For that reason, we ordained for the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul for other than murder or spreading corruption in the land, it is as if he has killed the whole of humanity... Qur'an 5:35
One of the gravest charges levied against Islam, in terms of its alleged antipathy towards women, is the claim that it encourages a phenomenon known as honor killings. This un-Islamic practice consists of the murder of female family members who are seen as dishonoring their families through real or perceived acts of indiscretion, such as premarital sexual relations or unapproved dating.
The practice of honor killings has absolutely no sanction in the Qur'an, the Prophetic practice, or in the evolved systems of Islamic law. In the case of fornication or adultery, the only way a charge can be levied against an individual, male or female, is through confession, which is discouraged, or by four people actually witnessing the male organ penetrating the female. Even if four people witnessed a naked man engaged with a naked woman, but could not actually testify that they witnessed penetration, their testimony would be rejected.
In a somewhat related issue, it should be noted that in three of the four Sunni schools of law, as is the case with all of the major Shiite schools, pregnancy is not a proof of fornication, as the possibility of rape exists in such a case. Therefore, if a single woman were to become pregnant, according to the overwhelming majority of Islamic jurists, there is no basis for punishing her. In the few well-publicized instances where a pregnant woman has been threatened with death, the minority opinion of the Maliki School of law was unjustly evoked, as occurred in Nigeria, or criminal malfeasance occurred as is the case in Pakistan.
In the case of dating, there is no Islamically-mandated punishment for a male or a female seeing a member of the opposite sex against the wishes of their families. Such situations should be handled with counseling, compassion and a healthy dose of common sense. Muslim immigrants who have migrated to the West should realize that they have placed their children in an environment where there is a tremendous amount of anti-Islamic peer pressure. This is especially true if they have placed their children, as was the case of the young lady who was recently murdered in Canada, in public schools. Children who succumb to that pressure should not be seen as "bad" kids, for by the standards of the society that has shaped them, no matter how strong their home environment is, they are normal. To kill a female guilty of an offense such as dating or dressing like her peers under such circumstances is nothing short of cold-blooded murder, and no Islamic authority can argue otherwise.
The overwhelming majority of Muslim societies are free from the practice of honor killing, although it does endure in some parts of the Middle East and South Asia. According to statistics released by the United Nations in 2000 there are approximately 5,000 deaths annually from "honor" killings. Even if one killing occurred due to such barbarity, it would be one too many, as the Qur'an emphasizes.
However, to use the existence of such killings to smear Islam shows the desperation and misplaced priorities of many of those levying such attacks. Most of those deaths are the pathetic acts of sick individuals, who are far removed from the letter, as we have shown above, and the spirit of Islam. An example of such an individual is Muhammad Riaz, a British Muslim of South Asian descent who died as a result of a fire he set to burn to death his wife and four daughters, allegedly because his wife resisted his attempt to arrange marriages for his daughters. His wife and daughters did perish in that fire. To present Riaz, whose daughters had neither fornicated nor dated, as anything other than a sick individual is a sad attempt to defame Islam.
To attack Islam from this angle is a case of misplaced priorities because it can distract attention from far graver abuses of women that demand immediate redress. For example, the State Department estimates that approximately 800,000 women and girls are trafficked as sexual slaves annually. The overwhelming majority of these females are taken from and sent to nominally Christian countries.
Over the last five years well over one thousand women have been kidnapped and then gruesomely murdered in Guatemala. Their bodies usually turn up after a few days, mutilated and in some instances with messages such as "death to bitches" written on them. To date only three men have been incarcerated in connection with those attacks. Would it proper for us to infer from that situation the conclusion that the "Christians" of Guatemala, an overwhelmingly Christian nation, have no regard for the suffering of their women? Of course it would not.
At the end of the day, attacks such as the one that resulted in the death of Aqsa Parvez are acts of domestic violence resulting from rage that emanates from a total neglect of Islamic teachings. Ms. Parvez lost her life due to such violence and perhaps there are a few other instances where Muslims women in Canada or here in the United States, have been similarly victimized. However, these instances should be kept in perspective. In the United States there are approximately 1,200 women killed every year by their husbands or intimate partners. There are other "Christian" nations where murders of this type are even higher.
The United States, Guatemala, and other countries we could mention where similar abuses occur are Christian nations. However, it would be disingenuous to use such statistics as an indictment against Christianity. These issues are an affront to humanity and require our collective attention. Until we all view the problem this way, we are in jeopardizing the health and integrity of our society.
Saying this is not to minimize the gravity of so-called honor killings to the extent that they do occur in Muslim societies. As Muslims, we are commanded to be committed to justice. That commitment entails that as a community we oppose in the strongest terms "honor" killings and take immediate action to end such a practice in our communities.
Practical steps include the following:
1. Emphasize that such killings have no sanction in the Qur'an, the Prophetic practice, or in Islamic law.
2. Declare anyone guilty of involvement in honor killings to be a cold-blooded murderer.
3. Encourage judicial authorities to enact the harshest penalties possible for anyone accused of involvement in such killings.
4. Educate our Muslim communities, especially in the West, about the un-Islamic nature of honor killings, and the pressures, nuances, challenges and complications facing young Muslims, male and female in the West.
5. Work to eliminate the double standards, and to expose the hypocrisy that exist in our communities, generally, concerning attitudes and standards relating to the indiscretions of males as opposed to females.
In conclusion, Islam honors the female, and values femininity. It is up to every Muslim to translate teachings in that regard into a beautiful reality that helps to elevate the status of women in all societies. Honor killings, domestic violence in general, murders of the type terrorizing women in Guatemala, female sexual slavery and trafficking, pornography, especially its more violent manifestations, are all crimes against humanity that we should oppose in the strongest terms and work strenuously to eliminate. If our women are not safe, psychically, emotionally, spiritually, or psychologically we are all at risk, for without women men are incomplete, and without men women are incomplete. Our Prophet, peace and blessings of God upon him alluded to this complementariness when he said, peace upon him, "Women are the complimenting halves of men." Let us all work harder to make our societies whole.
Topics: Crime And Justice, Family, Honor Killing
i ready your whole article, very well and nicely
written but i have a query brother and i will be
very thankful to you if you can solve it.
A Hadith of Nabi Kareem (SAW):
"Don't take Quran in Mushrikeen's land otherwise
Me(Nabi kareem S.A.W) and My Allah are free from
Meaning of this hadith in Tasfeers book by Ulimah
is that "Don't settle in Mushriken's land"
When you have settled in Mushriken Land and Allah
and His Profet is free from you then why to make
a such long debate.
Remember, Islam is what the religion teaches, not what 'muslims' practise unfortunately!
Pakistan and perhaps Afghanistan. The problem
goes much farther, however, and seems to be a
serious issue in India as well.
In India, for example, more than 5,000 brides die
annually because their dowries are considered
insufficient, according to the United Nations
Children's Fund (UNICEF).
The Telegraph of India reports:
Not just in Punjab and Haryana, but in western
Uttar Pradesh as well, women are being put to
death if they "violate" the honour of their
family and community by marrying a person outside
her own caste, community or religion. ...
According to Aidwa, 10 per cent of murders in
Punjab and Haryana are honour killings. ... Aidwa
points out that in cases involving couples from
upper castes, there is always an effort to save
the young man. "The woman from the same caste,
however, will be killed for destroying the honour
of the family and community," the report says.
The girl's death is never reported. "It is as if
she never existed," it adds.
Honor Killing is not related to religion but it
is a cultural issue and missing of tolerance
which is taught by religion.
Although a character like you doesn't merit a response, this will probably my first and last response to you.
Before you comment on my intellectual level, go to kindergarten to learn basic reading first. Perhaps your brain didn't enable you to read my argument that those who do honor killing are not Muslims at all. They may have Muslim names are or citizens of so-called Muslim countries. So I need no defend them. Secondly, how many non-Muslims are involved in honor-killing? Didn't it register in your head the mention of the fact in my comments that in India, mostly Hindus and a small number of other non-Muslims in Punjab, kill / abort their female fetuses in the number of approximately 2 million every year. Isn't it worse than honor killing? In honor killing, although it can't be supported, someone is killed to defend a family's honor. But, what honor do you defend by killing innocent unborn female children? And, the number is obviously 100 times more than honor killing
Romesh, as more and more of your deviant mind is coming to light, people are simply ignoring you. People are also laughing about your comments on the New York subway incident. That's why my note was to Kris of Malaysia. I would often wonder why IslamiCity continues to post your articles. Now I understand your nuisance value. You continue to amuse many of us and make us understand the evil better.
So while not replying on all the 5 questions and points that I raised earlier, as usual you leapfrogged to other issues.
Yaa, Brother Sagar. It's so surprising isn't it. Romesh, a renowned atheist or probably a no. 1 devout of Godless belief continues his obsession, I did remember him mentioning wanting to visit a Pagan website. It reminds me of the story of the fox and the grapes.
I'll writ more later. Wassalam Brother Sagar.
I am asking you to state the source of the Islamic text which sanction honour killings. Look, the burden is on you, and I am not amused at all when you mention that honour killings is practice in Malaysia. Where did you get this nonsense ? Okay, quote me proof then. If the statistics from the Malaysian police or reports are not convincing to you, then get the source from Amnesty International Malaysia. That is a very independent body and they will tell you THERE IS NO HONOUR KILLING IN MALAYSIA. And I am not flinching from my demand, I insist that you quote the source of Islamic law that sanctions honour killing.
Yaa, fine you admitted that you are not an Islamic scholar thus by your admission, do not have any audacity of claiming that it is an Islamic practice. And your background are unmeritous at all to mmention that my arguments are not convincing. Since you are not an Islamic scholar, you are not in a position to give judgments on my line of arguments.
It is you rather, Dear Romesh, that has always blowing your top, trying to seize the slightest opportunity to smear Islam. Did the atheist dictators killed their own relatives ? Why don't you do a little research on how Hitler's niece actually died. And there are dictators who ordered the entire family of own relatives to be killed. And that speaks for all atheist dictators past and present, their brutality konws no limits.
You write "If you read Quran, there is mention of such characters - whose main job is to create Fitnah (trouble-shooting and causing strife). Actually, the brutal practice of honor killing may have crept into some tribes with Muslim names from atheistic and idol-worshipping religion such as Hinduism.".
Fantastic. If you cannot defend any of your misdeeds, then just blame everything on the Hindus, athiests, and even Crusaders, Jews & Zionists. I wonder if 'Honour Killings' is the only thing they learned from Hindus?. Could they not learn something better? How many athiests & Hindus are killing their daugthers and sisters? I am quite impressed by your intellectual level.
to protect the family honor and I guessed it would be practiced by families who feel very strongly about their moral reputation and respect in the community.When the morality and reputation of a family is threatened by the acts of one of its member some family member will react with anger and in most cases this will end in murder. It is not practiced only among Muslims in fact recently in Canada there have been two cases of Sikh families murdering their daughters.One family even tracked their daughter to India and had her murdered.
Don't waste your time on a pathologically deranged character such as Ramesh Chander. I advised earlier to ignore such a mentally corrupt individual. Don't you realize that if he didn't like this website he would stop visiting IslamiCity. Yet he does and makes provocative remarks. If you read Quran, there is mention of such characters - whose main job is to create Fitnah (trouble-shooting and causing strife). Actually, the brutal practice of honor killing may have crept into some tribes with Muslim names from atheistic and idol-worshipping religion such as Hinduism. This Ramesh character pretends not to know that just having a Muslim name doesn't make one Muslim. One who practices non-Islamic cults may have a Muslim name or live in so-called Muslim countries, but actually isn't a Muslim by faith. In India, even today, 2 million foetuses are aborted every year when they are diagnosed female. This was also the practice in pre-Islamic Arab tribes where young female children (often infants) were buried alive. Isn't it worse than honor killing? Tactfully, Ramesh Chander doesn't mention this as if this didn't / doesn't happen anywhere.
We are talking about Honour Killing which is done by close relatives of the victim. I don't think Hitler killed any of his relatives and neither did Stalin killed any of his relatives (sorry, communist party members were not his relatives). So, stop comparing apples with oranges.
If Honour Killing is a tribal custom, then why it has come to UK/Canada/Holland; no entire tribes move to the western countries. So, the source must be elsewhere.
Is Honour Killing an Islamic practice? I don't know, I am not an islamic scholar. But it is practised by Muslims, the followers of Islam. What is the source of the knowledge for Honour Killings. Moreover, it is practised in about all the muslim countries (including advanced countries like Malyasia). But I doubt that it is practised by Muslims in China and Russia (they have very tough laws against murder).
Frankly, Kris, you have never been convincing in your arguments; you always try to defend an indefensible position.
In your earlier post ( Romesh ) you wrote " How and where did Muslims picked this concept when the rest of the world missed it "
Killings and barbaric murders happens everywhere. Did Hitler picked up the ideas of the " final solutions to the Jewish question " from the bible ? Surely he did not. Yaa, what about Stalin, Romesh atheist comrades. He's an atheist, I suppose he picked up the idea of obliterating his own people from his Godless beliefs. And on the same account, Mao Tze Tung also did just that, he picked up the idea of brutally eliminating his own people who were oppossed to his destructive cultural revolution from his Godless beliefs too, atheists like him are just like that. Infact they killed more people than anyone else.
As part of the freedom of the press, Romesh and Kam have no right to dictate to IslamiCity on what they should or should not publish. Freedom of the media means the Editorial decides what to publish and I suppose they have their own sets of considerations. For instances, after doing my Masters in law, I applied to my previous university in the U.K for permission to send a supplementary of my masters thesis to a known global media corporation ( I won't mention identity out of respect for their media independence ) for purpose of publishing it as an article. The Editors decided to publish it and I respect their decision. I don't sulked and yelled a cry baby, by accusing them of anything. That's part of press freedom.
My message to you Romesh is that you can't force any website to publish any article and condemns it for not doing so. Is that not part of the press freedom ? In regards to " honour killings " again I am challenging Kam and Romesh to reply to the five questions that I put forth before them. If you can't, then please don't have any audacity to say any further.
If that is so, then I wish to challenge those claimants that honour killings are Islamic practices, I pose them these few questions :
(1) On which particular source of the Islamic texts has it ever sanction " honour killings " ?
(2) when did these practices began, isn't it not a pre Islamic belief ?
(3) Didn't Islam value life, the duties of a Muslim to his own brother Muslims, his neighbours, relatives, have these not been explicitly mentioned in the Quran,
(4) the articles by Farukkh Salem in Pakistan Times, whatever it is, Farukkh Salem's opinion is not a source of Islamic law, yes, these " honour killings " happened but just because one sorry and pathetic looking atheist read it, such opinion doesn't become part of Islamic law,
(5) And to Kam and Romesh, the fact that IslamiCity doesn't or hasn't publish Farukkh Salem's article, that is within their right. What can't you understand what happens in the Editorial Boardrooom, before publishing anything, the editors will have to consider whether or not they have the permission of the writer or whoever is holding copyright to do so. Otherwise publishing the whole article might contravene the legal provisions on copyright, why can't Kam and Romesh understand that ?! Since law is my discipline, and my line of work, I understand the consequences better than any layman. It's that simple.
Don't just jump mad as usual Romesh, or Kam and started pointing accusations at IslamiCity.
Why should it take such a long time to understand such a simple truth?
I read that article by Farrukh Saleem in the DailyTimes of Pakistan. That is exactly what I talked about in my first postings without giving any statistics (as given by Saleem). Yes, Denial is not Option. Time for Denial is long gone.
What bothers me is that if IslamCity is really interested in discussing the issues, then why it does not publish that article by Farrukh Saleem? But it won't publish it; rather it publishes an apologia by Zaid Shakur. It seems to me that, IslamCity wants no criticism of muslim society (probably that is what the benefactors of this website want). If that is true, then what is the purpose of this website?.
Yes, Denial is an option of IslamCity. It has been practising it for years.
Sorry being tough. But, hey, it is time to call a spade a spade, only if IslamCity will publish this note from me; they have so far not published another one I sent on this subject. And I have serious doubts that it will publish.
I you want to know a bit about 'Honour Killings" in Islamic world, read the column by Farukh Saleem a highly reputed Economist and Columnist from Pakistan. here are the links:
Truth and denial --Farrukh Saleem
Dec19, 2007 Dailytimes
There are laways apologists for any kinfd of crime in every society and religion!
Any society that allows a families enemy to put a knife to the throats of the women folk with nothing more than a rumor is a society that deserves to die out. Where I grew up, if someone started a rumor like that we tracked them down and dealt with them. This is something I once reminded one of my sisters boy friends of with an ax. (before they went on a date)
In a Muslim country I would expect the family to track the accuser down and force them to either produce their proof or take their 100 lases. It shouldn't take too many people receiving 100 lases before the rumor mill dried up. And I don't mean just the originator of the rumor, I mean all who repeat the rumor.
Now just ask why they happen among muslims of very different backgrounds and countries? There must be some common link which makes people commit honour killings when they have so divergent backgrounds. Could somebody tell me that common link? Why it does not happen among Jews, Christians, Buddhists, natives of South America and even in non-muslim Africa? How and Where did muslims pick this concept but was missed by the rest of the world?