A Historical Lie: The Stone Age

schwester wrote: but evolution denies god's existence, there comes the clear thing about its being falsehood. my god, i remember those colorfull history books at school. and i guess these books are still read and taught to students . wasn't the evolution's first founder a dude in church? afterward he becomes an atheist by inventing evolution, as scientists in those times were all against christianity, because it denied most of scientific facts.

Evolution doesn't necessarily deny God's existence. 

God created the earth in Six Days.....what is a day to him?  Time is a human invention.  We have fossil fuels today because of decaying organic material from millions of years ago.  Do we think this wasn't part of God's plan?  Everything has a place, a reason and a purpose.  God's plan is perfect.  So, what if there were other humanoids before us?  There is no direct link from them to us.  Perhaps they held a place here for other reasons.  To create wonder, to test.

Have you ever considered that the existence of Homo Erectus was simply a test of your faith?  I have.  Just because they existed does mean that Adam wasn't created from Dust.  Who did Cain and Seth marry?  Their own sisters?  Who were the people of Nod that Cain married into????  The Quran, Torah and Bible are silent on this matter. 

Evolution is not a science.  In order for something to be considered a successful science it requires three things according to Scientist Philip Kitcher: independent testability, unification and fecudity. 

 in evolution the theory states that it takes millions and billions of years for a process to occur. scientists cannot independently test it. scientists only live to be less than a century old. Independent testability is a process of vigorous testing of any proposed theory- but nope, somehow the theory of evolution passes the test in their eyes.  is that fair?

Unification has a couple meanings; that everytime a scientist tests it, they all come up with the same result and all science complies with that result. the use the same pattern of resoning again and again. Evolution doesn't have unification. there are holes in it. Darwin speaks of gradualism (translition btw species, morphogenisis) but according to fossil record shown in the evolutionary time chart, scientists see bursts of variation of fossils at one time or another.  an example is the famous Cambrian Explosion. all-of-a sudden they extract thousands of different species within a few layers of earth that span couple hundred years time. now Evolutionary biologists preach 'punctuated equilibrium'. (they changed Darwin's patern of reasoning) When it comes to graduallism they make erronious proposition of how one fossil just relates to another. no proof, just ideas to stay consistent with darwin's theory.

Fecundity means fruitfulness.  a successful science must bring bout more discoveries and knowledge.  Like Newton's Laws.  You could say that fecundity wants incompleteness in science (knowledge/research never ends or goes to completion).  Evolution has holes in it.  it's research never ends only bcz it's ever trying to cover up those weak points in evolution.  they say evolution holds 'future promises' and are just waiting for the answer to come allong in future experiments (a clearer ansser on how animals/plants evolved from one another). 

that's not fecundity, that's exasperation ... they're just building up a groundless issue.

k i've said enough.

Salaam,