Aftermath of Flight 253 - A Familiar Pattern

Category: Americas, World Affairs Topics: Barack Obama, Government And Politics, Terrorism Views: 4087
4087

In the days after Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's failed attempt to kill himself and bring down Northwest Flight 253, the story followed a familiar pattern.

First, there were the daily revelations of what various intelligence and other government agencies didn't do with what they had already known about Abdulmutallab's behavior and associations: from his father's effort to alert US officials about his son's radicalization, to Abdulmutallab's cash purchase of a round trip ticket and his checking in for the flight without luggage - both "red flags" that should have warranted secondary airport screening.

As the full picture emerged, it became clear that some of the same problems that existed prior to 9/11 still plagued the many diverse components of the U.S.'s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus. In particular, they were not communicating with one another or sharing critical information with each other. For example, the concerns shared by Abdullmutallab's father with U.S. Embassy staff and the CIA, and the fact that the young man had gone to study in Yemen, were recorded, resulting in Abdumutallab being placed on the large National Counterterrorism Center's TIDE master list of persons of interest, but not on a "terrorism watch list". Also, the information did not get passed to the Yemen government or the FBI, nor did it impact his U.S. visa. 

It could be argued that this after-the-fact "connecting of the dots" is unfair, since it can be compared to doing a crossword puzzle after looking at the answers, but this matter of "dot connecting" was supposed to have been resolved by provisions of the Patriot Act that encouraged inter-agency intelligence sharing, and by the creation of the Directorate of National Intelligence and the National Counterterrorism Center that were designed to serve as the "nerve centers" and intelligence clearinghouses facilitating such inter-agency cooperation. The fact that some of the same problems that haunted the intelligence community pre-9/11 still exist today, eight years after the deadly attacks, caused exasperation among those who had been involved in the reform effort and led a clearly troubled President Obama to declare that there would be accountability for those who had failed.

If the pattern of revelation and recrimination was familiar, so too were the efforts of some to politicize the almost tragic affair. There were calls for Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to resign or be fired, and the charge that this entire episode demonstrates the Obama Administration's weakness in dealing with matters of national security. Former Vice President Cheney used the incident to ratchet up his personal attacks against Obama, while GOP Congressional leaders saw an opportunity to attack the President's plan to close Guantanamo.

Fair or unfair, or just "plain politics" there can be no question about the seriousness of what almost occurred on Flight 253. Had Abdulmutallab succeeded in his evil mission, a deadly blow would have been delivered to the nation and a serious challenge to the Obama Presidency. The incident, therefore, must be and will be taken seriously.

Overlapping hearings will be held by Congressional committees, a full scale administrative review will be conducted looking into what happened and what didn't happen in this particular incident, with the President's call for accountability possibly resulting in changes in personnel.

In the meantime, while all this is sorted out, travelers will once again endure time consuming checks. We now know that airport security remains vulnerable and that new threats cannot be adequately combated by procedures currently in use. We also know that post-9/11 reforms have not been fully implemented and that there are weaknesses in our "list" making and the use made of these lists. 

Here, too, the discussion will follow a familiar pattern. There have already been calls for more extensive use of "profiling", an overly broad expansion of the "no-fly" lists and a lowering of the threshold of what constitutes sufficient grounds to be placed on the terrorism "watch list", and more extensive use of more sophisticated scanning equipment that some have complained are highly intrusive, in that they create a virtual "strip search" image of passengers. Some of the proposals are but a worn out rehashing of the kind of alarmist and bigoted ideas that surfaced after 9/11. They were shot down then, and more thoughtful Congressional leaders have shot them down again in recent days.

But there will, no doubt, be a healthy and needed debate on all these efforts, with civil libertarians, lawmakers and law enforcement professionals seeking the right balance in the remedies needed to correct the weaknesses in our security. This debate, which has already begun, will take us well into the New Year. It will be important and worth following closely, since its consequences will shape our lives for years to come.

Washington Watch is a weekly column written by AAI President James Zogby.


  Category: Americas, World Affairs
  Topics: Barack Obama, Government And Politics, Terrorism
Views: 4087

Related Suggestions

 
COMMENTS DISCLAIMER & RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Older Comments:
IBNKHALDOUN FROM USA said:
Common James, evryone knows that this is just another pretext to move forward their hidden agenda. If you are not convainced, then just answer this simple question: Why TSA/gouvernement would test the body milimeter-Scanner at some airports, if the law forbid its use??? Once there was another "Nero" type event, the law was changed despite its unpopularity. Then people were given this dilemma: either you accept the chnage or you'll suffer delays at airports!
2010-01-10

IMAM SHAMSUDEEN FROM AUSTRALIA said:
I dont know why people are so stupid to believe anything the media says. The fact that 9/11 conspiracies have been exposed ovetime, many still believe this controlled media. I dont trust neither cia or fbi. It's all about targeting islam and muslims. We see the truth one day
2010-01-09

CHRISTOPHER JONES FROM USA said:
Here are some things for Muslims to ponder every time terrorism occurs. Does or does not acts of terrorism feed the growth of Biblical Christianity among people in targeted nations?. And what effect it has on Islam?. And does terrorist acts kill more Biblical Christians then it creates?. Answer honestly to yourselves.
2010-01-06

FRANK DOUGLAS FROM USA said:
With increased terrorist threats, now from Yemen, Christians will use that threat to promote and spread Biblical Christianity in the US and around the world. Thanks Al-Qaeda.
2010-01-06

JOHN CLAY FROM USA said:
In light of new terrorist threats, Americans and others should embrace,use, and spread Biblical Christianity for their security and safety if their governemtns will do nothing to protect them from this threat. Furthermore there should be no objections from Muslims, because we are using Biblical Christianity as a defense against terrorism and Al-Qaeda not Islam and Muslims, which Muslims claim is not part of Islam or is Muslim.On the other hand if Muslims do object and say that Biblical Christianity is being employed to target Muslim and Islam then the charge that Islam and Muslims are linked to terrorism and Al-Qaeda maybe true.
2010-01-05

SAYEED FROM BANGLADESH said:
Lets ask the right question, are these incidents are
set up by the intelligence agencies? Look who are
the beneficiaries? another conspiracy theory, right?
2010-01-05