Faith/Doctrine/Practice

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

Assalamu alaikum.

Muhammad's
 way of life known as his Sunna or practice was never limited to his 
followers, for if all do not join hand the world will never be at peace.
 To those who love accusing Muhammad of learning or copying from those 
who called themselves 'Christians' his way of life, that is not a far 
fetched assumption provided that way of life is what is confirmed from 
those 'Christians'  who followed him.
I was reading today from an 
'Arabic book -Tabaqat Kabir- that a Sahaba named 'Amir bin Shahr 
Hamdaanii heard he holy apostle telling a delegate: Fear Allah (obey 
Allah) and pay attention to what the Quraysh tell you and follow their 
examples. I became convinced with what he said  and I decided to see 
Negus, king of Abysinia, a trusted friend. When I was with Negus, one of
 his young sons came and set with us. Negus gave him a tablet and read 
from it. I laughed. Negus asked me why I laughed. I said, I laughed 
because of what I heard your son reading. Negus said, "I swear by Allah 
that is what Allah revealed to Jesus son of Maryam. Certainly the 
displeasure of Allah is on that civilization appointing the young as 
their leaders." I then recall hearing the same from the holy apostle.
The
 problem the world is experiencing is as a result of the behavior and 
practice of the followers of Muhammad in disbelieving what Allah 
revealed to  Jesus son of Maryam by appointing young, illiterate and 
inexperienced to responsible positions. When Muhammad died, Abubakr 
Siddiq was appointed the Caliph of Muhammad Rasulullah. He was 60 
years then. I want the Christians to ponder on the assumed understanding
 of those who called themselves 'Shiites' that Ali ibn Abi Talib was the
 one to be appointed as the leader of the Muslim Umma. Ali then was 
barely 33 years old- the age of Jesus at his leaving the world.  Why not
 say that Muhammad Rasulullah followed the teaching of Jesus son of 
Maryam in recommending the appointment of Abubakr as his successor?  
What
 does one gain by giving a deaf ear to the truth? Those who like to 
take  pleasure in creating discord and hatred are hereby called to be 
factual and disprove this incident reported by Muslim historians. Why 
are such incidents and evidences absent from historical books written by
 Christians? If the followers of Muhammad were to be partisan and 
selfish, could such historical events be available today? 
Let us be 
bi-partisan in seeking the common good for our own good. Why is it that 
the Western world is dealing with such Muslim countries? Is the West 
then not behind terrorism and our socioeconomic downturn?

Friendship.

Edited by Friendship - 10 December 2012 at 2:16pm