Hamas` Impossible Mission

Category: World Affairs Topics: Hamas, Occupation, Palestine Views: 3040

It should be established by now that most Western governments are the least interested in honoring the decided democratic choice of the Palestinian people, which elevated to power a movement that is branded 'terrorist' by Israel, thus by much of the Western hemisphere. 

Since facts and common sense are of little concern to those who hastily decided to withhold badly needed funds to support the battered economy of the Occupied Territories, there would be no need to once again marvel at the rhetorical inconsistencies of the Bush Administration and of the European Union. 

So what if Hamas has adhered to a virtually unilateral ceasefire for over a year, while Israel did not? So what if the newly formed government has given ample evidence that it is keenly interested in dialogue, not violence? So what if the majority of the Palestinian people have adamantly and repeatedly -- according to recent public opinion polls -- expressed their interest in a negotiated settlement with Israel? Indeed, so many "so whats" that hardly matter now, since it is quite clear that the US and the EU's real intentions are to topple the Palestinian government, along with the sham of a doctrine which claims that democratizing the Arabs is the ultimate policy objective of Bush and Blair. 

Seeing ample empirical evidence that supports such a claim, one has to wonder what the remaining options are for the Palestinian government. Unfortunately, there are not many, and none of them are trouble-free. 

The coordinated financial and diplomatic boycott, led by the US, which was demanded by Israel, makes it impossible for the Palestinian government to pay the salaries of some 150,000 government employees. Even Arab banks could be punished if they agreed to transfer funds to the Palestinians, according to US terror laws. The Palestinian government is, naturally, desperate to secure whatever meager funds from alternative sources. 

Concurrently, the word is out that disgruntled Fatah members -- whose party has dominated the political scene for many years until they were cast aside last January by Palestinian voters, fed up with corruption and nepotism -- are planning to stage wide protests demanding salaries and government services. Early signs of such disorder have been plentiful in recent weeks. Moreover, former PA government advisors - now posing as independent 'experts' with newly forged think-tanks - sound as eager to maintain a financial stranglehold on the new government as any pro-Israeli analyst in a Washington-based neoconservative think-tank. 

It's now politics at work; forget about a "just solution" to the conflict, "peace" and "democracy" and all other ornamental phrases. What's at play here is politics, and dirty politics at that: any Palestinian government or leader, democratically elected or not, that fails to perform according to a specified role and insists on addressing the central elements of the conflict, must be fought, branded and discarded, no matter how pragmatic his argument may be. 

Former Palestinian Authority President Yassir Arafat was caged in the basement of his battered offices in the West Bank town of Ramallah for years, for simply failing to read his assigned lines. The lapel of his jacket was decorated not only with the flag of Palestine, but that of Israel as well. He condemned terrorism, shut down Palestinian charities, imprisoned militant and political leaders, but was still deemed "irrelevant" and was literally imprisoned until a mysterious illness and death set him free. He would call Israeli leaders "my brothers", "my partners", he would condemn attacks on Israeli civilians and often neglected to even address attacks on Palestinian civilians, yet he was told that all was not enough. "Arafat must condemn Palestinian terrorism in Arabic," US officials and pundits parroted. He did. That too did not suffice. "He must follow his words with deeds," they further instructed, but without calling on Israel to free him to achieve such a mission. 

He was humiliated, physically confined and completely stripped of any tangible powers, and yet he was expected to ensure Israel's security while in his shackles. He was expected to do the impossible, and naturally he failed. 

History has an odd and often ironic way of repeating itself. The same conditions are now being imposed on Hamas, who would, predictably have to do more to prove to be seen as a legitimate partner in a peace process that doesn't exist and was not meant to exist. The US is now backing Fatah, which was much more "flexible" and ready to sign and initial with the slightest wink, yet, it was too "no peace partner", according to Israel, and of course the US.

Undoubtedly, Washington has no constructive foreign policy of its own regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and is itself following an Israeli script, one that will deem any Palestinian leadership "terrorist", "irrelevant" and "no peace partner", even if the entire Palestinian leadership was made of vegetarian, pacifist, Mother Teresa incarnates. That's all beside the point. All Israel is striving for is time: to consolidate its strong hold over occupied Jerusalem, to conclude the construction of its illegal Apartheid Wall built mostly on Palestinian land and to demarcate its own borders, which also happen to fall in Palestinian areas. Meanwhile, let Palestinians starve, wrangle over pathetic powers of the government and the president, and resort to Iran for financial aid. None of this is of any concern to Israel, but it provides the further proof needed to brand Palestinians incapable of governing themselves, and to make obvious the "evil" alliance between Hamas and Iran - which in turn places the Palestinian government in the anti-American camp. 

It's unfortunate indeed that the EU has agreed to participate in this charade, betraying the trust of most Palestinians who have always seen Europe as different from the US, believing that their foreign policies have not yet been fully hijacked by pro-Israeli lobbies, and so forth. All of this is faltering will likely push the Palestinian government, willingly or not, toward a more detrimental and extremist political line, because mere survival - neither pragmatism nor a shadowy peace -- is now its ultimate objective.

Veteran Arab American journalist Ramzy Baroud teaches mass communication at Australia's Curtin University of Technology, Malaysia Campus. His most recent book is entitled, Writings on the Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People's Struggle (Pluto Press, London.) He is also the editor-in-chief of the Palestine Chronicle online newspaper.

  Category: World Affairs
  Topics: Hamas, Occupation, Palestine
Views: 3040

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
Romesh, for the person that lost a son/daughter,a spouse or a father/mother, the loss is qualitative rather than quantitative. I rather have my son with me, than me enjoying freedom on his expense,especially when no foreign troops are marching in Nathan Philip Square(downdown Toronto). To fly across the world to bomb a people we don't know? It's just insane. But in Bush's case this war is driven by other motives than defending the country. If you can't see that Romesh, I must admit I over-appreciated you.
Peace out!

Romesh Chander! You sound much more intelligent since you refrain yourself from Islamophobic slurs. I really appreciated this comment and a couple more that you posted lately. I begin to believe that you are a reasonable person afterall. Not everything you say is pleasant but at least it's true and that serves the purpose. Good work, Romesh.

To Hudd:

As of now, US has lost 2400 soldiers in Iraq. Well, compared to Vietnam, that is nothing. 800 soldiers per year!!. In 2nd world war, US used to lose thousands in one day and they still kept on sending more soldiers to the battlefield. Remember, it is war; and in war, soldiers die.

Any nation which refuses to sacrifice blood of its young, will not win the war. As US seems not to like to sacrifice the blood of its young, I doubt it will win the war (or achieve any of the objectives).

M. EL FROM US said:
What Isreal and the west want is for Hamas to collapse. Since it is a Democratic Government it is best to be fought against by its own people, Fatah. What they want is a civil war while buying time to build the barrier, setting borders, and fortification of Isreal. The goal is to make Jerusalem capitol of Isreal and build the 3rd temple on the site of the Al-Aqsa mosque. For this all the preparations have been made, including the structural and ceremonial elements. A good book to read about this is FORCING GOD'S HAND by Grace Halsell. It is matter of money and the right timing. It is a project that is being worked on in churches in the US. While Arab states watch this prophecy will unfold, maybe within the next 10 years or maybe sooner.

Foreign policy deals with Protection of Interests of Your Own Country; it is never intended to be even-handed or fair. It is all based on perception at a particular time. Currently, US feels that its interests lie in NOT recognizing or helping Hamas; and that is what US is pursuing at this time. Of course, a leter administration may find that policy to be wrong and may reverse it or continue with the same policy.

During Cold war, US foreign policy had one objective -- anti-communism. So, US supported dictatorial regimes as long as they were ant-communist. As soon the communist receded, US dumped them; that is a fact of life, which people have to get used to it.

A foreign policy which is perceived to be 'correct' today may turn out to be disasterous in a few years; but that is what life is all about; you may mistakes, you may even lose your country. Ottomans supported Germans who got defeated; Ottoman empire got wiped out. USSR attacked Afghanistan, and USSR disintegrated. US attacked Iraq; it has made the entire world its enemy -- nobody supports US in Iraq, and US will pay for its consequences in a few year. And these are the consequences of its foreign policy.

Yes, foreign policy is never even-handed.

NorthernStar, keep on counting the bodies shipped out of the Middle East to be repatriated in USA. When USA fought Hitler's army the whole good world joined. Who joined in the war on terrorism? Can that be compared with D-day? Your statements are ridiculously stupid. You compare Hitler to the Muslims? Are you suffering of withdrawal syndrome? Don't do it abruptly, that's your problem, withdrawing from cocaine must be done gradually. Now take a deep breath and say "wooza" rubbing the lobes of your both ears between index and thumb! Did you do that? Good boy, keep it up. The process is said to work. Good luck and speedy recovery! If this fails you, there are always specialized asylums, I hope you could afford the fees. You don't live in Canada, here it would be free, but hey you have to finance Bush's military adventures.
Peace out!

Azhar...Your apparently haven't read my comments closely. Then world recognizes that Hamas won fair and square, but the West is under no obligation to respect a government run by Islamic extremists anymore than Germany's Third Reich under the Palestinians' ally Adolf Hitler. If you Muslims demand that the West respects Hamas, then you should obligate yourselves to respecting George Bush. Dump your double standards, otherwise don't expect us to care about your constant whinings.

US must change it's foreign policy to be equal.
The Hamas group and other Islamic groups are labeled terrorist by US and Israeli. US and Israeli both had a terrorist group operating in the Middle East and other parts of World.
The world is mislead by these Jews, the world can't be blind forever.


You apparently don't read history. Israel govtstarted off as a terrorist organization. If the world can recognize Israel's govet then, I don't see why Hamas cannot be given the same chance. Since their election, there have been no violence from Hamas. Their claim is pretty legitimate: For thhem to recognize Israel, Isarel has tomove back to 67 borders with no strings attached.

Very correct assessment and truthful commentary.
I always look in Quran and Sunnah/Hadeeth for answers which gives guidance to Muslameen/ Believers (in Him and His Messengers/Prophets and Last Prophet) in such circumstances:

Bismillahir Rehmanir Raheem. In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
Surah 60. She That Is To Be Examined, Examining Her.
60:8. Allah forbids you not, with regard to those who fight you not for (your) Faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for Allah loveth those who are just.
60:9. Allah only forbids you, with regard to those who fight you for (your) Faith, and drive you out of your homes, and support (others) in driving you out, from turning to them (for friendship and protection). It is such as turn to them (in these circumstances), that do wrong.
60:13. O ye who believe! Turn not (for friendship) to people on whom is the Wrath of Allah, of the Hereafter they are already in despair, just as the Unbelievers are in despair about those (buried) in graves.

Here what they are doing:
Al-Baqara (The Cow)
2:11. When it is said to them: "Make not mischief on the earth," they say: "Why, we only Want to make peace!" http://www.islamicity.com/quransearch/default.asp?ref=peace&TB=

Here what they are thinking according to their
"Talmud" http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/talmudx.htm
Al-Imran(The Family of Imran)3:75
"Because they say: 'There is no blame on us to betray and take the properties of the illiterates (Arabs).' But they tell a lie against Allah while they know it." http://www.islamicity.com/mosque/quran/3.htm

Here what Allah is doing:
"They were all transgressors throughout their lands, bringing about much corruption there. Therefore, you Lord let loose on them the scourge of suffering." Al-Fajr (The Dawn) Chapter 89: Verses 11-13

I agree w/Br. Mohd Haneef Yusoff-pstd 4/28/2006 in

The US-Israel clear and direct anti-Palestinian policies and intention must be acknowledged and exposed to the international community. After 40 years of deceit and lies from Israel to prolong their illegally-acquired home, the world should not be in the negotiating or tolerance mode anymore. The UN Resolutions against Israel vetoed by the US is a clear indication that all Arabs-Muslim must be in the war mode against the illegal occupation and domination by the Jews/Zion/US pact.

On Israels deceit and lies, the simple question is: How would anyone prolong the status of illegally occupying other people's land? Continuous and diberate cheat, deceit and lies with only one obejective: non-settlement to the illegal occupation.

Unfortunately, all Arab leaders around Israel are weak socially, politically, economically, religiously and materially. The only potent force that can stop Israel-US illegal occupation and continued denial of the Palestinian rights are the mujahiddeen within Palestine and the other around the ME.

The US-Israel pact can cheat, bribe and pay the PLO, PA, Mahmoud Abbas and the likes but they can't do that to the mujahideen because the Mujahideen allegiance is to Allah, not human beings.

Democracy is a good political process, but it's not a license for evil. No one is denying that Hamas is the legitimate choice of the Palestinians anymore than Hitler was the legitimately elected leader of Germany many years ago. But just because the Palestinians made their choice fairly doesn't mean that we in the West must support it. Or do you Muslims think that you have to respect George Bush simply because he won the majority of votes in our 2004 election?