prove the truth |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | ||||
minuteman
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1642 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Delta, you did not try to understand. If your bible is not good then does not matter. I will not use the bible. It is you who will be asked to present the material from the bible. Not from your mind only. But that would be for any sensible debate. Not the same as you are doing here now. I had explicitly indicated the good manner of discussing things. But you never understood. |
||||
Delta
Senior Member Joined: 16 April 2007 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
========== Delta, you did not try to understand. If your bible is not good then does not matter. I will not use the bible. It is you who will be asked to present the material from the bible. Not from your mind only. =========== You don't use, it is you and only you, because a lot of muslims like to trace Mohammad's advent by the bible and then they quote a buch of verses from the bible out of context But that would be for any sensible debate. Not the same as you are doing here now. I had explicitly indicated the good manner of discussing things. But you never understood. ======== And how do you want to discuss ? quoting the bible or the Quran ? Edited by Delta |
||||
minuteman
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1642 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Delta, I do not need to quote from the bible. You may not use the Quran. You will use your bible and I will quote from the Quran. I will remain within Quran. You will remain within the words of the bible. That is all. I hope you understand now. |
||||
Andalus
Moderator Group Joined: 12 October 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
This is a fallacy called a non sequitur. The Quran nor the hadiths do not need to say which verses, specifically, are erroneous, in order for a Muslim to find a verse in the bible that they agree with, and verses they disagree with. Your line of thinking would exclude any work by a secular scholar simply on the grounds that he has no way of knowing from a revelation perspective as to which verses are wrong, so therefore he cannot comment at all.
You imply desparity where it does not exist. The Hadiths themselves contain "unrecited revelation" which are of a sole purpose to particularize generalities where necessary. In other words, there simply is no "problem", just like your "Torah" was never meant to be interpreted on its own, and it always included the "oral traditions" which are what is left of the oral teachings of Moses.
Your laughter is out of ignorance, since you need to show that a problem exists for the Quran due to the relationship between the scope of Prophetic authority and the Quran. Furthermore, what does "put a hadith in that" mean exactly? Example? Hope this helps. |
||||
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/ http://www.pt-go.com/ |
||||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |