50,000 Errors in the Bible |
Post Reply | Page <12345 13> |
Author | |
Angela
Senior Member Joined: 11 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 2555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Well, I was raised in a dual household. I remember apocrypha being read as scripture by my aunts. I also realize that in early Christianity there were many texts, such as the Gnostic texts that were rejected due to their incompatibility with the body of the texts. We use the KJV in my own church. The reason being its the most accurate of the bible translations. However we must allow for the possibility of lost texts even prior to the Birth of our Lord. 66 books by over 40 authors is a daunting task by any council. I do not think there was any maliciousness in the Council of Nicea when agreeing on the Bible. The most important thing is that we continue to delve into its depths and look outside to further gain our sense of belief and truth. |
|
Servetus
Senior Member Male Joined: 04 April 2001 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
(Alibaba) �The Bible has some 40 plus authors. One of the proofs of the divine inspiration of Scripture is that 40 plus authors could write such a book that is so unform in its doctrine - how beautifully these various men wrote (under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit), a 66-book document that consistently teaches montheism, salvation by God's grace, andthe coming forth of the Messiah, Jesus, to pay the penalty of sin (compare Genesis 3:15 and Isa. 53 for instance).�
Interesting parenthetical aside, �under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.� I suppose that would be worth mentioning. Otherwise, the �amens� coming from what are ostensibly orthodox Christians on this board, including the arbiters of orthodoxy, to that part of Cyril�s statement which reads �the Bible was written by men� would seem quite inexplicable. Serv Edited by Servetus |
|
Patty
Senior Member Joined: 14 September 2001 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Not by me, Servie, not by me! Patty |
|
Patty
I don't know what the future holds....but I know who holds the future. |
|
Patty
Senior Member Joined: 14 September 2001 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Angela said: "I also realize that in early Christianity there were many texts, such as the Gnostic texts " Angela, my friend, the Gnostic texts were researched extensively and found to be extemely heretical. Have you read them? They are a real eye-opener as far as "unbelievers" go. 'Course, that's only my humble opinion. Patty |
|
Patty
I don't know what the future holds....but I know who holds the future. |
|
Suleyman
Senior Member Joined: 10 March 2003 Location: Turkey Status: Offline Points: 3324 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Muslims should be careful SO CAREFUL on Bible,there are so many ayats being untouched and same as revealed from Allah,by the way one denies the whole bible then becomes Khafir...some ayats in the bible really touch the hearts...
|
|
Angela
Senior Member Joined: 11 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 2555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've read a few.....you are right, there needed to be a consolidation and canonization of texts. But, I don't think we should reject a text just because its not in the 66. Look at the wealth of knowledge coming out of the dead sea scrolls. Some discoveries are obviously something to question, like the Gospel of Judas. But each should be evaluated on its own merits. |
|
Yankovich
Guest Group Joined: 19 May 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 18 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The so-called Gospel of Judas has been debunked by the Roman Catholic Church and proven a Gnostic forgery, probably written sometime after 300 AD - hardly something you'd want to canonize.
|
|
GETTING TO THE TRUTH!
|
|
Angela
Senior Member Joined: 11 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 2555 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I was using it as an example. The Gospel of Judas is an obvious forgery. When between the Garden of Gethsemane and his suicide did he have an opportunity to write a Gospel clearing himself? Of course its a forgery.....but that's its merit. I was talking about taking each one and looking over it before its just dismissed without reason.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <12345 13> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |