Similarities between Islam and Hinduism

The One wrote: Ahmad, ...how do we know this untill or unless we educate and learn this fact from others. No amount of discussion will lead to true knowledge.  Can I know why you are so skeptical about the concept of Oneness of God in Hinduism? Aparichithudu.

Dear The One, the skeptism leads to misguidance to which I would always avoid. I would rather say that I am "unaware" of this concept in Hinduism through my previous interactions with this religion, however, through your discussions, hopefull to know about it with logic and wisdom. 

My bro The One,

First of all, for hate has nothing to do with Mushriks, at all. It is just a term for all those who don't believe in the oneness of Allah. That is it. No derogatary used in this term. Personally, I consider them mostly ignorant of message of Allah and hence have sympathy for them than ridiculing. This is the main reason for our discussion to know more about Hinduism, beyond my sterotype knowledge, and let them know about Islam, as much as I can, only if they want to.

Now coming to your our long passages, though your replies are aptly posted, but somehow they don't provide any depth. They seems to be more of digital 0 or 1 kind of replies. For a simple info I have to repeat that question 3 or 4 times and only then some meaniful info is obtained. Just as an example of Vedas, initially there was hardly a cursory mention of vedic language in your post and only after 3 to 4 posts, repeating the same questions, one way or the other, you tell me that the original language of Vedas is not Sanskirt (even though you alluded that it was specifically invented for them) but the Vedic language. Why so much hesitation my bro, that sometime, I feel kind of frustrated? Anyhow, so much so far and so good. Let us continue but this time with smaller area of discussion to remain focus.

Coming to one of your important question regarding author's name for a book vs the contents of the book. There are different situations in which one is relatively more important over the other. For example, if a book contains physical sciences, then the author's name is relatively less important, if not known, than the contents, but nevertheless, this anonymouse status of the book would ever remain with the contents where ever the contents are referred. However, once it comes to faith related subject of the contents, the authorship of the book is extremely important; otherwise on whom someone can put faith onto? Since I believed in Prophet Mohammad, hence believed in the Quran. Without having faith in Mohammad, faith in Quran can never be established. Isn't it logical?

Same way authorship of Vedas is extremely important. Who were those Rishis who recieved the guidance from our The only Lord, Allah? Is it not possible that people, after the death of that particular Rishi to whom guidance in the form of a particular Veda was recieved, might have changed it? This also leads to other important questions of preservation of vedas in their original contents? What was this system prior to writing them down from Oral narrations? Does anyone authentically know such a system ever existed? So, in a nut shell, all this info is highly essential for anyone (more for hindus themselves that for any outsider) to put his faith on it. As you had referred to me to Vedic Mathematics, on my search, I found out that not all vedic literature is divine, but from the ancient great mathematicans and scientists of the land of Bharat. Though, I must acknowledge the great work done by these great minds of their time, but this has little to do with divine knowledge. It is thence, that I understood as what did you mean by "vedas are everything" and "vedas are infinite" etc etc. Why didn't you tell me this on the first place? Why did you make it appear like a mission impossible by referring me to learn Sansikret to even open the book? I don't know?  However, I do know that this is an information age, the old age books of wisdom are no more properitary collection of a select few especially once a birds eyeveiw can be obtained through the translations. Ofcourse for the mastery of the subject, one has to learn the original language but not for general understanding of it.

One more question and that is On the issue of Krishana, if you don't consider him God, then what do you say about Gita? Do you really think its not a myth (atleast the way it was narrated) but a fact?