The Trinity is a Pagan Doctrine.

Dear BMZ,

Thank you for the kind remark.  You're very "sweet" yourself.

You stated this:

"Patty, this was how John explained. It was John's own view and own statement, not Christ's view. I do not find anything of this sort in the Bible, taught by Jesus himself.

Aren't you relying more on what men thought and what men said?"

Jesus loved John very, very much.  I believe (and I don't expect you to believe it) that John's words are inspired by God, so that less than intellectual persons such as myself, will be able to fully understand God's entire plan in our lives.  So, yes, I suppose I do rely on what Jesus' disciples and prophets revealed in holy scriptures which, to Catholics/Christians, are the inspired word of God.  (Isn't it true that Muhammed was a man....and don't you also believe his words?  Or am I mistaken?)

God's Peace and Blessings!

BMZ said:

"Yes, Muhammad was just a man, an ordinary man and I believe in the words that were revealed to him which he recited to people but of course he did not write anything under inspiration."

Okay, that's good.  Basically, it's the same thing.  I believe the words of the disciples and prophets, much as you believe the revelations of Muhammed.  Whether he physically wrote it himself, or had someone write it for him is of no consequence.  It was revealed to him and you believe it. 

The same goes for me regarding the disciples and apostles and prophets.  Much was revealed to them by God....and I believe it.  There, that's not so hard to understand, is it?

God's Peace.

The Trinity is not three Gods.  It is one God.

We organize things to better understand them.  We talk of the five different oceans because it is useful, but there is only one undivided body of seawater covering the earth.

Christians believe there is only ONE God.  The Qu'ran is correct; people who believe God is three different beings are in error.  People who ascribe partners to God are in error as well.

bmzsp asked:

"I am happy for you but do you believe it was the same John who wrote John? In fact, if that were true, his gospel should have been the first and only one? Don't you think so?"

John did only write one gospel.  First John is not a gospel...only Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are gospels.  Here is who wrote what :

John the Apostle (יוחנן "The LORD is merciful", Standard Hebrew Yoḥanan, Tiberian Hebrew Y�ḥānān) was one of the twelve apostles of Jesus. Christian tradition proclaims he is the same John who wrote:

• the Gospel of John and first epistle of John (the author of these is strictly referred to as John the Theologian and John the Evangelist)
• the second and third Epistle of John (the author of these is officially known, by decree of the Council of Rome, as John the Presbyter).
• the Book of Revelation (the author is strictly known as John the Divine and John of Patmos) - this book is formally called Apocalypse of St. John the Divine^{[citation needed]} - the term "divine" is an old term for "one who has had a revelation", while "apocalypse" is merely the Greek term for "revelation" (and only gained its modern heavily negative associations as a direct result of its association with the contents of the Book of Revelation).

St. John wrote both the Gospel of John and First John, aka John the Evangelist.

John the Presbyter wrote the 2nd and 3rd epistles (not gospels) of John. 

And the Book of Revelation or the Apocalypse was written by John of Patmos or John the Divine.

I hope this is of some help.

God's Peace and Blessings.