60 Questions for the Christian |
Post Reply | Page <1 891011> |
Author | ||
JOUBERAR
Guest Group Joined: 13 March 2009 Status: Offline Points: 573 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So you accepted that he also steal woman and children in his blood thirsty and property thirsty wars and divided them among the muslims is that with a acceptable yes.
Then one fifth of stolen raided goods goes for muslims public purposes is that with an acceptable yes.
So islam and Muhammad thrive on the goods stolen in war thats why the wars must go on and on to donate to islam's fast growing wealth.
|
||
Akhe Abdullah
Senior Member Male Joined: 19 November 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1252 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Many Christians,have attacked the person of Muhammad and attributed to him the most unbecoming epithets there by giving vent to their resentment and sowing the seeds of hatred and hostility.Despite the commonly held view that the Crusades have long been finished and forgotten,fanatic Christian antagonism still continues to rage against Muhammed.The present situation has not changed except for the worse.Moved by the same fanaticism,the missionaries resort to immoral and depraved means in theirstruggle against Islam.(THE LIFE OF MUHAMMED xxxv Haykal)copy right 1976
Edited by Akhe Abdullah - 21 July 2009 at 3:52pm |
||
JOUBERAR
Guest Group Joined: 13 March 2009 Status: Offline Points: 573 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Who ordered the crusades the Pope or Christ the muslims have no back bone thats why always seek refuge by means of the crusade while the muslim were main cause that started the crusade after they raided and stole Jerusalem from the Jews and there excuse for the wrong doing in islam is look at the crusade look what the christians have done, but they are not looking back and seen what the muslims have done no that was right because Allah permited it.
The crusades was wrong and that was not an order God or Christ.
In the eyes of God,Jesus and real christian and in me point of view it is totally wrong for a christian to go war, our war is not against "flesh blood" and the church ministers gave the wrong education to thier members christian must take part in any form of war or even think of murder, war is murder and Jesus said we must not even hate your brother and love those who hate you, war is absolutely taboo for Christians.
|
||
Akhe Abdullah
Senior Member Male Joined: 19 November 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1252 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
[Jouberar]christian must take part in any form of war or even think of murder, war is murder and Jesus said we must not even hate your brother and love those who hate you, war is absolutely taboo for Christians. [Akhe Abdullah]Even in your own words, that these clearly are, you contradict yourself and what you claim Christians to believe.Take a closer look at what you wrote.
|
||
Akhe Abdullah
Senior Member Male Joined: 19 November 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1252 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Edited by Akhe Abdullah - 22 July 2009 at 10:02am |
||
Akhe Abdullah
Senior Member Male Joined: 19 November 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1252 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
[Jouberar]it is totally wrong for a christian to go war, [Akhe Abdullah]Christianity and Fighting.The missionaries say,"But the spirit of Christianity condemns fighting altogether."I do not wish to pause here for investigating the truth,or lack of it,of such a claim.The history of Christianity,however,is a legitamate witness in this matter and so is the history of Islam.From the dawn of Christianity until today every country of the world has been soaked with blood in the name of Jesus Christ.The Romans and the Byzantines of old as well as European peoples of modern times are guilty of shedding blood in religious causes.The Crusades were launched and their fires fanned by Christians,not by Muslims.For hundred of years,one army after another rolled out of Europe in direction of the Muslims Orient to fight,to destroy and to shed blood.In every case,the popes who claimed to be the vicars of Jesus Christ,bleesed and encouraged these armies and hurried them to Jerusalem and other destinations.Were all these popes heretics? Was their Christianity spurious? Or was every one of them a pretender,an ignoramus,unaware that Christianity absolutely condemns fighting?The missionaries rejoin,"Those were the middle Ages,ages f darkness, unfit as evidence agaianst Christianity."If this is an argument on which they pin some hope,let us then turn to "the twentieth century of the highest human civilization."This century has indeed seen the same darkness as did the Middle Ages,Lord Allenby,representing the allied forces of England,France,Italy,Romania,and America,stopped in Jerusalem in 1918 after his conquest of that city toward the end of the first World War and said:"Today the Crusades have come to an end."
Edited by Akhe Abdullah - 22 July 2009 at 7:38pm |
||
kapalu
Starter Joined: 11 June 2009 Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Greetings:
I will attempt to deal with all 60 questions. However not all at the same time. I will begin with the first 14 dealing with the nature of God according to the christian view. Now first remember that Christianity is seen as an extension of Judaism by true Christians. Now ancient Israel believed that there was only ONE God. Take a look at Deuteronomy 4:35; 6:4, Isaiah 45:5, Zech 14:9. The new testament makes the same claims. (please take a look at mark 12:29-32, 1 cor 8:4-6, Eph 4:4-6; 1 Tim 2:5) However the emphasis on one God does not contradict the Christian concept of the triune God (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). The texts simply affirms that there is no pantheon of various gods or deities. So then how do Christians arrive to the conclusion that the ONE God is Father Son and Spirit? Well lets begin in the Torah( Old testament): Well the Old Testement even though it does not explicitly tech that God is triune, it alludes to a plurality within the Godhead. Gen 1:26 - Then God said, �Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.� Gen 3:22 - Then the LORD God said, �Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever� Gen 11:7 - Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another�s speech.� So clearly the Prophet Moses is alluding to the plurality of God. Why someone talk to himself and refer to himself as US, OUR, WE. Now many people would say that this type of language was pretty standard for royalty. For example, Queen victoria or maybe elizabeth 1 (i cant remember right now) was well known for referring to herself in the plural. Famous remarks like -"We are not pleased"..... and the like. There is a problem with this though. There is not any evidence whatsoever of any ancient figure refering to themselves as such, in the the ancient world; furthermore in the middle east, north africa or the mediterranean. Such use of language is fairly recent not more that 500 years old and originating in northern europe. So when someone says WE, US, OUR in ancient hebrew texts.... It means exactly that. That this is a conversation between 2 or more individuals. Other Text to Look at: Now Various references distinguish the Spirit of God from God. Gen 1:1-3 - 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was[a] on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. 3 Then God said, �Let there be light�; and there was light. It would seem here that God and the Spirit of God are two separate entities. Some references not only refer to the Spirit, but include a Third Person in God's work. look at the texts below. Isa 48:16 (read it yourself) This chapter has prophetic significance regarding the coming Messiah (who Christians believe was Jesus) The truth is that i hate to give these small reference text. When reading the hebrew scriptures, CONTEXT is important. I would prefer that anyone reading this read the entire books of Genesis and Exedous. Things start to fit together and you see more clearly the allusion to a plural God. Wow..... that was long !! Okay so I will stop here for now. My next post will attempt to answer in detail the first 14 questions. This post will form part of the premises used. Notice these references are from the Law(Torah) and the Prophets (old testament) Now these are just a handful of references alluding to the plurality of God. There are many more. Well see you next time then. |
||
Shibboleth
Guest Group Joined: 06 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
""59.As a Christian, do you agree that out of fairness and honesty you
must investigate what Islam says about God, Jesus, including this life
and the hereafter?""
Please read my posts under Intrafaith Discussion, Islamic Dialogue and Prophet-Mohammad to answer your following questions. |
||
Post Reply | Page <1 891011> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |