Canadian Intelligence Looking for Team Players

Category: Americas, World Affairs Topics: Canada, Crime And Justice, Terrorism Views: 4728

"We do not target specific communities," says a Canadian intelligence officer parroting the official line, "we [including Canadian Muslims] are all on the same team in the war on terror." The agent, who was questioning one of my clients, was attempting to assuage the growing insecurity gripping the community. 

Showing up at homes and workplaces unannounced; speaking with employers; offering money and favors for "information"; intimidating and threatening newcomers; questioning about specific institutions and individuals; inquiring about a person's religiosity; and discouraging people from engaging lawyers are some of the recurring themes that I have come across from clients. The problem is so severe that the Council on American Islamic Relations (Canada) has distributed almost 30,000 Know Your Rights guides and organized 27 workshops across the country on dealing with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). 

Now, growing allegations of Canadian intelligence cooperating with foreign governments to detain and question citizens abroad.

Most recently, a sixty-two year old academic, Dr. Mahboob Khawaja, told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) that "the [Saudi] police officer told me they had no reason to arrest me. There were no charges against me here in the kingdom (of Saudi Arabia). They arrested me on a request from Canada." The Canadian citizen, currently employed at a Saudi government run college in the port city of Yanbu, was picked up shortly after the arrest of his son, Momin Khawaja, in Ottawa on terrorism charges. The twenty-four year-old software programmer's arrest on March 29th was the first under Canada's hastily drafted anti-terror laws. Saudi intelligence released the elder Khawaja after two weeks without any charges. 

Unlike Maher Arar, the Canadian citizen detained by the Americans during a September 2002 transit stop in New York and deported to Syria and allegedly tortured, Dr. Khawaja says he was not mistreated by the Saudis. But the doctor's claim that his detention was at the request of Canadians is consistent with Arar's allegation of Canadian complicity. Dr. Khawaja's eldest son, Qasim, got it right when he told the press "this is a very disturbing fact that the RCMP would go about in a manner by asking a foreign government to apprehend a Canadian on foreign soil." And as if this was not serious enough, Dr. Khawaja dropped another bombshell when he said that his interrogators informed him that they were asked by Canadian authorities to ensure that he did not contact consular staff in Riyadh in clear contravention of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. The RCMP denies the allegations and CSIS refuses to comment. 

The denial would be easier to believe if this was an isolated incident and if they had a better track record. Moreover, even former solicitor general Wayne Easter acknowledged the possibility that "rogue" elements of the RCMP may have played a role in Arar's rendition to Syria - essentially torture by proxy. Indeed, as far back as 2002, U.S. officials incredulously defended the practice as an acceptable weapon in the war on terror to the Washington Post. At the time Human Rights Watch called for an investigation into what it called a serious violation of international law.

Arar has launched separate lawsuits against American and Canadian authorities. The U.S. suit revolves around the practice of rendition and the Canadian claim alleges, among other things, that Canada was "negligent for passing on erroneous information to the American authorities that led to them believing that Mr. Arar was connected to a terrorist group."

The fact that at least seven Canadians -- Maher Arar, Abdullah AlMalki, Ahmad Abou El-Maati, Dr. Aly Hindy, Muayyad Nureddin, Helmy Elsherief, and Dr. Mahboob Khawaja -- have been detained abroad (a few of them even tortured) is problematic enough. To think that Canadian intelligence may have played a role is unacceptable and disturbing to say the least. These cases along with that of Mohammed Mansour Jabbarah, a twenty-three year old Canadian, who was repatriated to Canada after his arrest in Oman and then secretly handed over by CSIS or RCMP to waiting Americans at the border - subverting the extradition process -- raise more than enough concerns about the way our intelligence agencies operate. Granted that Jabbarah plead guilty to a whole slew of terrorism charges in a secret trial earlier this year, the fact remains that guilt or innocence is not the issue, but rather the treatment and rights of Canadians. If there is evidence then why not charge, arrest and prosecute them in Canada to the full extent of the law? 

Barbara Jackman, a lawyer specializing in national security, told a press conference recently that both agencies are trying to get around the prohibition of using security certificates to detain citizens. Indeed, why do all the hard work when you can get others to do it with less constraints? Jackman says that both agencies are "opportunistically taking advantage" of citizens traveling abroad by providing information to foreign governments. If this is the case, then in effect, Canadian intelligence has quietly adopted an indirect form of rendition -- getting foreign governments to do, in the words of Jackman, the "dirty work." 

Disturbingly, the sharing of intelligence on citizens with other countries including those that have questionable human rights records has been a recurring theme over the years. In fact, Michel Juneau-Katsuya, a former CSIS agent, has gone on the record a number of times with this very claim. 

The practice seriously undermines the value of Canadian citizenship and our democratic ethos, namely the rule of law and due process. To demand anything less than a full and complete investigation into these claims would be irresponsible, particularly when even the head of the RCMP's own watchdog, Shirley Heafey, has publicly acknowledged her inability to investigate misuse of the force's new anti-terrorism powers. 

The Maher Arar public inquiry, set to hear arguments for intervener status this week, should be just the beginning of a more comprehensive look at just how our intelligence agencies are conducting themselves.

"It is sad but true that all Canadians cannot rely on their government to stand up for their human rights at home and abroad," said NDP leader Jack Layton. "If you're a member of a religious or ethnic minority, the message from the government seems to be: 'You're on your own.'" If intelligence agencies believe they can win a war by undermining the team's potential star players then they better think again about the growing Arab/Muslim alienation, distrust and resulting silence. It's time to rebuild the team's sagging morale. 

Faisal Kutty is a Toronto-based lawyer and freelance writer. He is general counsel for the Canadian Muslim Civil Liberties Association (CMCLA) and his law firm ( has been retained by the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) to seek standing at the Public Inquiry into the Maher Arar case. His articles are archived at and he can be reached at [email protected].

  Category: Americas, World Affairs
  Topics: Canada, Crime And Justice, Terrorism
Views: 4728

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
J FROM USA said:
Although I am from the US. Many of my foreign friends have too experienced harrassment. To this cause, I laugh. Americans of African decent have been tortured worldwide, yet who stands in the defence of an uneducated people that were forced into slavery and then made second class citizens. Muslims are suppossed to stand for justice and equality. What type of world is it when muslims only stand for Arabs. What about believers of other nationalities. I am a firm believer that the evils that many of my Arab bros and sis face will not go away until "WE" muslims as a whole decide to find peaceful ways to resist all evils, not just evils that the Arabs face. May ALLAH forgive us for our sins!


I basically agree with the writers views. Just wanted to add a few things to identify some of the causes of misconceptions among government officials and intelligence agencies in Canada. Post 9/11, these parties have sought help and advice, on many domestic and foreign issues related to muslims from different sources. Unfortunately, I have reasons to believe that some of the knowledge and information they are getting about Islam and Muslims, is from several anti-muslim groups, and also from groups that have crossed the boundaries of Islam and still call themselves muslims. Therefore, it is the duty of a true muslim to come out and propagate his/her faith to the Non-muslims particularly the intelligence agencies, police and law enforcement authorities, and government officials. If not the consequences could be really bad. As I have mentioned the anti-muslim groups and the misguided sects opetating under the banner of Islam have hijacked our religion and are giving statements and advice that affect our lives very much. I hope that this will serve as a wake-up call for the Muslim community.


I can say that what Faisal Kutty has said in this article is true, being a Canadian myself I have seen all of this happen. In fact, "detectives" came to my door asking me information about a Sikh friend of mine who just so happens to live on the same street as someone who was murdered. They persistently insisted that I give them a statement or some sort of police report, and after telling them a few things as at first I found it to be something unrelated to spy agencies like CSIS, I discovered that these homocide detectives were spying on her and tapping her phone calls, following her into the women's gym she attends, and actually spying on her in her LOCKER ROOM! I found out all of this after these detectives left my house...but they did not leave without a report of which they persuaded me to fill in for them, but Alhumdulillah, I refused to sign the report on the advice of my father...but as they left my house door, they kept saying "you'll call me and tell me when ur gonna sign won't you??" about 10 times. Then the following 3,4 days one of them kept harassing me phoning my cell phone trying to get me to sign the report, so that they could use my testimony in court over a murder that has nothing to do with me. I actually have reported this incident to CAIR-CAN. (Council on American Islamic Relations Canada). CSIS (Canada's spy agency equivalent to the CIA), has stopped bothering my friend, and they've stopped bothering me as well. I advised my friend to file a formal complaint to the police services and that she should keep in touch wiht the human rights commission, as entering into a women's locker room to spy on you is a serious breach of one's privacy.

Obviously from such paranoid activity, I can see that American federal goons have perverted the minds of Canadian government officials, who are officially taking the law into their own hands now. I'm with you all the way Faisal, ppl, start demanding your rights!