Increase Earthquakes Is A Sign Of Hazrat Mahdi

schmikbob wrote: The problem with anecdotal evidence is IT'S ANECDOTAL.  Unless you have some source in mind that I'm unaware of, earthquake frequency and strength is relatively stable down through the ages.  Data such as, "well I remember this one earthquake" or "what about Mount St Helens?" is not very convincing.

I assume the data collection method is covering every jolt no matter where it occurs and how strong. But did not I wrote this to make a point: nobody lived at that particular place back then, so nobody talk about it?

You know what we discuss is what we have in memories, like Japan, Kashmir and --- barely new destructive earthquake in New Zealand, we don't talk about the earthquake that occurs well below the earth surface which does not concern people. But maybe they are on payroll to calm the population "Relax people this is not the thing to worry, it is just normal earth activity" after few thousand people killed and scores lost their homes? Sure the people will return to their ruins sooner or later regardless since that is where they belong. And when Christchurch was hit second time that too was nothing to add, the level activity still has not change.

Hey but you are right, if we blank out our memories life is truly sweet. If person still in tears in the cemeteries for the lost of the loved one let those scientist erase his / her memories about that lost loved one, so when it's done he / she would say: "What the hell I am doing here in the graveyard?".

The 2004 tsunami was not a rare event. And neither was the one off the Japanese coast in 2011. Only Tepco thought so. Take a look at the history

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_historic_tsunamis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_earthquakes

The Qur'an and the Hadith does not contain true scientific knowledge. In fact, quite often it's the opposite. Drinking camel urine has no benefits. Milk is not good for people who are lactose intolerant. Full veils give women vitamin D deficiency. The list is very long.



Edited by Matt Browne - 25 July 2012 at 8:31am

Wow, so determining "whether present earthquakes and tsunamis
are leading us to end of time" belongs in whose "realm" exactly?  I'd say that everything that occurs is leading us to the end of time.  Just when that end will occur is not a question that is answerable, by you or anyone else.  

Guess what newbie, you don't run this forum.  Religious debate is exactly that, debate about religion.  Since religion affects many aspects of everyone's life, including agnostics and even atheists, I can and will contribute to the discussion.  Just because you are uncomfortable with certain answers and questions is no reason to become hostile.  Maybe it is you that would be better served in another forum, like one that caters to children.