The REAL reason why the US invaded Iraq!

nu001 wrote: Swat, I am not paid to waste time with someone paid for it. And you are right, that what ever you say, it does not harm islam. Allah is the biggest and most wise planner. So I don't worry about what you say, your reasonings are like comic to me and it really makes me laugh.   How can someone put arguments against comic/joke? That's why i rathar told you to carry on. :)

The recent events in Iraq are very significant and are in direct connection to the US election. As I had explained before on the thread about Obama, who becomes the next president of the United States would depend on what happens in the war on Iraq. This is why there was a surge and now a Shia uprising lead by Moqtada al-Sadr who until now was doing nothing but helping the occupation forces.

Edited by Sawtul Khilafah - 21 April 2008 at 7:58pm

New reports claim British and American forces are in south Iraq and are actually taking part in the fight against the "Mahdi Army".

This is from the BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7360875.stm

Let me just comment on some of the things the BBC says:

US and UK special forces are carrying out operations in Basra in southern Iraq against Shia militiamen, a Western military source has told the BBC. The aim is to detain senior figures in the Mehdi Army and other Shia militias, and members of a local tribe.

So their aim is just to arrest them? I thought they were supposed to be fighting.

At that time, the BBC understands that 550 US troops embedded with the Iraqi army also joined in the battle.

Remember when it was reported that American troops are not taking part in the battle? Now they claim that they are!!! Secretly!

This video from the BBC also makes this claim that the British and American soldiers have covertly taken part in the fighting without anyone knowing:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7361730.stm

Remember before they claimed the reason why Americans and British forces are not taking part in the fighting was that they didnt want to "inflame the situation", but now they say they are taking part in the fighting but secretly... my question is, if it's a secret then WHY ARE THEY REVEALING IT??? Wouldn't that "inflame the situation"???

The truth is as originally reported, British and American troops are NOT fighting the "Mahdi Army", they first made the excuse that they dont want to "inflame the situation", now they make the excuse that they are fighting covertly.

You may ask, if they want to decieve us why dont they just lie and claim they are fighting normally?

Well because then the ordinary people in Iraq and independent journalists would know that this is not true and they could be exposed real soon.

So since American and British soldiers are nowhere to be seen in the streets they make excuses like "we dont want to inflame the situation", or "we are there but covertly and secretly" (as if they would reveal their own secrets).

The operation was criticised by US commanders as poorly planned and as failing to achieve its stated aims.

Yes it was poorly planned, even an idiot would know that sending the Iraqi Army alone to fight the Shia militias is pointless.

Going back to this video: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7361730.stm notice the BBC report that military sources (in other words commanders working directly for the US Government) "revealed" this secret (either these are the st**idest commanders in the world as they revealed secrets that they claim would harm them, or they actually gave false information to the BBC to decieve viewers into thinking that the USA and Mahdi Army are fighting eachother).

The video also shows Iraqi soldiers handing over weapons to the "Mahdi Army" (I posted a picture of it on my last post).

But the FUNNIEST part of the video is the end where an Iraqi Soldier who refused to fight the "Mahdi Army" says "I dont want to fight Iraqis or Muslims".

WHAAAAAAAT??!!! LOL!!! What has he been doing all this time?? The Iraqi Army do nothing BUT fight Muslims and Iraqis, there is no one else to fight since they never fight the Americans and are trained and armed by them and are under their command.

So why did this guy join the Army if he didn't want to fight Iraqis??? What nonsesne.

He obviously didn't want to fight the "Mahdi Army" and MOST LIKELY the New Iraqi Government itself secretly told the soldiers not to fight because the New Iraqi Government is mainly controled by the "Badr Brigade" and many soldiers in the Iraqi Army are from the "Badr Brigade" and the "Badr Brigade" is directly controled by Iran as is the "Mahdi Army".

So it's very obvious that he is lying and that he didn't fight because he was ordered not to by agents of the Iranian Government who also control the "Mahdi Army".

After reading this thread, it appears many readers are not well informed of the origins and beliefs of the Shia sect. May I take this an opportunity to recommend all readers to read about the Shi'a on the following very informative site: