IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Politics > Current Events
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The murders in Afghanistan
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


The murders in Afghanistan

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
abuayisha View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 05 October 1999
Status: Offline
Points: 4901
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abuayisha Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The murders in Afghanistan
    Posted: 15 March 2012 at 6:54am

The Panjwai 16

The murders in Afghanistan were all too predictable

BY MICHAEL YON / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Updated: Thursday, March 15, 2012, 4:37 AM
An%20Afghan%20soldier%20is%20seen%20in%20a%20guard%20tower%20at%20a%20military%20base%20as%20civilians%20gather%20outside%20in%20Panjwai,%20Kandahar%20province%20south%20of%20Kabul,%20Afghanistan,%20Sunday,%20March%2011,%202012.%20Afghan%20President%20Hamid%20Karzai%20says%20a%20U.S.%20service%20member%20has%20killed%20more%20than%20a%20dozen%20people%20in%20a%20shooting%20including%20nine%20children%20and%20three%20women.%20Karzai%20called%20the%20attack%20Sunday%20an%20assassination%20and%20demanded%20an%20explanation%20from%20the%20United%20States.%20He%20says%20several%20people%20were%20also%20wounded%20in%20the%20attack%20on%20two%20villages%20near%20a%20U.S.%20base%20in%20the%20southern%20province%20of%20Kandahar.%20%28AP%20Photo/Allauddin%20Khan%29

ALLAUDDIN KHAN/AP

Are some in the American forces buckling under the pressure of war?

The mass murder in Afghanistan was predictable. Twice in the past three weeks, I published that it was coming. Why was I able to write this with sad confidence? I’ve spent more time with combat troops in these wars than any other writer: about four years in total in country, and three with combat troops.

About 200 coalition members have been killed or wounded from insider attacks. Afghan President Hamid Karzai is tantamount to being Taliban and has not bothered to apologize. Instead, Karzai whips up anti-U.S. fervor at every opportunity. Twice, Karzai has threatened to leave politics and join the Taliban.

Even our most disciplined troops — not the few problem troops — have lost all idealism. They have not lost heart for the fight. Mostly, they just don’t care. They fight because they are ordered to fight, but they have eyes wide open. The halfhearted surge and sudden drawdown leave little room for success.

We face a discipline collapse. The bulk of our force is solid — then there’s a small fraction, probably a sliver of a percent, who might be crushed by the pressure.

On Feb. 24, I published

: “As the prevalence of insider attacks rises, and we lose more troops to Afghan troops going berserk and murdering our people, it’s likely just a matter of time before a U.S. troop or troops turn the table and intentionally slaughter Afghan forces.

“That could lead to a meltdown. We are at risk of losing control of more than some people might imagine. There is only so much that U.S. forces will put up with before fringe U.S. combat troops start taking matters into their own hands. Believe me.”

The next day, I published, “If things keep going this way, my expectation is that it’s a matter of time before discipline breaks and the gun turns.”

I’ve seen a few men on our side precariously close to the edge. In fact, my official embed status was ended by the Army in August 2011 after I wrote about issues with three soldiers.

I was accused of saying there were issues because I was disembedded. Yet the written trail and chronology is clear: I publicized discipline problems, then the Army circled the wagons and I was shown the door.

I published that a master sergeant stationed in Kandahar was homicidal after he strongly hinted at murder on his website. For years, he had been writing about his mental issues — yet the Army sent him to Afghanistan. Between hate-filled rants about gays and so on, he would write about his mental illness. In January of this year, he turned himself in to a clinic in Kandahar for mental issues.

Why was this guy armed and in Afghanistan in the first place? (He had nothing to do with the 16 murders.)

The 16 murder victims, including women and small children, are Pashtun. Pashtuns live by a code called Pashtunwali, which they take as seriously as the Koran. Pashtunwali includes “nanawatai” (asylum), “badal” (justice/revenge), “tureh” (bravery, specifically protecting women, children and property) and “namus” (honor of women).

Pashtunwali commitment to “badal” makes the Hatfields and McCoys look like a schoolyard fight. Nor is this just a Pashtun thing. There is an annual bloodfest between the Hazaras and Kuchis. That feud should be cranking up again with spring.

Afghan feuds are famously persistent. Badal carries through the generations like DNA. A grandson not born today might take revenge for events decades before his birth. He may kill someone who also was not born at that time.

Panjwai district, the scene of the crime, had been one of the most dangerous districts in Afghanistan. Panjwai saw major battles involving Canadian, U.S., U.K., Dutch and Afghan forces. Many hundreds of enemy were estimated killed, and we took substantial casualties.

Progress was happening there. In early 2011, I drove there from Kandahar city without the military. The mood of the locals was tense. The journey was unsafe, but the fact that we entered what had previously been a Taliban-owned district, and returned safely, was demonstrative.

Yet in one furious night of murder, a single U.S. soldier (apparently) has wiped Panjwai progress off the map.

Karzai is Pashtun. He said, “This is an assassination, an intentional killing of innocent civilians, and cannot be forgiven.”

Afghans will seek revenge and they will have it. This will lead to yet greater possibilities of another mass murder from our side. We are considering holding the trial in Afghanistan. Pashtuns don’t care about our justice system. They don’t even care about the Afghan government; they want blood for blood. We are being drawn into a feud.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/i-massacre-coming-article-1.1039181#ixzz1pC3pLen3
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
abuayisha View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 05 October 1999
Status: Offline
Points: 4901
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abuayisha Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 March 2012 at 11:09pm
Back to Top
Sign*Reader View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 November 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3352
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sign*Reader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 March 2012 at 11:15pm
Remember who got the Nobel Peace Prize?
I am not surprised...

Cheapening the Peace Prize Eight Days a Week


You talk about Afghans even the SoD is running scared...That should wake people up about the feckless administration.

Unprecedented: US Marines Forced To Disarm In Combat Zone Over Fear For Panetta's Safety




Edited by Sign*Reader - 16 March 2012 at 11:20pm
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
Back to Top
abuayisha View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 05 October 1999
Status: Offline
Points: 4901
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abuayisha Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 March 2012 at 7:30am
Originally posted by Sign*Reader Sign*Reader wrote:

Unprecedented: US Marines Forced To Disarm In Combat Zone Over Fear For Panetta's Safety


 

The order to disarm came from Maj. Gen. Mark Gurganus, who commands troops in Helmand province.

Asked about the move, Hall told the New York Times' Elisabeth Bumiller: "Somebody got itchy, that's all I've got to say. Somebody got itchy; we just adjust."

Gurganus later told reporters the decision had nothing to do with the weekend shooting, and said it was because the Afghan soldiers in attendance were unarmed and he did not want them treated differently than the Marines.

"This is not a big deal," Gurganus said. But he then added that "you've got one of the most important people in the world in the room," referring to Panetta.  When it was pointed out that this had not been the custom, Gurganus - who is new to the post - replied, "There's a new sheriff in town."

Back to Top
Sign*Reader View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 November 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3352
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sign*Reader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 March 2012 at 4:32pm
The new sheriff in town with deputies without arms will make a great talking point on show circuit.
Own the town before being the sheriff!

Anything such as this with after the fact explanation will go only with so called progressives.

Once one becomes a general if don't also be his fanny can be kicked out in a jiffy. Remember the Gen. Stanley McChrystal being not being less than PC?
Where did he go?
In case of marines the war zone disarmament is as PC as it gets and that wouldn't fly too well with the military and the right and probably the independents.
The gun control in the war zone cuz they can do it without making a law.


Edited by Sign*Reader - 17 March 2012 at 5:16pm
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.