Open for debate |
Post Reply | Page <1 34567 12> |
Author | |
Tim the plumber
Senior Member Male Joined: 30 September 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 944 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If you want to use a science fiction metaphore you could use the idea of a familure or avatar where, say in an Ian M Banks book (Very good reads all of them), a hyper inteligent computer, normally a ship, will often have a human biological bit of it freely wandering around as a human. Fully human but the brain inside is inhabited by the mind of the computer.
The ship's remote wroker drones it uses to repair stuff around and about are the same sort of thing but they are mechanical. The ship's human avitar is, in this science fiction setting, both fully human and fully a machine intelligence. |
|
DavidC
Senior Member Male Christian Joined: 20 September 2001 Location: Florida USA Status: Offline Points: 2474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hello Niblo. As I said, I believe we agree which is hardly an argument.
The Christian answer to "Can God create another god like himself?" is no, because God was not created. It is a nonsensical question. It is like asking, "Can God create a circle with three sides and three angles?" |
|
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
|
|
Niblo
Groupie Male Islam Joined: 01 September 2016 Location: Leeds; UK Status: Offline Points: 58 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Of course there’s a contradiction. You are assuming that the incarnation is true in order to prove that it’s true. You are assuming that Christ has two natures in order to prove that he has two natures. You are assuming that Christ is a ‘Divine Being’ in order to prove that he is a divine being. In every case your premises assume the truth of your conclusions. This is circular reasoning; a logical fallacy in itself. Would you argue that Yeshua (ʿalayhi as-salām) is both wholly man and wholly donkey (see my reference to Aquinas)? Of course not. Then why would you think that he is both ‘wholly man’ and ‘wholly God’? The second statement is just as ludicrous as the first; just as much a contradiction; and just as impossible. Ponder this: ‘Whatever implies contradiction does not come within the scope of divine omnipotence, because it cannot have the aspect of possibility.’ (Aquinas: Summa Theologica: Part 1; Question 25; Article 3). Very best regards. |
|
'Sometimes, silence is the best answer for a fool.' (Alī ibn Abī Tālib)
|
|
Niblo
Groupie Male Islam Joined: 01 September 2016 Location: Leeds; UK Status: Offline Points: 58 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi Tim. A 'hyper intelligent computer', having a 'human biological bit of it freely wandering around as a human' is a compound. Machine plus a bit of human. The avatar is a human with a brain that is inhabited by the 'mind of the computer' Therefore the avatar is also a compound. As you describe it, this avatar is not ‘fully a machine’ at all...only a certain function of its brain, its machine intelligence, can claim that distinction. We have to assume, since the avatar is human, that those parts of its brain that control its bodily functions are as human as yours and mine. I’ve not read Ian Banks; but am happy to accept that he does a good job. As you say, his books are works of fiction; exactly the same genre as the doctrine of the incarnation, some might say! I wish him every success. Very best regards. |
|
'Sometimes, silence is the best answer for a fool.' (Alī ibn Abī Tālib)
|
|
Niblo
Groupie Male Islam Joined: 01 September 2016 Location: Leeds; UK Status: Offline Points: 58 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi David You wrote this: ‘There is nothing God cannot do. I believe this is accepted in Islam as well as Christianity.’ The article I quoted included these words: ‘That which is impossible does not exist, because it cannot exist, so it is nothing, even if the mind can imagine it. It is known that the mind can assume and imagine the impossible, the mind can imagine two opposites, such as something existing and not existing, at the same time. ‘The verse states that Allaah has power over “things” but that does not include things that are inherently impossible, because they are not things, rather they do not exist and they cannot be brought into existence. ‘Hence more than one of the scholars have stated that the power of Allaah has to do with that which is possible, for the reason that we have mentioned, which is that that which is non-existent and impossible is not a “thing”. I wished only to demonstrate that your statement ‘I believe this is accepted in Islam as well as Christianity.’ is incorrect. We certainly are in agreement (you and I) when we say that God cannot do the inherently impossible, such as creating ‘a circle with three sides and three angles.’ Very best regards. |
|
'Sometimes, silence is the best answer for a fool.' (Alī ibn Abī Tālib)
|
|
airmano
Senior Member Joined: 31 March 2014 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Indeed, you bring up a very important point here. I once tried to "help the Christian view" by comparing the Trinity concept with the 2-dimensional projection of a body which -in the case of a cone for instance- can lead to a circle or a triangle, depending on the observer. So the same object can have two "contradicting" appearances albeit in a lower dimension. Well, it didn't go down well at the time... To the point: I think the concept of an eternal, omnipotent and omniscient being leads in itself to unsolvable conflicts. My thoughts on this one go like this: A) An omniscient being must (by definition) know everything, including the past, and future and everything about itself. B) Therefore this being can not change his mind nor take any decision since these alterations are consequences of new insight, thus something the being could/did not know before. This is obviously in conflict with A) C) Therefore this being must be fully static for eternity. Some people call [an entity in] this state simply "dead". Airmano
|
|
The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses (Albert Einstein 1954, in his "Gods Letter")
|
|
airmano
Senior Member Joined: 31 March 2014 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
@DavidC
If I see your point correctly you argue that logic exists outside the realm of God. It was thus not created [by him] nor can it be overruled by God either. Do I interpret you correctly ? Airmano
|
|
The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses (Albert Einstein 1954, in his "Gods Letter")
|
|
DavidC
Senior Member Male Christian Joined: 20 September 2001 Location: Florida USA Status: Offline Points: 2474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Not exactly but true in part. I do not know if God created logic, but I suspect it is part of the 3D world he created. Aristotle, who defined human logic, states logic is only applicable to physical things.
God, angels, djinn and other elohim are not subject to logic as they are not physical. Neither is anything in the emotional realm. God is not constrained by time, but does appear to function sequentially. Reason, not logic, is useful in approaching God. Logic is rarely applicable. We can infer, but we cannot deduce because we cannot define the limits of God. The classic error in amateur intellectualism is a failure to adequately examine the basis of axioms and postulates before building upon them. Aquinas did the early Christian theological work on the logic of God using apophatic logic, but truly this was more a pragmatic way of defining where logic and reason are not useful in theology, Aquinas is dogmatic in this area and not doctrinal. Al Ghazzali wrote extensively on this topic from an Islamic perspective in 'A Niche for Light' and 'The Incoherence of the Philosophers'. These are essential reading which demonstrate Islam is a sound theology and not a superstition. |
|
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 34567 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |