IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Islamic INTRAfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - In defence of the Salafis  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

In defence of the Salafis

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
Ali Zaki View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar
Joined: 10 May 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 217
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ali Zaki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 June 2005 at 9:27am

If you clicked on the link, you would see that on this page the chain of transmission of the hadith is given. In case is is a burden for you, here is the chain of transmission (from the page)

"He said: Abul Hasan Ali b. Khalid al-Maraghi al-Qalanisi reported to me from Abul Qasim al-Hasan b. Ali b. al-Hasan, who reported from Ja'far b. Muhammad b. Marwan who reported from his father, who reported from Ishaq b. Yazid, who reported from Khalid b. Mukhtar, who reported from al-A'amash from Habbah alArani, who said:"

The reason I give the link (instead of pasting the chain of transmission is to give the full context of the quoted passage as well as the chain without "muddling up" the form).

"The structure of faith is supported by four pillars endurance, conviction, justice and jihad."

Imam Ali (a.s.)
Back to Top
Ayubi1187 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie

Joined: 06 December 2001
Location: Somalia
Status: Offline
Points: 69
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ayubi1187 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 June 2005 at 1:51pm
[QUOTE=Ali Zaki]

If you clicked on the link, you would see that on this page the chain of transmission of the hadith is given. In case is is a burden for you, here is the chain of transmission (from the page)



"He said: Abul Hasan Ali b. Khalid al-Maraghi al-Qalanisi reported to me from Abul Qasim al-Hasan b. Ali b. al-Hasan, who reported from Ja'far b. Muhammad b. Marwan who reported from his father, who reported from Ishaq b. Yazid, who reported from Khalid b. Mukhtar, who reported from al-A'amash from Habbah alArani, who said:"

[QUOTE]

Why not just give the name of the shia book or are you ashamed to name it. Number two the chain is not complete at all as you think.
Back to Top
rami View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Male
Joined: 01 March 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rami Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 June 2005 at 6:26am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

assalamu alaikum

Ali Zaki, i see no point in replaying to your last post since you have not adressed the issues i raised.

Regarding Aisha (ra), the war was over those who killed Uthman (ra) she was not attacking Ali personaly.

You asked about why some scholars thought the verse on Tahara of Ahl al bayt was talking about the wives of the Prophet (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam);

33:32 O ye wives of the Prophet! Ye are not like any other women. If ye keep your duty (to Allah), then be not soft of speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease aspire (to you), but utter customary speech.

33:33 And stay in your houses. Bedizen not yourselves with the bedizenment of the Time of ignorance. Be regular in prayer, and pay the poor due, and obey Allah and His messenger. Allah's wish is but to remove uncleanness far from you, O Folk of the Household, and cleanse you with a thorough cleansing.

It is clearly adressing the wives of the prophet.


Edited by rami
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.
Back to Top
Ali Zaki View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar
Joined: 10 May 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 217
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ali Zaki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 June 2005 at 8:14am

Salam Rami,

"Ali Zaki, i see no point in replaying to your last post since you have not adressed the issues i raised."

You raised several issues (some explicit, and some implied) in your previous post. I'm sorry, but I don't see and questions marks (?'s). If you have a specific issue or question you would like me to address, please let me know and I will (inshahAllah) address it.

" Regarding Aisha (ra), the war was over those who killed Uthman (ra) she was not attacking Ali personaly."

Actually, what she did was worse since she was rebeling against the authority of the "Fourth Rightly Guided Caliph" (the Sunni title), which is indefensible according to the Sunni school of thought. Is this not correct?

REGARDING THE VERSE OF PURIFICATION

The verse itself demonstrates the neccesity and importance of leadership that is "free from error". you said that " It is clearly adressing the wives of the prophet." If you mean "It is clearly adressing (only) the wives of the prophet.", then why is it that numerous Sunni scholars from all Sunni schools say that the Ahly' Al-Bayt refers to the Prophet (a.s.), Fatima Zahara (a.s.), Ali (a.s.), Hassan (a.s.) and Hussien (a.s.) SEE : http://al-islam.org/mot/default.asp?url=14ahlbayt.htm. If you mean that it includes the wives and the 5 mentioned above, then how is it that one member of the Ahly Al'Bayt attacked the army led by another, thereby directly challenging the authoity of the Caliphate.

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

We see that among the Sunni scholars, there is no agreed upon meaning of the Ahly Al'Bayt (despite much evidence in the Quran and Hadith which specify the identity of these persons). If the "leadership of the Sunni Scholars" is to be depended on, then which scholar do we follow. There are thousands of examples in the history of Sunni schoarship of major disagreements on very basic and fundemental issues in Islam. If this is the case, how can they lead?

For this reason, we must depend on the leadership of an "unbroken chain" of authority which reverts back directly to the Holy Messenger himself. The Shia scholars of today are only custodians for the authority of the Ahly Al'Bayt, and have no authority on their own. The tradions that have been faithfully preserved from the Ahly Al'Bayt are a firm foundation on which the whole of Shia scholarship rests and depends on.

Salam


 

"The structure of faith is supported by four pillars endurance, conviction, justice and jihad."

Imam Ali (a.s.)
Back to Top
rami View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Male
Joined: 01 March 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rami Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 June 2005 at 2:14am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

assalamu alaikum

The war was not over the Khalifat or replacing the Khalifah that is the reality, You claim to understand the actions of someone who was the wife of Rasul Allah whom he raised with his own hands and whom Allah chose for him and adressed in the Quran "His wives are their mothers." (33:6) exactly after saying the prophet is closer to you than your selves. Can anything ever change what Allah has said.

'Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our wives and your wives, our selves and your selves, then let us humbly pray and so lay the curse of Allah upon the ones who lie.'"(3:61) the Prophet called 'Ali, Hasan, Husayn and Fatima, and said, "O Allah! These are my family."(Muslim.)

Allah mentiond the Wives of Rasul Allah specifically was he going against Allahs orders or saying my wives are not my family by only calling Them instead?

From what i can remember non of the prophets wives were present.

33:32 O ye wives of the Prophet! Ye are not like any other women. If ye keep your duty (to Allah), then be not soft of speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease aspire (to you), but utter customary speech.

33:33 And stay in your houses. Bedizen not yourselves with the bedizenment of the Time of ignorance. Be regular in prayer, and pay the poor due, and obey Allah and His messenger. Allah's wish is but to remove uncleanness far from you, O Folk of the Household, and cleanse you with a thorough cleansing.

Umm Salama related that when that verse was revealed, the Prophet surrounded with his garment `Ali, Fatima, al-Hasan, and al-Husayn, and said: "O Allah! These are the People of my House, therefore remove uncleanness far from them and cleanse them with a thorough cleansing." Ahmad narrated it in his Musnad with six chains, also Tirmidhi with several chains and he said: hasan sahih, al-Hakim, and Tabarani.

what is expressed clearly and literaly in the Quran is taken as being above or of more importance than implied or secondary meanings.

A Hadith is not taken over a verse in the Quran, nor can it be interpreted in such a way to contradict the Quran. If an aparant contradiction exists than another explanation is looked at.

You can not interprate One hadith in such a way to the exclusion of All others all the evidence relating to a particular matter must be considered.

These are simple laws for understanding the Quran and Sunnah which our scholars have used and is probably why Shia have trouble understanding Sunni position since what they look at is simple analysis and add to this our differing hadith collections.

As you know we can not leave aside any piece of evidence once authenticity is established.

The verses are first and formost adressing the wives of the prophet specificaly in 32 then Allah calls them Ahl al Bayt Himself in 33 this is the plain and literal wording of the Quran. The verse was also revealed in the house of the prophets wife, after the revelation rasul allah called Ali, fatimah Hasan and Husain under the cloack.

Regarding Umm Salamah whos house the verse was revealed in.

The Muslims were greatly saddened by the plight of Umm Salamah. She became known as "Ayyin al-Arab"� the one who had lost her husband. She had no one in Madinah of her own except her small children, like a hen without feathers.

Both the Muhajirun and Ansar felt they had a duty to Umm Salamah. When she had completed the Iddah (three months and ten days), Abu Bakr proposed marriage to her but she refused. Then Umar asked to marry her but she also declined the proposal. The Prophe t then approached her and she replied:

"O Messenger of Allah, I have three characteristics. I am a woman who is extremely jealous and I am afraid that you will see in me something that will anger you and cause Allah to punish me. I am a woman who is already advanced in age and I am a woman wh o has a young family."

The Prophet replied:

"Regarding the jealousy you mentioned, I pray to Allah the Almighty to let it go away from you. Regarding the question of age you have mentioned. I am afflicted with the same problem as you. Regarding the dependent family you have mentioned, your family is my family."

The hadith of Umm salamah further explains the versus in the Quran it does not contradict it nor does it separate the two versus.

Jibril aranged the order of the verses in the Quran so context is not a question,

Fatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated from her father (may Allah bless him and grant him peace), who told her that Jibril would rehearse the Quran with him (in Ramadan) once every year, and he did so twice in the year of his death. (Bukhari 6/485)

I have not said it refers to the Wives exclusevly I can not comment on authenticity or the opinions of scholars, the site provided only refrences for where the hadith is cited.

No commentary from anyone.

You seem to be ryling heavily on this site br, I need to ask about its authenticity since I am aware of forgeries in Shia books about Sunni sources, An example is a book which a shia br gave to me to read called Peshwar nights in which it refrenced many sunni sources all of which turned out to be fabricated. I can provide examples if you wish.

 

 




Edited by rami
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.
Back to Top
rami View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Male
Joined: 01 March 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rami Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 June 2005 at 11:02am
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

assalamu alaikum

It seems i have misread a hadith, as verse 33:33 being revealed in the house of Umm salamah but in fact it was revealed in the house of Aisha.

From the article on tafsir of 33:33
Al-Suyuti, al-Durr al-Manthur (6:603): [after citing the narrations of the
`Itra] Ibn Sa`d narrated from `Urwa that he said: "Ahl al-Bayt [in 33:33]
means the wives of the Prophet (SAWS) and it was revealed in the house of
`A'isha."
by Muslim. The mother of Believers, Aisha says: �One day, the messenger of Allah left the house at the afternoon and he was wearing a cloak. Then Hasan bin Ali came and the Prophet took him under his cloak. Next Hussain bin Ali came and the Prophet took him under his cloak. After that Fatima came and the Prophet took her under his cloak. Finally, Ali came, and the Prophet took him under his cloak. Then the Prophet said: �And Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye Members of the Family, and to make you pure and spotless�
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.
Back to Top
rami View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Male
Joined: 01 March 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rami Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 June 2005 at 7:34pm
Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem

I should point out the hadith of Umm salama does not give Asbab al Nuzul (reason for revelation), and it is clear that Ali, fatimah, hasan husayn where not the reason or around at the time of revelation, I am not implying they are not included i personaly believe they where along with there decendants but we should not be blind out of love for them.

I remember the asbab for earlier revelation in the surah but not that particular one, Allahu alam.
Rasul Allah (sallah llahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Whoever knows himself, knows his Lord" and whoever knows his Lord has been given His gnosis and nearness.
Back to Top
kursi2255 View Drop Down
Starter
Starter
Avatar
Joined: 04 July 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kursi2255 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 July 2005 at 10:33pm

as salaamu alaykum wa rahmatu allahi wa barakatu bros and sis,

im a new member.congratulations for the excellent posts! im learning many things here.

im for unity within the ummah. however, i would like our wahhabi/salafi brothers to address the hadith of najd satisfactorily. i read on a salafi website that 'najd' in the hadith refers to iraq. but i am not satisfied, as i saw a reply to that interpretation. pls read bros and sis, especially our wahhabi/salafi bros:

 

PUNCTURING THE DEVIL�S DREAM ABOUT THE
HADITHS OF
NAJD AND TAMIM
[updated]

Kerim Fenari

_______________________________

bismi�Llahi�r-Rahmani�r-Rahim

It is striking that not one of the great muhaddiths, mufassirs, grammarians, historians, or legists of Islam has emerged from the region known as Najd, despite the extraordinary and blessed profusion of such people in other Muslim lands. This essay offers to Muslims with open minds an explanation of this remarkable fact.

_______________________________

The Hadith of Najd: a correction

The land of Najd, which for two centuries has been the crucible of the Wahhabi doctrine, is the subject of a body of interesting hadiths and early narrations, which repay close analysis. Among the best-known of these hadiths is the relation of Imam al-Bukhari in which Ibn Umar said: �The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) mentioned: "O Allah, give us baraka in our Syria, O Allah, give us baraka in our Yemen." They said: "And in our Najd?" and he said: "O Allah, give us baraka in our Syria, O Allah, give us baraka in our Yemen." They said: "And in our Najd?" and I believe that he said the third time: "In that place are earthquakes, and seditions, and in that place shall rise the devil�s horn [qarn al-shaytan]."�

This hadith is clearly unpalatable to the Najdites themselves, some of whom to this day strive to persuade Muslims from more reputable districts that the hadith does not mean what it clearly says. One device used by such apologists is to utilise a definition that includes Iraq in the frontiers of Najd. By this manoeuvre, the Najdis draw the conclusion that the part of Najd, which is condemned so strongly in this hadith, is in fact Iraq, and that Najd proper is excluded. Medieval Islamic geographers contest this inherently strange thesis (see for instance Ibn Khurradadhbih, al-Masalik wa�l-mamalik [Leiden, 1887], 125; Ibn Hawqal, Kitab Surat al-ard [Beirut, 1968],18); and limit the northern extent of Najd at Wadi al-Rumma, or to the deserts to the south of al-Mada�in. There is no indication that the places in which the second wave of sedition arose, such as Kufa and Basra, were associated in the mind of the first Muslims with the term �Najd�. On the contrary, these places are in every case identified as lying within the land of Iraq.

The evasion of this early understanding of the term in order to exclude Najd, as usually understood, from the purport of the hadith of Najd, has required considerable ingenuity from pro-Najdi writers in the present day. Some apologists attempt to conflate this hadith with a group of other hadiths which associate the �devil�s horn� with �the East�, which is supposedly a generic reference to Iraq. While it is true that some late-medieval commentaries also incline to this view, modern geographical knowledge clearly rules it out. Even the briefest glimpse at a modern atlas will show that a straight line drawn to the east of al-Madina al-Munawwara does not pass anywhere near Iraq, but passes some distance to the south of Riyadh; that is to say, through the exact centre of Najd. The hadiths which speak of �the East� in this context hence support the view that Najd is indicated, not Iraq.

On occasion the pro-Najdi apologists also cite the etymological sense of the Arabic word najd, which means �high ground�. Again, a brief consultation of an atlas resolves this matter decisively. With the exception of present-day northern Iraq, which was not considered part of Iraq by any Muslim until the present century (it was called �al-Jazira�), Iraq is notably flat and low-lying, much of it even today being marshland, while the remainder, up to and well to the north of Baghdad, is flat, low desert or agricultural land. Najd, by contrast, is mostly plateau, culminating in peaks such as Jabal Tayyi� (1300 metres), in the Jabal Shammar range. It is hard to see how the Arabs could have routinely applied a topographic term meaning �upland� to the flat terrain of southern Iraq (the same territory which proved so suitable for tank warfare during the �Gulf War�, that notorious source of dispute between Riyadh�s �Cavaliers� and �Roundheads�).

Confirmation of this identification is easily located in the hadith literature, which contains numerous references to Najd, all of which clearly denote Central Arabia. To take a few examples out of many dozens: there is the hadith narrated by Abu Daud (Salat al-Safar, 15), which runs: �We went out to Najd with Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) until we arrived at Dhat al-Riqa�, where he met a group from Ghatafan [a Najdite tribe].� In Tirmidhi (Hajj, 57), there is the record of an encounter between the Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) and a Najdi delegation which he received at Arafa (see also Ibn Maja, Manasik, 57). In no such case does the Sunna indicate that Iraq was somehow included in the Prophetic definition of �Najd�.

Further evidence can be cited from the cluster of hadiths which identify the miqat points for pilgrims. In a hadith narrated by Imam Nasa�i (Manasik al-Hajj, 22), �A�isha (r.a.) declared that �Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) established the miqat for the people of Madina at Dhu�l-Hulayfa, for the people of Syria and Egypt at al-Juhfa, for the people of Iraq at Dhat Irq, and for the people of Najd at Qarn, and for the Yemenis at Yalamlam.� Imam Muslim (Hajj, 2) narrates a similar hadith: �for the people of Madina it is Dhu�l-Hulayfa - while on the other road it is al-Juhfa - for the people of Iraq it is Dhat Irq, for the people of Najd it is Qarn, and for the people of Yemen it is Yalamlam.�

These texts constitute unarguable proof that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) distinguished between Najd and Iraq, so much so that he appointed two separate miqat points for the inhabitants of each. For him, clearly, Najd did not include Iraq.

_______________________________

Najd in the Hadith Literature

There are many hadiths in which the Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) praised particular lands. It is significant that although Najd is the closest of lands to Makka and Madina, it is not praised by any one of these hadiths. The first hadith cited above shows the Messenger�s willingness to pray for Syria and Yemen, and his insistent refusal to pray for Najd. And wherever Najd is mentioned, it is clearly seen as a problematic territory. Consider, for instance, the following noble hadith:

Amr ibn Abasa said: �Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) was one day reviewing the horses, in the company of Uyayna ibn Hisn ibn Badr al-Fazari. [...] Uyayna remarked: "The best of men are those who bear their swords on their shoulders, and carry their lances in the woven stocks of their horses, wearing cloaks, and are the people of the Najd." But Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) replied: "You lie! Rather, the best of men are the men of the Yemen. Faith is a Yemeni, the Yemen of [the tribes of] Lakhm and Judham and Amila. [...] Hadramawt is better than the tribe of Harith; one tribe is better than another; another is worse [...] My Lord commanded me to curse Quraysh, and I cursed them, but he then commanded me to bless them twice, and I did so [...] Aslam and Ghifar, and their associates of Juhaina, are better than Asad and Tamim and Ghatafan and Hawazin, in the sight of Allah on the Day of Rising. [...] The most numerous tribe in the Garden shall be [the Yemeni tribes of] Madhhij and Ma�kul.� (Ahmad ibn Hanbal and al-Tabarani, by sound narrators. Cited in Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, Majma� al-zawa�id wa manba� al-fawa�id [Cairo, 1352], X, 43).

The Messenger says �You lie!� to a man who praises Najd. Nowhere does he extol Najd - quite the contrary. But other hadiths in praise of other lands abound. For instance:

Umm Salama narrated that Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) gave the following counsel on his deathbed: �By Allah, I adjure you by Him, concerning the Egyptians, for you shall be victorious over them, and they will be a support for you and helpers in Allah�s path.� (Tabarani, classed by al-Haythami as sahih [Majma�, X, 63].) (For more on the merit of the Egyptians see Sahih Muslim, commentary by Imam al-Nawawi [Cairo, 1347], XVI, 96-7.)

Qays ibn Sa�d narrated that Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: �Were faith to be suspended from the Pleiades, men from the sons of Faris [south-central Iran] would reach it.� (Narrated in the Musnads of both Abu Ya�la and al-Bazzar, classified as Sahih by al-Haythami. Majma�, X, 64-5. See further Nawawi�s commentary to Sahih Muslim, XVI, 100.)

Allah�s Messenger said: �Tranquillity (sakina) is in the people of the Hijaz.� (al-Bazzar, cited in Haythami, X, 53.)

On the authority of Abu�l-Darda (r.a.), the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: �You will find armies. An army in Syria, in Egypt, in Iraq and in the Yemen.� (Bazzar and Tabarani, classified as sahih: al-Haythami, Majma�, X, 58.) This constitutes praise for these lands as homes of jihad volunteers.

�The angels of the All-Compassionate spread their wings over Syria.� (Tabarani, classed as sahih: Majma�, X, 60. See also Tirmidhi, commentary of Imam Muhammad ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Mubarakfuri: Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi bi-sharh Jami� al-Tirmidhi, X, 454; who confirms it as hasan sahih.)

Abu Hurayra narrated that Allah�s Messenger (s) said: �The people of Yemen have come to you. They are tenderer of heart, and more delicate of soul. Faith is a Yemeni, and wisdom is a Yemeni.� (Tirmidhi, Fi fadl al-Yaman, no.4028. Mubarakfuri, X, 435, 437: hadith hasan sahih. On page 436 Imam Mubarakfuri points out that the ancestors of the Ansar were from the Yemen.)

�The people of the Yemen are the best people on earth�. (Abu Ya�la and Bazzar, classified as sahih. Haythami, X, 54-5.)

Allah�s Messenger (s) sent a man to one of the clans of the Arabs, but they insulted and beat him. He came to Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) and told him what had occurred. And the Messenger (s) said, �Had you gone to the people of Oman, they would not have insulted or beaten you.� (Muslim, Fada�il al-Sahaba, 57. See Nawawi�s commentary, XVI, 98: �this indicates praise for them, and their merit.�)

The above hadiths are culled from a substantial corpus of material which records the Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) praising neighbouring regions. Again, it is striking that although Najd was closer than any other, hadiths in praise of it are completely absent.

This fact is generally known, although not publicised, by Najdites themselves. It is clear that if there existed a single hadith that names and praises Najd, they would let the Umma know. In an attempt to circumvent or neutralise the explicit and implicit Prophetic condemnation of their province, some refuse to consider that the territorial hadiths might be in any way worthy of attention, and focus their comments on the tribal groupings who dwell in Najd.

_______________________________

The Tribe of Tamim

The best-known tribe of Central Arabia are the Banu Tamim. There are hadiths which praise virtually all of the major Arab tribal groups, and to indicate the extent of this praise a few examples are listed here:

Allah�s Messenger (s) said: �O Allah, bless [the tribe of] Ahmas and its horses and its men sevenfold.� (Ibn Hanbal, in Haythami, Majma�, X, 49. According to al-Haythami its narrators are all trustworthy.)

Ghalib b. Abjur said: �I mentioned Qays in the presence of Allah�s Messenger (s) and he said, "May Allah show His mercy to Qays." He was asked, "O Messenger of God! Are you asking for His mercy for Qays?" and he replied, "Yes. He followed the religion of our father Ismail b. Ibrahim, Allah�s Friend. Qays! Salute our Yemen! Yemen! Salute our Qays! Qays are Allah�s cavalry upon the earth."� (Tabarani, declared sahih by al-Haythami, X, 49.)

Abu Hurayra narrated that Allah�s Messenger (s) said: �How excellent a people are Azd, sweet-mouthed, honouring their vows, and pure of heart!� (Ibn Hanbal via a good (hasan) isnad, according to Haythami, X, 49.)

Anas b. Malik said: �If we are not from Azd, we are not from the human race.� (Tirmidhi, Manaqib, 72; confirmed by Mubarakfuri, X, 439 as hasan gharib sahih.)

Abdallah ibn Mas�ud said: �I witnessed Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) praying for this clan of Nakh�.� Or he said: �He praised them until I wished that I was one of them.� (Ibn Hanbal, with a sound isnad. Haythami, X, 51.)

On the authority of Abdallah ibn Amr ibn al-As, who said: �I heard Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) saying: "This command [the Caliphate] shall be in Quraysh. No-one shall oppose them without being cast down on his face by Allah, for as long as they establish the religion."� (Bukhari, Manaqib, 2.)

The hadith which appears to praise Tamim is hence not exceptional, and can by no stretch of the imagination be employed to indicate Tamim�s superiority over other tribes. In fact, out of this vast literature on the merits of the tribes, only one significant account praises Tamim. This runs as follows: Abu Hurayra said: �I have continued to love Banu Tamim after I heard three things concerning them from Allah�s Messenger (s.w.s.). "They will be the sternest of my Umma against the Dajjal; one of them was a captive owned by �A�isha, and he said: �Free her, for she is a descendent of Ismail;� and when their zakat came, he said: �This is the zakat of a people,� or �of my people�."� (Bukhari, Maghazi, 68.)

This hadith clearly indicates that the rigour of the Tamimites will be used for, and not against, Islam in the final culminating battle against the Dajjal; and this is unquestionably a merit. The second point is less significant, since all the Arabs are descendents of Ismail; while the variant readings of the third point make it difficult to establish its significance in an unambiguous way. Even the most positive interpretation, however, allows us to conclude no more than that the Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) was pleased with that tribe at the moment it paid its zakat. As we shall see, its payment of zakat proved to be short-lived.

Far more numerous are the hadiths which explicitly critique the Tamimites. These hadiths are usually disregarded by pro-Najdite apologists; but traditional Islamic scholarship demands that all, not merely some, of the evidence be mustered and taken as a whole before a verdict can be reached. And a consideration of the abundant critical material on Tamim demonstrates beyond any doubt that this tribe was regarded by the Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) and by the Salaf as deeply problematic.

An early indication of the nature of the Tamimites is given by Allah himself in Sura al-Hujurat. In aya 4 of this sura, He says: �Those who call you from behind the chambers: most of them have no sense.� The occasion for revelation (sabab al-nuzul) here was as follows:

�The "chambers" (hujurat) were spaces enclosed by walls. Each of the wives of Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) had one of them. The aya was revealed in connection with the delegation of the Banu Tamim who came to the Prophet (s.w.s.). They entered the mosque, and approached the chambers of his wives. They stood outside them and called: "Muhammad! Come out to us!" an action which expressed a good deal of harshness, crudeness and disrespect. Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) waited a while, and then came out to them. One of them, known as al-Aqra� ibn Habis, said: "Muhammad! My praise is an ornament, and my denunciation brings shame!" And the Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) replied: "Woe betide you! That is the due of Allah."� (Imam Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Juzayy, al-Tashil [Beirut, 1403], p.702. See also the other tafsir works; also Ibn Hazm, Jamharat ansab al-�Arab [Cairo, 1382], 208, in the chapter on Tamim.)

In addition to this Qur�anic critique, abundant hadiths also furnish the Umma with advice about this tribe. Since the tacit acceptance of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) constitutes a hadith, we may begin with the following incident.

This relates to a famous poem by Hassan ibn Thabit (r.a.). The Tamimites were late converts to Islam, joining the religion, after much resistance, only in the Year of Delegations (�am al-wufud), which was the ninth year of the Hijra. They hence miss the virtue of sabiqa, of precedence in Islam. Coming at last to the Prophet (s.w.s.), the Tamim insisted on a public debate against him, and he appointed Hassan to reply to the Tamimites� vain boasting about their tribe. Hassan�s ode, which completely defeated and humiliated them by describing the low status of their tribe, can be considered evidence for the Prophet�s (Allah bless him and give him peace) own view of Tamim, since the condemnation was given in his presence, and there is no record of his criticising it. (Diwan Hassan ibn Thabit [Beirut, 1966], p.440; for full details of the incident see Barquqi�s commentary in the same volume. See also Ibn Hisham, Sira [Guillaume translation], p.631.)

A further hadith concerning Tamim runs as follows:

On the authority of Imran ibn Husayn (r.a.): �A group of Tamimites came to the Prophet (s.w.s.), and he said: "O tribe of Tamim! Receive good news!" "You promise us good news, so give us something [money]!" they replied. And his face changed. Then some Yemenis came, and he said: "O people of Yemen! Accept good news, even though the tribe of Tamim have not accepted it!" And they said: "We accept." And the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) began to speak about the beginning of creation, and about the Throne.� (Bukhari, Bad� al-Khalq, 1.)

The harsh waywardness of the Tamimi mentality documented in the Qur�an and Hadith casts an interesting light on the personality of Abu Jahl, the arch-pagan leader of Quraysh. Abu Jahl, with his fanatical hatred of the Prophet (s.w.s.), must have been shaped by the Tamimi ethic in his childhood. His mother, Asma� bint Mukharriba, was of the tribe of Tamim. (al-Jumahi, Tabaqat Fuhul al-Shu�ara, ed. Mahmud Shakir [Cairo, 1952], p.123.) He also married the daughter of �Umayr ibn Ma�bad al-Tamimi, by whom he had his son, predictably named Tamim. (Mus�ab ibn Abdallah, Nasab Quraysh [Cairo, 1953], p.312.)

An attribute recurrently ascribed to the Tamimites in the hadith literature is that of misplaced zeal. When they finally enter Islam, they are associated with a fanatical form of piety that demands simple and rigid adherence, rather than understanding; and which frequently defies the established authorities of the religion. Imam Muslim records a narration from Abdallah ibn Shaqiq which runs: �Ibn Abbas once preached to us after the asr prayer, until the sun set and the stars appeared, and people began to say: "The prayer! The prayer!" A man of the Banu Tamim came up to him and said, constantly and insistently: "The prayer! The prayer!" And Ibn Abbas replied: "Are you teaching me the sunna, you wretch?"� (Muslim, Salat al-Musafirin, 6.)

_______________________________

Banu Tamim and the Khawarij

Perhaps the best-known of any hadith about a Tamimite, which again draws our attention to their misplaced zeal, is the hadith of Dhu�l-Khuwaysira:

Abu Sa�id al-Khudri (r.a.) said: �We were once in the presence of Allah�s Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) while he was dividing the spoils of war. Dhu�l-Khuwaysira, a man of the Tamim tribe, came up to him and said: "Messenger of Allah, be fair!" He replied: "Woe betide you! Who will be fair if I am not? You are lost and disappointed if I am not fair!" And Umar (r.a.) said, "Messenger of Allah! Give me permission to deal with him, so that I can cut off his head!" But he said: "Let him be. And he has companions. One of you would despise his prayer in their company, and his fast in their company. They recite the Qur�an but it goes no further than their collarbones. They pass through religion as an arrow passes through its target."� Abu Sa�id continued: �I swear that I was present when Ali ibn Abi Talib fought against them. He ordered that that man be sought out, and he was brought to us.� (Bukhari, Manaqib, 25. For the �passing through� see Abu�l-Abbas al-Mubarrad, al-Kamil, chapter on �Akhbar al-Khawarij� published separately by Dar al-Fikr al-Hadith [Beirut, n.d.], pp.23-4: �usually when this happens none of the target�s blood remains upon it�.)

This hadith is taken by the exegetes as a prophecy, and a warning, about the nature of the Kharijites. There is a certain type of believing zealot who goes into religion so hard that he comes out the other side, with little or nothing of it remaining with him. One expert who confirms this is the Hanbali scholar Ibn al-Jawzi, well-known for his hagiographies of Ma�ruf al-Karkhi and Rabi�a al-Adawiya. In his book Talbis Iblis. (Beirut, 1403, p.88) under the chapter heading �A Mention of the Devil�s Delusion upon the Kharijites� he narrates the hadith, and then writes: �This man was called Dhu�l-Khuwaysira al-Tamimi. [...] He was the first Kharijite in Islam. His fault was to be satisfied with his own view; had he paused he would have realised that there is no view superior to that of Allah�s Messenger (s.w.s.).�

Ibn al-Jawzi goes on to document the development of the Kharijite movement, and the central role played by the tribe of Tamim in it. Hence (p.89) �The commander of the fight [against the Sunnis, at Harura] was Shabib ibn Rab�i al-Tamimi�; also (p.92) �Amr ibn Bakr al-Tamimi agreed to murder Umar�. All this even though their camp sounded like a beehive, so assiduously were they reciting the Qur�an (p.91).

The Kharijite movement proper commenced at the Siffin arbitration, when the first dissenters left the army of the khalifa Ali (k.A.w.). One of them was Abu Bilal Mirdas, a member of the tribe of Tamim (Ibn Hazm, 223), who despite his constant worship and recitation of the Qur�an became one of the most brutal of the Kharijite zealots. He is remembered as the first who said the Tahkim - the formula �The judgment is Allah�s alone� - on the Day of Siffin, which became the slogan of the later Kharijite da�wa.

In his long analysis of the Kharijite movement, Imam Abd al-Qahir al-Baghdadi also describes the intimate involvement of Tamimites, and of Central Arabians generally, noting that the tribes of Yemen and Hijaz contributed hardly anyone to the Kharijite forces. He gives an account of Dhu�l-Khuwaysira�s later Kharijite activities. Appearing before Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib (k.A.w.) he says: �Ibn Abi Talib! I am only fighting you for the sake of Allah and the Hereafter!� to which Imam Ali replies: �Nay, you are like those of whom Allah says, "Shall I inform you who are the ones whose works are most in loss? It is they whose efforts are astray in the life of this world, but who think that they are doing good!" [Kahf, 103].� (Imam Abd al-Qahir al-Baghdadi, al-Farq bayn al-firaq [Cairo, n.d.], 80; see the note to p.76 for the full identification of Dhu�l-Khuwaysira.)

As Imam Abd al-Qahir gives his account of the early Kharijite rebellions, replete with appalling massacres of innocent Muslim civilians, he makes it clear that the leaders of each of the significant Kharijite movements hailed from Najd. For instance, the Azariqa, one of the most vicious and widespread Khariji movements, were led by Nafi� ibn al-Azraq, who was from the Central Arabian tribe of Banu Hanifa (Abd al-Qahir, 82). As the Imam records, �Nafi and his followers considered the territory of those who opposed them to be Dar al-Kufr, in which one could slaughter their women and children. [...] They used to say: "Our opponents are mushriks, and hence we are not obliged to return anything we hold in trust to them.� (Abd al-Qahir, 84.) After his death in battle, �the Azariqa pledged their allegiance to Ubaydallah ibn Ma�mun al-Tamimi. Al-Muhallab then fought them at Ahwaz, where Ubaidallah ibn Ma�mun himself died, along with his brother Uthman ibn Ma�mun and three hundred of the most fanatical of the Azariqa. The remainder retreated to Aydaj, where they pledged their allegiance to Qatari ibn al-Fuja�a, whom they called Amir al-Mu�minin.� (Abd al-Qahir, 85-6.) The commentator to Abd al-Qahir�s text reminds us that Ibn Fuja�a was also of Tamim (p.86).

The Azariqa, who massacred countless tens of thousands of Muslims who refused to accept their views, had a rival in the Najdiyya faction of the Kharijites. These were named after Najda ibn Amir, a member of the tribe of Hanifa whose homeland is Najd; Najda himself maintained his army in Yamama, which is part of Najd. (Abd al-Qahir, 87.)

As is the way with Kharijism in all ages, the Najdiyya fragmented amid heated arguments generated by their intolerance of any dissent. The causes of this schism included the Kharijite attack on Madina, which came away with many captives; and different Kharijite ijtihads over sexual relations with Muslim women who, not being Kharijites, they had enslaved. Three major factions emerged from this split, the most dangerous of which was led by Atiyya ibn al-Aswad, again of the tribe of Hanifa. Following Najda�s death, his own faction split, again into three, one of which left Najd to raid the vicinity of Basra (Abd al-Qahir, 90-1).

The last major Kharijite sect was the Ibadiyya, which, in a gentler and much attenuated form, retains a presence even today in Zanzibar, southern Algeria, and Oman. The movement was founded by Abdallah ibn Ibad, another Tamimi. Its best-known doctrine is that non-Ibadis are kuffar: they are not mu�mins, but they are not mushriks either. �They forbid secret assassinations [of non-Ibadis], but allow open battles. They allow marriages [with non-Ibadis], and inheritance from them. They claim that all this is to aid them in their war for Allah and His Messenger.� (Abd al-Qahir, 103.)

The best-known woman among the Kharijites was Qutam bint �Alqama, a member of the Tamimite tribe. She is remembered as the one who told her bridegroom, Ibn Muljam, that �I will only accept you as my husband at a dowry which I myself must name, which is three thousand dirhams, a male and a female slave, and the murder of Ali!� He asked, �You shall have all that, but how may I accomplish it?� and she replied, �Take him by surprise. If you escape, you will have rescued the people from evil, and will live with your wife; while if you die in the attempt, you will go on to the Garden and a delight that shall never end!� (Mubarrad, 27.) As is generally known, Ibn Muljam was executed after he stabbed imam Ali (k.A.w.) to death outside the mosque in Kufa.

Muslims anxious not to repeat the tragic errors of the past will wish to reflect deeply upon this pattern of events. Tens of thousands of Muslims, fervently committed to the faith and outstanding for their practical piety, nonetheless fell prey to the Kharijite temptation. The ulema trace the origins of that temptation back to the incident of Dhu�l-Khuwaysira, who considered himself a better Muslim than the Prophet himself (s.w.s.). And he, like the overwhelming majority of the Kharijite leaders who followed in his footsteps, was a Tamimi. Of the non-Tamimi Kharijites, almost all were from Najd.

_______________________________

The Ridda: the First Fitna

There is a further issue which Muslims will wish to consider when forming their view of Najd. This is the attitude of the Najdis following the death of the Messenger (s.w.s.). The historians affirm that the great majority of the rebellions against the payment of zakat which broke out during the khilafa of Abu Bakr (r.a.) took place among Najdis. Moreoever, and even more significantly, many of the the Najdi rebellions were grounded in a strange anti-Islamic ideology. The best-known of these was led by Musaylima, who claimed to be a prophet, and who established a rival shari�a which included quasi-Muslim rituals such as forms of fasting and dietary rules. He also prescribed prayers three times a day. As leader of a rival religion, he and his Najdi enthusiasts were in a state of baghy, heretical revolt against due caliphal authority, and Abu Bakr (r.a.) sent an army against them under Khalid ibn al-Walid. In the year 12 of the Hijra Khalid defeated the Najdis at the Battle of al-Aqraba, a bloody clash that centred on a walled garden which is known to our historians as the Garden of Death, because many great Companions lost their lives there at the hands of the Najdis. (See Abdallah ibn Muslim Ibn Qutayba, Kitab al-Ma�arif [Cairo, 1960], p.206; Ahmad ibn Yahya al-Baladhuri, Futuh al-buldan [repr. Beirut, n.d., 86.] An indication of the continuity of Najdi religious life is given by the non-Muslim traveller Palgrave, who as late as 1862 found that some Najdi tribesmen continued to revere Musaylima as a prophet. (W. Palgrave, Narrative of a year�s journey through Central and Eastern Arabia [London, 1865], I, 382.)

The other ringleader of Najdi rebellion against the khilafa was a woman known as Sajah, whose full name was Umm Sadir bint Aws, and who belonged to the tribe of Tamim. She made claims to prophethood in the name of a rabb who was �in the clouds�, and who gave her revelations by which she succeeded in uniting sections of the Tamim who had argued among themselves over the extent to which they should reject the authority of Madina. Leading several campaigns against tribes who remained loyal to Islam, the Najdi prophetess is said to have thrown in her lot with Musaylima. Other than this, little is known of her fate. (Ibn Qutayba, Ma�arif, p.405; Baladhuri, Futuh, pp.99-100.)

_______________________________

Recent Najdi Tendencies

It is well-known that the Najdi reformer, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, was a Tamimi. The violence and takfir associated with the movement which carries his name surely bears more than a coincidental resemblance to the policies and mindset of the Tamimi Kharijites of ancient Najd. Consider, for instance, the following massacre, of the Shi�a of Karbala in April 1801, as described by a Wahhabi historian:

Saud made for Karbala with his victorious army, famous pedigree horses, and all the settled people and bedouin of Najd [...] The Muslims (i.e. the Wahhabis) surrounded Karbala and took it by storm. They killed most of the people in the markets and houses. One cannot count their spoils. They stayed there for just one morning, and left after midday, taking away all the possessions. Nearly two thousand people were killed in Karbala. (Uthman ibn Bishr, Unwan al-Majd fi Tarikh Najd (Makka, 1349), 1, 121-122.)

It is hard to distinguish this raid, and the brutality of its accomplishment, from the Khariji raids from Najd into the same region a thousand years earlier.

Muhammad Finati, an Italian convert to Islam who served with the Caliphal army which defeated the Wahhabis, wrote a long first-hand account of the extreme barbarism of the Najdi hordes. For instance:

Such among us as fell alive into the hands of these cruel fanatics, were wantonly mutilated by the cutting off of their arms and legs, and left to perish in that state, some of whom, in the course of our retreat, I myself actually saw, who had no greater favour to ask than that we would put them to death. (G. Finati, Narrative of the Life and Adventures of Giovanni Finati (London, 1830), I, 287).

It is sometimes claimed that the days when �all the settled people and bedouin of Najd� would happily commit such mass murder are long gone, and that Wahhabism has become more moderate. But another, more recent example, shows otherwise. In 1924, the Wahhabi army entered the city of Ta�if, plundering it for three days. The chief qadi and the ulema were dragged from their houses and slaughtered, while several hundred other civilians lost their lives. (Ibn Hizlul, Tarikh Muluk Al Sa�ud [Riyadh, 1961], pp.151-3.) After giving the the Sunni population of the Hijaz this terrorist lesson, �Ibn Saud occupied Mecca with Britain�s tacit blessing� (Alexei Vassiliev, A History of Saudi Arabia [London, 1998], p.264).

_______________________________

CONCLUSION

A good deal of material concerning Najd and Tamim has been preserved from the time of the Salaf. If we reject the method of some Najdi apologists, a method based on the highly selective quotation of hadiths coupled with the blind imitation of opinions expressed by late-medieval commentary writers, we may reach some reasonably settled and authoritative conclusions regarding Central Arabia and its people. The Qur�an, the sound Hadith, and the experience of the Salaf overwhelmingly concur that Central Arabia is a region of fitna. The first of all fitnas in Islam emerged from that place, notably the arrogance of Dhu�l-Khuwaysira and his like, and also the apostasy and fondness for false prophets which caused such difficulty for Abu Bakr (r.a.). Subsequently, the Kharijite heresy, overwhelmingly Najdi in its roots, cast a long shadow over the early history of Islam, dividing the Muslims, distracting their armies from the task of conquering Byzantium, and injecting rancour, suspicion, and bitterness among the very earliest generations of Muslims. Only the most determined, blinkered and irresponsible Najdi sympathiser could ignore this evidence, transmitted so reliably from the pure Salaf, and persist in the delusion that Najd and the misguided, literalistic rigorism which it recurrently produces, is somehow an area favoured by Allah.

And Allah knows best. May He unite the Umma through love for the early Muslims who refused bigotry, and may He preserve us from the trap of Kharijism and those who are attracted to its mindset in our time. Amin.

_______________________________

it would clarify many things for me if our salafi brothers could reply to this. thanks brothers.may Allah bless us all.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.