The Worst Possible News Yet

The recent news regarding Iraq is not good. Almost every day another American soldier is killed. More soldiers, in fact, have been killed by hostile fire during this war than during Gulf War I. Soldier morale is taking a nose dive. Every day, more and more doubt is cast on the intelligence that shaped the decision to go to war with Iraq. The weapons of mass destruction that Iraq reportedly had have yet to be found. In fact, the BBC has reported that "very senior sources" in the British government have virtually ruled out the possibility of ever finding weapons of mass destruction (WMD). They believe the weapons were there, but were either hidden or destroyed before the war.

This last piece of news, which did not cause a stir in the U.S., is the most troubling of all. The failure to find weapons of mass destruction can only mean one of three things: (1) senior UK officials were correct; (2) the weapons were never there to begin with; (3) in the chaos and confusion of the war and its aftermath, some or all of the weapons that were in existence ended up in the hands of terrorist groups. 

It is this third possibility that makes me so nervous even thinking about it. In the weeks and months leading up to the war, President Bush and his Administration continually insisted that Iraq indeed possessed WMD, and these weapons may end up in the hands of terrorists. In the light of Sept. 11, the argument went, military action was needed to disarm Saddam Hussein. Now, 100 days after the war "ended," there are no weapons in sight. 

Could it be that they ended up in the hands of terrorists? Could it be that anthrax, or botulinum toxin, or processed uranium was looted out of Iraq along with priceless artifacts of antiquity? Could it be that the very same war that was supposed to prevent WMD from ever getting into the hands of terrorists actually be the thing that directly lead to terrorists getting their hands on weapons of mass destruction? If senior UK officials are correct--weapons were there in Iraq but were destroyed before the war--how can we be sure that all the weapons that were there were destroyed? Even if some WMD are eventually found, how can we be sure that they have all been accounted for?

There is only one way out of this whole weapons mess: the Bush Administrations must come clean and reveal that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq after all. True, it would be confirmed that the war was totally unjust and unjustified, but more and more people around the world, including more Americans, are coming to this conclusion, if they do not believe so already. If there were no weapons in Iraq to begin with, then there is no possibility that they could have ended up in the hands of murderous terrorists who are bent upon killing innocent Americans. Yes, we may have egg on our face, but that is certainly better than blood on our streets from another terrorist attack using Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Besides, the Bush Administration--racked with a hubris that is proving to be dangerous to the country--could use some humility.

Earlier this month, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said, "The coalition did not act in Iraq because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq's pursuit of weapons of mass destruction." On July 12, CIA Director George Tenet publicly took the blame for the false claim made by President Bush in his State of the Union address that Iraq sought to acquire processed uranium from Niger. Retired State Department official Greg Thielmann told the Associated Press that "There was no solid evidence that indicated Iraq's top nuclear scientists were rejuvenating Iraq's nuclear weapons program." All these revelations seem to suggest that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the war. That would be great! No weapons means no way those weapons could be in the hands of terrorists.

Yet, the Bush Administration continues to insist there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the war. In fact, on July 18, a senior Administration official held an unusually long briefing session with reporters outlining a recently declassified intelligence document which indicated there was "compelling evidence" of Iraq's attempt to procure nuclear weapons. So where are the weapons? Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the BBC that if the weapons had existed before but had not been found by coalition forces, officials should be "unable to go to sleep at night" for fear that those weapons are in terrorists' hands. I hope and pray those officials are sleeping like babies. 

Hesham A. Hassaballa is a Chicago physician and columnist for and Media Monitors Network (MMN). He is author of "Why I Love the Ten Commandments," published in the book Taking Back Islam: American Muslims Reclaim Their Faith (Rodale Press), winner of the prestigious Wilbur Award for Best Religion Book by the Religion Communicators Council for 2003.

Related Suggestions

The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
Richard Miller, glad to know that our anger is understood. We don't "try" to see things from both sides, we KNOW and we SEE things from both sides, we know and we saw there were more people in the US demonstrating against the mad dogs in Washington and their plan to invade a sovereign nation, than in the whole Arab world together (thanks to our rulers on Washington's payroll). We also know and saw that almost all the US senators and US congressmen/women gave full power to an unfit president to wage war against Iraq, we know and we saw how the United States spit on the world and violated every international law (whatever that means). However knowing and seeing that there are Americans and British who feels the same way is doing a little in stopping the carnage and rape of a nation. Some will answer without thinking "well what about the butcher Saddam, he did this and he did that to his own people" without asking themselves who put him there in the first place, read my posts 7079, 7080, 7081 and 7082 in the "Perils of attacking Iraq" for reference. I am afraid that understanding how other people feel is definitely not enough, hopefully your next national election will prove me wrong. Until then we only know who gave the job to your president and his mafia.

madmax I understand your anger but I feel you need to try and see things from both sides of the story I not saying that what the US did was right or wrong I just feel that you need to know that thier are many americans that feel the same way you do but the polititions do not portray what the people of the united states nesisaraly believe or want done but one thing is for sure I truely know there cannot be peace if there is WAR

Assalamu Aleikum brother Hesham
With all due respect and regarding your article, I believe it is written only for the intellectually challenged like the majority of people in your country. The Butcher Administration will never come up clean "they" don't think they would need to, no US administration did in the past and no US administration will in the future. The whole word and the US administration(s) mutually believe only one thing, this is only about the greed of the "Ugly American", but only the American populace believes in what their mad and cupid politicians want them to believe. Next time please write something for the rest of the planet, such as the Euro (US Federal Reserves nightmare), the failure of the American scientists and businessmen to come with cost effective and cleaner way to run your cars, fly your planes and keep people warm during the harsh winters, or maybe even about what can the politicians do to keep people working now that most of the industries moved out to cheaper labor land, far, far away. Hey! even the business of politic has apparently moved to Tel-Aviv. I guess all what is left there are crimes, drugs and corporate crooks, but at least something is still booming.

Wa Allah 'alakul shai in 'Alim

Sorry, the weapons in Iraq are no longer the issue (except for some democrats as a political issue for next year's election). The main issue now is the staying power of US/UK in Iraq (and Iran/Saudi Arabia) or how to make them go home (ceremonously or unceremoniously). So start talking about the real issues of today which do matter in the real life and not stale ones of yesterday, which nobody pays any attention (except historians).