Arab scholars interpreted hieroglyphics 1,000 years earlier than thought

Category: Featured, Middle East, Nature & Science Topics: Islam And Science Values: Contentment Views: 11701
11701

Western scholars were not the first to decipher the ancient language of the pharaohs, according to a book that was published by a University College London researcher.

Dr Okasha El Daly of UCL's Institute of Archaeology revealed that Arabic scholars not only took a keen interest in ancient Egypt but also correctly interpreted hieroglyphics in the ninth century AD - almost 1,000 years earlier than previously thought.

It has long been thought that Jean-Francois Champollion was the first person to crack hieroglyphics in 1822 using newly discovered Egyptian antiquities such as the Rosetta stone. But fresh analysis of manuscripts tucked away in long forgotten collections scattered across the globe prove that Arabic scholars got there first.

Dr Okasha El Daly, of UCL's Institute of Archaeology, explains:

"For two and a half centuries the study of Egyptology has been dominated by a Euro-centric view, which has virtually ignored over a thousand years of Arabic scholarship and enquiry encouraged by Islam.

"Prior to Napoleonic times little was known in the West about the ancient civilization of Egypt except what had been recorded in the Bible. It was assumed that the world of the pharaohs had long since been forgotten by Egyptians, who were thought to have been incorporated into the expanding Islamic world by the seventh century.

"But this overhasty conclusion ignores the vast contribution of medieval Arabic scholars and others between the seventh and 16th centuries. In reality a huge corpus of medieval writing by both scholars and ordinary people exists that dates from long before the earliest European Renaissance. Analysis reveals that not only did Moslems have a deep interest in the study of Ancient Egypt, they could also correctly decipher hieroglyphic script."

Following the Roman invasion of Egypt in 30 BC the use of hieroglyphics began to die out with the last known writing in the fifth century AD.

While Western medieval commentators believed that hieroglyphics were symbols each representing a single concept Dr El Daly has shown that Arab scholars grasped the fundamental principle that hieroglyphics could represent sounds as well as ideas.

Using his unique expertise in both Egyptology and medieval Arabic writers, Dr El Daly began a seven year investigation of Arabic writing on ancient Egypt.

"The manuscripts were scattered worldwide in private as well as public collections and were mostly not catalogued. Even when they were, they were often wrongly classified so I had to go through each one individually - it is not like researching in modern books with an index which you can check for relevant information," says Dr El Daly.

"A specialist in only Arabic or Islamic studies reading these manuscripts would fail to grasp their significance to Egyptology. Conversely Egyptologists think that Arabs and Moslems had nothing useful to say about ancient Egypt, so there wasn't any need to look at manuscripts that were mainly the domain of scholars within the disciplines of Arabic/Oriental studies."

The breakthrough in Dr El Daly's research came from analysis of the work of Abu Bakr Ahmad Ibn Wahshiyah, a ninth century alchemist. Ibn Wahshiyah's work on ancient writing systems showed that he was able to correctly decipher many hieroglyphic signs. Being an alchemist not a linguist, his primary interest was to identify the phonetic value and meaning of hieroglyphic signs with the aim of accessing the ancient Egyptian scientific knowledge inscribed in hieroglyphs.

"By comparing Ibn Wahshiyah's conclusions with those in current books on Egyptian Language, I was able to assess his accuracy in understanding hieroglyphic signs," says Dr El Daly.

"In particular I looked at the Egyptian Grammar of Sir Alan Gardiner which has a sign list at the end, it revealed that Ibn Wahshiyah understood perfectly well the nature of Egyptian hieroglyphs."

Dr El Daly added: "Western culture misinterprets Islam because we think teaching before the Quran is shunned, which isn't the case. They valued history and assumed that Egypt was a land of science and wisdom and as such they wanted to learn their language to have access to such vast knowledge.

"Critically they did not, unlike the West, write history to fit with the religious ideas of the time, which makes their accounts more reliable. They were also keen on the universality of human history based on the unity of the origin of human beings and the diversity of their appearance and languages. Furthermore, there are likely to be many hidden manuscripts dotted round the world that could make a significant contribution to our understanding of the ancient world.

Adapted from materials provided by University College London published by ScienceDaily


  Category: Featured, Middle East, Nature & Science
  Topics: Islam And Science  Values: Contentment
Views: 11701

Related Suggestions

 
COMMENTS DISCLAIMER & RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Older Comments:
SHAHIDA FROM U.S.A said:
Reply to SM Farhad's comment.

We are doing our best but the MEDIA is theirs
2009-05-27

SM FARHAD FROM INDIA said:
Though muslims did great works in past, this information too is being provided by europians. What we,the Muslims of today, are doing?
2009-05-25

ROBERT MULCAHY FROM CANADA said:
Islam and Muslims are already reviving. History of Islam had played the key role in that process. Like Uri Avenery, the Jewish intellectual has rightly said, every Arab child is reading the past, it is in the interest of Israel and Jews to make peace now with Arabs with dignity. Tomorrow, the wheels could turn, and the repetition of what happened with crusaders will be obvious. Muslims are very lucky to have their glorious past and they must enlighten their children of the greatest civilization the mankind witnessed. We are from the past, we live in current, and we will decorate our future with the past.

2009-05-23

MAYA V FROM AK said:
Response to Romesh Chander:
I'm happy to see that you admit Muslims had glorious past. Now you should see that it was a time when Muslims were governed more by Islam. Second, during the last couple of centuries Muslim lands were conquered, occupied and there were delibrate efforts to destroy their culture and advancement. Even the medium by which they were taught and communicated was replaced by foreign languages. This will have its own effect. When the dummy Muslim leaders will be replaced the results will follow.

But you have a good point which I agree, instead of being lost in the past glory, Muslims should work on the present realities.

Just to ask you a counter question, what is that your race or religion contributed to the modern world?
2009-05-22

NURAINI FROM MALAYSIA said:
So Romesh, and what is wrong with uncovering historical facts? Why is it exciting when any other historical piece is discovered that changes the current view of history, and yet whenever the exact same thing is discovered, but about the Islamic civilisation, this somehow means Muslims only look backward? Does that mean that Chinese archaeologists uncovering new ruins are re-living in their past?

So the Arab nations these days underfund R&D, it is not then surprising that the discoveries are few. Africa also underfunds R&D, hardly anything comes out of there either, but I'm always interested in the historical findings of their past golden ages, because it is so unexpected and enlightening. Also there are discoveries made by Muslims, albeit those in foreign universities - they are just presented as discoveries, not 'discoveries by Muslims'. Clearly you do not read science publications, but I am a science professional and do know of the existence of such research findings just from my recreational reading.
2009-05-22

ROMESH CHANDER FROM USA said:
As usual, Arabs / muslims love to live in the Glorious Past, not in the present or future.

What is recent contributions of muslims / Arabs in any subject, scientific or non-scientific.

The world does not stay static; it progresses into the future.
2009-05-21