The REAL reason why the US invaded Iraq!

Sawtul Khilafah wrote: All Sunni families in that area were killed off by the Americans, but the Shiah family and their house were left untouched!!

 

Im sorry I made a mistake here, the documentary actually says the "Mahdi army" were the ones who carried out the massacre rather than the Americans.

Sawtul, read up on the techniques used by the CFR to plant supporters of
both sides of an argument, thereby continuously confusing the public as
to their real intentions. As supreme master of these techniques, Kissinger
is very unlikely to reveal the truth about ANYTHING although, a grain of
truth may be planted in whatever he states so as to lead us all along.

Personally, I feel Kissinger and his fellow seekers of One World
Government are annoyed with G.W and Cheney who consistently try to get
the upper hand over them, and some public knuckle-rapping is in order.

Incase you haven't been able to bone-up on the CFR, here's a small idea:
The CFR members include executives from the New York Times,
Washington Post, L.A Times, Wall Street Journal, NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX,
Time Fortune, Business Week. Candidates from both sides of the political
spectrum, most of the relevant government posts, especially Foreign
Policy obviously, CIA, FBI, and the IRS. Henry Kissinger is the key man in
the CFR. The president of the CFR, and founder, is David Rockerfeller,
world class banker extraordinaire.

Since before 1942 the CFR and Bilderberg Club have been working
towards a One World Government, which is largely what today�s UN is
being prepared to become, governing the three world regions of Europe
(notice it has already become an entity with its own �constitution�) a Pan-
American union, (the introduction of the Amero- replacing the Peso/
Canadian Loony/U.S Dollar is already in the public awareness) and Pacific/
Asian Union. The powerfully rich rule these regions behind the curtains of
the current U.S Admin and the European Parliament, via bodies such as
the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Tavistock Institute and Royal Institute of
International Affairs (UK) along with a whole range of seemingly un-
related �think-tanks� and foundations (Rockerfeller Foundation, Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation, Carnegie, Ford etc.,)

Psycho-political campaigns directed by the CFR and Bilderberg Club,
mostly prepared by the Tavistock Institute in the UK, are designed to
manipulate and create perpetual tensions in order to imprint upon the
world the �public opinion� that best suits their ends. There are three basic
rules of influencing conduct: Carefully elaborated misinformation must
contain an element of truth: the elaborate web of deceit must be so
ornate as to make proof and actual evidence supporting it, intangible, by
hiding key information from the public, and thirdly; the actual
misinformation must not discredit a source of credibility such as the
media, which are therefore responsible for this role of �credible source�.
The Western media are almost entirely under the control of the CFR.

Placing themselves on both sides of an argument they demoralize,
confuse and confound and very few of us can see through the
smokescreen and determine the real motives.

From what I can judge, I see Ahmadineyad and the Iranian Ruling Council
as one of the last bastions against this world-domination of the ultra-rich
US based bankers, along with Cuba and Venezuela, and the emerging
Russian oligarchy.

Today, on Fox News Sunday, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol declared that the U.S. was close to victory in the Iraq war, arguing that the only concern left for the U.S is dealing with alleged Iranian involvement in Iraq:

"We're winning in Iraq. That is the absolute crucial precondition to having success in the broader fight against Islamic jihadism.  And I think we are going to have to be serious about dealing with both their intervention in Iraq which is now the only real threat, I think, incidentally, to relative success in Iraq and their nuclear program."

 

As you can see they are actually trying to change history. I mentioned numerous other examples on my earlier posts such as my post at the buttom of this page: http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8411& ;PN=1&TPN=1

Wait a minute, are you actually implying that they got rid of the Shah and replaced him with Khomeini just to stop Iran from prospering financially??? Since the Shah was openly their ally, surely they could have made more money with him around than the supposed anti-American anti-West Khomeini.

I agree that things are more complicated than they seem, but it's certainly not all about money.