What is this "something else"?

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

 Caringheart wrote:

Well, fine, if you feel you must take a mocking attitude, but I feel no such need.  Peace to you.

Awww, that's so sweet!  I am touched...NOT!

Liars can pretend like they are sincere people but in the end, they are always exposed for what they are.  Here, you are being exposed for all to see.

 Caringheart wrote:

Anyway, I do not see Sebeos referring to Muhammad as a 'prophet',
but as one, 
" learnt and informed in the history of Moses."
'Muhammad a merchant, and a preacher' teaching of the God of Abraham...

Still not getting it???  Well, I guess I cannot act surprised.  After all, the deaf will not hear nor will the blind see!

For those with eyes to see and ears to hear (and who know how to read), Sebeos' account shows that Muhammad (peace be upon him) was considered to be a prophet.  He stated:

"At that time a certain man from along those same sons of Ismael, whose name was Mahmet [i.e., Muḥammad],
 a merchant, as if by God's command appeared to them as a preacher [and]
 the path of truth. [...] 
Now because the command was from on high, at a single order they all 
came together in unity of religion. [...] No one will be able to resist you in battle, because God is 
with you."   

These are the facts.  Of course, facts mean nothing to people like you, since you live in your own pathetic fantasy world.  

 Caringheart wrote:

^{As
 regards Yshwe, you say he was not all knowing, and yet we have from His
 own words proof.  He knew, from the beginning, for what He had come.}
¹⁸... the Jews ... said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things?
 ¹⁹Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
 ²⁰Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
 ²¹But he spake of the temple of his body.
 ²²When
 therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he 
had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word 
which Jesus had said.

 What a typical response from a blind apologist!  Why did you completely ignore the clear evidence from your own so-called "scripture" which shows that Jesus was not "God"?  Hmmm?  Still stuck in your fantasy world?  

Not only was Jesus not "all-seeing", as the fig tree episode shows, he was also not, by his own admission, "all-knowing,!  Let's read Mark 13:32:

"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."

Ooops!  