quiero saber que piensa el islam en esta parte,esta bien lo que estados unidos yjudios hacen con palestinos,irak,afganistan, y el asesinato de bhutto por su presidente de pakistan y estados unidos,quitandose las culpas con mentiras,quien tiene tiradores de elites,alqaeda ninguno.

y los pueblos arabes traidores a la causa arabe y al islam

debemos seguir en silencio o luchar hasta morir

llevo  a�os moviendome para que las causas del mundo islamico ,salga a la luz publica ,publico en varias web internacionales,el genocidio a palestina,sahara,irak,afganistan,libano,siria y egipto como se vende y arabia saudita,jordania a intereses economicos y venden a sus pueblos,debemos estar en silencio,y dejar que asesinen diriamente a los palestinos,ya casi no tienen nada,ni tierras ni casa,solo les queda la vida y pocas tierras y queda poco

para que se exterminados los palestinos,que debemos estar de brazos cruzados,europa y latinoamerica los bombardeo con mis escritos,del

mundo islamico y su opresion y su asesinato.

que hace el mundo islamico y arabe ,pues venderse y ser esclavo,

la justicia puede llegar pronto ,pero seran los martires,los que entregan sus vidas a una causa noble.

y otros en silencio sentados sin hacer nada.

quiero respuestas,que piensan los demas

S.O.S.  TUAREG

Nobody knows all that you this one costing your freedom the nomadism of your people(village) comes to his(her,your) end(purpose), the borders are closed, fence in the magic Universe of your freedom, and with it you lose your identity.
The caravans that you form(train) in the desert, when you were owners of this full world of exotismo, these former routes of salt up to Timbuktu, where your dreams were travelling for the sands of the desert.
People Tuareg you suffer the tragedy of not territoriality live relegated to the marginalization and to the political isolation.
To few kilometres of his(her,your) land they starve and be.
While the vermins distribute your territories, and to you that you are enslaved in refugee camps, and also massacred mercilessly.
The United Nations close the eyes and it(he,she) does silence before so much injustice, with his(her,your) silence it(he,she) approves such a massacre.
They want that there eliminate 3 million human beings whole the cleanliness of the people Tuareg of the Desert, they that are the same desert, and the life.
You are the last dream of freedom of the human being since you are chased(prosecuted) for wanting to be free in your own(proper) land indiscriminate slaughters, without nobody in this damned world raises before so much injustice.
Where there are those who speak about democracy and freedom, hypocrites of this false world. I feel real pain Franc, for the Tuareg you that you are the life of this desert.
Only the wasteful blood and the oblivion do pasture on your lives, your tonic blue long billiard cues and with the face covered by the turban, the lithan elaborated with the thin cotton, protect your eyes of the sunbeams in the desert, and of the sands that the wind raises and kiss your eyes.
Raised on the camels, as the big gentlemen that you are of the desert, years were happening(passing), centuries, always you will be the owners and masters of the desert.

        AMAZIGH (Tuareg)

I HAVE A WAVE PENALTY

Where the coffins, carrying only men,
And where the silence of the words die
Like the aletazo of a dove
Poza his wing Porcelain my face
Where my mouth is silent and the silence of the pain of my soul
It fails to heal the penalties in the world.
Watch the world with the mourning of my pupils
Where no achievement erase the images that come to my mind,
Where the worms devour death
With its relentless pursuit of power, greed and greed
My poor soul who dies of grief.
I have so many dead silences,
And one of those silences the interior is closed to lime and singing my life,
Where the wind silenced my lips painful.
We live in a world full of lies
Live chained to our fears
We live behind the mountains of darkness.
The world tour, hatred and innocence,
Poor mortals who mourn over their broken dreams
Since the air reeks of dead, full of sores my soul
And waves of hatred toured the world.
My foot dragging by the naked drills and roads of this world
If my world this arid and sad at times uncertain.
Words, words, words that swarm, creeping through my mind
That comes from the bottom of my soul,
Where the words are pushing the silence of my mind.
Look too technical, without content
Want to be the vanguard, wisdom
A decadent world.
I emerge more harsh words,
Sad, unusual and fortuitous
Who covet vibrate make to humanity.
I want to destroy prejudices and preconceptions
Cathedrals and wisdom.
In�tiles shadows leave my words
Impregnated in the tides of the spirit of humanity.
Mat�is before birth anything,
Agonizing leaves the color of my feelings.
Reposan words burning in my mind
But came on the day that other beings
Resucitaran someday my words.
My words are a far cry from this and flee
Unreasonable world.
The time will give life to my work
Pressing the stone of life, and that resonates
Unquenchable fig tree in my eternal life

asalamu alaykum sign*reader,

Thankyou for the translation.  I can read english and arabic, but very little spanish. 

MUHHAMAD (MAHOMA) In your dreams deals with the burning fire of paradise Where the glow of the aurora pounds on earth, And where the roses are captive in the beautiful paradise, That illuminate the conscience of the people friendly, And that his smile ripping the thin veil of innocence. The champion who with his tenderness of Muslim Manmade with its lyrics by poet to mankind. The smiles and charms of women Appear to see the goodness of mysterious champion, Silent that passes through the valleys of the beautiful city of Ramallah. At the dawn departs Tortola, which is in bankruptcy silence Where he heard the falling crystal drop of dew, We wake up from dreams that decorated life. The sweet singing of the bird glides with placid sound, Ignites our ears and our senses. Some waves of sand born in East Undulating sand beaches of tame pearls. Your most blessed of men Illuminates and productive with your verses tender hearts, Your most beloved loved ones. With that spark of genius shows and illuminate your eyes Where your eyes sparkle and joy irradias Where the souls of your faithful give them wings To cover areas of the world. Today resonate throughout your lyrics by poet And teaching your wisdom be sweet Always in the memory of your faithful. At the largest of the poets Muhhamad (Mohammed)

The tour Bush arouses little enthusiasm in the Middle East

Analysts believe that the president of USA only looking for more support against Iran

After seven years of waiting, Palestinians and Israelis are preparing for the first visit of George Bush to the region. His intention confess, in addition to seeking the support of Arab governments against Iran (Persian) during his stay in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf, is advancing the peace process relaunched at Annapolis in November.

But the truth is that since the chips are still in the box output and a commitment to make "every effort" to reach an agreement before the 2009 sounds increasingly unreal. "No major breakthroughs are expected. His visit is rather symbolic, a way of stepping up and thank Olmert and Abbas," says a professor at the Hebrew University, Gabriel Sheffer. For what has transpired, the president will refrain from raising deals or impose a timetable for negotiations, in line with its position in Annapolis.

They did not even meet with Olmert and Abbas. "Bush unfortunately is not Clinton. Its mandate has been overshadowed by the war in Iraq and its interest in this conflict is peripheral. Comes, I am afraid to take the picture," says Amirab Mos�.

Speaking of the colonies

  Even so, Bush has announced that "talk" with the Israelis "on settlements", who spoke a few days ago as an "obstacle to peace". The Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, has taken note yesterday and said that he will pledge to dismantle the "wild colonies" of the West Bank, nothing less than a hundred. It remains to be seen if fulfilled, because after Annapolis, where he said that would freeze the expansion of settlements, has done the opposite: to approve the expansion of Maale Adumim and Har Homa.

"For us this is the key issue, along with the momentum of the economy," says Palestinian analyst, Bassem Barhum. "I think Bush has to redeem itself and show his face kind of diplomacy in the USA. Its credibility depends on the success pressure on settlements," says Barhum.

But beyond the will confess, the internal weakness of the leaders of each side gives them little room for manoeuvre. "Abbas continues uncontrolled militias in Gaza or the West Bank and Olmert is gripped by scandals, the fragility of his coalition and the final conclusions and imminent on the war in Lebanon," Israeli analyst granted, Hillel Frisch.
In his view, the real objective of Bush in this tour is to win Arab support for a new round of sanctions against Iran or even for a possible military attack. One issue which will focus discussions with the Israeli Defense Minister, Ehud Barak.

Bush awaits a warm reception in Israel. "It's the most proisrael� chairman of the history," says Professor Sheffer. Not surprisingly, it was he who acknowledged in a letter to Ariel Sharon, Israel's right to keep large settlement blocs. Who delayed the ceasefire during the war in Lebanon. And who has always forgiven, in the name of security of Israel, the excesses of its armed forces. 

What has the US �surge� in Iraq accomplished?

https://secure.wsws.org/phpform/use/comments/form1.html -

The fall in US military and civilian casualties over the past several months has seen supporters of the Iraq occupation claim that the Bush administration�s boost of troop numbers to over 160,000 this year�the so-called �surge��was a total success.

Senator John McCain, for example, has made strident advocacy of sending more troops to Iraq the focus of his bid to become the Republican Party presidential candidate in 2008. A new ad promoting his campaign declares: �One man [McCain] warned us we were failing in Iraq, and told us how we could turn things around�more troops and a different strategy. He took a lot of heat, but he stood by what he knew was right. Today that strategy is working.� His campaign was endorsed on December 17 by Democrat Joe Lieberman, who stood alongside him in New Hampshire and enthused that the US was, because of the surge, at last winning the war in Iraq.

A similar assessment has been made in the US media, with various statistics cited as proof of the success. The 38 American fatalities in October and 37 deaths in November were among the lowest monthly figures since the March 2003 invasion. The number of insurgent attacks on US and Iraqi government forces per month has fallen from 5,000 at the beginning of the year to 2,000.

The sectarian Shiite-Sunni fighting and mass killing that raged after the destruction of the Shiite Al-Askariya mosque in Samarra in February 2006 has abated, with some 560 civilian deaths documented by news services in November down from between 1,500 and 3,000 per month throughout 2006 and 2007. On the economic front, oil production and electricity generation have moderately increased.

Based on these figures, the Pentagon has stated it was on schedule to wind back the American force in Iraq to the pre-surge level of 130,000 by mid-2008. The agreement signed between the US and the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki last month envisages that the US presence will be reduced to a force of approximately 50,000 troops by the end of 2009 that would not have a day-to-day policing or combat role.

Absent from the back-slapping in Washington is any concern for what the US invasion and occupation has done to the Iraqi people over the past four-and-a-half years. The country has been rendered a wasteland of devastated cities and ruined infrastructure. As many as one million people have been killed and millions more maimed or traumatised. More than two million have fled the country altogether, while another two million have been turned into internally displaced refugees. The economy has collapsed with unemployment over 40 percent. Disease and malnutrition are widespread.

For all the optimism in Washington about the latest figures, a more considered analysis reveals that the �surge�, far from ending the quagmire for US imperialism in Iraq, has qualitatively deepened the crisis. The Bush administration has failed to achieve its stated aim of fashioning a pro-US Iraqi government that is accepted as legitimate by the majority of the Iraqi population. Instead, US policy throughout the year has undermined the already dysfunctional puppet government in Baghdad and dramatically exacerbated the sectarian and ethnic divisions within the country.

The deployment of 30,000 additional troops to Baghdad and the western Iraqi province of Anbar was intended to create a breathing space for political efforts to end the constant guerilla attacks on US forces and the murderous civil war between militias linked to the Shiite parties that dominate the US-backed Iraqi government and the largely Sunni anti-occupation resistance organisations.

The Bush administration demanded that the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki offer a number of incentives to the predominantly Sunni ruling stratum that held sway under the previous Baathist regime to join a �national unity� government and use their influence to call off the insurgency.

The main US demands or �benchmarks� were ending the policy of de-Baathification that prevents former senior Baathists from holding political and military positions; an oil law that would specify the division of oil revenues between Iraq�s provinces and guarantee a flow of wealth to the resource-poor majority Sunni areas; and provincial elections by the end of the year to enable the Sunni parties who boycotted the first poll to take control of the Sunni provinces.

None of these benchmarks have been achieved. Maliki was not able to overcome opposition within the Shiite parties to US-dictated measures that amount to concessions to their Baathist enemies. The attempts to do so, in fact, caused a breakup of the Shiite coalition, with the faction loyal to cleric Moqtada al-Sadr walking out of the government.

Far from �national unity�, 2007 witnessed the most extreme elements among Shiites and Sunnis intensify the sectarian carnage and largely complete their agenda of carving out homogeneous power bases in various parts of the country. Serious analysts have concluded that the main reason for the decline in intra-Iraqi violence is the completion of this sectarian cleansing, not the deployment of thousands more US troops.

Brookings Institution commentator Ivo Daalder wrote on December 17: �The sectarian violence had to a large extent succeeded in forcing Sunnis from Shiite areas and Shiites from Sunni areas. One look at an ethnic map of Baghdad tells the story�what were previously mixed neighbourhoods are now mostly Shiite or Sunni. The violence caused a large-scale movement of people�one in six Iraqis has either left the country entirely or has been internally displaced. A lot of this movement has made sections of the country ethnically more homogeneous, thus stemming a major source of the violence.�

The US military has made no attempt to prevent the ethnic cleansing take place. Instead, it has assisted the segregation by throwing up 12-foot concrete walls around Sunni suburbs of Baghdad, transforming the city into a series of sealed off ghettos. A resident of one, the Ghazaliya district, told the Christian Science Monitor earlier this month: �Iraq is a prison and now I live in my own little prison.�

Throughout the capital and across the country, the US military abandoned any pretense of trying to develop the authority of the Iraqi government. Instead, it pursued a policy of striking deals with whatever militia force or political formation dominated particular districts or suburbs.

In Baghdad�s densely populated Shiite working class slum of Sadr City, arrangements have been made with representatives of Moqtada al-Sadr�s Mahdi Army militia, which is blamed for much of the violence against Sunnis. In return for promising to turn over recalcitrant elements that attack US forces, Sadr�s militia is allowed to openly rule over much of the capital, including areas that it had purged of Sunni inhabitants.

In the walled-off Sunni enclaves, the US military has gone further and actually recruited Sunni insurgents and militias into �local citizens� groups�. Their members are paid $300 per month for not attacking US troops, while their leaders are allowed to preside like modern-day feudal vassals.

The US payment of militias is widespread across the so-called Sunni Triangle in central Iraq. An estimated 192 separate armed groups with over 77,000 fighters have been formed by Sunni tribes and �local citizens� groups� over the past year. The Sunni militias have also assisted the US military hunt down Islamic fundamentalist organisations such as the �Al Qaeda in Iraq� that continued the armed resistance. For Sunni leaders, it is an opportunity to secure greater political leverage under the US occupation.

The US had several motives in enlisting their aid. The policy began in Anbar province as a pragmatic and somewhat desperate attempt to stem US casualties and allow the Bush administration to claim that progress was being made. As it has proceeded, Washington has recognised the Sunni militias as a useful counterweight to the Maliki government under conditions where the US has been preparing for military strikes against neighbouring Shiite Iran. In the event of war, anti-Shiite and anti-Iranian Sunni militias could be used to counter opposition from Iraqi Shiites.

The overall result has been a steady sidelining of the Iraqi central government. Instead of creating a �national unity� regime, the US has sponsored the creation of a myriad of sectarian fiefdoms, with militia warlords holding sway through a combination of terror, criminality and the offer of some protection for a poverty-stricken and desperate population. The police in most areas are generally controlled by the dominant local militia, as is the local government to the extent it exists.

The fragmentation extends from Baghdad to every corner of the country. While the divide-and-rule tactics may have brought about a decline in the number of attacks on US forces, it hinders every aspect of economic and social activity. Basic services are simply not available to many people because they are located in or supplied from a rival sectarian area. The US occupation has not only destroyed the economy, but created tremendous political obstacles to any coherent reconstruction.

Iraq is currently ranked as the third most corrupt country in the world. It is estimated, for example, that $18 billion in Iraqi government funds has been stolen since 2004. More than one third of all US �reconstruction� funds is simply stolen and ends up in the pockets of various powerbrokers.

The overwhelming majority of the population is firmly opposed to any US presence in the country. According to a recent ABC/BBC poll, 98 percent of Sunnis and 84 percent of Shiites want all US forces out of the country. Attacks on US troops have dropped markedly but still continue at over 60 per day and are supported, according to the poll, by 93 percent of Sunnis and 50 percent of Shiites.

Far from �stabilising� Iraq, the US military now faces a highly volatile situation with troops stationed in exposed forward bases keeping ethnically cleansed neighbourhoods and districts apart. While the multitude of sectarian militia are hostile to each other, they remain bitterly opposed to the US occupation. There is nothing new or innovative in the US tactics, which mark a return to the classic colonial policy of �divide-and-rule�. Any number of factors could rapidly lead to the collapse of this precarious house of cards.

Any conception that Iraq will become a pliable US client state in a matter of a few years is a pipedream. The imperialist ambition of dominating Iraq�s oil resources and using it as a garrison state in the Middle East can only be pursued by the permanent occupation of the country, the repression of Iraqi opposition and a constant flow of dead and wounded soldiers back to the US.

A true media commotion arose in the region following the court case the briefcase to a prosecutor chavista deputy

District Miami, Tom Mulvihill, caratul� bluntly?'s Presidential campaign Cristina Kirchner?. It was inevitable that many

See the case as a blunt as an element of pressure against the new Argentine president by the internal opposition and

External to it, precisely because part of a government today faced with its own spies such as George W. Bush, and

Within days of signing the international treaty against usury is known as Bank of the South.

A similar case affected in September for pre-Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton for the briefcase with almost the same amount

(850,000 dollars) donated to his campaign by the multiple swindler Norman Hsu, it being clear that not only

Unrest in the CIA against W. By pressures for fabricating reports about weapons of mass destruction to massacre Persians

Iran, but our men in Langley have declared their own imagination on strike.
Apart from this, every time we know better than the real operation is the garbage that have undertaken since offices

Virginia seeking embed in Paraguayan politics to guevaristas financed by the CIA that militate our original

Luguista left. Curiously, in the midst of so much psychosis antichavista owners of the means used to be filled

Pockets with donations from the National Endowment for Democracy and paid advertising by USAID, have bypassed briefcases

George W. Bush has been entering covertly in Paraguay, going to end up in the pockets less thought.

Let's look at some cases.

For example, $ 45226.96 on behalf of the Plan Threshold recently received the Guevarist House for Youth (NGOs

It collects for the PMas) labour-imperialist agencies under the control of George W. Bush, supposedly to teach

To high school students something fundamental? Identify corruption? In Paraguay. Adding money to the 127,000 that

Previously benefited the IAF. According to data Americans, with the money in ten months, the clientele Guevarist

Camilo Soares and Rocio Old? Trained? To 50 teachers? Sensitized? 1000 students and clink box (it looks like

Responsible in documents Sunia Valinotti). A further example of that in our country there are no applications for credit

Works, but it works invented to request credit.
It added in the same context that the large sums received Local Governance, an NGO whose responsibility are both financiers

Tekojoja of, or $ 132,700 in 2006 received the Foundation Harlequin Tetro (refuge Organisers

Demonstrations against the current municipal administration) for goals as related performing arts? Help

Adolescents in schools to identify, study, discuss and address community priorities?.

We must add $ 116,300 George W. Bush received in 2006 by the CIDSEP, 95,000 US dollars received by

Paraguayan Foundation for Cooperation and Development of former Mayor Martin Burt, 94,000 deposited in the name of the

ADEC, 27,500 donated to the CPES Dominic Rivarola, 164,404 contributed to the EDC, or major donations

Receive DNIC of Augustine Carrizosa for? Supporting organizations of civil society, the IDEA Patricia Abed, or

Sensitive environmental Alter Life as Jorge Lara Castro.

Any opinion or political incursion of these engendros the rule, obviously, is hailed as politically correct

Stratospheric from the summits of the House of Advertisers of Paraguay and Cerneco whose? Forums for freedom of

Expression? - Like organized in November 2004 - were always sol�citamente sponsored by USAID. To get an

Drop idea of the line by CERNECO, just mention that your committee? Proposed code of ethics? Former employees of the integrated

Stroessner and propagandist alabardero of Videla, Aldo Zucolillo (Rufo Medina and Ilde Silvero), and son-in-law of a general key

Operation Condor, Carlos Jorge Biederman. It is not difficult to deduce the origin of the exaggerated account of the relatives of the last of the

Mentioned in Wachovia Bank (Securities), which withdrew the tiny fraction of $ 172,000 on June 25, 2005

(Check No 1323).
All of this garbage empire in Paraguay, as we know, has great? Prestige? And support of this press

Pro-imperialist, whose debris and evils Paraguayan society has been dragging since the state department

Commissioned to Tte. Colonel Robert K. Thierry to train torturers Edgar L. Ynsfr�n towards 1956. A small mistake that

? Amended? 1987 toward hiring through the CIA agent Leonard Susman, a strong communicators

Identified with Stroessner for? Fight? Against the dictatorship they banc� their media.

They protest at US embassy in Argentina's case by case and in Latin America wide protest by all briefcases

Delivered to the USA, to destroy successful democracies in Latin America and to prevent them from leaving government

Democratas

At this point one should be writing good news for 2008, messages of brotherhood and good wishes for the country and people loved. But it is, does not give us the right or Christmas truce, they are as Christians and fill their mouths with the word reconciliation. Pure fallacy.

On the night of December 23 when leaving the bakery a group of girls offered us T-shirts for sale with Christmas and to help poor children. The stamping is decorated with a garland NO size of the chest. When he arrived home, VTV went bonuses and carols, while Globoterror shot lead in two parallel programmes interviews and reports. When cansaban to do so directly, were connected to a TV argentina which continued the onslaught against our government. They followed the scenario came to the Colombian RCN to finish with CNN. Pure antichavismo frenzied. And VTV, sports programs.

The comidilla fashion: the briefcase Antonini. This coup opinion can place it perfectly within the ongoing psychological warfare designed and implemented by the CIA and its agents, speak English, Caracas or Buenos Aires. The media siege is part of the tactic to keep the hosts on the defensive Boliviarian on such sensitive issues as corruption, personal insecurity and shortages of consumer goods daily.

The briefcase Antonini say once and categorically, that Chavez has nothing to do in this matter. I say this with absolute conviction. I appeal to the intelligence of our people. Look at this. If the President would like to give any of its allies on this continent, not to mention eight hundred thousand dollars-that for a presidential campaign in Argentina are almost nothing, say ten million dollars, does not need to send with the first mandadero to appear, even with some of his closest confidence, simply because the President has in his plane and point. Moreover, it can not be checked by customs or immigration authority hands. Let us remember that there is diplomatic immunity, pouches and other privileges of world dignitaries.

In summary, our Government was not to send money to third parties and much less on private planes. Conclusion: the roll of the briefcase Antonini is otherwise.
For example (here is my vision): everything was planned in Miami for enlodar the presence of Chavez in the Southern Cone and the electoral triumph of Cristina Fernandez. Blow to South American unity. I am convinced that Antonini is a type recruited for some time by the Mafia mayamera. We had everything ready. Prosecutors and judges included. The same fraud that legalized in favor of Bush. Not excluding anything having to do business with corrupt our ranks. Remember that everything is corrupt, firstly, a traitor, because he betrays the trust that society puts in him in custody to deliver public funds.

The rest neither forgive nor right. While my comrades nationwide spent Christmas mensajitos, antichavismo was striving to make departure date to put Chavez. Corruption and insecurity are the reefs to bite. Its breeding ground is our lack of initiative. Noto some distraction in the Boliviarian forces. The street, social strife and political creativity can not dej�rselas anyone. Less to *****

"�Deberemos olvidarnos de Palestina para obtener la aprobaci�n de alguien? Nos escuchar�an si partes de Francia o de EEUU estuvieran ocupadas. Somos respetados a ojos del mundo en tanto que nos respetamos a nosotros mismos, y en primer lugar a nuestros propios derechos".

Hoy en d�a, nuestro pueblo �rabe se encuentra bajo el salvaje ataque de fuerzas oscuras. Las l�neas maestras de sus planes se han visto con claridad en Iraq , en lo que est� ocurriendo en Sud�n, en su injerencia en los asuntos de L�bano, en sus amenazas a Siria. Todo esto ocurre en un tiempo condicionado por dos grandes tendencias en el mundo �rabe. Una de ellas jam�s podr� romper la voluntad de los pueblos. La resistencia encuentra siempre un modo de enfrentar al invasor, incluso alcanzando el punto en el que el cuerpo humano se convierte en un arma mortal.

La situaci�n de hoy en Palestina no es sino otro punto de enfrentamiento entre ambas tendencias: la de la resistencia y la liberaci�n y la de la rendici�n y la puesta en venta. Este noble pueblo y su gloriosa Intifada, con el heroico movimiento de resistencia a la cabeza, se encuentra bajo un ataque hostil de una clase especial, combinando el enorme palo de la ocupaci�n (con su destrucci�n, masacres, asesinatos, el desarraigo de la gente y el asolamiento de sus tierras, el genocidio de nuestro pueblo y la servidumbre de quienes sobrevivan) con la zanahoria, la insinuaci�n y la declaraci�n de facto de que la paz est� al alcance de la mano y que todo lo que debemos hacer para conseguirla es prepararnos a entrar en el nuevo orden, vestidos apropiadamente en honor a su venerable cultura.

Al mismo tiempo, el dinero ha comenzado a llegar, de manera precisa y bien estudiada, aprovech�ndose de las dif�ciles condiciones de vida soportadas por nuestro pueblo, para intentar as� despojarle de su voluntad y determinaci�n, situ�ndole en la encrucijada entre el para�so y el infierno. En esa misma l�nea se han aproximado a nuestra gente con las novedosas ONGs, con sus misteriosas fuentes de financiaci�n, inevitablemente ligadas a programas y posturas que pretenden aplastar toda lucha de liberaci�n, que piden que se abandone el derecho b�sico a la resistencia contra la ocupaci�n, en particular bajo la forma de operaciones de martirologio.

Los acuerdos de Oslo sustituyeron la realidad de una revoluci�n por la quimera de un Estado, en un intento por acabar con la primera Intifada, y por ello sufrimos una gran p�rdida por duplicado. Los acuerdos reemplazaron el esl�gan "Revoluci�n hasta la victoria" por una "Autoridad" Palestina que no pose�a ni la tierra, ni el agua ni siquiera el aire. Esto desanim� a la mayor�a de los palestinos, y al mismo tiempo liberaba a la Ocupaci�n de sus responsabilidades hist�ricas, morales y pr�cticas. Se recompens� a los que flaquearon y se convirti� en fugitivos a los revolucionarios. �Y cual ha sido el resultado final? Que cualquiera que se interpusiera en su camino podr�a ser envenenado [1]. �Qu� saldo m�s vergonzoso!

Pueblo fiel, no debemos tropezar dos veces en la misma piedra. Hoy, los ingenieros de la cat�strofe nos vigilan de nuevo, y esta vez planean quedarse con el resto de Palestina. Las armas no miden el honor de un hombre, sino su verg�enza. Se debe poner freno al caos. Decir la verdad o quejarse son "provocaciones" a ojos de los sionistas, y est� prohibido hacerlo por una "Orden Presidencial " emitida antes incluso que alguien ocupe el cargo de presidente; nuestra preocupaci�n deber�a ser "comprender el sufrimento de los israel�es", y ese ser� nuestro billete para poder ser admitidos en el club de amigos de Am�rica, la llave de un cofre del tesoro repleto de maravillas prometidas.

Resistencia frente al sionismo y al imperialismo

Hemos seguido de cerca la historia y experiencia de los pueblos del mundo. Entendemos las dimensiones de los programas del Sionismo y del imperialismo para nuestra tierra. Nos gu�a el ejemplo de nuestros antecesores, quienes nunca aceptaron la humillaci�n, si no que a trav�s de las �pocas ofrecieron voluntariamente sus vidas resistiendo a los opresores, para as� mantener libre y limpio de toda humillaci�n a su pa�s. Podemos ver los brillantes haces luminosos de la victoria, que vienen de manos de los gloriosos h�roes de la triunfante resistencia iraqu�. Nos enorgullecemos de la victoria conseguida tan duramente en el sur de L�bano, el fruto de una lucha que se ha dirigido al agresor en el lenguaje que entiende. De acuerdo con la ley de Dios y la voluntad de Izz ad Din al-Qassam [2], de Mahir al-Burnu, del Guevara de Gaza, de al-Ayyash y de ash-Shiqaqi, y de todos aquellos dispuestos a unirse a la lista de m�rtires, declaramos lo siguiente:

- Primero. El trabajo nacional palestino, la conducta de los representantes palestinos, y el rumbo tomado por sus l�deres debe estar basado en la autoridad hist�rica de Palestina, y en la original Carta Nacional Palestina (que fue falseada por el Consejo Nacional cuando se reuni� con el presidente Clinton de EEUU, un acto ilegal, ya que ni el Consejo ni la Autoridad Nacional Palestina tienen autoridad para aprobar resoluciones que afecten al destino de la poblaci�n palestina dispersa por el mundo desde que en 1948 se robara su tierra, y que habiten tanto en la Franja de Gaza, como en Cisjordania, como cualquier otra parte del mundo, sobre todo la poblaci�n de los campos de refugiados, que espera volver a casa), y debe afirmar las dimensiones �rabe e isl�mica de Palestina.

- Segundo. La Resistencia es la opci�n para derrotar la Ocupaci�n, aplastarla y obligarla a retirarse, enterrando sus ilusiones para siempre. La resistencia no es una minucia: es un deber sagrado, moral y humano ante el que nos sentimos llamados por Dios y por la historia. En este contexto advertimos sobre las llamadas elecciones palestinas, que ser�n realizadas bajo ocupaci�n, y afirmamos que nuestra prioridad ahora es extender la opci�n de combatir al enemigo., uniendo fuerzas frente a el. Por esto la Intifada sigue siendo el medio disponible para avanzar por el camino de la liberaci�n. Debemos seguir posicion�ndonos y profundizar en contra de los acuerdos de Oslo y sus negociadores. Rechazamos actuar seg�n la l�gica impuesta por el enemigo,, pero esto no significa que vayamos a permanecer en silencio respecto a aquellos que, entre nuestras filas, insisten en seguir cometiendo los mismos errores. Los acuerdos de Oslo han perdido toda credibilidad, incluso a ojos de quienes inicialmente albergaron alguna ilusi�n respecto a los mismos. El objetivo real de los acuerdos Oslo se ha visto claramente, y lo mejor que podr�an hacer quienes los defendieron e impulsaron es disculparse ante nuestro pueblo y retirarse, sin entrar en consideraciones morales por no decir de las po�ticas.

- Tercero. El derecho al retorno y las compensaciones no est�n sujetos a negociaci�n ni intercambios, y mucho menos han ser olvidados. �Es acaso razonable pedir que la persona cuya casa ha sido robada, que ha sido desplazada y se ha convertido en un sin techo, deber�a mirar al frente y sonreir porque aquel que le expuls� ha resuelto su propio problema de vivienda? � O deber�a incluso acudir a ayudar de buena voluntad en la remodelaci�n de la casa del invasor para que se encuentre m�s c�modo? El derecho al retorno es una derecho b�sico recogido en la Declaraci�n de Derechos Humanos y sin duda en la historia recogida con anterioridad a la creaci�n del derecho y organismos internacionales. Nuestros padres nunca tiraron las llaves de sus antiguas casas; nos corresponde a nosotros ahora no tirar los derechos de las generaciones venideras. Heredamos esta tierra tal y como heredamos nuestros nombres y caracter�sticas gen�ticas, y su perdida significa la p�rdida de nuestra humanidad, de nuestros estatuto de seres humanos.

- Cuarto. Si este fuera un mundo perfecto, no tendr�amos mayor problema en dejar al derecho penal, que dicen internacional, resolver nuestros problemas. Si la voz de los jueces se escuchara, si no fuera abrogada o ignorada; si todo el mundo fuera como Mandela, Gandhi, la Madre Teresa o Jesucristo, nosotros tambi�n pondr�amos la otra mejilla, porque al final del d�a nuestros derechos acabar�an siendo restituidos. Pero eso es s�lo un sue�o, y ya que los asesinos y sus sicarios se sientan en sus tronos, la realidad para nosotros se traduce en recuperar por la espada lo que nos han robado por la espada, ya que lo que ha sido tomado por la fuerza s�lo puede ser devuelto por la fuerza. Hasta que el sue�o de un mundo perfecto pueda ser realidad, depositar nuestra fe en la legalidad internacional es un aut�ntico suicidio para el mas d�bil, pero eso s�, un suicidio en toda legalidad.

- Quinto. El rumbo de la llamada sumisi�n "racional" y la conciliaci�n (tal y como las presentan Mahmoud Abbas, Yasir Abd Rabbuh y el resto de la panda de Oslo y Ginebra) no es el elegido por el pueblo palestino. Ellos no tienen el derecho de vender, conceder o ceder nada en el nombre de �ste. Las fuerzas activas en nuestro pueblo resistente deben llegar a un acuerdo para elegir un liderazgo que represente a todos los palestinos, donde quiera que se encuentren; un liderazgo que sostenga algo que es mas grande que el propio liderazgo o cualquiera de nuestras individualidades: la Carta Nacional Palestina y los principios nacionales b�sicos que permanecen sobre todo lo dem�s, al igual que lo hace Palestina. Hasta que llegue ese momento, nuestro portavoz ser� la Resistencia, nuestras declaraciones oficiales ser�n las balas y rocas de la Resistencia; hasta que llegue el momento en el que un portavoz hable empleando su misma l�gica.

- Sexto. No es relevante si el lenguaje que empleamos est� de acuerdo o no con el que se usa en sectores que no creen en el car�cter �rabe de Palestina. �Qu� tendr�a de bueno aparentar haber ganado frente al mundo si hemos perdido nuestros propios derechos?

Si el camino adecuado fuera insistir en el error com�n a costa de un derecho dif�cil de alcanzar, entonces el Profeta Muhammad no hubiera expandido la religi�n de su Se�or manteniendo el control de la Luna y del Sol con sus manos; entonces Jesucristo no se hubiera rebelado contra los ej�rcitos de la opresi�n y el asesinato sin haber contado con un Katyusha ni un mill�n de hombres detr�s de s�. Su �nica arma era que ten�a raz�n, y una disposici�n absoluta al sacrificio.

�Deberemos olvidarnos de Palestina para obtener la aprobaci�n de alguien? Nos escuchar�an si partes de Francia o de EEUU estuvieran ocupadas. Somos respetados a ojos del mundo en tanto que nos respetamos a nosotros mismos, y en primer lugar a nuestros propios derechos. Nuestros enemigos mataron al Conde Bernadotte [3]. Han espiado a EEUU. Cortaron la electricidad en una exposici�n donde se pod�a contemplar el cuadro de una joven luchadora m�rtir. Se han burlado de todas las resoluciones de NNUU que iban contra sus intereses. Hacen todo esto sin tener la raz�n de su parte, pero est�n dispuestos a luchar hasta la muerte, aunque sean invasores ocupando la tierra de alguien. �No deber�a ser esta determinaci�n mas apropiada para los descendientes de Salah ad-Din, al- Awwam y Jalid Ibn al-Walid [4]?

(This statement on the current situation in Palestine was approved on December 26, 2004, after extensive dialogue, on the Arab Nationalist list. We are hereby asking all those interested to distribute it as widely as possible).

Translated from Arabic by Muhammad Abu Nasr

Today our Arab People are under savage assault by the international forces of darkness. The outlines of their plans have become clear in Iraq, in what is going on in the Sudan, in their interference in Lebanese affairs, and in their threats to Syria. All of this is taking place at a time when there are two currents in the Arab Region. One of those currents will never be able to break the will of the peoples. Resistance always finds a way to stand up to the invaders even if it reaches a point that the human body is turned into a deadly weapon.

The situation in Palestine today is but another part of the struggle between the two currents: the current of resistance and liberation and the current of giving up and selling out. This noble people and their glorious intifada, and in the first place the heroic resistance movement, are under a hostile attack of a special kind that combines the big stick of the occupation - destruction, massacres, murder, the uprooting and displacement of people and their very fields, i.e., the attempted genocide of our people and the subjugation of those who are left ­ with the carrot, the hint, in fact the open declaration, that peace is at hand and that all we must do to achieve it is to prepare to enter the new order, dressed appropriately in honor of their venerable culture. At the same time, money has begun to pour in, in a precise and well-directed manner, and taking advantage of the difficult living conditions endured by our people to try to rob them of their steadfastness and determination, putting before them the choice of paradise or the fire. Along the same lines they have come at us with the innovation of the "Non Governmental Organization," with its mysterious foreign sources of funding, inevitably linked with the programs and positions that serve to totally crush the liberation struggle, that demand at the very least that the basic right to armed resistance against occupation ­ in particular the martyrdom operations and the martyrdom fighters ­ be abandoned.

The Oslo Agreement substituted the chimera of a state for the reality of the revolution to put an end to the first intifada, and we suffered a two-fold loss. That agreement replaced the slogan "Revolution until victory" with a Palestine "Authority" that possessed no land, no water, nor even airspace. It gave up most of Palestine while at the same time relieving the occupation of its moral, historical, and practical burdens. It rewarded the lackeys and turned the revolutionaries into fugitives. And what was the outcome? That anyone who obstructed their way would be poisoned. What a shameful bargain!

Faithful people, we must not fall into the same hole twice. Today the engineers of ruin are eying us again, and this time they plan to take all that is left of Palestine. Arms are no longer a man's honor but his shame. An end must be put to "anarchy." To speak the truth or to complain are "incitement" against the Zionists which has been prohibited by a "presidential order" issued before presidential power has even been conveyed to its issuer. Our motto now must be to "understand the sufferings of the Jews," and this will be our admission ticket to the club of America's friends, the key to a treasure chest of promised wonders.

We have surveyed the history and experience of the world's peoples. We understand the dimensions of the Zionist and imperialist programs on our land. We are guided by our forefathers who never for one day accepted humiliation but freely gave their lives to resist oppressors throughout the ages so that our country might remain free and pure of all desecration. We can see the bright rays of the light of victory coming from the hands of the glorious heroes of the triumphant Iraqi resistance. We take pride in the hard-won victory in southern Lebanon, the fruit of a resistance struggle that addressed the aggressor in the language he understands. In accordance with the law of Heaven and the behests of Izz ad-Din al-Qassam, Mahir al-Burnu, The Guevara of Gaza, of al-Ayyash and ash-Shiqaqi, and all those now awaiting their turn to join the every-growing line of martyrs, we declare the following:

First. Palestinian national work, the behavior of Palestine's representatives, and the course taken by its leaders must be based on the historic authority of Palestine and the original Palestine National Charter, (which was falsified by the national council when they met US president Clinton ­ a step that was illegal, given the fact that the Council and even the Palestine Authority has no authority to pass resolutions affecting the destiny of the Palestinian people who come from all of Palestine, that which was stolen in 1948, as well as the West Bank and Gaza, as well as those living dispersed around the world, and in the first place those in the refugee camps awaiting their return home.), and they must affirm the Arab and Islamic dimension of Palestine.

Second. Resistance is the option for driving out the occupation, for crushing it, compelling it to retreat, for burying its illusions forever. Resistance is not a bargaining chip; it is a sacred, moral, and human duty for which we will be judged by God and history. In this context we warn against so-called Palestinian presidential elections that will be taking place under the occupation, and affirm that our priority now is to rally around the option of fighting the enemy, of massing forces against him. Therefore the intifada is the means available today on the path of liberation. It must continue and deepen in opposition to Oslo and the conciliators. We refuse to operate using a logic like that of the enemy, but this does not mean that we must remain silent regarding the errors of those who persist in committing mistakes within our own ranks. The Oslo Agreement has lost all credibility even in the eyes of those who formerly had illusions about it. The aim of Oslo has become crystal clear, and it would be best for those who have defended it and promoted it to apologize to our people and to withdraw, out of moral considerations to say nothing of political ones.

Third. The right of return and compensation is not subject to negotiation, to give and take, to say nothing of being thrown away and abandoned. Is it reasonable to demand that the person whose house has been stolen, who has been displaced and made homeless should look on and smile because the one who kicked him out has now solved his own housing problem? Or even to go and willingly help him remodel the house so that it suits him better? The right to our home is a basic right enshrined in the Declaration of Human Rights and indeed in the logic of history before any international bodies and institutions were created. If our fathers never let go of the keys to our homes, it is not for us to throw out the rights of future generations. We inherit this land as we inherit our names and genetic characteristics, and their loss means the loss of our humanity, of our status as human beings.

Fourth. We would like to be able to hand over our problem to what is called international legality if this were a perfect world, if the word of judges were listened to, not thrown aside or abrogated, if they were all like Mandela, Gandhi, Mother Theresa, or Jesus Christ, we too would turn the other cheek, and at the end of the day our rights would be returned to us. But since that is all a dream, and so long as murderers and their henchmen sit on their thrones, then reality in the first place makes us take back by the sword that which has been taken from us by the sword, for that which has been taken by force cannot be regained except by force. Until the dream of a perfect world comes to pass, putting faith in international legality is nothing but suicide for the weak, but suicide under a cloak of legality.

Fifth. The course of "rational" submission and conciliation (as represented by Mahmud Abbas, Yasir Abd Rabbuh, and the rest of the Oslo and Geneva gang) is not the course chosen by the Palestinian people. They do not have the right to sell, concede, or give up anything in their name. The active forces among our resisting people must come to an agreement on a way to elect a leadership that represents all of the Palestinian people, everywhere they are, one that continues to hold on to that which is greater than the leaders or us individually ­ the Palestine National Charter and the basic national priniciples that stand above everyone, like Palestine. Until such time, our spokesman will be the resistance, our official announcements will be the bullets and rockets of the resistance, until such time as someone who can speak by their logic is elected.

Sixth. It is not important whether the language we use is in agreement with the language used in quarters that do not believe in the Arab character of Palestine. What good is it if we win over the world but lose our own rights?

If it were the correct path to persist in common error at the expense of a right that is hard to obtain, then the Prophet Muhammad would not have preferred the religion of his Lord over having control of the moon in his right hand and the sun in his left, then Jesus Christ would not have rebelled against the armies of oppression and murder without having a Katyusha nor a million men behind him. His only weapon was what was right and a readiness to sacrifice everything for it.

Should we give away Palestine in order to win someone else's approval? Would they be listening to us if it were parts of France or America that were occupied. We are respected in the eyes of the world to the extent that we respect ourselves, and in the first place our own rights. Our enemies killed Count Bernadotte. They spied on America. They turned off the electricity to an exhibit where there was a picture of a girl martyrdom fighter. They have made a mockery of every resolution passed by the United Nations if they thought that to be in their interests. They do that and are in the wrong, yet are ready to fight to the death, even though they are alien thieves occupying someone else's land. Is not this kind of determination more appropriate for the descendants of Salah ad-Din, al-'Awwam, and Khalid Ibn al-Walid?

http://www.voltairenet.org/article153115.html#article153115 - http://www.voltairenet.org/article153115.html#article153115

It is an important article about the American sailors and his(her,your) murders in irak

http://www.voltairenet.org/article153115.html#article153115 - http://www.voltairenet.org/article153115.html#article153115

http://www.voltairenet.org/article154079.html#article154079 - http://www.voltairenet.org/article154079.html#article154079

http://www.voltairenet.org/article154345.html - http://www.voltairenet.org/article154345.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article154345.html -  

MAHDI,

It is important that we all comply with guidelines. Please read:

Guidelines

Guidelines Updates

Siyam: �Security forces arrested a suicide bomber who intended to kill Haniyya�

Sunday January 20, 2008 06:06 by IMEMC Staff mailto:saed%20at%20imemc%20dot%20org - saed at imemc dot org http://www.imemc.org/report_posts?subject=Abusive Post Report: Story 52373 with title: Siyam: �Security forces arrested a suicide bomber who intended to kill Haniyya�&message=Abusive Post Report: Story 52373 with title: Siyam: �Security forces arrested a suicide bomber who intended to kill Haniyya�%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.imemc.org%2Findex.php%3Fobj_id%3D53%26story_id%3D52373%26%0A%0AEnter+your+reason+here+-+please+do+not+remove+the+above+link+as+it+will+allow+an+editor+to+easily+remove+the+offending+content">

Palestinian Legislator of the Hamas movement, previous Minister of Interior, Sa�id Siyam,  stated on Friday that Hamas-controlled security forces in the Gaza Strip arrested a resident who intended to carry a suicide bombing in Gaza in order to kill Hamas leader Ismail Haniyya while he was praying in a Gaza mosque.

Sa'id Siyam

Israel closes Gaza Crossing to UN Aid and Kills 37 Palestinians

Sunday January 20, 2008 05:48 by Palestine Solidarity Committee of South Africa http://www.imemc.org/report_posts?subject=Abusive Post Report: Story 52372 with title: Israel closes Gaza Crossing to UN Aid and Kills 37 Palestinians&message=Abusive Post Report: Story 52372 with title: Israel closes Gaza Crossing to UN Aid and Kills 37 Palestinians%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.imemc.org%2Findex.php%3Fobj_id%3D53%26story_id%3D52372%26%0A%0AEnter+your+reason+here+-+please+do+not+remove+the+above+link+as+it+will+allow+an+editor+to+easily+remove+the+offending+content">

According to the UN, about half the strip's 1.5 million people no longer have access to fresh water, because Israel has been restricting fuel supplies, which in turn halts pumps and reduces electricity production. This has created an unprecedented humanitarian crisis in the impoverished Strip and denies the population their most fundamental human right - the right to life.

Archive Photo

http://www.imemc.org/ - http://www.imemc.org/

http://www.brigadasinternacionais.blogspot.com/ - http://www.brigadasinternacionais.blogspot.com/

http://english.pnn.ps/ - http://english.pnn.ps/

http://www.rebelion.org/ - http://www.rebelion.org/

La Franja de Gaza sometida a castigos colectivos del r�gimen sionista
Israel siempre ha utilizado coartadas para reprimir a los palestinos

Israel ha cortado los suministros de combustibles y electricidad dejando toda la Franja de Gaza y sus 1,5 millones de habitantes a oscuras y sin ning�n tipo de energ�a. A pesar del anuncio del Gobierno sionista de reanudar el suministro en breve,  el sitio y el castigo colectivo contra la poblaci�n civil contin�a.

El castigos colectivos contra la poblaci�n civil viola claramente la legalidad internacional, la pasividad de la comunidad internacional y el silencio frente al f�rreo bloqueo que afecta a Gaza, estimulan a Israel para continuar con su pol�tica de agresi�n basada en la superioridad militar.

Israel argumenta y justifica sus agresiones militares como respuesta al lanzamiento de cohetes caseros por parte de la resistencia palestina, respondiendo a estas acciones con una lluvia de mort�feros misiles de avanzada tecnolog�a que si han causado solo en las �ltimas 3 semanas 75 muertos, y centenares de heridos, la mayor�a civiles y entre ellos ni�os.

El bloqueo que sufre Gaza, donde los militares israel�es controlan las fronteras, el espacio a�reo y las costas, no permite el transito de la poblaci�n y la salida o ingreso de las mercanc�as, adem�s de prohibir la entrada de la ayuda humanitaria de Naciones Unidas. Solo durante los �ltimos 6 meses, 78 enfermos palestinos han fallecido al no permitirles la salida para recibir tratamientos m�dicos, miles de pacientes sufren la escasez de medicinas y decenas de miles no pueden salir de la Franja bloqueada para trabajar o estudiar.

La reacci�n desesperada de los palestinos expresada por el lanzamiento de cohetes artesanales es utilizada por Israel para justificar, respuestas desproporcionadas, la gran destrucci�n, muertes, el permanente bloqueo y ahora los cortes de combustibles y electricidad. Israel pretende mantener la ocupaci�n, el control absoluto, la opresi�n, el desacato a la legalidad internacional y continuar con sus violaciones de los Derechos Humanos, sin recibir ning�n tipo de resistencia.

A parte del silencio c�mplice de la comunidad internacional, llama la atenci�n la tibia reacci�n de los reg�menes �rabes que solo �condenan� los hechos y m�s llama la atenci�n la respuesta incoherente de la propia Autoridad Nacional de Mahmud Abbas, que mientras Israel siembra muerte y destrucci�n en Gaza y Cisjordania, esta Autoridad contin�a negociando con Israel la supuesta Paz.

http://www.mundoarabe.org/palestina_derechos_humanos.htm - http://www.mundoarabe.org/palestina_derechos_humanos.htm

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article9241.shtml - http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article9241.shtml

pandilla de borregos traidores

ignorantes y acomodados al servilismo

MAHDI,

Please post in English here that is the language being used at the forum. Another thing is that this is discussion forum, and you cannot just posting on and on without any discussion and interaction.