Concealing Causes and Consequences

Category: Americas, World Affairs Topics: Osama Bin Laden Views: 5229

As we approach the crowning of our Emperor for another four years, a short two months to the day when he launched the United States into its imperialist policy of pre-emptive invasions of foreign states, we might pause to reflect on how deeply this administration analyzed the causes that gave rise to the atrocity of 9/11, the ostensible basis for our attacking a nation that had done nothing to the US to warrant its destruction and occupation. Consideration might be given, for example, to the two antagonists who entered the lists recently, appearing almost simultaneously before the American public, Osama bin Laden via a recent tape aired by al Jazeera and Mr. Anonymous, Michael Scheuer, author of the recent CIA approved Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror. Interestingly, while they carry lances from opposing Lords, bin Laden's lifted on behalf of Allah and Scheuer's questioning our Lord of Misrule, George W, both proffered the same perspective, the causes that gave rise to the atrocity of 9/11 have never been addressed.

Osama stated it this way in his address to the American people: "thinking people, when disaster strikes, make it their priority to look for causes, in order to prevent it happening again. But I am Amazed at you. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred." Scheuer made this observation: "(Osama's) genius lies in his ability to isolate a few American policies that are widely hated across the Muslim world. And that growing hatred is going to yield growing violence." Scheuer goes on to say that Osama " is remarkably eager for Americans to know why he doesn't like us, what he intends to do about it, and then following up and doing something about it in terms of military actions." Yet our President continues to claim that the al Quaeda terrorists hate us because of our freedoms while the real causes for their actions go unaddressed. 

As I contemplate the horrendous consequences of this election and the solidifying of Bush's neo-con crew and right-wing evangelical Zionist supporters into positions of power, I am forced to reflect on 9/11 once again, the catalyst that propelled America into Bush's unending war against the forces of evil. America awoke that morning to an atrocity incomprehensible to contemplate, an act that defied common sense, a wanton act of inane dimensions that inflicted catastrophic destruction on innocent people, an act we could not grasp because we had never experienced its like before, an act that galvanized our people in brotherhood, in anger, and in fear. 

I was driving my stepdaughter to her high school that morning and stopped at a convenience store. As we entered, we saw two proprietors, mid-eastern by descent, transfixed before the TV screen, horror struck at the burning towers, transfixed by images that seemed at the time to come from some Hollywood action film. There before us, she in her teens, I having lived sixty years in the last century, lay the ruins of America's might symbolically destroyed in the World Trade Towers, the first instance of such destruction on American soil by a foreign force.

How incomprehensible those images to a teenager, the unfathomable realization that humans could inflict such suffering on another human; indeed, how incomprehensible to a man who lived while the firestorms of Dresden raged, while the US firebombed 64 Japanese cities before the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, while Nixon lit up the skies with the Christmas bombing of Cambodia and Hanoi, and while I witnessed in a hotel room in Prague the shock and awe destruction of Baghdad less than two years ago.

Though I had lived five decades longer than she, I had not, as is true of all Americans who have lived between our far flung shores, ever heard the drone of Super fortresses far overhead, the screech of bombs hurtling toward earth, the wrenching split of buildings bursting beneath the explosive power of tons of TNT, the intense heat generated by thousands of phosphorus bombs that roll in waves of fire over cars, down streets, into buildings turning everything into an inferno of searing heat that melts human flesh, sucks the breath of life from the lungs, and leaves the landscape a barren waste, miles and miles of debris, the shattered remnants of human toil.

These reflections struck home with a vengeance, when I received an email in response to an article I wrote for Counterpunch, October 22, titled "Killing for Christ." That article described pictures of death in Iraq, death wrought in part by Christians goaded to war by fanatical ministers. "Not until the US lies in ruin - the same carnage I witnessed as a child in post-war Europe - will Americans be forced to face the kind of evil they have unleashed upon the world," Sandy wrote; "....These wars are not about religion, or even oil they're about ignorance. Ignorant people who have never watched their cities burned, have never dug through the rubble of their bombed out home for the dismembered remains of their children, have never shuddered to hear the tanks and planes coming to destroy their homeland." 

The thought contained in that letter, ignorance and hence indifference resulting from America's isolation from aerial devastation, surfaced again in Osama bin Laden's "talk to the American people" printed in al Jazeera, October 24. As Osama describes the events that brought him to imagine the destruction of the Twin Towers, events resulting from "the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon," he recounts unforgettable scenes of carnage, "blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining on our home without mercy And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children." 

How terrible the thought, ignorance of what we Americans have wrought on others believing in our hearts that what our leaders did in our name was done to ensure peace, to ensure our freedom, to bring Democracy to the rest of the world. But that is not the thought present in Osama's head. He reacted to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon as it hurled American bombs from American supplied planes in a totally different and personal way. "And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance." 

Michael Scheuer confirms what bin Laden says according to the CBS "60 Minutes" interview: "Right or wrong, he (Scheuer) says Muslims are beginning to view the United States as a colonial power with Israel its surrogate, and with a military presence in three of the holiest places in Islam: the Arabian peninsula, Iraq, and Jerusalem. And he says it is time to review and debate American policy in the region, even our relationship with Israel."

But there is no discussion of this as a cause in the United States; indeed, as Scheuer notes, "But the idea that anything in the United States is too sensitive to discuss or too dangerous to discuss is really, I think, absurd," a comment directed specifically at the Congress, the administration, and the main stream media to open discussion about the impact of our Israeli policies as it can be a cause of the terror that confronts America. "No one wants to abandon the Israelis," Scheuer comments, "but I think the perception is, and I think it's probably an accurate perception, that the tail is leading the dog that we are giving the Israelis carte blanche ability to exercise whatever they want to do in their area." In short, Bush policy, essentially that designed by his neo-con controllers, has put the United States in danger, made it an accomplice in Sharon's oppression and occupation of the Palestinian land and his savagery against its people, not the least of which is the stridently visible manifestation of it in the illegal and inhumane Wall of Fear he's erected around their homes and villages, and, for the past year and a half, the occupation and devastation of Iraq by America, seen as a joint venture by the United States with Israel.

Now, 100,000 civilian deaths later, more than 1300 American soldiers dead, cities in ruins, and the people in revolution against the American oppressor, we, as a nation, have chosen to continue our unilateral aggression ..

From Osama's perspective, the United States has moved to take control of Arab land and resources using Israel as its accomplice in the area. That perception of US policy nourishes the hate, a hate that flows from two sources: the hard right Israeli Zionists and the mentality that guides Osama's fanatical brethren who drink from the same well, the mythological stories that prophecy an inevitable war of destruction between Jews and Arabs, the religious war of Armageddon. America's support for Zionist goals is, therefore, a direct attack on Allah and can only be repelled by counteractions that will result in destruction of America. That is the kernel of Osama's talk to America. Address the cause or suffer the consequences. That means, as Scheuer notes, open debate on America's policies in support of Israel or we continue our steady march to the ditch of doom.

Open debate, however, means more than an investigation into the neo-cons' paper trail from 1991 to March of 2003 calling for and carrying through the invasion of Iraq; it means as well an opening of America's soul to a catharsis caused by an acute and painful examination of the chaos and havoc it has wrought throughout the world. Osama's glib yet understandable comment that Sweden was not attacked points the finger at America as an instigator of actions that have raised the hatred of people in nations throughout the world. Witness our emperor's recent reception in Chile. 

But Americans, for the most part, know little or nothing of the actions taken in their name that have given birth to the visceral hatred, evident throughout the world, that plagues their every step. What graphic pictures have we seen of our devastation of the holy city of Falujah? What pictures show the bodies buried beneath the rubble of bombed homes? What images of humans mangled and eaten by roaming dogs have we seen in our press or on TV? What pictures show the terrorism of Israeli forces and their indiscriminate murder of innocent civilians? What graphics depict the horror of the wall that incarcerates women and children, steals farms and orchids depriving families of their livelihood? What graphs show the American taxpayer how his or her money is being used, not just to surround and decimate a people but to implicate America in the carnage caused by Sharon and his government? How terrible the thought: the ignorance and indifference of the perpetrators of the devastation, that allows for its continuation, becomes the source of hatred for those who see themselves the victims of the government Americans elect to lead them. 

The Twin Tower atrocity allowed for a moment of reflection, a chance for Americans to look inward, to see the world as those beyond our borders see us, victims of a horror too incredible to contemplate, the intentional detonation of civilian structures with the explicit and calculated knowledge that innocent lives would be cremated beyond recognition. And, indeed, the reaction was visceral in the heart of every American! How instantaneous the response to the crumbling towers, not only by my teenager 3000 miles away from the carnage, but on the part of all Americans. How galvanized the response across America, with an outpouring of money for the fallen firefighters and police, the mourning for the relatives of the victims, and the flooding of the blood banks. All felt the impact, shared the loss, and suffered the anguish of those who fled in terror the flaming debris, the falling stone, the blowing ash. Americans knew first hand the horror of war at home.

That awareness drove them to follow without question their leader's plea to go to war against the evil forces that wanted to destroy America's "freedoms." That war, first in Afghanistan, then in Iraq, sent wave upon wave of bombers to unleash untold tons of explosives on untold numbers of civilians who suffered the revenge of America's determination to destroy its unknown enemy. But as I reflect on this galvanizing of America's desire to eradicate its enemy, I begin to understand that we have not merged our feelings with the feelings of those who have suffered at our hands in Europe, in Asia, and in the mid-East. What we experienced on 9/11, a deplorable atrocity that took the lives of 3000 people, that brought havoc and chaos to our people for weeks on end, that destroyed a collection of buildings on approximately four acres of land in the middle of a city, could not compare to the totality of devastation wrought by American bombing on Falujah, or Baghdad, or Lebanon, or Hanoi, or Tokyo, or Hiroshima, or Dresden. That these acts were seen as acts of war by most Americans does not erase the impact of the slaughter they brought to thousands of innocent people caught in the accepted euphemism that allows the innocent to be sacrificed on the altar of collateral damage. 

To bring the American mind to a point of recognition that allows for comparison of the suffering we have inflicted against others as a possible rationale for the hatred that has been leveled at America is a task beyond our powers. But something has driven millions around the world to look at America as a fearsome power willing and able to devastate smaller states to achieve its goals and to protect its purported interests. Why? Why this attitude about America? 

As I reflect on times in my own life when America unleashed its mighty power on those incapable of defending themselves, I need only consider the firebombing of Dresden. "On the evening of February 13, 1945, an orgy of genocide and barbarism began against a defenseless German city, one of the great cultural centers of northern Europe. Within less than 14 hours, not only was it reduced to flaming ruins, but an estimated one third of its inhabitants, possibly as many as half a million, had perished in what was the worst single event massacre of all time." ("The WWII Dresden Holocaust"). Dresden had no military installations, no aircraft to defend it, no munitions factories, only factories that produced cigarettes and china, and a hospital filled to overflowing.

Winston Churchill and Roosevelt needed a "trump card" over Stalin for the upcoming Yalta meeting, "a devastating 'thunderclap' of Anglo-American annihilation' with which to impress him," in effect, an act of unimaginable terror. That thunderclap took the lives of half a million people. It took the form of a firestorm where huge masses of "air are sucked in to feed the inferno, causing an artificial tornado. Those persons unlucky enough to be caught in the rush of wind are hurled down entire streets into the flames. Those who seek refuge underground often suffocate as oxygen is pulled from the air to feed the blaze, or they perish in a blast of white heat, heat intense enough to melt human flesh." 700,000 phosphorus bombs dropped on 1.2 million people, 1 for every 2 people, where the heat reached 1600 degrees centigrade, in a bombing raid that lasted over 14 hours. Those who lived through this Hell on earth had to pile the bodies on huge pyres for cremation, 260,000 bodies counted; the remaining dead, indistinguishable, melted into the cement or charred beyond recognition. "In just over an hour, four square miles of the city equivalent to all of lower Manhattan from Madison Square Garden to Battery Park was a roaring inferno." (Murray Sayle, "Did the Bomb End the War?") We Americans gasped at the horror of four acres of destruction and 3000 dead; we could now, should we but reflect on time past, understand how others felt when they endured a slaughter of far greater proportions. 

This horrendous description of our might has been repeated over and over again since WWII and during it. Tokyo and 63 other Japanese cities felt the brunt of America's air power. "334 Super fortresses flew at altitudes ranging from 4,900 feet to 9,200 feet above their target (Tokyo) ... For three hours waves of B-29s unleashed their cargo upon the dense city below... the water in the rivers reached the boiling point. ...83,793 killed and 40,918 injured, a total of 265,171 buildings were destroyed and 15.8 square miles of the city burned to ashes. "(Christian Lew, "The Strategic Bombing of Japan"). Then came Hiroshima. "... the bomb instantly vaporized, at a temperature of several million degrees centigrade, creating a fireball and radiating immense amounts of heat....Heat radiated by the bomb exposed skin more than two miles from the hypocenter...between seventy thousand and eighty thousand people are estimated to have died on August 6th, with more deaths from radiation sickness spread over the ensuing days, months, and years." (Murray Sayle, "Did the Bomb End the War"?). Why did we drop the bomb? Without going into detail, suffice it to say, "Some scholars ... have found it hard to believe that the act that launched the world into nuclear war could have come about so thoughtlessly, by default."

Consider these statistics: the Germans "dropped 80,000 tons of bombs on Britain in more than five years"; America dropped over 100,000 tons in a month on Indochina, and between Lyndon Johnson and Nixon, America delivered "7 million tons of bombs on Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos," far more than we, and the British, unleashed on Germany and Japan in all of WWII. Nixon found reason for this devastation in his anger that North Vietnam had broken off peace talks in Paris. 

That brings us to our illegal invasion of Iraq, an invasion we now know was engineered years in advance of 9/11 and for reasons that had nothing to do with the purported "war on terror." We also know that we did it to aid Israel in its desire to destroy one of their enemies, a nemesis that supported "freedom fighters" against Israeli occupation of the land of Palestine. And today we have a second letter from Osama bin Laden, delivered via video, that proclaimed for a second time that Israel's subjugation of the indigenous population in Palestine and its continued "cleansing" to rid the land of them, is a reason for the destruction caused by 9/11. Now, 100,000 civilian deaths later, more than 1300 American soldiers dead, cities in ruins, and the people in revolution against the American oppressor, we, as a nation, have chosen to continue our unilateral aggression making America more of a pariah nation and even less likely to share the grief of millions who have suffered at our hands.

And that returns me to that horrific morning of 9/11 when I attempted to share with a teenager the inhumane nature of humans. How to demonstrate the enormity of that act, yet put it in relationship to time past that we might share the torment of those who have felt the oppressor's boot and the wanton slaughter of innocents? In reflection days after 9/11, I had a vision of Hiroshima's ashen landscape stretching for miles as far as the eye could see, an image indelibly marked on my mind as a young child, but in that barren waste rose the Twin Towers, silhouetted against the distant hills and sky, a reference point for reflection just before the planes struck, turning them into candles to light the darkness that shrouds the fields of death that once stood as the city of Hiroshima. Perhaps in the light of those candles we might see, what we have not wanted to see in our ignorance, that we have spread pestilence and death throughout the world and now we are reaping the whirlwind.

William Cook is a professor of English at the University of La Verne in southern California. His new book, Psalms for the 21st Century, was published by Mellen Press. He can be reached at: [email protected]


  Category: Americas, World Affairs
  Topics: Osama Bin Laden
Views: 5229

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
BSKJB: My my the militants come out on the internet, don't they? Getting a little personal aren't we? Am I meant to prove that I'm a good Muslim by following the de rigeur of condemning America? Let me make myelf very clear: I say what I want with no apologies to you or anyone else, and will continue to do so until we have a Khalifa. If my comments offend because they don't fall into your vision of the way things are (or the way they should be), then so be it. As far as my historical statements go, they are impeccably accurate, I almost got my doctorate from UCLA in History. I am very familiar with the historical context of the modern world, most especially in the Middle East.
This is what I have to say: I put forth that the efforts undertaken by members of the umma to benefit our situation in the world have ended in abominable failure. This should be obvious to any but the most dim-witted. The fiery neo-revolutionary rhetoric that one too often hears in popular (note, my choice of words here, please)political commentary is dangerous, unrealistic and counter-productive. I mean, what good has it done us, really? It sounds great, I grant you, and evokes some nice romantic and heroic imagery: The Crusaders are coming! Lets get together and whip their butts just like in the old days when we were masters of the world. But the reality is we are in very real danger of getting completely disenfranchised from international dialogue and action. Violence and anger are not the answer (and are haram). We have the right to defend ourselves as Muslims, yes, but that defense does not always mean combat or crazy mouth spouting.

BSKJB: OOF! My my the militants get personal don't they? Why don't you go make yourself useful to the umma and burn the US flag in Hyde Park like a good fellow. My posts are, in fact, impeccably accurate in their historicity, little man, I have a degree in history, and nearly got my doctorate from UCLA. Anyway, I say what I want with no apologies to you, Mr. Left Wing Whacky Muslim. Oh, you're so angry, so oppressed here in the West. You know, if you actually lived in the 3rd world, I might respect your opinion.
Anyway, until that time, why don't you stick to writing college terms and leave the matter of world politics to those of us who know what we're talking about.

Pretty lame "idris." Once again you've repeated the canard that one shouldnt stay in the US if they disagree with American policies. Apparently you cant see the difference between the government and country. A true red, white and blue hypocrite. All I see in your historically inaccurate and sugercoated postings is whitewashing American terrorism.
So would you DARE call Bush a murderous messinaic terrorist for all the deaths he's caused ? Nope, I didnt think so. No wonder you yanks demand immunity for your troops overseas, to protect them from war crimes which they routinely commit. And no, "dishonorable discharge" for rapists and murderers isnt good enough.
So please spare us your mendacious jingoism.

BSKJB: I'm glad that we agree about Osama (although you don't go to great lengths to condemn him). However, I'm not really sure why you mentioned Iraq in response to my post, since I never referred to it. Perhaps you are seeking some sort of moral highground above me, I don't know. But, to answer your question about the US soldier, I'd say that he should be court-martialed or dishonorably discharged for behavior not becoming a US soldier.
And, as far as my response to Dr. Edress, I in no way am saying-or even implying-that he should not enact his right to free speech, but merely say that if you don't like it here, then leave. It's that simple. No one is making you stay. Or, if you elect to stay (I'd surmise for economic reasons, since we're such a reprehensible society), then try changing things instead of complaining on the internet. It's what America is all about.
This is my third post on the internet (my first pointed out glaring historical inaccuracies that the article's author made, but no post)I hope you get the chance to read my response.

bskjb: I never mentioned the war in Iraq (which I am against, by the way). So I'm not really sure why your response to my post does. I guess you want to go for some nebulous moral highground that I can't legitimately argue with first to offset me and rally others to angrily post against me in hopes to bury any responses I might have and then get to your real points: you don't like my country, yadda yadda yadda I've heard it all before.
Anyway, I'm afraid that in my experience, most Americans have been very open-minded about my religion.
Don't get me wrong, I've had to endure negative stereotypes, prejudice, etc, but not any more than I'd receive anywhere else, in fact, alot less than I would get in the UK. It seems to me that being anti-American is sort of de rigeur for many Muslims, and I put forth that we question just how contsructive this is, what it has accomplished or how accurate views of the US and the Americans are (not very, would be my response). I have some real ideas to effect positive change, and I'm afraid they go beyond angry college kid rhetoric.
And as far as my response to Dr. Edress, I do not mean "America love it or leave it" what I mean is, if you're so unhappy here, then leave. It's that simple. No one is forcing you to stay. Go home. But if you stay, and you are not happy about the way things are, fine, but instead of complaining and America-bashing on the internet try DOING something about it. It isn't that hard. We have rights in this country: 1) Freedom of speech
2) The Right to Assembly
3) Freedom of Press
4) Representative government (in other words, our officials are voted into office. Government of the people by the people)
You may not know this (many Americans don't, but I tell them when I can), but much of the US constitution came from Islamic jurisprudence.

The international community does not want, nor does it need, the model imposed by a country barely 200 years old, with serious human rights problems, whose history is associated with ethnic cleansing of its native population, whose history is based upon the illegal deportation of races, a country whose military forces even today practise torture and which has concentration camps in more than one continent where the terms of the Geneva Convention are broken.

George Bush can keep his freedom and democracy to himself and to his own country. Nobody asked for his opinion abroad and nobody is interested in his opinion abroad. Each and every movement of the US regime outside its territory will be seen as belligerence, interference, and arrogance and is bound to produce an exponential reaction of hatred in the four corners of the Earth.

[email protected] FROM UK said:
(...It is in poor taste to refer to Osama bin Laden as anything other than a
murderer, for that is what he is....)

Fair enough, would you call the American soldiers who murdered a couple in
front of their kids in Iraq today terrorists as well ? Would you call Bush
who is responsible for far more deaths (150000) of innocents than OBL as a
terrorist ?

(...Dr. Edriss, I dsagree with you completely. If you dislike the US so much
then move somewhere else...)

Meaning anyone who disagrees with you and with US policies which promote
terrorism should simply "move out". A magnificent example of freedom of
speech and tolerance for dissenting voices. Absolutely brilliant. And what
gives you the right to call for posts to be banned ? This website doesnt
take orders from US state department. As for paranoia and militarism, thats
what describes the average American today who doesnt have the sincerity to
ask tough questions from their own government, so they simply shut up and
try to do the same to others who have the courage to speak up. Who wouldnt
want this sort of "freedom." Just look at what these criminals are doing in

It is in poor taste to refer to Osama bin Laden as anything other than a murderer, for that is what he is.
Dr. Edriss, I dsagree with you completely. If you dislike the US so much then move somewhere else.
And what is up with that whacky post by Mitch form Canada? Is this a reputable web-site or some strange hot-bed of paranoia and militarism? Please, let's avoid posting such odd comments in the future, Mr. Editors. Also, I am curious why you did not post my previous comments made under the pseudonym of "Khaysuddin Ali"? I'd like to know. I guess some people don't like the truth.


Abdul said ---------
Western countries including Europe are against the MUSLIMS beacause of their RELIGION.They hate us and our religion.

They are after their resources(money, oil, gas).

They DO NOT not want Muslims to practice their faith, prosper, to live in peace,to become independent(military, food, things etc. and so on).

Allah bless us.
I can not say more than Abdul! they hate us and they are acting upon their hate to us and killing us. plus they accuse us of their crimes!

that's what our media failed to understand and failed to broadcast what's happening to us to the world.
we belong to Allah and to Him we return

e-mail me for the whole thing - there is not enough room to tell the whole story and prove it with pictures....

If the moderate Muslims would speak up and let the West know
they do not support the terrorism of Osama bin Ladin and
others, perhaps the West would begin to understand. Right now,
the majority of US citizens believe that ALL Muslims are out to
destroy the US and all of its interests and citizens. I know - am
one of them. Why don't more moderate speak up instead of
supporting hateful programs that build up fear and anger of the
West. If all Muslims are not terrorists we have to prove that - not
support the terrorists. Do you peoplle realize that the majority
of US folks do not understand the whole Israel connection? Wake
up!!!! We are tryong to live or daily lives here in the US peacefully
- every terrorist act a Muslim land supports simply builds up the
belief that Islam = Killers.

Western countries including Europe are against the MUSLIMS beacause of their RELIGION.They hate us and our religion.

They are after their resources(money, oil, gas).

They DO NOT not want Muslims to practice their faith, prosper, to live in peace,to become independent(military, food, things etc. and so on).

Allah bless us.

Methinks the good author needs to find a better way to state his case. While I agree with some points, he needs to realize that Americans will never listen to the words of Osama, nor of those who quote him. To use him as a reference robs one of credibility and legitimacy in an American's eyes. This is something that we can't afford to do, not if we really want to change US policy and effect positive change.
Also, the mention of WWII (our great moral war, it is almost mythic in American consciousness) in this context will certainly not resonate with Americans. Simply put: we didn't start the war with the Germans or the Japanese. There is no nice way to win a war. The Axis certainly would have done the same to us (the Japanese planned to use bacterilogical warfare on the Americans, a sort of poor man's atom bomb. One load of bubonic plague actually made it to US soil, it was delivered by hot-air balloon. Also, the Nazis were hard at work on their own nuclear bomb program. As far as bombings go, I wonder if the author ever heard of the London Blitz. Hmmm.) The Nazis and Hirohito were evil plain and simple, and they needed to be stopped (the Holocaust is well known. But read "The Rape of Nanking" for an account of Imperial Japan's inhumanity. Also, shock and awe for Yalta isn't at all true, I'm not really sure where that comes from. It is well documented from FDR's correspondence that Roosevelt (unlike Churchill) thought that Stalin was a man that he could reason with.
Further, it is in bad taste to mention 9/11 as a moment for Americans to reflect on their shortcomings. It was a terrible tragedy, let's leave it at that.
I'll reiterate for the benefit of the Umma: friends, clearly we are not on the straight path, but I do not think that we've had much success with the policies (if we can call them that) that have preceeded us. I suggest that we take a new course of action, one that will actually produce results that are beneficial to all.

And thus, the expenditure of blood, treasure and goodwill has done little to solve the problem, either one way or the other. And thus, as was the case with imperial adventures (by other nations) in the past, America's recent efforts appear to be encouraging the neutral nations of the world to become less neutral - but this time around perhaps it might not seem to be working to America's advantage.

I think these mad people in the US and Israel will be consumed by their own power and greed. A time will come when all their might will not help them a bit. They will overreach themselves to a point that they will self-destruct.


Alhamdulillah, i read this article in it original website itself. Being muslim and non american it is easy to see the point raised by the author and agree with them in whole. But,i can understand if any american will have hard time with this article.

Neverthless,solution for a problem is not by evading the problem rather by facing it. The whole effort of the author of the article can be summarized jus' that.