Remaking the world through terrorism

Category: Faith & Spirituality Views: 2945

In contemporary Western societies, repressed religion returns in secular cults and fascism of different shades. The cult phenomenon becomes more dangerous when religious zealots push their agendas through the so-called liberals and neo-conservatives. 

The Bush and Blair regimes' response to recent Israeli aggression and terrorism is an excellent example of the apocalyptic passions of religion that have returned as projects of universal human emancipation through more and more terror. 

Today, the United States and its close allies ignore history and justify their own and Israeli aggression on the basis of lies or pretexts such as the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers. On the other hand, mass killing of innocent civilians in occupied lands is considered "collateral damage" in an effort to emancipate the survivors. 

With only a little hyperbole, one might define secular cult's marriage of neo-conservative Islamophobic philosophy in terms of this Freudian cycle. The mark of repressed thought and emotion is that it is shut away from conscious scrutiny. This is nowhere more evident than in the encounter of Muslim societies with radical part of the West. Western thinkers note that Islam has never grasped the need for a secular realm. Actually, they fail to note that what passes for secular belief in the West is a mutation of religious faith. 

Besides the struggle to maintain the exploitative economic order that benefits just a few, the continued conflict between the Muslim majority world and the West is a war of religion. The Enlightenment idea of a universal civilization, which the West upholds against Islam, is an offspring of Christianity. The peculiar hybrids of dictatorships, kingdoms and democracy are by-products of Western radical thought and designs. 

The chiliastic violence of radical democracy of the United States, Britain and Israel is not the product of any 'clash of civilizations'. The twentieth century's grand experiments in missionary terror were not in reaction to something wrong in the Muslim world. They expressed the totalitarian ambitions that have been harbored only in the West. 

The death camps of Nazi Germany, the gulags of Soviet Russia, the Dresden bombing and the nuking of Japan killed 60 million people, far more than in any earlier century. Yet it is not the number of dead that is peculiarly fascist. It is the belief that as a result of these deaths a new world would be born. In former times, the Inquisition tortured and killed on a large scale; but it did not imagine it would remake the world through terror. It promised salvation in the world hereafter, not paradise in the world below. 

In contrast, both in the twentieth and twenty-first century, industrial scale killing has been practiced in the belief that the survivors will live in a world better than any that has ever existed. As a whole the U.N. sanction on Iraq 1.8 million lives. When the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. was asked on 60 Minutes program whether the cost of the lives of over a half million children "was worth it" in order to get rid of president of Iraq. She replied, "yes the price is worth it." A real estimate will show that close to 200,000 people have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq since 2001, yet the warlords are determined to make these places earthly paradises for the survivors. 

Edmund Stillman and William Pfaff rightly pointed out in their book, The politics of hysteria, in 1964: 

"To destroy a city, a state, an empire even, is an essentially finite action; but to attempt to total annihilation-the liquidation-of so ubiquitous but so theoretically or ideologically defined an entity as a social class or racial abstraction is quite another, and one impossible even in conception to a mind not conditioned by Western habits of thought. Here is a truly Faustian ambition-to transform by physical action to merely the earth, but the qualities of the creatures who dwell upon it, an ambition related to the modern quest for the breaking down of mountains, the escape from the bounds of the earth, the control and reform of human genetics, the manipulation of life itself-all of them ambitions which, before this century, were the dark matter of myth and necromancy. Yet such have been the stated ambitions of the two political movements, Communism and Fascism, which have convulsed the middle years of our century." 

Self evidently, the belief of Western totalitarians that terror can remake the world is not a result of any kind of scientific inquiry or secularism. It is faith, pure and simple. No less incontrovertibly, the faith is uniquely western. 

Western warlords believe in the myth that, as the rest of the world submit to their power and reshape itself in their image, it is bound to become enlightened, peaceful and pure-as contrary to all evidence, they imagine themselves to be. The continued and successful resistance in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan has destroyed this myth; and yet it continues to be believed. The nihilists in Washington, London and Tel Aviv are driven by the belief that the world can be transformed by spectacular acts of "shock and awe" and terror. This myth has been repeatedly disproved; but still it persists. 

Myths are not refuted. They simply disappear, as the way of life from which they sprang fade from the world. Science teaches limits, but intermingled with eschatological myths it has kindled limitless ambitions. The result is the unbounded violence of modern times, which the U.S., U.K. and Israel in particular continue. It is not the first attempt to remake the world by terror, and it will not be the last. Once the past tyrannies disappeared, other types of terror in the name of liberation and democracy followed. The advancement of knowledge and technology does not prove that this is the age of reason as well. It merely added another twist to human folly and fine tuned the ways to subjugate torture and annihilate. 

United Nations Security Council's unanimously passing a resolution condemning Israeli terrorism or the U.S. vetoing it, is irrelevant. The world has to do more than thinking about resolutions to condemn terrorism of the axis of evil because Washington, London and Tel Aviv's determination to continue global terrorism has ensured that the humanity is in for an unimaginably bigger, wider and most horrible war of human history in the very near future.

Abid Ullah Jan is the author of A War on Islam? (2001), The End of Democracy (2003), The Musharraf Factor (2005) and Afghanistan: The Genesis of the Final Crusade. He is a political analyst and journalist from Pakistan, residing in Canada. He is associated with the Independent Centre for Strategic Studies and Analysis. A frequent commentator on global politics, his write-ups are published widely in various leading publications around the world.

  Category: Faith & Spirituality
Views: 2945
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Older Comments:
Hey John!

Stop being an embrassment for the Untied States as your smartboy, Bush jr, aka Adolf Bush, is an embarassment for all Americans. Before you open your mouth get your facts straight. You, the WEST, is completely responsbile for the chaos in the Middle East and in fact in the whole world.

Your dear son/hero Senior Adolf Hitler started the problem for the Jews. You at the time were occuping Muslim land (the Palestine). (By the way, when you the so called "civlized people" are going to give up your occupying mentaltiy? and STOP stealing others' resources? Stop beings the thieves of Mother Earth)

Since the West was occupying Muslim land at the time, it shifted the problem onto Muslims and created the zionist state called Israel in the land of Palestines. The zionist state should have been created in the Europe or in America b/c you are the one who massacared the Jews.

May be I should come to your house and kick you out of it and occupy and live in there forever. May be then you going to grow up.

Muslims did not kill each other in Iraq. You started the war and created the situations. All of you Americans need to be tied up and kick out this planet for you stupidity and for you lies.

YOu are the sickest and lowest creatures of Earth now. Congratulations!!! Keep up the good work!

You don't have take my words for it. Just travel around the world. You going to find out for yourself. Stop living the U.S. for all 12 months of the year. Don't let the zionist media brainwash you thruout the whole year. Get out the USA and get different perspectives from other countries.

You will find out that NOBODY LIKES YOU. You and your zionist cohort are the real threat to world peace and stability.

Once again, Muslims refuse to take responsibility for their own actions and instead blame the "West" for all of their problems. When Muslims stop murdering Muslims by the thousands, then you might have a modicum of credibility.

Continuation from previous post;

Author states; '...the belief of Western totalitarians ...', what the heck, the West is democratic, and the Middle East is filled with Totalitarian Governments. He got it backward.

Charles Hammer got it right, the Author makes no sense whatsoever. Period!

Can't help it, one last comment, author believes the West is trying to model the world after itself, and he doesn't like it because he would prefer the world be modeled after Islam. I guess two can play that game also!

The basis for the argument for the author is the 'supression of religion in Western society'.

Unfortunately for the author there is no supression of religion, so there goes his article, where it belongs in the waste basket!

Secondly the author states; 'In contrast, both in the twentieth and twenty-first century, industrial scale killing has been practiced in the belief that the survivors will live in a world better than any that has ever existed'.

I think the author should read some history, as UNFORTUNATELY mass genocides have been happening for thousands and thousands of years.

In my understanding of the Koran, war under some conditions is acceptable, a dangerous game to play, as two or more can play at that game.

In the last 1400 years, has there been peace among Muslims? I don't think so!

Now the BIG BIG lie by the author; 'Self evidently, the belief of Western totalitarians that terror can remake the world is not a result of any kind of scientific inquiry or secularism. It is faith, pure and simple. No less incontrovertibly, the faith is uniquely western.'

Ok, so the author really has never read any history what so ever. Go read a book on the history of Africa, Asia and the Middle East!

Hitler used to use the big lie, because, it was so incredible people believe it had to be true, I guess the auhtor is trying to do the same!


This article makes almost no sense and reminds me of the kind of silly cant you used to hear on Radio Moscow back in the 60's. Which is to say the author has a simplistic mindset: West=Bad. Muslim=Good. (Substitute "Marxist" for "Muslim" and there you have Radio Moscow). Well, I'd like to hear what the author makes of the "good old days" of Saddam Hussein (a Muslim) gassing Kurds and Iranians (Muslims)? I'd like to hear what the author makes of 9/11, Madrid and London? Or, what about Sunni death squads in Baghdad? How does he fit all that into his simplistic, dualistic world view?

S.M. FROM USA said:
As an "indigenous" Muslim of African and some Native descent, I often find that the opinions of our foreign-born sisters and brothers are based in a distinct lack of knowledge about the foundations of Western "civilization." These 'foundations' are taught in every U.S. classroom right through University level. The presentation of 'facts' often deliberately ignores the contributions of Islam and its African and Asian progenitors; relocates the earliest Christian communities from the Midddle East and North/East Africa; and also ignores those Europeans who practice the faith of Islam. For this reason, recent insults about the Prophet (SAW) were not only unsurprising, but run-of-the-mill for those of us raised in the West.

This article is one of the few that I've read that actually discusses the fanatical 'Christian' interpretations (including the anti-Christian NAZIs) which have motivated European-descended, and increasingly "Western-descended," peoples for centuries. I believe that Abid Ullah Jan rightly addressed those radical anti-Islamic, pro-neocolonial elements within Euro-Christian thought.

Very insightful and thought provoking. It really calls a spade a spade.