IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Science & Technology
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - hi guy,I have a question,please help me!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


hi guy,I have a question,please help me!

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
mikemikeee View Drop Down
Starter.
Starter.
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 2018
Location: đà nẵng
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mikemikeee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: hi guy,I have a question,please help me!
    Posted: 24 May 2018 at 2:55am

Tone son phù thống nhất với đôi môi dày đấy chính là màu olive, màu trái đào và những màu son nude. không nên tiêu dùng son bóng bởi dòng son này sẽ “vạch trần” đôi môi dày của bạn và khiến cho nó phát triển thành tệ hơn. các nàng nên tô son theo đúng viền môi rồi tán đều vào trong, nên tô môi dưới trước rồi mới tô môi trên, như vậy đ£m b£o cho làn môi thanh thoát, sắc nét và không bị lem nhem.
xem thêm:phun môi pha lê giá bao nhiêu
hầu hết điều bạn cần là vẽ viền môi với chì có gam màu đậm nét hơn so với màu son môi bạn vừa sử dụng và vẽ viền môi tràn ra ngoài một tí để tăng thêm độ dày cho môi. phương pháp điểm trang cho môi dày này vừa giúp tạo hình cho đôi môi vừa khiến cho đôi môi căng mọng và sexy hơn đó. dùng kem che khuyết điểm Bước chung cục cực kì quan yếu trong cách thức điểm trang cho môi dày hấp dẫn này là sử dụng kem che khuyết điểm viền tiếp giáp với môi. H£y bôi 1 lớp kem che khuyết điểm mỏng vòng vo viền môi rồi sử dụng tay tán nhẹ. cách thức này sẽ làm cho các vết son thừa bị loang ra sẽ đư£c mẫu bỏ giúp cho đôi môi dày g£i c£m như mong muốn.
xem thêm:xăm môi đẹp tự nhiên
Đôi môi thắm mọng quyến rũ bao giờ cũng h£p mốt. đó là cách thức xuất sắc để ngay thức thì làm thay đổi hình £nh của bạn, chưa đề cập đôi môi là 1 trong những điểm nổi bật nhất trên khuôn mặt phái đẹp. Để sở hữu một đôi môi hấp dẫn trước hết bạn cần ph£i trông nom đôi môi thật tỷ mỉ, trước khi tô son h£y thoa 1 lớp son dưỡng lên môi để giúp môi không bị khô và sẽ bán son hơn.
nguồn:http://phunmoingocdung.com/bang-mau-dep-de-phun-moi-nen-chon-mau-hong-cam-mau-do-hong-baby-hay-do-cherry/

Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Tim the plumber View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 September 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 841
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tim the plumber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 2018 at 2:45am
Scientifically;

There is no proof that God exists at all.

There is also no proof that God cannot exist. But then there never could be such a proof.

Life is uncertain. Deal with it.
Back to Top
schmikbob View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 27 June 2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 526
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote schmikbob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 2018 at 6:01pm
Is this supposed to be replied to?  if so, please try to make sense
Back to Top
Faaiz Rosli View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 19 May 2018
Location: Singapore
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Faaiz Rosli Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2018 at 11:34am
God cannot be proven with Science, since science was created by God. Science is proof itself.
God does not need to comply with the law of physics. He created physics.
If God needed to comply with the law of physics for existence, then how could he exist before the creation of physics?
It's like saying "God is in the Heavens".. if God created the Heavens, then where was he before he created it?
God does not need anything in order for him to exist. Everything revolves around him, and he does not need to revolve around anything. :)

Do not compare God with us humans.
God knows best.
Ghulaam
Back to Top
asep garut View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 November 2017
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 312
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote asep garut Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 June 2018 at 3:36pm
It is impossible that something exists if no one makes it come into existence, for example: we have a watch, we will surely say there should be watch maker even though we don't see who makes it.

Likewise the universe, it will not exist if no one makes it, that's Allah (God).

Sometimes humans feel that they know everything, even though their knowledge is only a little.

 وَمَااُوتِيْتُمْ مِّنَ الْعِلْمِ اِلَّا قَلِيْلًا           (17:85)

“And of knowledge, you (mankind) have been given only a little.”

 

Back to Top
Qadadah View Drop Down
Starter.
Starter.
Avatar

Joined: 07 June 2018
Location: Singapore
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Qadadah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 June 2018 at 7:20pm
Yes there is proof Allah or god exists. It's the creation. If Allah didn't create it and it just evolved itself and no mighty being with a mind did it than we should find atheists evolving and making so much as a wing of a fly, which we don't. If mindless can do all this why can't the mindful do a simple wing of a fly?

Debating with atheists is like debating with dung. It goes nowhere and stinks all the time. Look, atheists actually think they are apes. What's the point debating with someone who actually thinks he's a ape?

Science evidence of god would be based on seeing god. That would contradict the whole test, so no there's no science evidence of god. There's only logical evidence and logic is also a form of science. The science of philosophy.
Back to Top
Tim the plumber View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 September 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 841
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tim the plumber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 June 2018 at 4:01am
Originally posted by asep garut asep garut wrote:

It is impossible that something exists if no one makes it come into existence, for example: we have a watch, we will surely say there should be watch maker even though we don't see who makes it.

Likewise the universe, it will not exist if no one makes it, that's Allah (God).

Sometimes humans feel that they know everything, even though their knowledge is only a little.

 وَمَااُوتِيْتُمْ مِّنَ الْعِلْمِ اِلَّا قَلِيْلًا           (17:85)

“And of knowledge, you (mankind) have been given only a little.”

 



The thing is that scientist say that they don't know what cased the universe to happen.

You however know what caused it despite a total lack of any evidence or understanding as to what the universe is.

Which side do you think says they know everything?
Back to Top
asep garut View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 November 2017
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 312
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote asep garut Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 June 2018 at 8:06pm
Originally posted by Tim the plumber Tim the plumber wrote:

Originally posted by asep garut asep garut wrote:

It is impossible that something exists if no one makes it come into existence, for example: we have a watch, we will surely say there should be watch maker even though we don't see who makes it.

Likewise the universe, it will not exist if no one makes it, that's Allah (God).

Sometimes humans feel that they know everything, even though their knowledge is only a little.

 وَمَااُوتِيْتُمْ مِّنَ الْعِلْمِ اِلَّا قَلِيْلًا           (17:85)

“And of knowledge, you (mankind) have been given only a little.”

 



The thing is that scientist say that they don't know what cased the universe to happen.

You however know what caused it despite a total lack of any evidence or understanding as to what the universe is.

Which side do you think says they know everything?

One example is when some scientists say that their definition is the most correct, but it turns out there are some of the other scientists who refute the definition, and they assume that their definition is most correct.

This shows that humans can only do according to experiments (trial and error), and scientists say they do not know what caused the universe to happen, that's proof that human science is limited.

You said:’ You however know what caused it despite a total lack of any evidence or understanding as to what the universe is.’

I am not a scientist but I only get information from God of the universe in the Qur'an. He is the most capable to make something that can not be done by humans.


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.