- |
Post Reply | Page <1 3456> |
Author | |
islamispeace
Senior Member Joined: 01 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 2187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Brilliant response, Believer! Change the subject to the Quran when the topic is about the Bible!
|
|
Say: "Truly, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death, are (all) for Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds. (Surat al-Anaam: 162)
|
|
believer
Guest Group Joined: 08 January 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1397 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
http://www.harvardhouse.com/quran_purity.htm
Note from Moderation: Please try and keep the thread on topic. You may start a topic with the above link in the interfaith section. Keep in mind that if you start such a topic, you are responsible for the material if someone decides to engage you. So please read the material with some understanding before you copy and paste. Regards Edited by Andalus - 08 July 2009 at 4:13pm |
|
John 3
16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. |
|
Nur_Ilahi
Senior Member Joined: 19 January 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1031 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Believer wrote - "there are Books of the Holy Bible that have always been considered scripture for example - Matthew, Mark, Luke and John"
Considered? Considered by whom? Consider means - think through, mull over, chew over, reflect, deliberate, contemplate, take into account, ponder, weigh up, study, cogitate (formal), ruminate Definitely considered by human. Anything that belongs to God is DEFINITE! Because God is The Truth! These have been kept ntot destroyed, considered early Christians writings, but not the Word of GOD. Which could be found extensively in the Bible. Therefore not the word of God. The difference between islam and Christianity is that we did not intentionally burn the various collections the way Uthmann did with the quran, The Christians should have followed the footsteps of Uthman. They should have burned all the copies of the Bible leaving only a few authentic ones instead of having thousands of version of the Gospel and none even resembling the Truth. |
|
Ilahi Anta Maksudi, Wa Redhaka Mathlubi - Oh Allah, You are my destination, Your Pleasure is my Intention.
|
|
hat2010
Senior Member Joined: 10 October 2006 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 561 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
-
Edited by Jamal Morelli - 05 November 2009 at 5:06am |
|
hat2010
Senior Member Joined: 10 October 2006 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 561 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
-
Edited by Jamal Morelli - 05 November 2009 at 5:07am |
|
believer
Guest Group Joined: 08 January 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1397 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Remember the quran you have today confirms the Gospel and Torah!
|
|
John 3
16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. |
|
believer
Guest Group Joined: 08 January 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1397 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I am sure it can be very confusing for those that have not studied Bible history- there are Books of the Holy Bible that have always been considered scripture for example - Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - then there are some that have not been completely proven. These have been kept ntot destroyed, considered early Christians writings, but not the Word of GOD.
You do realize that we have manuscripts of various Books of the Holy Bible from much earlier dates then the Codex Sinaiticus don't you?
The reason the Epistle of Barnabas was not included in the Bible we have today is that it was written later- not enough proof for it to be included.
The difference between islam and Christianity is that we did not intentionally burn the various collections the way Uthmann did with the quran, so we can in fact see when man has altered the text: This is talking about a book Ehrman wrote-
3. The Tools Used in Text Critical Case Against Biblical Inspiration Actually Support the Opposite Conclusion
The argument Ehrman makes against biblical authority, ironically enough, supports the opposite conclusion. Ehrman indicates that various scribes changed the biblical text as they made copies. Fine. Let's grant that this is true, as I think it is in some cases. The text critical tools used in Ehrman's argument, however, actually show that we can identify these scribal changes and, to a high degree of probability, show what the text was like before the changes were made. In other words, Ehrman's use of text criticism to point out that scribes "misquoted Jesus" employs scholarly tools that allow us to get back to the more authentic words of Jesus. So, the very critical tools that Ehrman uses to write his book, one might argue, are the tools God has given so we can have confidence that we have access to the actual words He once inspired, or something very close to these words. |
|
John 3
16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. |
|
Akhe Abdullah
Senior Member Male Joined: 19 November 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1252 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As Salamu Alaikum,Brother Jamal.Ajabanee Haqan!
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 3456> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |