IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Science & Technology
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Open challenge to atheistic science
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Open challenge to atheistic science

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>
Author
Message
Mohammad Shafiq View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 18 November 2012
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mohammad Shafiq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Open challenge to atheistic science
    Posted: 18 November 2012 at 11:29pm
Atheism at the physical level has been challenged as Einstein's all theories have been shown to be incorrect and consequently openly challenged on the basis of published articles. Open challenge is on World Science Database & General Science Journal
http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Abstracts&tab1=Display&id=6476&tab=2 and also on.
http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/4018
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Matt Browne View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2010
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 940
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Matt Browne Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2012 at 12:07am
There is no such thing as atheistic or theistic science. There is only science.

A religion that's intolerant of other religions can't be the world's best religion --Abdel Samad
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people--Eleanor Roosevelt
Back to Top
Mohammad Shafiq View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 18 November 2012
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mohammad Shafiq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2012 at 12:50am
Einstein changed the paradigm of physics in 1905 and thereby defined a paradigm of physical sciences under which existence of God is not possible. The articles on the basis of which open challenge has been put forward expose the trickeries of Einstein in his articles of 1905. Thus science was converted to atheistic science by Einstein. Now so-called scientists like Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku, Tyson & many others are just selling this atheistic science to promote atheism. Their whole knowledge is reduced to trash as the consequence of the scientific research articles published in peer-reviewed journals.
Under the alternative paradigm of physics which emerges after rectifying the fallacies of Einstein existence of God is obvious & evident.
Back to Top
bunter View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 March 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 November 2012 at 3:08pm
Originally posted by Mohammad Shafiq Mohammad Shafiq wrote:

Einstein changed the paradigm of physics in 1905 and thereby defined a paradigm of physical sciences under which existence of God is not possible. The articles on the basis of which open challenge has been put forward expose the trickeries of Einstein in his articles of 1905. Thus science was converted to atheistic science by Einstein. Now so-called scientists like Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku, Tyson & many others are just selling this atheistic science to promote atheism. Their whole knowledge is reduced to trashas the consequence ofthe scientific research articles published in peer-reviewed journals.
Under the alternative paradigm of physics which emerges after rectifying the fallacies of Einstein existence of God is obvious & evident.


Can you point out where Einstein said these things? What on earth do you mean by insulting brilliant men in this way, it's absolutely outrageous to call Hawking for example a 'so called scientist'. Can you justify this by telling us who therefore are 'proper scientists'?
Back to Top
Mohammad Shafiq View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 18 November 2012
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mohammad Shafiq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 November 2012 at 11:41pm
I have justified every word of what I have stated through scientific research articles published in peer-reviewed journals and following is the list of articles & sites where these articles are available
1. Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe (www.indjst.org; March2012)
2. Foundation of Theory of Everything: Non-living Things & Living Things (www.indjst.org; Sep 2010)
3.Michelson-Morley Experiment: A Misconceived & Misinterpreted Experiment (www.indjst.org; April 2011)
4. Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology (www.indjst.org; August 2010)
5. 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies' by Albert Einstein is Based on Trickeries (www.elixirjournal.org Feb.2012)
6.Ultimate Proof of Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology (www.indjst.org; August 2010)
7. Theory of Origin & Phenomenon of Life (www.indjst.org; August 2010)
These publications are also available on www.gsjournal.net, www.wrldsci.org, viXra, Intellectual Archives & ResearchGate in my profile.
Back to Top
bunter View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 March 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 November 2012 at 3:31am
Originally posted by Mohammad Shafiq Mohammad Shafiq wrote:

I have justified every word of what I have stated through scientific research articles published in peer-reviewed journals and following is the list of articles & sites where these articles are available
1. Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe (www.indjst.org; March2012)2. Foundation of Theory of Everything: Non-living Things & Living Things (www.indjst.org; Sep 2010)3.Michelson-Morley Experiment: A Misconceived & Misinterpreted Experiment (www.indjst.org; April 2011)4. Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology (www.indjst.org; August 2010)5. 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies' by Albert Einstein is Based on Trickeries (www.elixirjournal.org Feb.2012)6.Ultimate Proof of Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology (www.indjst.org; August 2010)7. Theory of Origin & Phenomenon of Life (www.indjst.org; August 2010)These publications are also available on www.gsjournal.net, www.wrldsci.org, viXra, Intellectual Archives & ResearchGatein my profile.


I have never heard of this journal before and it appears to publish anything from how to mix concrete to flower growing. One wonders who would go there? Any journal worth it's salt would peer review publications so there is nothing special there. As far as I can tell this site is the only place you have visited or know about and you trust it or att least your understanding implicitly. The idea that there is Aetheist science is totally absurd - do you think there are Aetheist versions of Ohms law or gravity? One is sceptical about an article that claims to be an 'ultimate proof' or charge Einstein with trickery. Perhaps you would like to outline one or both of these
Back to Top
Mohammad Shafiq View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 18 November 2012
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mohammad Shafiq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 November 2012 at 9:47pm
What is stated in my previous post is shown mathematically, theoretically & experimentally in the articles. Whatever the journal but the contents are verifiable. Open challenge is actually for information of all members of this forum so that they could inform all the physicists of the world to produce the rebuttal of the articles on the basis of which open challenge has been put forward in the relevent forum. It is simply improper to reject or question the open challenge on this discussion forum (This forum could be only rebuttal articles which are to be published in some peer-reviewed journal). However there could be discussion regarding the consequences of the paradigm shift in physics on theology, social, biological & political sciences.
Back to Top
Mohammad Shafiq View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 18 November 2012
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mohammad Shafiq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 November 2012 at 11:14pm
The question is not whether God could be seen or not. The question is whether God can exist. No one can physically see God but God has to exist and the existence of universe is the proof of existence God. This is my concern as a theoretical physicist and a theologian. Following is the list of published scientific research articles which substantiate my perspective and the contents of the book 'Natural World Order & The Islamic Thought'.
1. Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe
2. Foundation of Theory of Everything: Non-living Things & Living Things
3.Michelson-Morley Experiment: A Misconceived & Misinterpreted Experiment ( April 2011)
4. Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology
5. 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies' by Albert Einstein is Based on Trickeries
6.Ultimate Proof of Energy Theory of Matter & Cosmology
7. Theory of Origin & Phenomenon of Life
These publications are published in Indian Journal of Science & Technology and are also available on General Science Journal, World Science Database, viXra, Intellectual Archives & ResearchGate in my profile.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.