The Earth is 6,000 years old |
Post Reply | Page <12345 7> |
Author | |||||
Matt Browne
Senior Member Male Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Mentioning carbon dating in this context shows a lack of knowledge in this matter. The topic is the age of the Earth, not the age of a preserved iceman eating plants a couple of thousand years ago containing C-14 atoms. Perhaps you've never heard of elements such as argon and lead and where they come from. Edited by Matt Browne - 24 January 2016 at 1:05am |
|||||
A religion that's intolerant of other religions can't be the world's best religion --Abdel Samad
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people--Eleanor Roosevelt |
|||||
Abu Loren
Senior Member Joined: 29 June 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
You see, you are believing what the science men tell you blindly without even thinking about it. The weather patterns are created by the movement of the Sun around the Earth, and the winds that blow over the plane Earth, for example the low and high pressures and the jet stream etc. I suggest you go to youtube and search for 'the sun's trajectory over the flat earth' and this will show you brilliant graphics about the Sun and the Moon, how they traverse the flat plane(t) that we call Earth.
Saudi Arabia do not have a space programme, hence theese 'satellites' are managed by India. By the way all the 'space faring' nations are in on the lie including India, China, Japan, ESA.
Hence the Earth is NOT a spheroid!
There are 0 satellites in space. It's ALL a con.
I've already told, dating rocks do NOT work, it's impossible. Of course, you're going to come back with "he would say that wouldn't he?". |
|||||
La Ilaha IllAllah
|
|||||
Emettman
Senior Member Male Joined: 02 December 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
" By the way all the 'space faring' nations are in on the lie...."
And not one journalist or whistle-blower to make their name by breaking the story? Everything pictured as being from the Hubble telescope, invented? Yachts in round the world races having to average something like 35 knots? Cape Horn to Western Australia is such a trek on a flat "map". "You see, you are believing what the science men tell you blindly without even thinking about it." Err, actually no. I'm used to checking the working on proposed ideas, and enjoy seeing how these rose and fell with argument and evidence through history. "youtube and search for 'the sun's trajectory over the flat earth" I did. I saw several I have rarely seen anything more hilarious, as long as no-one takes them seriously. Both major and blatant errors abound... talk about "believing blindly without thinking about it!" "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY0xhUOL3vM" Spot at least three fatal problems with the text, the animation or conflict between them. You'd have to be naively believing not to see them. Do you really believe this flat earth idea? I credit you with more intelligence than that, so lean towards the likelihood of you playing a game. I call deliberate Poe. Chris. |
|||||
Emettman
Senior Member Male Joined: 02 December 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
It gets even worse as you think about it.
(so somebody must be swallowing without examining) No satellites since with no supporting mechanism they would just crash down onto the flat earth, as apples fall from trees. So what's keeping the sun up? Worse, the sun is supposed to be moving in a circle: just on a whim? What force is creating this circular path, since moving objects with mass don't do that, having a natural preference, as Newton observed, for straight lines, unless acted upon by a force. The sun staying up and moving in circles for no reason is hilarious. Or would be except for anyone taking it seriously. |
|||||
Abu Loren
Senior Member Joined: 29 June 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Carbon dating doesn't work. Full Stop. Period. |
|||||
La Ilaha IllAllah
|
|||||
Abu Loren
Senior Member Joined: 29 June 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
A spinning globe Earth is a satanic lie! It doesn't make any sense at all. The Earth does NOT spin 1,000+ miles. |
|||||
La Ilaha IllAllah
|
|||||
Emettman
Senior Member Male Joined: 02 December 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Rarely have I seen such a closed, fixed, position so firmly held on no solid ground at all. No Satan required at all You who rail at people believing without thought, scepticism or fair, questioning doubt; have you brought thought, scepticism or fair, questioning doubt against the flat earth or young earth models of earth and the solar system, or the cosmos as a whole? Have you seen how many wild assumptions and extra entities have to be brought into play (or ignored!) to make these young or flat perspectives even seem to work? I've twice been round the world. Looking at a flat map the air-flight leg times don't match by such a large degree that I don't need close detail I've been to Australia twice. THE STARS ARE WRONG. (That's to a northern hemisphere dweller, on a spheroidal earth.) On a flat earth the stars should look pretty much the same, looking up from Australia or the UK, because that's looking in almost the same direction. Think about it for ten seconds. It may be that a *absolutely* literal reading of terms seems to imply a flat earth, but this requires a ruling brought in from outside as far as I can tell. No metaphors, similes or pictorial language anywhere in the Qur'an? I'd be very surprised. But the world is round, and it spins, and gravity works. (On a flat earth how do you get much more variation in day length through the year as you get near the North pole? The effect is clearly recorded in discussion on its effects on Ramadan at such latitudes.) Edited by Emettman - 27 January 2016 at 4:06am |
|||||
AaronKM
Starter. Male Joined: 04 April 2016 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
As Salaam Alaykum brother. Having read most of the Quran, here is my take on it: The Quran contains allegory. It says so in the verse 3:7. Most of this refers to verses that have more than one meaning. However, I am under the impression that some of the stories are allegory as well, meant to teach us something, and not necessarily a literal account of a historical event. Look at the underlying themes from Adam, for example. Made from clay, angels prostrated to him, gave in to sin, expelled from paradise. My take on this is that it was meant to teach us about man, and what man means to Allah. We don't have to stick our fingers in our ears and yell "lalalalalalala" every time science contradicts a literal interpretation. In this sense, science actually teaches us about Islam. |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <12345 7> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |