How Many Divisions Does the Pope Have?


Joseph Stalin is famously said to have asked an adviser, dismissively, "How many divisions does the Pope have?" Had the adviser possessed greater courage, he might have replied: "How many does he need?"

Observing the many government leaders gathered at the Vatican for the funeral of Pope John Paul II, we might well have suspected that the world's politico-military chieftains need what the Pope has more than the Pope needs what they have.

Governments have physical force-control over a society's most decisive means of dispensing violence. They may try to disguise this essential attribute by cloaking it in measures ostensibly for the enhancement of the people's "welfare" and "security"; they may paint its hardened, harlot face with cheery "democratic" cosmetics; but when push comes to shove, all governments fall back on their superior ability to beat, shackle, imprison, and kill those who challenge the exercise of their power.

They prefer, however, to avoid such resort to violence, because it is too obvious, too difficult to misrepresent, despite their adamant claim that war is peace when they do lash out. If they routinely smash dissidents and opponents with violence, they will be seen clearly for what they are: killers in crowns, mobsters in dark suits, white shirts, and red neckties. They would rather present themselves in a different guise-a kindlier, gentler semblance that not only proclaims their noble intentions but mollifies many of their subjects who might otherwise grow restive or even revolutionary. The rulers don't want to seem to be just the most powerful thugs in the neighborhood.

They crave legitimacy because, apart from its intrinsically gratifying character, a thief and a murderer can go farther with legitimacy than he can go without it. But how are such reprehensible human beings to acquire what, in the nature of things, they manifestly do not possess? Well, if there is guilt by association, might there also be virtue by association? The rulers think so.

Hence their appearance at John Paul's funeral. Clearly religion did not bring them: few of them even claim to be Catholic, and many belong to groups that have been at war with the Catholic Church for centuries. No, these rulers came in order to be seen in the presence of something not one of them will ever possess: genuine moral authority. They hope that by sitting beside the dead Pope's casket, some of his towering moral stature will seep onto them and make them appear to stand a little taller in the eyes of those over whom they rule and upon whom they prey.

I doubt that their ploy will succeed. The contrast between those politicians and the beloved Pope could scarcely be more striking. On the one hand, we see a man who placed his faith not in bullets and bombs but in the everlasting love of Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace. On the other hand, we see a pack of political schemers, thieves, and murderers. Christian charity stood out in bold relief when the Church permitted Tony Blair and George W. Bush to come onto the Vatican's premises. The departed Pope had more moral authority in one of his eyelashes than Mr. Blair has in his entire body, and Mr. Bush is not morally qualified to inhabit the same planet as John Paul II.

Still these politicians and all the others came to Rome; and, most important, they were seen to have come. Appearances count for something in political life-that's why so much official effort goes into creating and manipulating them. Now that the U.S. government has created a Department of Homeland Security, perhaps the next big bureaucracy will be a Department of Pretense (DOP, pronounced "dope"), to centralize all the efforts along these lines now taking place in each of the existing federal departments. One of the administration's resident spinmeisters can then be elevated to the new cabinet position, and federal grants can flow copiously to a battalion of politically well-connected contractors in the public-relations industry.

For the time being, however, we may expect the U.S. government to continue its heavy reliance on raw force in those precincts, such as Iraq, where sheer bamboozlement yields little if any payoff, notwithstanding all the hoopla surrounding the recent phony-baloney elections. Hence, the old question arises in a new form: How many divisions does Mr. Bush have? Well, evidently not enough, judging by the inability of his forces to pacify even the city of Baghdad, much less the shattered little country of Iraq. Perhaps it's time to send in the Pope.

 

Robert Higgs is Senior Fellow in Political Economy at The Independent Institute and editor of its scholarly quarterly journal, The Independent Review. He is also the author of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government and the editor of Arms, Politics and the Economy: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives.


Related posts from similar topics:


Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use any copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

  3 Comments   Comment

  1. Talha Rizvi from USA

    I am glad that IslamiCity decided to post this article by Robert Higgs. He has great insight into the essential criminal nature of the modern nation-state. It is sad to see so many people put so much hope in government to solve all their problems. I hope to see more articles by him and others from organizations like the Independent Institute.

  2. Sirius from Finland

    Though not a catholic, I was very pleased that John Paul condemned the attack to Iraq. I would like to see something like that even more. It is couraging to see church to subside those who it should have subsided across the centuries: the weak, the poor etc. Unfortunately the reality was very different, especially earlier: The clercymen were good friends with the power, with mutual interests. And far too many times this ended to sad results: the ones who were to protect the poor joined their forces with all kinds of oppressors to gain wealth etc. Nowadays I see more positive things: for example in Latin America men in robes are standing along poor farmers against the tyranny of mercyless landlords and their private armies. Many of them have been killed, so I guess they are some sort of martyrs too.

    Back to trails: I don't believe the next pontiff will change the Vatican line on this war matter. That would be heartbreaking news, not one but hundred steps backwards. And I wish the next pontiff would be a african or latin american!

    Peace

  3. Mukhlis from Hong Kong

    It has happened before in the history of the church. Tyrants have forced their candidates in the seat of the pontiff. It can happen now. This is the effort of the neocons and the killers. Spins, Public relations, public opinion & capturing it is a tool. These are devils past masters in their trade & tricks.

    Last election in US, there were two burning issues. One was war in Iraq & other gay marriages. Democrat candidate wanted to be as tough as the incumbant on Iraq & neutral on gays. Bush ceased the opportunity. He stood clear on gay marriage & surely no one could be more ruthless than he in Iraq. He won.

    He has already got "4 more years", congress, senate & US Supreme Court with up coming nominations. He is now after UN & Vetican.

    May God protect the inhabitants of this planet, other than the neocons.

    Mukhlis