go against the rest of humanity in this matter. Regardless, you need to take your concerns up with the rest of humanity."

The basic rules of logic dictated by the Koran? What are you speaking about here? Humanity has defined basic rules of logic? And you managed to follow these rules? An example would be good with such a reply, not having any example just shows that your are speaking out of your behind. If in fact you do follow these imaginary rules of absurd logic, I can see why humanity consists of a majority of idiots.

Strawman, I never mentioned the Quran. I am not sure if I should comment further, as your lack of knowledge and education would be as if throwing pearls to swine.

Yes, logic as defined by humanity, beginning with classical logic from the classical Greek period, and further developed by Muslims and then the west. LOL....imaginary rules. Once again you show your lack of education. Please, you cannot superimpose your own ignorance on to the rest of the world when it appeals to you. Please do some reading and research and join the rest of humanity.

Take the time to look into a few dictionaries before pasting definitions.

par�a�noi�a       /ˌp�r əˈnɔɪ ə/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[par-uh-noi-uh] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation 
�noun 

1.

Psychiatry. a mental disorder characterized by systematized delusions and the projection of personal conflicts, which are ascribed to the supposed hostility of others, sometimes progressing to disturbances of consciousness and aggressive acts believed to be performed in self-defense or as a mission. 

2.

baseless or excessive suspicion of the motives of others. 
Your labeling of everything as being a "Zionist conspiracy" and your automatic refutation of sources on the basis that they are Jewish fits the second definition.

Now you are showing how illiterate you are. This states the same thing I posted in meaning, and your cheap quibbling further diminishes your credibility. In other words, you are whining for the sake of whining.

"2) Zionism is bankrupt: spiritually, morally, and intellectually"
There are several problems with this statement. 
1. We do not and will never have a common definition of spirituality; try to use a dictionary again for this word.

Thank you for agreeing with me. Not only is my statement correct, but you just confirmed it!  Riotous. Not having any common notion of spirituality is "spiritually bankrupt". LOL......Looks like you not only need a dictionary, but a basic course in logic. You were unaware that you just proved by statement. 
Moving on....

2. Morals are a serious matter of perception.

incoherent drivel. And this does in any way prove that my statement has problems.

3. Intelectual value is also a perspectivist domain.

More incoherent drivel. Not only does this "not" show that my statement is problematic, but this statement make absolutely "no sense".

"Some? They are all pro-Zionists, and every name appears to have some "Jewish" persuasion. You are obtuse if you truly believe this is an "unbiased" piece."
I said some of them are Jewish, and you don't know anything about their politics, you are talking out of your butt.

Actually I do know, but your response tells me that you had not even thought about the idea that your piece was so highly biased. It appears that you pulled this one out of your "backside".

 Nothing is really an unbiased piece, some writings have more biases than others. 

Nice attempt to evade the point. You do this when presented with uncomfortable facts about your movement....."well every nation has had racism"......"well every nation has done some wrong"......"well there is nothing that does not have some bias"......
Irrational.

And if the name does have Jewish persuasion that doesn't neccessarily denote any political position, or religion; you are truly a camel. Lastly, many "Jewish names" are actually German. And even if they are Jewish and Zionist, that doesn't disprove what they are saying, that MAY show that they have biases, but so does everybody, proving the degree of bias is a more complicated matter that cannot be done with a "cursory" education of your caliber.

Actually, it proves that you committed the fallacy of "appealing to authority". Obviously, any piece written by Zionists about Muslims will have a slant. The nature of zionism establishes this immediately. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds, as you would be the first to cry foul of Saudi thinkers wrote a piece about Israel and Zionism. 

"You stated it was a fact and you asserted it as such. You are welcome to debate your theory in the interfaith section. You will probably be met with links to to older threads where this subject has been debated to a large extent."

I never stated it was a fact, I said it was alleged, now you are "obfuscating." Just scroll up and read it properly.

"A fool like you can definately be made to worship the moon!"

"And the fact that you worship the moon was not made up by me."

enough said...

"1) I did not say I think she is, I stated that your Torah makes her out to be one. Another evidence of its complete corruption. I hold the wife of every Prophet (as) with great esteem, which is far different from pointing out the position another source makes."

That is the same thing as me saying that Mohammed was a petiphile because he consumated his marriage with somebody that would be considered underage. This is a malicious interpretation, and something that is extremely inflamatory.

False analogy. The Quran and Sunnah do not diminish his character, nor is anything that is stated inherently wrong. The Torah gives an account that morally reprehensible, and demeans Isaac and his wife.

And do not speak of the Torah that way, you Camel. Your own Koran considers the Torah a holy document, and you know nothing of it.

The Quran simply states that Moses was a messenger and had a revelation. The Quran does not confirm the "Sanhedrin�s" compilation. In other words, the Torah may have some things that are from God, mixed with things that are not. You are welcome to discuss this in "interfaith".

"2) I allowed you to throw a jab at my faith, and I simply provided you with an example of your own medicine, which you had repeated countless times."

You are making excuses for your fowl tongue, you are the one that started throwing around insults.

"I see nothing else worth commenting on."

Because you are a blind camel!

postamble();

No, I simply revealed your chicanery in your response to Sister herjihad. You lashed out with verbal games in response.
Given that you could not even hold a rational discussion with Br Whisper, I believe this thread to hold no more benefit. I will now close it. If you have any further desire to debate some of the irrelevant issues you raised, you may do so in the appropriate sections. 