Saudi Arabia - Victim of terrorism

With Australia conspicuously committed to both the "War on Terror" and the occupation of Iraq, the threat of terrorism is always in the background. It has, thankfully, always remained just that: a threat. However, on a recent visit to Saudi Arabia, I entered a society where terrorism has gone beyond merely a threat to become a reality with which every citizen and resident must, in some way, contend. 

A few weeks ago, on the evening of 29th December, 2004, rebels attacked the Interior Ministry in Riyadh with car bombs. I had been eating dinner at the time, with some Saudi friends; one of whom was the Imam of a mosque adjacent to the ministry building. Witnessing the flood of phone calls he received from family and friends, anxious to confirm he had not been harmed in the blast, it became apparent that, regardless of what might be commonly believed in the West, Saudi society is and continues to be victim of terrorism. 

The effects of the nation's struggle with domestic terrorism are visible everywhere. At times, Riyadh looks like a city under siege. There are regular checkpoints established along the city's freeways; tanks and armed vehicles sit outside government offices and 'at risk' buildings; and even a trip to a popular city shopping center requires one's car to be searched extensively for bombs. 

To untrained Western eyes, there may appear little visible difference between the fundamentalism of the Saudi population and the extremism of the terrorists. After all, both dress the same, practice similarly austere interpretations of Islam, and are concerned about similar issues, such as social justice, and American intervention in the Muslim world. However, it takes only a brief visit to a Saudi city and some conversations with a small sample of the Saudi population to see that such simplistic reasoning is far removed from reality. Without exception, the Saudi people -- regardless of their religiousness -- are repulsed by the horror that has visited their cities and consider it anathema to the faith on which they were raised and by which they live. 

Despite that, Saudi-bashing has emerged as a popular post-September 11 sport. The electronic and print media are littered with self-styled "Middle Eastern Analysts" pontificating on the cause of Saudi Arabia's problem with terrorism and its alleged role as the financial and intellectual epicenter of Islamic extremism. Although the arguments may differ in their detail, the blame is almost always leveled against the country's religious establishment, its system of Islamic education, and the role of Islam in Saudi culture. 

Such analysis is fundamentally insincere. It begins with the intended culprit of fundamentalist Islam or "Wahabism" firmly in mind, and then seeks to cobble together arguments to indict it -- regardless of how detached from reality those arguments might be. 

For instance, they argue that Saudi education system is, in part, to blame for both the domestic terrorism and September 11; the entire system must be radically reworked in order to reduce the threat of future terrorism. Although millions of Saudis passed through this same system and studied these same texts without succumbing to terrorism or extreme anti-Western sentiment, reformists argue that the religious content of these textbooks must be radically diluted. However, when contemporary textbooks are considerably less conservative in their outlook than the textbooks of thirty or forty years ago, and the problem of anti-Western terrorism is a relatively recent phenomena, it is difficult to see the casual connection between the two. 

Likewise, the Kingdom's Islamic scholars have been cast as the handmaidens of terror; portrayed as a coterie of rabidly anti-Western zealots whose strangle-hold on the country is responsible for every social and political ill. Such criticism is disingenuous as it ignores the fact that these same scholars were issuing edicts directed against al-Qaeda and terrorism in general, years before September 11. Such critics should remember that the people most capable of confronting religious extremism are these same scholars who argue using terms of reference that the extremists themselves accept. 

There is a symbiotic relationship between the extremists and Saudi Arabia's domestic and international hecklers. Each gain made by the secularists in promoting their "reforms" in Saudi society, feeds popular dissatisfaction and recruits more to extremism and terrorism; each terrorist attack is then cited by the secularists as a justification for further "reforms"; with further change begetting further terrorism. 

Domestic terrorism will not end until this vicious cycle is broken. It requires Saudi Arabia to continue its dialogue with its extremist minority, defusing their arguments and aggressively pursuing those who graduate to terrorism; but it also requires the West to realize that trying to force its own vision of change on Saudi Arabia isn't the solution, but is part of the problem. 

Amir Butler is a writer based in Melbourne, Australia.

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
I agree with you Bob - the actions of a nation state cannot be classified as being Islam. The moment we begin to realize the difference between the Islamic faith and nationalistic tendencies that do not even represent the people of the faith, is the moment we begin to differentiate between truth and falsehood.

To me, the article is disingenous. The author talks about Saudi people. Since when people in Saudi Arabia decided anything of importance?; everything is dictated by House of Saud. Saudis did not mind 'terrorism' as long as it was in other countries; they supported it with money and manpower and their brand of Salafi preaching. Now the chickens are coming home to roost. Osama may have worked for CIA, in reality he is a creation of the policies of 'House of Saud', and this House does not intend to change its policies. If the people in Saudi Arabia are not extremist, then why have they not kicked out all those imams who preach extremism in their mosques; why did not they stop going to their mosques and prayed at home?; after all, Allah is not in the mosque; Allah is everywhere. No, they loved listening to those extremist imams. It is only when those imams became a threat to the House Of Saud, did the kingdom took some action.

Sorry, Saudi Arabia is not a victim of extremism; it sponsored extremism elsewhere; now it must face its monster. As you sow, so shall you reap. You sow the wind, you reap the whirlwind.

No sympathy from for this "House Of Saud".

Islam or "Wahabism"
Is there NO such thing called ""Wahabism" - This is what has been portrayed & propaganda by the west media. I don't agreed with most of the corrupt policies of the "House Of Saud" but these are group of individuals who have been able to hold on the power by dirty political maneuvers.

Acts of individual or group can't be blamed against a FAITH OF PEACE.

It shouldnt come as a surprise that antisemetic racists and terrorists of the American and Israeli variety are ranting and raging about Saudis.
These two prinicpal propagators of terrorism shouldnt be pointing fingers. Just today I read that American soldiers in Iraq murdered a couple in front of their six children. This is terrorism pure and simple, difference being its OK to do this since those pulling the trigger were anglo-saxon war criminals working for their jewish terrorist masters.

Assalaamu Alaikum.

Amir Butler has hit the nail on its head.Islam - whether Wahhabi or Sufi; does not preach terrorism. Life is sacrosanct in every religion, so it is for Muslims. Calling Saudis in general as terrorists is a claim very much identical to Iraq's WMD. Bush & his neocon nuts know fully well that they are lying.

All societies, including Muslim countries have their own culture, ethics, & traditions. Looters and murderers can not just invade other countries to ostensibly implant American style democracy at the cost of killing hundreds of thousandds of civilians & flattening their homes.

Terrorising the weak is the current aim of the sole super power to remove imagined ghost of a risk to Israel. Side benefit is the wealth of the region.