British-Iranian Hostage Crisis Staged?

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ww3/iran_was_british_iran_h ostage_crisis_staged.htm

Was The British- Hostage Crisis Staged?

Many of you may be rightly highly suspicious of the timing of all this.

Evidently it appears that there is far more to this so called British hostage capture crisis than what has thus far been reported by virtually all of the MSM.

In a very revealing analytical studio commentary on The BBC's Newsnight programme last night: Diplomatic Editor: Mark Urban demonstrated to Host: Jeremy Paxman: that the video footage released by the Iranians yesterday - of those 15 British service personnel being "captured" - seems to have been FAKED in large part!

He also went on to illustrate how viritually inconceivable it is that such an event (like the alleged "ambush" of British Military personnel by the Iranians) could actually happen: given the fact that the area of water where this event supposedly took place was well within the Radar Scope of HMS Cornwall (not to mention a whole host of other vessels: WHICH WERE ALL MYSTERIOUSLY ABSENT at the moment when the Iranian interception party appeared on the scene!)

From this both he & show Host Jeremy Paxman conclude that The Royal Navy were (at the very least!) grossly negligent in their duty of policing The Shat Al Arab/International Waterways (hence their clamour to blitz the Media with "evidence" of their "innocence".)

It is when one considers the implications of what The BBC are getting at (but not saying directly!) that one realizes this entire thing may have really been a deliberate SET UP: i.e. either a TRAP laid by The British for The Iranians to fall into, or (even more mind bogglingly!) a TRAP laid by The British AND The Iranians (together with everyone else within The NWO Club) for The World to fall into!!!

Watch the requisite report from the aforementioned Newsnight programme, and judge for yourselves:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_4670000/newsid...... ...

Edited by Sawtul Khilafah

But seriously Sawtul, it's not that I doubt the whole thing may indeed be a
classic set up. Just read this carefully, and please note THE ABSENCE OF
EXCLAMATION MARKS!!
www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17454.htm

"Intelligence analysts place great store in sources� record for reliability
and the historical record. We would be forced to classify Tony Blair as a
known prevaricator who, for reasons still not entirely clear, has a five-
year record of acting as man�s best friend for Bush. If the president needs
a casus belli, Blair will probably fetch it.

Is there, then, any British statesman well versed in both the Middle East
and maritime matters, who is worthy of trust? There is. Craig Murray is
former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan (until he was cashiered for openly
objecting to UK and US support for torture there) and also former head of
the maritime section of the British Foreign Office, and has considerable
experience negotiating disputes over borders extending into the sea.

In recent days, former ambassador Murray has performed true to
character in courageously speaking out, taking public issue with the
British government�s position on the incident at hand. He was quick to
quote, for example, the judiciously balanced words of Commodore Nick
Lambert, the Royal Navy commander of the operation on which the
Marines were captured:

�There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that they were in Iraqi territorial
waters. Equally, the Iranians may well claim that they were in their
territorial waters. The extent and definition of territorial waters in this
part of the world is very complicated.�

Compare the commodore�s caution with the infallible certainty with which
Blair has professed to be �utterly confident� that the Marines were in Iraqi
waters, and you get an idea of what may be Blair�s ultimate purpose.

Writing in his widely read blog (http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/
weblog.html ), Murray points to a �colossal problem� with respect to the
map the British government has used to show coordinates of the incident
and the Iran/Iraq maritime border�the story uncritically accepted by
stenographers of the mainstream press. Murray writes:

�The Iran/Iraq maritime boundary shown on the British government map
does not exist. It has been drawn up by the British Government. Only Iraq
and Iran can agree on their bilateral boundary, and they have never done
this in the Gulf, only inside the Shatt because there it is the land border
too. This published boundary is a fake with no legal force...Anyway, the
UK was plainly wrong to be ultra-provocative in disputed waters...

�They [the British Marines] would under international law have been
allowed to enter Iranian territorial waters if in �hot pursuit� of terrorists,
slavers, or pirates....But they were looking for smuggled vehicles
attempting to evade car duty. What has the evasion of Iranian or Iraqi
taxes got to do with the Royal Navy?�

Ambassador Murray has appealed to reason and cooler heads. To state
what should be the obvious, he notes it is not legitimate for the British
government to draw a boundary without agreement of the countries
involved:

�A little more humility, and an acknowledgement that this is a boundary
subject to dispute, might actually get our people home. The question is
are we really aiming to get our people home, or to maximize propaganda
from the incident?�