Only 10% US see Iran as Immediate Threat |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |
Sawtul Khilafah
Senior Member Joined: 20 July 2006 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 623 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 22 March 2007 at 3:49pm |
Only 10% in U.S. See Iran as Immediate Threat http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewIte m/itemID/15093 ----------------------------------------------------------- As you can see most Americans are against invading Iran, and the same certainly goes for the great majority of Europeans. But as I had already explained on another thread almost 2 months ago, this was what the US government really wanted. In other words, the US Government and its allies delibrately turned their own people against invading Iran while pretending to support it themselves !! This is what I wrote : http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8411& ;PN=1&TPN=1
Now the US Government is trying to make it seem like they want to invade Iran, but they just cant because so many people are against it... so as people protest against invading Iran, Bush and his administration just pretend like the good old "democracy" has tied their hands and the PEOPLE have prevailed.
|
|
.:: SoHaIB ::.
Groupie Joined: 24 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 96 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thats a good theory man
|
|
|
|
nu001
Senior Member Male Joined: 02 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 252 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Americans also did not think Iraq was a threat, before the attack. Even Bush declared in the state of the union address, days before the attack, that Iraq does not pose an immediate threat. But they went for attack. Everyone knows, it was oil for which US went to Iraq. Iran has more reasons than just oil. US is not yet attacking Iran coz they are bogged down in Iraq. Don't forget Iraq was under UN sanctions for 10 years before the attack. Sawat, I am amzed seeing your enthusiasm to convince muslims that Iran is a partner of USA. What's ur problem? Would Iran partner with US for getting economic sanctions?? Crazy. If Iran is a partner of USA; then it's no news and there is no point of discussion. Because then they only join all the other islamic countries like SA, Egypt, Jordan, Pak etc. All of them are US partners. Since you are trying hard to prove that Iran is a partner of US; that only indicates that, Iran is different than others and that means an enemy of USA. So a friend of true muslim people. Edited by nu001 |
|
"Al-Quran-The only Straight path to success. Alhamdulillah"
|
|
Sawtul Khilafah
Senior Member Joined: 20 July 2006 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 623 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
http://youtube.com/watch?v=gno6iwuJlmw US Mainstream Media turning American people against war on Iran... including Fox News who are delibrately broadcasting it calling it "nonsense" but in fact what they are really doing is giving it even more publicity. |
|
Sawtul Khilafah
Senior Member Joined: 20 July 2006 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 623 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Watch this recent video (late August 2007): http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Play/20658/1/Colbert-Che ney-VFWSpeech.wmv/ In it, Thomas Ricks says exactly what I said on this thread and also wrote nearly 7 months ago on this other thread: http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8411& ;PN=2&TPN=1 Where I wrote:
|
|
Israfil
Senior Member Joined: 08 September 2003 Status: Offline Points: 3984 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
U.S cannot invade Iran because troops are spread too thin...simple as that. The rhetoric is mainly to convince Iran to "wise up" probably.
|
|
Cassandra
Senior Member Joined: 30 May 2006 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 293 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Israfil: U.S cannot invade Iran because troops are spread too thin...simple as that. The rhetoric is mainly to convince Iran to "wise up" probably. I wonder? Look at the Silk Road. Do we have a potential "new Road": From (Pakistan), Afghanistan....(Iran)...Iraq...(Syria)...(Lebanon)...Israel? Easy passage through the Med. What would be the purpose of such an overland road? No rounding the continent of Africa...no Suez Canal. And Gibraltar...well, almost in the U.S. pockets isn't it really? I posted on this ages ago, but I still think that it is not Iran that is a threat to the U.S. Looks more to me that the U.S. is a threat to Iran. Look out Syria and Lebanon....? Looks like a clear run to me. C (But what do I know??) |
|
Sawtul Khilafah
Senior Member Joined: 20 July 2006 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 623 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Israel has plans for nuclear strike on Iran: report
(Reuters) 7 January 2007 LONDON - Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran�s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons, Britain�s Sunday Times newspaper said.
Citing what it said were several Israeli military sources, the paper said two Israeli air force squadrons had been training to blow up an enrichment plant in Natanz using low-yield nuclear �bunker busters�. Two other sites, a heavy water plant at Arak and a uranium conversion plant at Isfahan, would be targeted with conventional bombs, the Sunday Times said. The UN Security Council voted unanimously last month to slap sanctions on Iran to try to stop uranium enrichment that Western powers fear could lead to making bombs. Tehran insists its plans are peaceful and says it will continue enrichment. Israel has refused to rule out pre-emptive military action against Iran along the lines of its 1981 air strike against an atomic reactor in Iraq, though many analysts believe Iran�s nuclear facilities are too much for Israel to take on alone. The newspaper said the Israeli plan envisaged conventional laser-guided bombs opening �tunnels� into the targets. Nuclear warheads would then be used fired into the plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce radioactive fallout. Israeli pilots have flown to Gibraltar in recent weeks to train for the 2,000 mile (3,200 km) round-trip to the Iranian targets, the Sunday Times said, and three possible routes to Iran have been mapped out including one over Turkey. However it also quoted sources as saying a nuclear strike would only be used if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene. Disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, the paper added. Washington has said military force remains an option while insisting that its priority is to reach a diplomatic solution. Iran�s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for Israel to be �wiped off the map�. Israel, widely believed to have the Middle East�s only nuclear arsenal, has said it will not allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. |
|
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |