Does Defeat Always Have to be so Humiliating?
What's worse than a defeat is a humiliating defeat. Worse than both, a defeat that's brushed off, as if it never happened.
There are basic facts that some acknowledge and some wish to discount. The war on Iraq was fought for world hegemony, Israel, natural resources and a misguided president who genuinely believes that he was ordained by God to save the world.
But why do we always stop there? It's also a fact that Iraq was defeated, and in a very humiliating fashion. You'd think that both concepts refer to the same value: defeat is defeat. I beg to differ. What makes Iraq's defeat a humiliating one, is not only the way the US chose to fight this dirty war, collect the spoils or reveal its "wanted list" of Iraq's top alleged war criminals on decks of playing cards. The defeat was especially difficult because it exposed our incompetence.
On one hand, the Arab world repeated the same old broken record, angry masses that are quickly dispersed by anti-riot police, and two-faced leaderships: against the war in fiery speeches while doing their best to provide the needed logistical help to aid the invaders.
And, since the war is over, the only country that publicly hailed the war on Iraq, amongst the Arabs, Kuwait, has emerged on top, as poor Arab nations are now seeking forgiveness from the tiny Sheikdom, for opposing the war.
On an Arab satellite television show today, a group of Egyptian psychiatrists and intellectuals met to discuss the "mass depression" suffered by Arab people as a result of the war on Iraq, on Palestine, poverty and every other stressful factor. One advised the audience to "avoid depressed people and only seek the company of happy ones". That was his solution to the endemic problem. A religious cleric decided that the solution was to "keep on praying", while a third disgruntled for a whole hour to prove that it's scientifically wrong to call the feeling suffered by almost entire populations, "depression". Did anyone think that a mass depression might require a mass movement for change, rather than seeking the company of happy people?
Meanwhile, Arab regimes are scrambling to prevent a war on Syria, again, without any indications that their approach to the new challenge was much different than past ones. I doubt that a serious official stance shall be taken even if US soldiers, a few months or years from now, began handing out decks of play cards with pictures of "wanted" Syrian officials.
Another incompetence, which we hardly address, is the failure of anti-war movements to stop the war on Iraq, or to at least slow down its momentum. Sure, no one expected our signs to change the world, but no one protests for the sake of protesting only.
The anti-war movements worldwide were indeed spirited and uplifting, but they only resolved half of an equation. The missing half was using their numbers to stop a war, translating the power of the masses into a real tool for tangible change.
Western "democracies", most notability in the US and the UK are clearly oblivious to the anti-war efforts, no matter how massive. Public opinion can always be fabricated to serve the political interests of the ones in control, and can always be dismissed if it fails to serve the interest of the governments. Here comes the missing link: so what do we do now? Anti war activists, intellectuals and educators must seriously move one step forward, to escape preaching and problem-digenesis, into offering solutions, mechanisms, guidelines, and to-do lists, so that the passionate millions know what to do with their passion, to effect change and to foster a more promising vision for the future.
Meanwhile, in the Arab world, facing the problem is the best way to move out of the decades of defeatism and exploitation, by their own rulers first, and foreign exploiters second. American civil rights activist Malcolm X used to say, "you better stop singing and start swinging." Many in the Arab media, especially on television are failing to realize that, wasting airtime for singing and dancing all day. What's there to celebrate? Is this the human version of an ostrich hiding its head in the sand? True, tearing our cloths and weeping at the ruins are not the solutions either. Arabs must prevail over their differences, realize the magnitude of the challenges facing them, and move forward toward the problem, rather than away from it.
A precious little Iraqi girl was rushed to the Mansour hospital in Baghdad on a stretcher during the first a few days of the war. She was rushed to the emergency room, covered with blood, as her entire family was trapped under the rubble of their bombed house. The little girl was more overwhelmed by the cameras that greeted her at the hospital's entrance, than by here own wounds. She reacted with her natural instincts, but while neither calling for "mommy" or "daddy". The little girl raised her hand with untold pride and flashed the victory sign. The other arm seemed missing.
Defeat doesn't always have to be humiliating. Defeat can be a stage where we gather our strength and fight back, for our world, shattered by cluster bombs, for our fellow men and women, brutalized by exploiters who wear the guise of liberators, and for the sake of that Iraqi girl, who tried to tell us not to be weakened, because she was still standing.
Ramzy Baroud is the editor-in-chief of the PalestineChronicle.com and editor of the book entitled "Searching Jenin: Eyewitness Accounts of the Israeli Invasion."
Related Suggestions
But one has to comment on Michael Hollifield's commentary - the big murderous ones are the so-called leaders of the "liberating" nations. No the US did not help in Bosnia - they allowed the Bosnians to be murdered on a huge scale never offering supprt but denying them arms to defend themselves saying it would have led to more killing. No the US has not ever stopped the murderous Sharon from daily killing and bmbing Palestine. Do not ever use this in yur arguments. You are the ones who have been blindly led my the media. Where are these WMD's that this war was based on.
Gearge Bush is a liar and a cheat and was only after one thing - OIL. He is the murdering coward Michael.
Fallahi Jazeekum Khair
But once again, why don't we hear of the conflicts between and among Islamic nations and peoples that have brought death to many more Muslims than the United States and Israel, the two nations that are virtually the sole focus of moral blame by Islamicity? It is Islamiss, who have obligingly practiced the "politics of slaughter" everywhere they have appeared, as Paul Berman noted, from Khomeini's "human wave" attacks in the Iran-Iraq war, to the devastation wrought by the Algerian and Sudanese civil wars, to the suicide missions of "holy martyrs" in the Middle East, the United States and elsewhere, the toll in human lives has been in the millions--mass death on a scale that would have made Hitler and Stalin proud. But WHERE are the cries of protest? Where among Muslims does one hear of the efforts of the United States on behalf of Muslims in Bosnia and Somalia? Certainly not in Islamicity. A massive omission and a massive hypocrisy on your part. You are rendered morally blind by your hateful religious ideology.
Salaams and sorry if I am a little harsh on my Arab brothers. I love them all too but they must wake up.
I'd like to hear Muslims talk about that, and I'd like to hear what those Muslims who think terrorism is not a good interpretation of Muhammad example propose to do about it. For it is a law of nature: the strongest imposes his will. Are terrorists the stronger Muslims and are the others too coward for reacting against this real danger and prefer to howl at an enemy (democratic governments) they know won't touch them? Doesn't this faith give strength to its believers? Or does it give strength only to killers and not to thinkers? What is that faith good for? Singing and killing? And dreaming of some long buried past?
God, let them wake up!
last 25 years of Iraq for the Arab world? Surely what was
happening in Iraq was not a secret. The Arab world chose
not to do anything about the situation. That's humiliating.
rj
Thanks for thought provoking article. We need dedicated leaders and foot soldiers of action for justice and humanity.
Saleh
Why defeat of Iraq by US is more humiliating than other defeats Arabs have suffered? Why lament this defeat. After all, in 1948, mighty Arab armies of established Arab countries got defeated by a band of jews who were just coming out of holocaust, were just trying to get on their feet, and had to beg, borrow and steal weapons and food to fight for their very existence. Was that defeat not more humiliating than defeat of Iraq where Iraqis had no chance; but then Iraqis chose not to fight. Remember Vietnam; she defeated two imperialist powers on the battlefield, first France and then US. Yes, Ho Chi Minh's government was brutal, but at least it organized the country to fight enemy bravely. Arab governments are brutal but have shown no capability to organize their people.
Where is the real analysis, Mr Broud; may be sitting in the comforts of US, you are too afraid to do any serious analysis. Only thing left behind for you is to lament and lament. Well, Arabs have been lamenting for the last 55 years, and what have they got; more defeats. May be they should keep up with their lamenting; in 50 years, may be, there will be no independent arab governments left behind; then they will not need to lament at all.