Does Bin Laden hate liberal America?


Demagoguery Posing as Scholarship

Dinesh D'Souza, a fellow at the conservative Hoover Institution at Stanford University, has raised a ruckus in his new book The Enemy at Home. In the book, he contends that the 9/11 attackers were motivated by neither U.S. foreign policy abroad nor by a hatred of U.S. freedom, as President Bush has repeatedly argued. Instead, D'Souza declares that Osama bin Laden hates the liberal U.S. culture that promotes contraception, abortion, and homosexuality. In a recent op-ed piece in the Washington Post defending the book, D'Souza says that he doesn't "hate America." No, he just hates liberal America and is reprehensibly trying to use the horrible 9/11 attacks to score points against the Democrats of the left.

D'Souza is not the first person to try to turn the 9/11 attacks to his advantage. President Bush disingenuously tied them to Saddam Hussein and invaded Iraq. In fact, D'Souza is not even the first person on the right to try to pin the blame for 9/11 on the left. Jerry Falwell blamed gays, pagans, and the ACLU for the attacks. Although D'Souza seems horrified to have been compared with Falwell, they both end up at the same place. Falwell argued that God was punishing the United States for the activities of these liberal groups, and D'Souza argues that bin Laden has been enraged by American liberal groups' overseas distribution of contraceptives and lobbying of non-Western countries to liberalize laws against homosexuality and abortion. Although Falwell's explanation is religious and D'Souza's is more secular, they both blame the left. Because D'Souza is a fellow at the Hoover Institution, however, he claims that he is not an "unqualified right-wing hack."

But D'Souza's qualifications for commenting on the causes of 9/11 are suspect. D'Souza's biography on the Hoover Institution's website indicates no scholarship expertise in fundamentalist Islam. In fact, D'Souza's biography indicates no expertise on terrorism, foreign affairs, or national security policy. His Hoover Institution biography lists his expertise as follows: "Social and individual responsibility, civil rights and affirmative action, economics and society, higher education." All previous books he has authored are on domestic subjects, and he was a senior domestic policy analyst at the White House during the Reagan administration. Academically, he earned a B.A. in English. After 9/11, everyone wants to be a foreign policy expert.

As a result of minimal credentials in the fields about which he is speaking, D'Souza, unsurprisingly, gets it wrong on the causes of 9/11. D'Souza writes in the Washington Post:

Contrary to the common liberal view, I don't believe that the 9/11 attacks were payback for U.S. foreign policy. Bin Laden isn't upset because there are U.S. troops in Mecca, as liberals are fond of saying. (There are no U.S. troops in Mecca.) He isn't upset because Washington is allied with despotic regimes in the region. Israel aside, what other regimes are there in the Middle East? It isn't all about Israel. (Why hasn't al-Qaeda launched a single attack against Israel?) The thrust of the radical Muslim critique of America is that Islam is under attack from the global forces of atheism and immorality-and that the United States is leading that attack.

To evaluate D'Souza's view, an examination is needed of bin Laden's original motives for undertaking his war against the United States. Most terrorism experts-not just liberals-have concluded that bin Laden's original motive for attacking the United States was seeing non-Muslim U.S. forces in the Islamic holy land of Saudi Arabia when he arrived back there after fighting the "infidel" Soviet occupiers in Afghanistan. In the Islamic world, it is the duty of every Muslim to do what he or she can to help evict non-Muslim occupiers from Muslim lands. This is what fuels Muslim resistance in Chechnya, Palestine, Afghanistan (both against Soviet and American occupiers), and Iraq. In fact, exhaustive empirical research on suicide terrorism by Robert Pape, a national security expert at the University of Chicago (hardly a bastion of liberalism), indicates that suicide terrorism has much less to do with religion than it does with the "nationalist" impulse to evict foreign occupiers from the homeland. Pape's research shows that al Qaeda's activities fall into this category because the group wants to evict the U.S. military presence from the Persian Gulf.

In addition, bin Laden's other original motive for attacking the United States was its support for despotic, corrupt regimes in the Middle East. Just because there are many of them there doesn't mean that this was not one of his prime motivators. His greatest hatred is for the autocratic government in his home country-Saudi Arabia. D'Souza, however, is right that bin Laden was not originally motivated to attack the United States because of its support for Israel. This justification was added later merely to gain more support for bin Laden's cause in the Arab world.

In addition to most expert opinion, based on bin Laden's original writings, and Pape's empirical research, repeated public opinion polls in the Arab/Islamic world discredit D'Souza's unsubstantiated musings. Those polls indicate that people in Islamic countries like U.S. technology, political and economic freedom, and even culture (which polls high even in Iran). The numbers start going south only when U.S. foreign policy toward the Islamic world is mentioned. As D'Souza even admits, the opinions of the Islamic mainstream are important because it has been the traditional recruiting pool for Muslim extremists.

Since D'Souza has few qualifications in the field and has little empirical data or expert opinion on his side, one has to conclude that he is, in fact, a political hack in scholar's clothing, who is exploiting 9/11 merely to pillory his political opponents. His demagogic bloviation, like that of Falwell and Bush, is dangerous because it obfuscates the demonstrated link between interventionist U.S. foreign policy and blowback terrorism and lets politicians and pundits avoid the most obvious solution: a more humble U.S. foreign policy.

Ivan Eland is the Director of the Center on Peace and Liberty at the Independent Institute in Oakland, California and author of the book, Putting "Defense" Back into U.S. Defense Policy: Rethinking U.S. Security in the Post-Cold War World.

New from Ivan Eland!
THE EMPIRE HAS NO CLOTHES: U.S. Foreign Policy Exposed

Most Americans don't think of their government as an empire, but in fact the United States has been steadily expanding its control of overseas territories since the turn of the twentieth century. In The Empire Has No Clothes, Ivan Eland, a leading expert on U.S. defense policy and national security, examines American military interventions around the world from the Spanish-American War to the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Buy It Today >>


  Category: Americas, Faith & Spirituality
  Topics: Christianity, George W. Bush, Osama Bin Laden
Views: 3577

Related Suggestions

 
COMMENTS DISCLAIMER & RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Older Comments:
CEDRIC FROM KUWAIT said:
Mr. D'Souza knows what he is saying. I am currently stationed overeas. I can and will speak up and speak the truth. People are tired of the American culture. Hollywood and the media has been getting away with bad things for too long. They are brain washing our youth, and insulting us adults overseas. The government needs to hold accountability on those individuals. That we trust on television.
()

YOHAN DAHAL FROM BHUTAN said:
... D'Souza declares that Osama bin Laden hates the liberal U.S. culture that promotes contraception, abortion, and homosexuality.

I wonder why witchcraft is excluded in the list. If the hatred is on this line, I too synpathise with reverend OBL. The influence of great America should be to build on good morals, not to currupt the divine institutions of God. God punish those who make light of His Holy standards.....

But I wonder why the Mohammedans hate Zionist State. They will get the hand of only their psychophants in their endeavours. Zionist state is a Divine Will...
()

ZINEDINE FROM MOROCCO said:


You don't have to be an expert of international politics so just use common sense & you will have no doubt that the majority of non-Americans hate America for its bloody Zionist controlled Govs for one simple fact their evil and multiple standards foreign policy!
Romesh Chander you paraphrased my line from past comments: If OBL wanted to attack liberalism and immorality, he would have attacked the red light district in Amsterdam and the city of lights, cabarets & le Moulin Rouge Paris.

()

NA FROM US said:
If he does can you blame him, along with others
what US and the Zionist State are doing to destroy the Middle East and its poeple.
Yet, US is so ignorant in this matter.
()

MOHAMMAD FROM CANADA said:
Of course his analysis is not valid, Islamist's disagreement with the west in general and USA in particular can be divided in two categories; Primary, such as Palestine, Support of despotic regimes, Forces on holy lands, Economic manipulations etc and Secondly, the unabated hedonistic tendencies of western culture. Second category always plays as a justification for the first category but it is never an impetus for action. OBL, I doubted, ever differentiated between liberal and conservative, left or right when referring to the west in his speeches. D'souza lacks qualification and understanding of the majority Muslims mind set. Fact is that if your remove the primary set of reasons then you solve many of the Middle East's problems.
()

ROMESH CHANDER FROM USA said:
No, Bin Laden does not care about immorality and liberalism of America. If he did, then he should have directed planes on capitals of immorality -- Las Vegas and Hollywood, not at the Twin Towers and Defense Department and probably the Capital Hill/White house. Europe is more liberal and immoral than US; He spared the european capitals of immorality -- Amesterdam and Paris.
()

KIM FROM USA said:
When will we stop ignoring the fact that the white house has been lying to us (the american citizens and its solders) all this time.
()