Mass versus Minarets: The Cordoba Controversy

Category: Europe, World Affairs Topics: Cordoba Views: 4327
4327

Should Spain's most famous mosque actually be called a cathedral? Dale Fuchs reports on the question dividing a city

For Fatima Moya, a 23-year-old hotel receptionist in Cordoba, it couldn't be more obvious: the 1,200-year-old building outside her window is a mosque.

Granted, a mahogany choir sits smack in the middle of it, along with all the other gilded trappings of a small cathedral, and the minaret is dressed up like a Baroque belfry.

But Ms Moya takes her breaks in the Moorish inner-courtyard, filled with orange trees and a gurgling fountain. Every day she sends hordes of tourists to admire the Arabic inscriptions and intricate mosaic tiles in what was once the prayer niche, or mihrab. The place where Ms Moya works is even called "Hotel Mezquita" - the Mosque Hotel.

So she has no qualms about calling this sumptuous place the Great Mosque of Cordoba, even though it has been consecrated as a church since a Catholic king took the city from the ruling caliphs in 1236.

"Everyone in Cordoba calls it the mosque," said Ms Moya. "If I said it was a cathedral, nobody would know where it is."

But the Bishop of Cordoba, Demetrio Fernandez, thinks this oasis of striped horseshoe arches, one of the oldest buildings in the Islamic world, is having an identity crisis and could do with a new christening. Earlier this week, he called on the city to refer to the Moorish-era masterpiece solely as the "Cathedral of Cordoba" on street signs and tourist brochures. The Muslim past and Catholic present receive equal billing on Cordoba's white-washed tourist circuit of winding cobbled lanes. "It confuses the visitor," the bishop wrote in an opinion piece in a local Cordoba daily.

In his view, the church deserves top billing on this Unesco World Heritage Site because it has paid for its preservation and held masses there for eight centuries. The mosque, he argued, was built in the 8th century on the site of a Visigoth church (with the ruins of Roman temple buried below). And here's the clincher: the defeated Moors would have destroyed all the intricate plasterwork rather than surrender it - if the negotiating skills of Cordoba's Catholic conqueror, Ferdinand III, hadn't saved the day.

Indeed, its conversion probably saved it from destruction by Inquisition-era builders, who had little interest in aesthetics and no qualms about plonking down churches on the ruins of elegant geometric motifs.

"History is fluid," the bishop concluded with a tit-for-tat reference to the Mosque of Damascus: "What was once a Catholic temple is a Muslim mosque today, and vice versa in Cordoba; what was once a Muslim temple is now a Catholic cathedral."

The attempt to rebrand a piece of Cordoba's Muslim heritage might seem odd. The city, a candidate for European Cultural Capital in 2016, usually sells itself to tourists by proclaiming its Muslim heritage from the 8th to the 13th century, when it was a cosmopolitan melting pot, a medieval Manhattan.

It was the biggest and wealthiest city in Europe with a population of about half-a-million Jews, Christians and Muslims living in relative harmony. Any self-respecting poet, scientist or philosopher had to pass through. The mosque, the second-largest in the world at the time, was the city's spiritual core. Most locals, moreover, are proud of this chapter in Spanish history. "There's a little bit of all three cultures in all of us," boasted Ms Moya. Not surprisingly, the city's mayor, from the United Left Party, has refused to change brochures and signs.

The bishop's sudden concern for nomenclature stems from a years-long feud between the Catholic Church hierarchy in Spain and Spanish converts to Islam, who believe Muslims should be allowed to kneel in prayer in the great hall once again.

"I don't care if they call it the old mosque, but what I don't want is for it to be called just a mosque," he told reporters recently. "The craze for suppressing the word cathedral and insisting that it is a mosque is related to the insistence that it should be open for prayer of all faiths."

In 2006, the Islamic Council, which represents the 300,000 Spanish converts out of Spain's growing Muslim community of two million, petitioned the Vatican "to send a message of hope to the world" by permitting ecumenical prayer at the former mosque. The Islamic Council insists that they do not wish to return Cordoba to the era of "al-Andalus," the name for Spain during the Moors' 700-year rule. "While others talk about the clash of civilizations, this would be an example of tolerance," said Isabel Romero, spokeswoman for the Cordoba-based Islamic Council.

The Vatican has since allowed Spain's hierarchy to decide the question, which means that security guards still stop any visitor who attempts to prostrate themselves amid the statues of the saints.

The guards worked overtime this April when members of a group of 120 Muslim tourists from Austria tried to pray. Some scuffled with the guards. Police were called and two tourists were arrested. The church officials believed it was an orchestrated challenge.

But purging street signs of the word "mosque" will not solve anything, as far as Ms Romero is concerned. "To try to erase history is a great error," she said.

She believes the bishop's concern for the name is motivated by Islamophobia, on the rise in Spain since the 11 September attacks in New York and the March 2004 rail bombing in Madrid by Moroccan extremists. Fear of Islam is a familiar theme here. Converted Catholics of Muslim origin, known as Moriscos, were expelled from Spain 400 years ago, and following that fateful decree, many converts took great pains to prove they were pure-blooded Christians, flagrantly thwarting Muslim taboos, according to Antonio Manuel Rodriguez, author of the book Footprints of the Moriscos and a professor of Islamic Civilization at the Spanish University of Distance Learning.

The familiar tapas, for instance, was originally a slab of prohibited pork fat over an equally off-limits glass of wine, signaling the drinker was not a devout Muslim. An effusive demonstration of worship during Holy Week was a sure way for the nervous convert to prove he had no hang-ups about graven images, Mr Rodriguez points out. Some covert Muslims even raised pigs to distract attention from the fact they didn't eat ham, an offence punishable by death at an Inquisition trial.

"They were sending out the message, 'See, look, I'm not a Muslim'," he said. Jewish converts used similar tactics that persist as popular customs, such as staging an energetic, open-window cleaning session on Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, he said. The surviving Islamic influence in Spain amounts to more than a bunch of florid inscriptions in praise of Allah plastered across Granada's Alhambra or Cordoba's former Great Mosque.

More than 300,000 Spanish words today are derived from Islamic terms, including the most stereotypical, such as the bullring shout of Ole! a variation of Allah, and flamenco, which, according to Mr. Rodriguez, grew out of the phrase fellah mengu meaning "displaced peasant", or gypsy. The 700 years of Moorish rule also permeates everything from irrigation to Spain's traditional architecture, with rooms set around an internal courtyard.

Or consider Mr. Rodriguez's grandfather, one of many Andalusian farmers who observed a strangely rigid washing-up ritual after a day's work. "He would first roll up his sleeves, and wash up to the elbows, then his face, then his eyes, mouth and ears and sniff the water into the nostrils," Mr. Rodriguez recalls. "He was echoing the Muslim ablution rituals, but he didn't know it.

"Catholic Spain destroyed the proof - they turned minarets into bell towers - but they couldn't erase the Muslim traces."

Source:  The Independent


  Category: Europe, World Affairs
  Topics: Cordoba
Views: 4327

Related Suggestions

 
COMMENTS DISCLAIMER & RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Older Comments:
ROGER BURR FROM USA said:
Kam, is trying hard to rewrite early meccan's history by blaming everything on those early Muslims. During prophet times he never ordered destruction of any pagan temples or Jewish synagogue. Even during war with idolaters he issued a decree not to harm places of worship, women, children, sick & old. And moreover Jews & early Muslims never clashed. In fact in mecca & Medina Jews were thriving community practicing their religion freely & had good relations with Muslims of mecca & Medina. Their synagogue's were destroyed not during Mohamed time but was destroyed when Saud family laid claim on all of mecca, Medina, & surrounding small villages to form modern day Saudi Arabia few decades ago.
()

SIDDEEQUE ZAINUDDEEN FROM INDIA said:
(Late)B.N.Pande was a great historian of India who spoke truth. Big lies were/are spread by many Hindu and English historians. Those lies were/are main cause of clash between Hindus & Muslims in the Indian Subcontent. Majority of Indian Muslim rulers did justice to the people. They donated wealth for building Hindu temples. They built mosques. Many warriors of Muslim rulers were Hindus.Tippu Sultan's chief warrier was Mr.Poornayya, a Hindu. Ram is a mythological character. How can he be born in a place? That too at the same spot where the masjid was built. I can't understand. Romesh Chander seems to be a supporter of VHP, a hindu militant group which collects money from the West to kill Muslims and Christians in the East. VHP now asks more Mosques from Muslims. Romesh also speaks in the same tone.
Kam seems to be lead by lies of historians. Kindly read books and speeches of (Late) B.N.Pande which will open your heart towards beautiful facts of Indian History. May God Bless !

()

H.A. FROM YATHRIB said:
Sir Kam and Sir Rom..SPEND too much time on computers. More than teenagers do nowdays.

Wouldn't it be better if they used their time to DO something constructive for other Kams and Roms in society?

They also don't seem to like Muslims, yet Spend all their time ONLY at this Muslim webstie. Very strange indeed.

Oh well! Why ask Why? Try Bud Dry!!!
()

ROMESH CHANDER FROM USA said:
Muslims don't understand Marketing. It is advertised as a Mosque because it brings tourists there who bring money; and the name of the game is making money; after all you live in Capitalist Spain.

May be they will improve marketing if they called it Cathedral Mosque or Mosque Cathedral (sorry, no matter what one calls it, no muslim prayers there; muslims don't control it now).

Why muslims insist on praying there? Would they allow Catholic mass in Damascus Mosque (previously a church) or Hindus worshipping their idols at Mosques in Varanasi and Mathura (previously Hindu temples)?. Sorry, reciprocity is a 2 way street, not a one way one.
It is commonsense logic.

Once a Mosque is always a Mosque? Cardoba and Ayodhya break that rule. You cannot impose it in Cardoba or Ayodhya, like it or not.
()

KAM FROM - said:
This author of the areticle is another ignoramus about about religious wars and their aftermath in history. He forgets Christian Church and its followers have demolished places of worship of other faiths ( Islam, Zorostrian, Hindu, Buddhist and pagan. It took place in Europe, Asia and Soth America.

But think again, does Islam has no trail of blood in its history? They were no different. Prophet Muhammad -examplar in the eyes of Muslims - ordered destruction of images and places of worship Christians and Jews in Mecca when victorious Muslim armies entered Mecca. That set the example, a precedent- to be followed by later Muslims.

Muslims were no less harsh in the destruction of temples , synagogues and churches in the last milleniums.It happened in Europe and Asia. However I must say there were always great souls-kings and ordinary men who protected places of worship too. That was an exception and not a rule.

This tells me such an intolerant barbaric behaviour is so common in followers of all Abrahamic faiths. What a tragedy. Wa Salaam.



()