Since the publication of my article "Hajj and the Neglected Legacy of a Great Woman" almost two decades ago, I continue to come across the hold of the traditional views and narratives. Recently when I posed a question on my Facebook page "If one person is to be recognized as the founder of Makkah, who should the person be?", the most common answer was it is the Prophet Ibrahim (a) and a less common answer is Ibrahim, Ismail and Hajera (a's), usually placing Hajera at the end.
I find this fascinating and further thought on this has led me to think that, apart from lack of knowledge or careful reading, this might be fundamentally shaped by our masculinist (male-centred or male-predominant) perspective. When our eyes become used to colored lenses of our glasses, then we gradually see the real world through that lens. Similarly, when our eyes are covered by masculinist (in contrast with the feminist) lens (both are extremes), it is difficult to avoid the impact of that lens. While my original article was meant to create awareness about that distorted lens of ours, in this article I intend to reinforce my effort.
Most of the discussions about hajj, whether Friday sermon or religious speeches, presentations, or even writings, as I have indicated in the original article, the primary focus is on Ibrahim (a) and Ismail (a). Even when mother Hajera's name is mentioned in passing, she is rarely highlighted for her unique contribution and her name is tagged at the end.
Thus it is not surprising that when I posed the question about who might be founder of Makkah, most of us do not think about mother Hajera (a). And, those who are not even aware of the prejudiced lenses over their eyes, they commonly fall into the trap of their masculinist interpretation or understanding. In response to my recent posting on Facebook (as to who should be recognized as the founder of Makkah, if a single person is to be recognized), a fellow Muslim wrote: "Since Ibrahim (a) brought and left mother Hajera to that valley, it should be Ibrahim (a), Ismail (a) and Hajera." This response is quite typical and predictable, which provoked me to add further to this topic. There is a little bit more to this comment, because earlier the same person has accused (and even cursed me) as a "feminist," to which I clarified that I believe both feminist and masculinist positions are extreme and I prefer to view and position myself simply as a Muslim.
Regardless, what that Muslim answered about who should be regarded as the founders of Makkah is not surprising. Rather, that's the traditional narrative and understanding. It is my impression that those who simply cannot discard the name of Hajera, usually append the name as the last in the list, so at least marginally she is mentioned. However, if we can put aside the masculinist lens and read the relevant hadiths carefully (for example, https://sunnah.com/bukhari/60/43), while keeping the following queries, we might have a more nuanced understanding of the narrative.
However, as per His plan, God took the struggle and suffering of a "lone" woman (unaccompanied by a male guardian or mahram male) in that desolate, uninhabited, water less valley and turned into a vibrant city to serve as the heartland of tawhid and Islam, and that woman, the mother of all Ismails like us, is mother Hajera (a).
After all these elaborations, if someone is still reluctant to recognize the unique role of mother Hajera, as per God's own plan, then most likely it is the influence of that masculinist lens. I invite everyone to be aware of that lens and, putting it aside, endeavor to study and learn about our history and legacy as it is.
[The author is an associate professor with University of Bahrain]