"FUTURE" THOUGHTS |
Post Reply | Page <1234 9> |
Author | |||||
truthnowcome
Senior Member Joined: 05 April 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
That is your hoping and wishful thinking, you are more wrong here than ever. The feast in Ezekiel 39:17-20 tie into Revelation 19:17-18 and it is not the Armageddon it is the beginning in the making of Armageddon, wrong here again also Armageddon comes first then a thousand year after will be the destruction of Gog and Magog which leads us into the Day of Judgment, It�s all in Revelation 20. WAKE UP! Your argument is that because Gog/Magog are at the end of the thousand years, Ezekiel 38 & 39 is timed to be at the end of the thousand years, right? Your arguments is incorrect, because (1) Gog is a fallen angel, like the Prince of Persia, and the Prince of Greece of Daniel 10 (2) Magog is the area that Gog has influence over. In Daniel 12, the angel that watches over Israel is Michael. So Gog is not a man. That is how he can appear in the pre- Antichrist reign, in Ezekiel 38-39 and again a thousand years later at the end of Jesus's millenial reign on thise present earth. The bible says different here: Genesis 10:2, The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. http://www.show-the-house.com/id55.html Clip: On the other hand, Koestler does indeed display key knowledge from the Holy Bible which bears directly on the subject matter at hand, the Khazars. For starters, he cites the genealogies in Genesis 10:2, where Magog is shown to descend from Japheth, son of Noah and brother of Shem. To this fundamental fact he adds several references (pages 20, 46, 72f & 81) to ancient traditions identifying Khazars with Gog and Magog. Perhaps the clearest prophecy of Gog supplanting the real Israel is in Genesis 9:29, "God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem..." Genesis 10:2, The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. You have to intensify your study more! Br.Zainool
|
|||||
LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT ONCE AND FOR ALL...NO MORE LIES!
|
|||||
truthnowcome
Senior Member Joined: 05 April 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
No, I do not have to explain Revelation 2:9. The countries listed in Ezekiel 38 & 39 are muslim, except for Russia, which is a muslim ally and is providing weapons and nuclear support for Iran. And it is the muslims who want Israel destroyed. They have already made at least three major efforts, since Israel became a nation again, but God has turned the muslims back every single time. Gog/Magog will be the last time. Regarding Revelation 2:9, I am aware of the Muslim attempt to twist Ezekiel 38 & 39 to claim the invaders are false Jews coming out of Europe. Are those teachings specific to Ezekiel 38 & 39 found in the Quran or Hadiths? If not, it is innovations. Doug L. Clip: A disquisition on Khazar Jews, the real Israel and the situation in Palestine. And a message to the Ashkenazim, who are properly known in prophecy as Gog: Thus saith the Lord God; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it? So too, the term "anti-semitism" is rendered void of meaning and useless, at least insofar as it is employed by the Turkic Ashkenazim as propaganda. Ironically, their Palestinian Arab victims are real Semites, along with the Sephardic Jews, Arabs in general and a few other groups, all of the blood of Abraham. At best, the Turkic Khazar-derived Ashkenazim are very long lost cousins of the Semitic folk, and have limited commonality with them in their genes along with the common house-fly and a host of other creatures of the Almighty's vast creation. Indeed, in chapters 38 and 39 of the Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, clear expression is made of a remnant of one sixth of Gog surviving and then arriving on the mountains of Israel, which is exactly how the Ashkenazi Khazar-derived Jews made their grand entrance into Palestine before, during and after World War II. The prophecies against Gog are dire prophecies, and the impersonation of the Ashkenazi Jews as blood descended Jews of the House of Judah or even of other Israelites descended from the lost 10 tribes of the House of Israel is clearly the point of the Almighty's command to Ezekiel to say to them, "In that day when my people Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it?" (Ezekiel 38:14) Sixty years are more than enough to know this tree by its fruits! In chapters 37 and 40 of the Book of Ezekiel, at the beginning and end of the prophecies against Gog, are prophecies concerning the real Israel. In chapter 37, it is shown that the real Israel will be known by a sanctuary, a king and the Almighty's covenant of peace. Chapter 40 to the end describes the location and details of the sanctuary. (For more about the correct site of the real Israel's next physical temple, see Appendix A of An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem at http://www.show-the-house.com/id3.html.) Throughout Koestler's lifetime, and more than two decades after his death, the Zionist state has had no sanctuary, no king and no peace of any kind. All three blessings are withheld from them. They only understand force to back their fraud. Their boastful words, and their supporters who are as dumb as nails and as used as screws, are really all they have. Only a fundamental change of heart will enable the Turkic Khazar-derived Jews to forgo the wrong temple site, the corrupt politics and full spectrum fraud and force against the indigenous people of Palestine. Now economic woes will soon force a moment of truth. Are you not seeing that after the world trade incident the whole world has change? All Bush�s wars help to bring dong the man made world economy except the Islamic one, and another one with Iran will do the job that is why the Arabs are giving the green light to Israel (the suppose Jews). Then after that the Messiah will finish them off. The fall of Israel is already underway. Br.zainool
Edited by truthnowcome - 21 July 2009 at 12:17am |
|||||
LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT ONCE AND FOR ALL...NO MORE LIES!
|
|||||
truthnowcome
Senior Member Joined: 05 April 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Mr. Doug, they link above that I�ve provide prove otherwise; saying he is a false prophet is one thing and proving it is another thing. That would mean all of your explanation of how Islam will be destroyed falls apart. Br.Zainool
|
|||||
LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT ONCE AND FOR ALL...NO MORE LIES!
|
|||||
islamispeace
Senior Member Joined: 01 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 2187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Douggg: Mr. X, I skipped over your other comments and questions because once
you see that Ezekiel 38 and 39 is God's condemnation of Islam, those
questions, to me, become irrelavent to the salvation of your soul IMO.
No, you are simply trying to dodge the questions, Dougggie! Because of the inconsistencies and contradictions of your religion, I know already that your interpretation of Ezekiel is wrong, if Ezekiel is indeed the unaltered word of God. I know from the inconsistencies and contradictions that the Christian message is not the word of God. So, your beliefs about the future are irrelevant. Douggg: The little babies and children of course have not reached an age of accountability, so their names will not have been erased from the book of life.Persons, who had never heard about Jesus, they will be judged according to their works as being righteous or not, so that had they had the opportunity they would have accepted Jesus. That is not specifically found in the nt, but it a comonly accepted position amongst Christians, based upon God's grace and mercy. This directly contradicts what you have previously said. See what I mean about the contradictions? This is what you said: It shows that you, as well as all who are of Adam's flesh, have inherited the penalty of sin, which is death...even before you committed a single sin. You also admit that there is no scriptural basis for your claim that the infants will be saved. I find it odd that the scriptures somehow forgot to discuss the fate of the little babies. It seems like an important topic to discuss. In any case, since the infants are tainted by the "scourge" of sin, and God does not allow sin in His presence, then how can you maintain that the infants are saved? Your argument that the claim is supported "based upon God's grace and mercy" is also a weak argument since the Old Testament records that God ordered on several occasions the extermination of literally thousands of babies belonging to the various nations surrounding Israel. There was no mercy for those babies. Douggg: Regarding your false charge of Jesus being a racist, saying that he called the woman a dog, the woman was not offended as woud be in a racial slur because of the context of Jesus making a point in the terms of a parable.... "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs." The woman was not "offended" according to the authors of the text. That is because they were trying to establish the Jews superiority over other races. Let me be clear: I don't believe Jesus actually said that. I think it is an example of heretics putting words in his mouth. Douggg: Jesus also greatly complimented her faith. He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel." The woman came and knelt before him. "Lord, help me!" she said. He replied, "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs." "Yes, Lord," she said, "but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table." Then Jesus answered, "Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted." And her daughter was healed from that very hour. Yes, because she "admitted" or "excepted" her inferior position. In other words, Jesus basically expected her to assume a position of inferiority before he would help her. Some mercy, huh? Douggg: Jesus in comparison to the animal kingdom even said of himself of his situation being less than that of the foxes and birds...Luke 9:58 And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head. This is a false analogy again. In the context the Gospels put dogs in, it is clear that it was meant as a derogatory term, when applied to people. Case in point: Luke 16:20-23 20At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores 21and longing to eat what fell from the rich man's table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.22"The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham's side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23In hell,[a] where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. From this touching story, we see the context of dogs. They were associated with everything lowly and dirty. So, when Jesus uses the word to refer to non-Jews, he used it in the context of them being below the Jews. The Jews were the "masters" and the Gentiles were the "dogs". Only when the woman excepted this role was she commended by Jesus. This is racism, pure and simple. And it corroborates everything I have said about the Bible and it's obsession with the superiority of the Jews. Douggg: Jesus also referred to the Jews as lost sheep, and the Pharisees as snakes, and Herod as a fox. Jesus used comparisons to the animal kingdom. It was not racism, which is founded on hatred of one race against another. Jesus loves everyone. And gave his life accordingly... as the Lamb of God. Referring to the Jews as "sheep" is not the same as referring to non-Jews as "dogs". If he were not a racist, he would have used the same term for both. If he were not a racist, he would have referred to the Jews as "lost dogs" or the Gentiles as "sheep" as well. Even in modern times, people use certain terms which I will not mention here because of their vulgarity, to refer to certain ethnic or racial groups. They don't refer to themselves with those same terms because the terms have a certain derogatory connotation with regard to the people they apply to. Therefore, your claim that the Biblical Jesus loves everyone is complete BS. I guess we can call it DS also. Edited by islamispeace - 20 July 2009 at 3:32pm |
|||||
Say: "Truly, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death, are (all) for Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds. (Surat al-Anaam: 162)
|
|||||
semar
Senior Member Male Islam Joined: 11 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1830 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Doug:
Well, what about little babies who die? And what about people in all parts of the world who had never heard about Jesus? The little babies and children of course have not reached an age of accountability, so their names will not have been erased from the book of life. Persons, who had never heard about Jesus, they will be judged according to their works as being righteous or not, so that had they had the opportunity they would have accepted Jesus. That is not specifically found in the nt, but it a comonly accepted position amongst Christians, based upon God's grace and mercy. Semar: This the inconsistency of the original sin concept. It's very confusing. What did you say will only apply if there is no original sin. In Islam there is no original sins, that's why it's very easy to follow by logic. Babies who just born, do nothing, know nothing, still clean, so they have not had any sins yet, that why they are eligible to go to paradise. Because paradise is for the un-sin people. |
|||||
Salam/Peace,
Semar "We are people who do not eat until we are hungry and do not eat to our fill." (Prophet Muhammad PBUH) "1/3 of your stomach for food, 1/3 for water, 1/3 for air" |
|||||
semar
Senior Member Male Islam Joined: 11 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1830 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Doug: Satan's goal is destroy both the Jews and Israel. Also the souls of men. Islam is just one of Satan's weapons. As was the Catholic Church in the middle ages
Semar: Wow, this is another interesting point. |
|||||
Salam/Peace,
Semar "We are people who do not eat until we are hungry and do not eat to our fill." (Prophet Muhammad PBUH) "1/3 of your stomach for food, 1/3 for water, 1/3 for air" |
|||||
Douggg
Guest Group Joined: 12 February 2007 Status: Offline Points: 469 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Mr. X, I skipped over your other comments and questions because once you see that Ezekiel 38 and 39 is God's condemnation of Islam, those questions, to me, become irrelavent to the salvation of your soul IMO. Satan's goal is destroy both the Jews and Israel. Also the souls of men. Islam is just one of Satan's weapons. As was the Catholic Church in the middle ages . Unfortunately, Satan has many persons deceived, thinking that they are doing God a service by destroying Israel and the Jews. Regarding the destiny of the babies who die, I responded in my previous post above, the first post on this page (6), near the end of the text. Regarding your false charge of Jesus being a racist, saying that he called the woman a dog, the woman was not offended as woud be in a racial slur because of the context of Jesus making a point in the terms of a parable.... "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs." Jesus also greatly complimented her faith. He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel." The woman came and knelt before him. "Lord, help me!" she said. He replied, "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs." "Yes, Lord," she said, "but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table." Then Jesus answered, "Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted." And her daughter was healed from that very hour. Jesus in comparison to the animal kingdom even said of himself of his situation being less than that of the foxes and birds...Luke 9:58 And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head. Jesus also referred to the Jews as lost sheep, and the Pharisees as snakes, and Herod as a fox. Jesus used comparisons to the animal kingdom. It was not racism, which is founded on hatred of one race against another. Jesus loves everyone. And gave his life accordingly... as the Lamb of God. Doug L. Edited by Douggg - 19 July 2009 at 2:30pm |
|||||
islamispeace
Senior Member Joined: 01 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 2187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Douggie, I will answer your questions when you answer mine. You skipped 95% of my last response. Answer my questions on Jesus being a racist, what happens to babies that die in infancy, and why it the Pharisees and Romans cannot be considered heroes for their killing of Jesus. While you are answering these questions, I will begin preparing my response to your questions. |
|||||
Say: "Truly, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death, are (all) for Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds. (Surat al-Anaam: 162)
|
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1234 9> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |