The oil party is over


Welcome to the world of $ 70/barrel oil. That's if there is no crisis in the Persian Gulf over Iran's nuclear ambitions. If there is, then get ready for $ 140 a barrel. Oil briefly breached the $ 70 barrier eight months ago, but this time it is going up for good.

Exactly one year ago the investment bank Goldman Sachs put out a paper suggesting that the "new range" within which oil prices will fluctuate is $ 50-$ 105 per barrel. (The old range, still used by most of the oil industry when deciding if a given investment will be profitable, was $ 20-$ 30.) The price could surge well past the upper end of the Goldman Sachs range if the United States actually does launch military strikes against Iran, but it's going up permanently anyway.

Whatever his longer-term plans, U.S. President George W. Bush is unlikely to attack Iran before the mid-term Congressional elections in November, for three of the last four global recessions were triggered by a sharp rise in the oil price. But even without a Persian Gulf crisis, the oil price will only stabilize at a price a good deal higher than now, because the major players in the market understand the long-term trends.

Transient events like the Iran crisis and the political unrest in Nigeria (which has cut that country's exports by a quarter) drive the daily movements in the oil price, but the underlying supply situation is so tight that oil would stay high even if Nigeria turned into Switzerland and Iran opted for unilateral disarmament. "On production, there is nothing we can do. (OPEC, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, is) already producing at maximum output," said Abdullah al-Attiyah, Qatar's oil minister.

This is not about "peak oil," the notion that we are already at or near the point where total global oil production reaches its maximum and begins a long decline. That may well be true, but the present price rise is just about rising demand for oil as the big developing countries, especially the Asian ones, lift large parts of their populations into the middle class.

Middle-class people buy cars. They also run their air conditioners all summer, and take holidays abroad, and do other things that have big implications for total energy consumption, but above all they buy cars. For the foreseeable future most of the cars they buy will run on some form of refined oil.

The rising demand that drives the oil price up does not just come from the middle-class Americans (and, increasingly, Europeans) who insist on driving enormous SUVs. It also comes from the new middle class of unassuming Chinese, Indian, Russian and Brazilian families who only want a modest family car for the school run and the weekend. There are just so many of them. 

This is the first big price rise that has been caused by rising demand rather than some temporary interruption of supply. Goldman Sachs also predicted last year that in 20 years' time there will be more cars in China than in the U.S. -- about 200 million of them. Ten years after that, India's car population will also overtake America's. Within 20 years Russia and Brazil will each have more cars than Japan. We are headed for a billion-car world (unless all the wheels fall off first), and that means permanently high oil prices.

Good. If the oil price rises gradually from $ 70 to $ 100 over the next five years, people and governments will start paying serious attention to energy conservation and alternate energy sources (including nuclear energy). The sooner that happens, the less extreme the global warming that we will have to contend with as the century progresses. But if the oil price leaps to $ 100 or more in one swift jump we will have the mother of all recessions, and then there will be a desperate shortage of funding for developing alternative sources of energy.

A U.S. attack on Iran is not the only threat to oil prices. If the markets should ever collectively decide that "peak oil" is upon us and that the supply of oil is heading for actual decline, the price would soar out of sight overnight. The oil companies and the governments of OPEC reassure us that oil reserves are ample to cover consumption at the current rate of world economic growth for decades to come, but they would be saying that whether it was true or not, and there is reason to suspect that it is not.

Never mind the geology. Just consider the fact that in the years 1985-1990, when OPEC's declared reserves grew by a massive 300 billion barrels, no major new oil fields were brought into production. The "growth" was achieved by recalculating existing reserves, and the incentive for exaggeration was provided by OPEC's decision to set production quotas in proportion to the total size of each member's reserves. So over a quarter of the world's total "proven" oil reserves of 1.1 trillion barrels may be no more than an accounting fiction.

The best we can hope for in the coming years, therefore, is a relatively slow and steady rise in the oil price, rather than a steep, fast rise that upsets everybody's apple carts. The party is definitely over.

 

Gwynne Dyer is a London based independent journalist and historian whose columns appear in 45 countries.


Related posts from similar topics:


Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use any copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

  4 Comments   Comment

  1. abdul kader abdul razak from Malaysia

    My own belief high prices are pemanent feature despite assurances by government and oil industy on plentiful supply, burgeoning growth in India. China and indisciminate use of oil by US consumers will surely act to keep pressure on supply demand.What we need is a united approach to avert calamity to the word economy precipitated by unbridled rise in oil price without a viable alternate to oil.

  2. Hudd from Canada

    It is like,Jesus,peace be upon him,said:"You can not read the signs of chaging times." The oil resourses were long ago predicted to run out some day or not to be enough. What did we do? Instead of reducing the size of the engines of our cars we built bigger SUV's and bigger pickup trucks meant for personal use. A car like Hummer should have never been even sketched. In the 60's the Europeans buit cars like Fiat 500(0.5L engine!), the British MINI Cooper 800(0.8L engine!) and so did the French and the Germans. Even today, people in Canada do not consider a Japanese vehicle of less than 2L engine a real car! The hybrid Honda Insight with a 1L engine and highest fuel economy is considered a toy. I look around in the parking lot and all I see is a croud of gas-guzzlers! On avarage vehicles with V8 or at least V6 engines, over 3L! The Asian and African ethnicities are maintaining their cars in the I4(in-line four) sector, below 3L engines, usually Japanese made. There is no problem with the oil reserves yet, but there will be a drastic and nasty one pretty soon if the philosophy of my North American brothers doesn't change. The public has to understand that in order to travel to one's workplace, a distance of no more than 10 miles, one doesn't need a Hummer to do the job! The time of the small inexpensive and very economic cars has arrived. And what a wonderful world will that be? The polution and thus the smog in the city will be almost extinct and more money will be left in the pocket of those that raise a family or are ingaged in some daring enterprise. I hope for that greener world to set in. Let's leave the crude for those that have it and let us use new ways of producing energy and new technologies for means of transportation. I believe that the revolutionazation of the domestic means of creating energy and new ways of propulsion would have not cost the American people one trillion dollars and 2500 dead!

    Peace out!

  3. Romesh Chander from USA

    Oh, Good. Oil party was going to end someday anyhow; oil is a non-renewable product and must exhaust itself someday.

    The word will DEINDUSTRIALISE; it will go back to 200-300 years back. In stead of fighting war by using planes, it will fight by using swords and soldiers will ride donkeys and horses. Soldiers will not go all over the world to fight; rather they will fight locally and regionally.

  4. Doin Phine from Canada

    Sooner it goes up the better, so as to more quickly cut the West's dependance on oil.

    Wind, solar, coal, nuclear, hydrogen, and many alternatives will increasingly be used, and the need for Middle East oil will disappear. The next 50 years will bring a revolution of technology that will drop the need for oil dramatically. The only thing missing was low oil prices. As a Canadian, I welcome higher prices to cut our addiction to cheap oil from the Middle East. When this happens the West will be able to let the Middle East keep their oil!