Apologetic Hiroshima and defiant America

The link between Iraq and terrorism. Shot down you say?

What is killing political opponents and having the military leaders so affraid that they rather not tell you the truth when it's bad out of fear of being killed?

What was all the support for Saddam at the start of this war(on TV) really out of fear of being killed by the secret service if they voiced a negative opinion of their opressor. but when their deffences got over run suddenly people came out trampling his pictures and cheering for their liberation.

The Saddam regime was nothing BUT terrorism....and i think it is a shame that instead of taking a stand against those who would love to take his place like Al Zarqawi and his likes, it seems people protract the situation by forgetting the real trouble makers and rather take in false information and dishonest opinions about those who brought Saddam down. I do not expect the Iraqi people to take that stand, because being in a society like that must takes it's toll on your moral health, and with death and political assasinations all around it is not easy for them to say "Zarqawi you are wrong, without you the Americans would be back home, and all this blood spilled over you would not be, so leave us alone and let us vote for our government, it can't be worse then Saddam or you." But for the free islamic and arab people to not spill a word on Al Zarqawi and people like him lusting for power through cowardly acts which they deem neccisary because they are weaker, and instead just be "fashionable" and tag along with anarchists and socialists against what they call the great opressor through dishonest opinions and twisted and twisted again information? i can not understand this. This only empowers people like Al Zarqawi and this causes more bloodshed.(nice going you o so peaceful people of the world). Maybe they should realize that if your weakness makes you resort to deliberate unjust acts, that means your whole cause is wrong. But this is hard to understand for someone who is blinded by the lust for power, so when are muslims going to take a stand against these kind of power lovers? and where were the muslims when Saddam killed his Kurdish neighbours? you did not hear muslims cry out then, except the kurds and muslims just looked at them and found Saddam more impressive because afterall he was the embodiment of Arab nationalism(what a crack up)...but when sanctions are put up...you hear some....and when the country is invaded and the tyrant removed you hear alot of them together with their anarchist and socialist (get over it) friends protest against really the removal of a tyrant and the fight against his supporters and those who wish to take his place. You can argue "no we are not against his removal, but against the US who put him there and supported him and now they are after the oil" but seriously even if it is true, so what? and the US being after the oil, even if this is so...ever heard of the thing called "war booty" it is something familiar to muslims, or do muslims think that they are the only ones intitled on taking war booty. Atleast they leave most of the women alone(good thing we are more civilized nowadays then lets say 300 years ago, 200, 100 years even) and free the country from an opressor.

So what is wrong here? Al Zarqawi is tollerated by muslims, Saddam is even tolerated but not the US. Why do muslims expect the US to be better in their actions then Saddam or Al Zarqawi(which in reality they are because imagine Al Zarqawi and Saddam having a military like the US), and scream high and low at their wrong doings but have understanding when it concerns.....is it because they are simply arabs? that is a filthy and disgusting form of racism, understanding wrong doings simply because of race. If this is not the case why then?

Is Al Zarqawi a freedom fighter according to you? if he is he must be one of the most stupid freedom fighters on the face of the earth, and it is amazing that he actually has people under him, i can only wonder what level of understanding they are on, because it is him and his people that keep the US military from leaving. So in reality he is an anti freedom fighter. Why can't they just back off? why do they feel such a need to be in power? are they forbidden from practising their faith if they have any under the new government?

And Saddam....well i guess he was better then the new iraqi government.....get real ok?

Bismillah,

B, I don't agree that believing that other methods of warfare than killing millions of people at a time is an immature view of warfare and the world.  It is one that shows we believe in a Merciful Allah, who has all the power and the glory, and has clearly told us not to kill non-combatants.  Those who perpetrate mass killings are wrong and Allah, SWT, will decide what to do with them. (And that inlcludes suicide bombers killing children, old people, any non-combatants.)

Community,  did you forget that our government supported and supplied Saddam Hussein and OBL?  So because of this we are actually almost completely responsible for the difficulties in Iraq and Afghanistan.  You want oppressed and terrified people to do what with Al-Zarqawi?  People who are against him are afraid for their lives and the lives of their families.  Do you think it's easy for people to get to him and people like him?  No, it's not! 

I'm sure many Iraqis and Afghanis would like to see the leaders of suicide bombers out of their countries.  It's just not as easy as you make it seem.