IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Politics > World Politics
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The REAL reason why the US invaded Iraq!  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

The REAL reason why the US invaded Iraq!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 16>
Author
Message
nu001 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 02 March 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 252
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nu001 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 March 2007 at 7:44am
Originally posted by Sawtul Khilafah Sawtul Khilafah wrote:

Bizzarrreeeeeee

Sawtul, All your logics and evidences are against your conclusions. Isnt it weird !!! Recycle your brain please. I mean your thought process.........

Can you tell, where the sunnis & Al-Qaida in Iraq gets their supplies? Why they have no complains against Iran?

Salam



Edited by nu001
"Al-Quran-The only Straight path to success. Alhamdulillah"
Back to Top
Sawtul Khilafah View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 20 July 2006
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 623
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sawtul Khilafah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 March 2007 at 10:32am

QUOTE=nu001]

Originally posted by Sawtul Khilafah Sawtul Khilafah wrote:

Bizzarrreeeeeee

Please dont misquote.

Originally posted by nu001 nu001 wrote:

Can you tell, where the sunnis & Al-Qaida in Iraq gets their supplies? Why they have no complains against Iran?

 

1: They make some of them themselves (especially the explosives)

2: Saddam allowed Weapons to be sold in Iraq before the invasion.

3: Iraq's military bases were raided by those who later formed the resistance groups

4: They take their enemies weapons from them after killing them (war booty).

 

The one place where they DONT get weapons from is Iran.

And you say they have no complains about Iran ??? Dont talk about things you dont know. Read this :

----------------------------------------------------

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3330633,00.html

Hizbullah chief Hassan Nasrallah has been branded a "worshipper of idols, an agent of the anti-Christ," and "charlatan" by Iraqi al-Qaeda leader Sheikh Abu Hamza al-Muhajir in a statement made earlier this month, the full text of which has now become available. The message, which also contained threats to blow up the White House, forms another escalation in al-Qaeda's increasingly hostile anti-Iranian rhetoric, that has also targeted Hizbullah . Discussing the actions of US President Bush, Muhajir said in the statement, released by al-Qaeda's al-Furqan Foundation, translated into English by the Al-Boraq Workshop, and reproduced on the Jihad unspun website:

"He (Bush) turned to the Sham (Syria and Lebanon ) and terrorized its tyrant (Basher Assad), who is a Rafidi (Shiite) and a Nusayri (one of Shiite's factions). The blockade continued until he (Assad) had to open his country to hundreds and thousands of Persians to acquire citizenship in it, (so the they can) support the charlatan agent of the anti-Christ, Nasr Allat (a common nickname for Hizbullah's Nasrallah, and meaning a supporter and worshipper of Idols) who is called Nasrallah..."

"Hence, the Old Persian Empire has become complete, extending from the countries behind the river, Iran and Iraq� to the Sham (Syria and Lebanon)," Muhajir said.

The al-Qaeda leader said the United States had become an agent for Iran. "I wonder whether the wise of Romans (Americans) realize that they have become slaves and mercenaries for Persia, and that they are fighting Persia's battles for free," he said.

On November 17, Sunni al-Qaeda followers in Lebanon released a statement on the internet calling on Lebanese Sunnis to prepare for an imminent confrontation .

According to the SITE Institute , a website which monitors Islamist web activity, the statement also said:"Let the Rafidi (Shiites) know that we are ready to fight them with Allah's help and let it be a war. We are more eager for it than they." Islamic State declared in Iraq

Meanwhile, al-Qaeda in Iraq has declared the establishment of a Caliphate (Islamic State), in anticipation of the withdrawal of US troops from the region.

-----------------------------------------------------

I think this is proof enough that al-Qaeda are against Iran. Also I explained that there are other groups in Iraq who are also against Iran on my earlier posts, such as ANSAR SUNNAH, ARMY OF ABU BAKR, ARMY OF RASHIDEEN and other Sunni resistance groups.

Everything I say can be proven, wether you believe or not.

Back to Top
nu001 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 02 March 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 252
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nu001 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 March 2007 at 9:51pm
Originally posted by Sawtul Khilafah Sawtul Khilafah wrote:

1: They make some of them themselves (especially the explosives)

2: Saddam allowed Weapons to be sold in Iraq before the invasion.

3: Iraq's military bases were raided by those who later formed the resistance groups

4: They take their enemies weapons from them after killing them (war booty).

Everything I say can be proven, wether you believe or not.

Do you think they can fight on booty & hand made explosives? They are loosing more than they are getting. They need a factory for amunition & small arms. They must have some external source for buying & shipping it. Which is only possible through Iran/syria; Unless US army supplies them from Saudi/Kuwait or in Iraq.

Your ref is a third party quote. Al Qaida accused All Saudi/Pak/Egypt/Jordan etc many times in their tapes and web sites.

Salam

"Al-Quran-The only Straight path to success. Alhamdulillah"
Back to Top
Sawtul Khilafah View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 20 July 2006
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 623
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sawtul Khilafah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 March 2007 at 3:51pm

 

Originally posted by nu001 nu001 wrote:

Al Qaida accused All Saudi/Pak/Egypt/Jordan etc many times in their tapes and web sites.

What's your point ??? All of these Governements are allied to the United States and Iran.

Originally posted by nu001 nu001 wrote:

Do you think they can fight on booty & hand made explosives? They are loosing more than they are getting. They need a factory for amunition & small arms. They must have some external source for buying & shipping it. Which is only possible through Iran/syria; Unless US army supplies them from Saudi/Kuwait or in Iraq.

I didnt say just booty and hand made, they also use the weapons left over from Saddam's regime. It is also a fact that they make explosives and many of them have even filmed themselves while doing so. I dont know why you try to imply as if I only mentioned 2 sources while I actually mentioned 4.

This is Ala al-Maliki, a close friend of Muqtada al-Sadr and member of "Mahdi Army" who was arrested and executed by the Sunni Kurdish group called Ansar Sunnah.

Ansar Sunnah claim that he was secretly working with the Americans and assassinating Sunni resistance leaders with their help !

This is just more evidence that the so called "Mahdi Army", the supposed "Shiah Resistance" armed and funded by Iran is in reality working with the Occupation forces.

So again, it is not just al-Qaeda who have found evidence, many other groups have also concluded that the "Shia resistance" armed and funded by Iran and the "Quds force" are imposters who are helping the occupation.

 

And here are a few interesting pictures that confirm what I said about Sadr being the Nasrallah of Iraq:

(Nasrallah is also an imposter, read : http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6007& ;PN=10&TPN=1 )

 



Edited by Sawtul Khilafah
Back to Top
.:: SoHaIB ::. View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar
Joined: 24 March 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote .:: SoHaIB ::. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 March 2007 at 2:06pm
I didn't read all that man cuz we all know America attacked Iraq just for oil but what DID we do about it ? what ARE we doing about it ?......Nuthing except whining about the Americans while our brothers and sisters are getting killed over there and around the world. I am doing the same thing as u whining, every1 knowz what happened but they didn't have the courage to stop it but we do have the guts to talk about it ????.... thats not fair man
Back to Top
Sawtul Khilafah View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 20 July 2006
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 623
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sawtul Khilafah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 March 2007 at 4:48pm

Originally posted by .:: SoHaIB ::. .:: SoHaIB ::. wrote:

I didn't read all that man cuz we all know America attacked Iraq just for oil

?????

Back to Top
Sawtul Khilafah View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 20 July 2006
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 623
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sawtul Khilafah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 March 2007 at 1:49pm
Originally posted by Sawtul Khilafah Sawtul Khilafah wrote:

 The original plan was for Sadr to take over, the back up plan is a (supposedly) "religious" New Iraqi Government which would (despite being "religious") be on the American side.

 The new Iraqi Government became "religious" because the Americans were being defeated by the "insurgency" and needed more help. Since most Iraqis are Shiahs the new Iraqi Government (which is mainly Shiah) was made to appear more religious so that:

1: More people would join the National Army

2: Sadr could side with the National Army and the Government whenever needed, saying "Im helping our Shiah brothers to fight the evil Nasibis (Sunnis)".

As long as the Sunni insurgency/resistance remains strong, the original plan cannot be implemented. The conspirators prefer the original plan ofcourse, but their back up plan can go back to the original if they manage to destroy the Sunni resistance.

This is why to this day Sadr Still pretends to oppose the Government, even though sometimes he sides with them and sends his militia to defend the Government !!!

He is still pretending to oppose them at times because if the Americans and their allies succeed in destroying the Sunni resistance, he can rise up and carry out the original plan.

This is also why George Bush refuses to set a date for US to pull out of Iraq. Bush constantly says that he is going to stay until they win - in reality he wants to stay until they Lose (to Sadr) but they dont know when they are going to go through with the plan as they do not know when (or even if) they would succeed in defeating the Sunni resistance.

 Hence it is impossible for the conspirators to set a date for pulling out of Iraq, as they want to make it seem like the US forces were suddenly defeated by Sadr.

But if the US is finally forced to leave Iraq (by Really being defeated), or if Sadr's militias are destroyed or seriously weakened by Sunni forces, then they would have no choice but to continue with the back up plan.

And the back up plan is that the New Iraqi Government would continue working for the US, but later, shortly after the Americans leave Iraq, they would side with Iran and appear to become anti-American (they may then claim that they worked with the US due to "political reasons" and that they always opposed them but pretended to be on their side for the "greater good").

Then the New Iraqi Government would join Iran, and Iran would send their army to Iraq to destroy the remaining Sunni resistance.

The back up plan is ofcourse far less convincing and is not helpful in giving Shiahs a heroic face. The original plan is tried and tested in Lebanon where it seems to work well.

Insha'allah, both plans will fail.

 

Those who wait for (some misfortune to befall) you then If you have a victory from Allah they say: Were we not with you? And if the disbelievers gain success, they say: Did we not acquire the mastery over you and defend you from the believers?

So Allah shall Judge between you on the day of resurrection, and Allah will by no means give the unbelievers a way against the believers.

(Qur'an: Surah Nisa: 141)

 

ALLAHU AKBAR

These are exactly the two things planned by Iran today.

Those who wait = Moqtada al-Sadr and his so called "Mahdi Army" who are WAITING and not fighting the occupation, while claiming to support the resistance.

If the Iraqi Sunni Resistance succeeds, they plan to say "were we not with not with you?" (They will say they were part of the resistance).

 

Back to Top
nu001 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 02 March 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 252
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nu001 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 March 2007 at 8:13pm

Doesn't make sense, How can you say that it's Iran and not SA, Egypt, Jordan or you?

At the moment; there is all the reason to believe that Iran is on the right side.

Others (SA, Egypt, Jordan etc) are openly on US side. So There is no chance to be on the right side, if you are with them.

 

"Al-Quran-The only Straight path to success. Alhamdulillah"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 16>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.