Imagine! So Many Voted in Egypt |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Whisper
Senior Member Male Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4752 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 10 September 2005 at 10:09am |
Carry on up the Nile No one in the Middle East need hold their breath in anticipation of the final outcome of this week's Egyptian presidential election. Partial results reported by the (tightly controlled) official media yesterday suggested President Hosni Mubarak has taken some 80% of the vote, easily seeing off all nine of his rivals. Not bad for a man of 77 seeking a fifth term 24 years since he came to power. Still, the reported turnout of just 30% suggests widespread apathy - even though this was the first time other candidates had ever been allowed to stand. Mr Mubarak's slick campaign kept the former air force pilot in soft-focus, avuncular mode, sipping tea while chatting to peasants on the banks of the Nile. But this could not hide flaws including vastly unequal resources and campaigning time as well as intimidation and ballot-stuffing. Foreign monitors were rejected as an affront to Egyptian sovereignty. Yet this was a landmark election not because it offered genuine choice now but because, by replacing the system of a referendum for one candidate, it showed in a partial, caricatured way what a real multiparty contest could be like, raising expectations for the future. Ayman Nour, courageous leader of the Al-Ghad (Tomorrow) party, was able to voice criticism of unemployment, corruption, emergency laws, human rights abuses and a notoriously unresponsive bureaucracy. It has to be said that this would not have happened without US pressure on its closest Arab ally (and recipient of $1.8bn in annual aid) to flesh out George Bush's vision of a wave of democratic reform rippling out from post-Ba'athist Baghdad. It was also easier than trying to demonstrate progress in Saudi Arabia. In the short term, the election will make little difference. It failed to even address two big questions. The first is that of the succession to Mr Mubarak, who in dynastic style that the ancient pharaohs would have recognised, has been grooming his son Gamal to take over from him. The other is what role there will be for Islamist parties. The Muslim Brotherhood, the country's largest and oldest opposition movement, remains banned and unable to participate in legal politics. Until it can, true multi-party democracy will not exist. |
|
nico
Senior Member Joined: 23 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 163 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
b95000
Senior Member Joined: 11 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1328 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Interesting thoughts - I agree that economic laws will be very
important in the so-called War on Terror...when people are happy and
content, they are much less likely to support a terroristic
notion..that said there are many wealthier terrorist also...so there is
a more complicated picture than just poverty.
|
|
Bruce
Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. |
|
Whisper
Senior Member Male Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4752 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
so there is a more complicated picture than just poverty. The day poor pathetic trigger happy Amreekis oil suckers could figure that out, they won't have to keep crying for their security. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |