IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Interfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Question For Open ( Debate For Christian
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Question For Open ( Debate For Christian

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 11>
Author
Message
IssaEl999 View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Avatar

Joined: 10 March 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 336
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote IssaEl999 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Question For Open ( Debate For Christian
    Posted: 24 March 2011 at 1:46pm
Ques ; The Immaculate Conception Of Mary That Christians ( Preach True ) ?
Ques ; How Does The Self Apointed  Saul , Shaool , Paul Justify Abolishing The Law ?
El's Holy Qur'aan , States In Chapter 17 ; 81 , '' And Say ; Truth Has ( Now ) Arrived , And Falsehood Perished ; For Falsehood Is ( By Its Nature ) Bound To Perish (81 ) .
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
bunter View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 March 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 March 2011 at 9:59am
Originally posted by IssaEl999 IssaEl999 wrote:

Ques; The Immaculate Conception Of Mary That Christians Preach True?
Ques; How Does The Self ApointedSaul, Shaool, Paul Justify Abolishing The Law?


Yes it is true that Christianity trusts in a virgin birth. As to whether it is true or not that is a matter of faith as I cannot see how it can be proved one way or another so it is perhaps a pointless question. This is no different is it from saying Mohammed was spoken to by an angel, is it true - I cannot see how it can be proved one way or another.

With regard to Paul it seems to me that you need to tell us where Paul justified abolishing as you say the law?

Edited by bunter - 28 March 2011 at 10:23am
Back to Top
IssaEl999 View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Avatar

Joined: 10 March 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 336
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote IssaEl999 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 March 2011 at 8:10pm
Originally posted by bunter bunter wrote:

Originally posted by IssaEl999 IssaEl999 wrote:

Ques; The Immaculate Conception Of Mary That Christians Preach True?
Ques; How Does The Self Apointed Saul, Shaool, Paul Justify Abolishing The Law?


Yes it is true that Christianity trusts in a virgin birth. As to whether it is true or not that is a matter of faith as I cannot see how it can be proved one way or another so it is perhaps a pointless question. This is no different is it from saying Mohammed was spoken to by an angel, is it true - I cannot see how it can be proved one way or another.

With regard to Paul it seems to me that you need to tell us where Paul justified abolishing as you say the law?
 
Maybe you should see if you can answer the question First And Not Tell Me What I Should Do Ok .
El's Holy Qur'aan , States In Chapter 17 ; 81 , '' And Say ; Truth Has ( Now ) Arrived , And Falsehood Perished ; For Falsehood Is ( By Its Nature ) Bound To Perish (81 ) .
Back to Top
Sign*Reader View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 November 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3352
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sign*Reader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 March 2011 at 8:31am


Paul did & didn't do lot of things, people are still asking it is just not the IC members!

Who Wrote The Bible and Why It Matters



Edited by Sign*Reader - 30 March 2011 at 8:33am
Kismet Domino: Faith/Courage/Liberty/Abundance/Selfishness/Immorality/Apathy/Bondage or extinction.
Back to Top
bunter View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 March 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 March 2011 at 8:51am
Originally posted by bunter bunter wrote:

Originally posted by IssaEl999 IssaEl999 wrote:

Ques; The Immaculate Conception Of Mary That Christians Preach True?
Ques; How Does The Self ApointedSaul, Shaool, Paul Justify Abolishing The Law?


Yes it is true that Christianity trusts in a virgin birth. As to whether it is true or not that is a matter of faith as I cannot see how it can be proved one way or another so it is perhaps a pointless question. This is no different is it from saying Mohammed was spoken to by an angel, is it true - I cannot see how it can be proved one way or another.

With regard to Paul it seems to me that you need to tell us where Paul justified abolishing as you say the law?


Is it not interesting that Bart Ehrman is quoted here, beloved it seems of Muslim because he says what they want to hear. Do you not know any other Biblical scholars (FF Bruce, Metzger, Barclay etc) and perhaps you would care to hear what Ehrman says about oral transmission since again Muslims put some much store by it, he said oral transmission is not about about exactness, that is a product of written cultures, but oral recitations are about fitting the story, the same story, but bending it this way and that way to fit circumstance.

Edited by bunter - 30 March 2011 at 8:51am
Back to Top
islamispeace View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 November 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2255
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote islamispeace Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 March 2011 at 1:59pm
I agree with Bunter about the virgin birth.  That is simply a matter of faith, as it is with Muslims.  But the second topic is definitely interesting.  Christians make all sorts of arguments to try to exonerate Paul, but as with many of their arguments, there are many inconsistencies which they try very hard to ignore.  
Say: "Truly, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death, are (all) for Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds. (Surat al-Anaam: 162)

Back to Top
IssaEl999 View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Avatar

Joined: 10 March 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 336
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote IssaEl999 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 March 2011 at 4:29pm
Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:

I agree with Bunter about the virgin birth.  That is simply a matter of faith, as it is with Muslims.  But the second topic is definitely interesting.  Christians make all sorts of arguments to try to exonerate Paul, but as with many of their arguments, there are many inconsistencies which they try very hard to ignore.  
 
 
 
Care Share What You Know About Saul , Shaool , Paul , Teaching ?
El's Holy Qur'aan , States In Chapter 17 ; 81 , '' And Say ; Truth Has ( Now ) Arrived , And Falsehood Perished ; For Falsehood Is ( By Its Nature ) Bound To Perish (81 ) .
Back to Top
Matt Browne View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2010
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 940
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Matt Browne Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 March 2011 at 8:23am
Modern enlightened Christians don't believe virgin birth to be a biological fact. Jesus, the human being, had a biological father too. Immaculate conception can have a symbolic meaning.

Modern enlightened Muslims don't believe in the physical night journey of Muhammad. This too has a symbolic meaning.

A religion that's intolerant of other religions can't be the world's best religion --Abdel Samad
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people--Eleanor Roosevelt
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 11>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.