'Taliban' confronts class divide |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |
abuayisha
Senior Member Muslim Joined: 05 October 1999 Location: Los Angeles Status: Offline Points: 5105 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Class divide in terms of social-economic and not Indian caste system, where you have social and economic restrictions based upon birth. In other words, Islam would not support the �Robin Hood� rob from the rich to give to poor, as there is nothing wrong with being rich. |
|
candid_new
Groupie Joined: 11 April 2008 Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Islam in fact supports class divides while stressing justice and equal rights for every body. But according to Islam you have to accept your circumstances and struggle for the survival.
It's outrageous to claim that Islam supports class divides. Class divides, especially those that exist in Indian Sub-continent, are hereditary and oppressive, and not based on merit. Class divide in Pakistan is derived from caste system that was prevalent in the pre-islamic past of Pakistan. Edited by candid_new - 28 April 2009 at 9:04pm |
|
abuayisha
Senior Member Muslim Joined: 05 October 1999 Location: Los Angeles Status: Offline Points: 5105 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
"This story from the news is true that Taliban have used class divide to gain popularity in rural areas. They have forced landlords(Khans of Swat) to flee and handed over their property to poor farmers and villagers. This way they have ensured loyalty of majority of population. However, this practice in itself is unislamic and is more of communist/imperialist practice. Islam in fact supports class divides while stressing justice and equal rights for every body. But according to Islam you have to accept your circumstances and struggle for the survival. However, there is supposed to be a support system for those who can not support themselves and their families. Having said this, you can not just grab/steal other peoples money/property using class divide as an excuse because such an excuse is totally unislamic."
|
|
believer
Guest Group Joined: 08 January 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1397 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
John 3
16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. |
|
candid_new
Groupie Joined: 11 April 2008 Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I meant replacement of the system with more egalitarian system. This is not possible unless the present system is fully discarded. I meant a revolution. Of course, the newer system will have its own flaws but, at least, it's support base will be wider.
|
|
abuayisha
Senior Member Muslim Joined: 05 October 1999 Location: Los Angeles Status: Offline Points: 5105 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
"If there was at all any central leadership it would have long been obliterated."
So, in Swat Valley, with whom did the Pakistani government deal with? Better for enlightened masses to have patience than anarchy, which is what, I assume, destroying a system entails (unnecessary bloodshed).
|
|
Whisper
Senior Member Male Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4752 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Taliban are the Bread n Butter of Pakistan Government. Why must they eradicate them? The day they do that billion of dollars stop coming in.
Edited by Whisper - 28 April 2009 at 4:40am |
|
candid_new
Groupie Joined: 11 April 2008 Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's common sense. If there was at all any central leadership it would have long been obliterated. Unless the insurgents have popular support, it isn't possible for them to make rapid advances they are making or, even, survive under such powerful opposition from the elites and infidels.
Why is central leadership necessary to acquire weapons? Hopefully for sake of civilians, the "insurgents" will organize into a proper political party and seek change through peaceful methods. A system based on oppression and injustice cannot face the onslaught of the enlightened masses. It is impossible to change the system to make it work. The system is destined to be destroyed, however painful it might be. Quicker it happens, the better. Edited by candid_new - 27 April 2009 at 11:32pm |
|
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |