Another prediction comes true!

Duende wrote: Now, you tell me, because it really makes my brain ache trying to follow your psychotic dialogues, why on earth would America be preparing a military build-up in the Straights of Hormuz- Persian Gulf, bombing the crap out of Iraq and consistently making up little propaganda excersises blaming Iran for providing weapons to Iraqi 'resistance fighters' if all the while, behind the scenes they are slapping each other on the back and praising one another for having managed to keep hidden from the entire world, including many seriously talented investigative journalists, the fact that Iran and the US are secret allies ...?

It's been nearly 5 months since you wrote this Deunde, what happened to the "military build-up in the Straights of Hormuz- Persian Gulf"???

Your "talented journalists" fooled you and hundreds of millions of people with their lies.

Supreme Leader lauds great achievements of Iraqi people

...

The Supreme Leader expressed pleasure with establishment of democratic government in Iraq and taking shape of constitutional organs in the country.

The Supreme Leader praised the great achievements of the Iraqi people and described them as blessings of the Almighty.

Ayatollah Khamenei honored the decisive leadership of venerable leader of Iraq (Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani) and said that Iraqi people are expected to reinforce national solidarity and religious unity to remove security problems in Iraq.

The Supreme Leader underscored the need for withdrawal of occupation forces from Iraq as pre-requisite for national security and successful hand-over of the state affairs to Iraqi forces themselves.

Source: Islamic Republic (of Iran) News Agency

Link:http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-22/06062075201625 06.htm

I just quoted the above as more confirmation of what I've been saying.

First of all, notice Khamenehi refers to the new Iraqi Government which the United States has made in Iraq as the "blessing of the Almighty"!!!

He then says the "security problems" in Iraq must be removed and the "Iraqi forces" (who are trained, armed and controled by the Americans) should take over.

So he is clearly saying that the puppet Government is Islamic (in fact, a "blessing of the Almighty") and that the "security problems" (by which he means the Iraqi resistance) must be destroyed.

Note: This is in connection to my posts on page 1 of this thread.

Whisper wrote: Ask someone else what "I had agreed" means if you are not familiar with good class English. Don't hark for my attention, I have told you I have no time for you at all.

Who did you agree with? When you agree with someone, that means both sides decide to do the same thing, since I didnt then you did not agree, you offered.

Im not seeking attention from you, I actually started a thread ("Sawtul vs Whisper") to stop you from posting nonsense on my other threads but sadly that thread was closed...

Getting back to the topic, here's again another reports which once again confirms my prediction:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/08/28/the-us-is-fighting- iraqi-government/

There�s a sinister reason why some journalists believe �the surge� is having a small effect in Iraq militarily. It�s because we�re actually fighting against the government we helped create. This is sick.

BLITZER: What did you think of what we heard from General Odierno, suggesting that some progress, in fact, is being achieved on the battlefield against Al Qaida in Iraq and other elements there?

Because the critics, a lot of critics, are suggesting, yes, there may be some progress, but it won�t make much difference in the long run, as long as that sectarian rift that exists between the Sunni, the Shia and the Kurds continues to exist.

WARE: Yes, well, General Ray Odierno very much has his finger on the pulse of this war, and his assessment is entirely correct.

Yes, there has been some stabilization, some spectacular examples, like in al-Anbar province. Yes, it�s forced changes in the type of violence that we�re seeing here.

But Iraqi innocents are still dying in their hundreds and thousands every month. And what we�re failing to address is how we achieving these successes in bringing down the violence is by cutting a deal with the tribes, the Baathists and the Sunni insurgents. It�s by creating Sunni militias to counteract the government�s own militias and the Iranian-backed militias. That�s bound to have long-term consequences.

In many ways, part of what�s being achieved is because America is turning somewhat, despite its rhetoric, against this government, fostering Sunni militias, questioning the role of this government, questioning whether it can actually perform.

And we Ambassador Crocker, just the other day, say that if Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki does not deliver, then American support is not at the end of a blank check. So he�s threatening the prime minister.

 

Remember that my prediction was:

"But just incase the Sunni resistance continues to stand tall, they are going to have to stay content with a pro-American, yet "religious" Shiah Government (So long as Iran is allied to them, and so long as Iran is seen as a religious anti-American Government, the New Iraqi Government could also hope to be portrayed as anti-American one day. In other words they can later pretend to have sided with Iran rather than the USA, when in reality they have always been working with both Iran and the USA)."

http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8411& ; ;PN=1&TPN=1 

Whisper wrote:  I had agreed to place photocopies of my passport with a firm of Swiss Confidentiality Solicitors

Whisper wrote: You know it and quite a few others on this forum know when I had offered (it was my offer, not some agreement with you) that test.

Why do you so constantly contradict yourself? 

 If only you start reading the posts (including your own) before posting again,  then maybe, just maybe, we can have an intelligent conversation.